1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I-95 HOT/HOV Lanes Project Fairfax County TAC August 16, 2011.
Advertisements

What If… What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Scenario Study Seminar on Regional Scenarios and.
1 Overview of the CLRP The Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan TPB Citizens Advisory Committee March 10, 2005.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Silver Line: Coming Soon Serving Reston to Largo via the District of Columbia Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority October 19, 2013 Presentation.
1 Beyond What If? The Next Phase of the TPB Scenario Study Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the Greater Washington 2050.
Metro Vision 2035 Regional Growth Scenarios. Scenario Workshop.
VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS SYSTEM PLAN 2040
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
1 The 2010 Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan And FY Transportation Improvement Program TPB Technical Committee November.
1 Results of FY 08 COG/TPB Travel Forecasting Research Presentation to Travel Forecasting Subcommittee September 19, 2008 Rich Roisman, AICP, Senior Transportation.
COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT CORRIDORS FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Coalition for Smarter Growth Presentation on Staff Recommendations for Bus Rapid Transit Silver Spring.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
1 Regional Priority Bus Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County December 17, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the Transportation Planning.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
1 Draft Regional Priority Projects List Steve Yaffe, Arlington County November 20, 2008 TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee Presented to the TPB Access For All.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
1 Presentation to George Washington University Transit-Oriented Development Seminar Ronald Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning Metropolitan Washington.
1 Presented by Tom Harrington WMATA Office of Long-Range Planning TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Future Metrorail Capacity Needs.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. Project Overview Master Plan of Transportation Purpose 2002 General Plan Guidance The Development Pattern Report.
1 Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee January 8, 2009 CLRP Aspirations Scenario Preliminary.
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
T Transportation and Land Use There is a growing acceptance in the transportation planning community that the effects of transportation and land.
Imagine the Possibilities… Vision from the 2002 Rail Plan.
1 Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Scenario Study Task Force September 17, 2008 Progress.
1 Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB Technical Committee December 5, 2008 Progress on “CLRP.
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
September 6, 2011 Summerville Chamber Public Policy Committee.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) December 19, 2012 (updated from November 28, 2012)
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Montgomery County Rapid Transit System (RTS) Service Planning and System Integration Study Steering Committee Meeting Presented to Montgomery County Department.
1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Richard Y. Nelson Jr. Director Montgomery County Department of Housing and Community Affairs Wednesday, May 9th.
Freeway Congestion In The Washington Region Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board February 15, 2006 Item # 9.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Living near work: More affordable than you think? Part of a presentation at The Mobility Lab (Rosslyn) Thursday, September 19, 2013 Eric Timar Department.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
TPB Access for All (AFA) Advisory Committee Presentation of the 2003 Report to the TPB Kathy Porter, AFA Chair April 21, 2004.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Results to Date of The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study February 8, 2006.
Strengthening the Linkages Between Transportation and Land Use Planning in the Washington Region Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Ronald.
2030 Transit-Oriented Development Scenario: Travel Model Results
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Urbanization Key Issue #4: Why do suburbs have distinctive problems?
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
COG/TPB Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Update Project Robert E. Griffiths Presentation to the TPB Scenario Study Task Force April 16, 2008.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 1: How to Determine Which Resources Should be Considered in a SCEA How to identify what.
Induced Travel: Definition, Forecasting Process, and A Case Study in the Metropolitan Washington Region A Briefing Paper for the National Capital Region.
Technical Committee Item # 9
National CAPITOL REGION STATE OF THE COMMUTE
Navigating Multiple Jurisdiction
Presentation transcript:

1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study TPB Citizens Advisory Committee Public Forum in Oxon Hill, Maryland September 20, 2005

2 Why look at alternative transportation and land use scenarios?

3 Because the road ahead isn’t looking good…

4 Most Transportation Dollars Are Needed for Maintenance Little money is available for new transportation projects 23% 77% New Roads and Transit* Operations & Preservation* * Based on region’s 2003 Constrained Long-Range Plan

5 The Highway System Won’t Keep Pace with Growth 2000: 109 Million 2030: 150 Million 2000: 15,300 Miles 2030: 17,600 Miles Based on region’s 2003 Constrained Long-Range Plan

6 Most of the Beltway Will Be Stop and Go Evening Highway Congestion 2000 and 2030 Congested Flow (Average Speed 30 to 50 mph) Stop and Go Conditions (Average Speed < 30 mph)

7 Metro Platforms and Trains Will Be Packed Morning Peak-Hour Transit Congestion: 2000 and 2030 Congested Highly Congested

8 Study of “What If” Scenarios  What if job and housing growth were shifted? What if new roads or transit were built?  How would 2030 travel conditions change?  Not looking at “how to,” just “what if.”

9 Developing the Scenarios: What are key issues related to land use and transportation?

10 Issue #1: Job Growth is Outpacing Household Growth The region must “import” workers from as far away as West Virginia and Pennsylvania Forecast Job Growth Forecast Household Growth Additional Households Needed to Balance Jobs Growth 2010 – 2030 (Thousands) Assumes 1.5 Workers/Household

11 Issue #2: Workers are Living Farther Away from Their Jobs  Inner jurisdictions – most job growth  Outer jurisdictions – lion’s share of household growth The average commute is more than 30 minutes.

12 Issue #3: East-West Divide Job Growth Rate 1990 – 2000 A 1999 Brookings Institution report highlighted disparities between the eastern and western parts of the region

13 Issue #3: East-West Divide West-bound travel clogs the roads during morning rush hour Average Commute Time Morning Rush Hour Up to 30 minutes Up to 40 minutes Over 40 minutes

14 Issue #4: Most Growth Located Outside Transit Station Areas Household Growth 2010 to 2030 Inside Transit Station Areas Outside Transit Station Areas Employment Growth 2010 to % 70% 20% 80%

15 Addressing the issues: What if we shifted job and household growth?

16 What if there were more development on the eastern side of the region? Shift 57,000 households and 114,000 jobs The “Region Undivided” Scenario shifts job and household growth from the west to the east.

17 Under this scenario, the area around Largo Town Center would have four times more housing… Which might look something like this:

18 And the Largo Town Center would have three times as many jobs… Which might look something like this:

19 How would 2030 travel conditions change? Compared to baseline forecasts for 2030 Severe AM Peak Period Congestion Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel Transit Trips “Region Undivided” Scenario

20 Under the “Region Undivided” scenario, driving would decrease by 1.2 million vehicle miles per day... The equivalent of 48 trips around the Earth

21 In many places, the local impacts would be even bigger. The number of transit trips to Largo would nearly double under the Region Undivided Scenario.

22 What if both land use AND transportation changed?

23 What if more people lived near transit, and there was more transit? “Transit Oriented Development” Scenario  Locate job and household growth around transit  Expand Metrorail, commuter rail, bus rapid transit and light rail Bi-County Transitway

24 This scenario includes Rail over the Woodrow Wilson Bridge Rail Over the Woodrow Wilson Bridge

25 The scenario also includes light rail or other rapid transit in southern Prince George’s County:  Light Rail from National Harbor to Anacostia  MD 5 Light Rail from Branch Ave Metro to Waldorf  Indian Head Highway Transitway  Pennsylvania Ave Transitway

26 How would 2030 travel conditions change? Compared to baseline forecasts for 2030 Severe AM Peak Period Congestion Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel Transit Trips “Transit Oriented Development” Scenario

27 Under the Transit Oriented Development Scenario: Largo would attract nearly twice as many transit trips And National Harbor would attract 20 times more transit trips! How would 2030 travel conditions change in southern Prince George’s County? Compared to baseline forecasts for 2030

28 What do the scenarios tell us?  Land use patterns affect transportation  Moving people closer to jobs  increases transit use  decreases driving and congestion  Changing both land use and transportation has the biggest effect

29 Other things to think about

30 Significant change may require redevelopment of existing areas Households in 2000 Growth by 2010 Growth by 2030 Affected by scenarios 2030 Households 72% 13% 15% Underway or in the pipeline Already in place

31 Change takes time Courtesy of WMATA  Scenarios only look out to 2030, but impacts may be greatest in 2040, 2050, and beyond  For example, just look at how long it took to get Metro in place...

32 For more information, contact the Transportation Planning Board: (202)