Air & Health Community of Practice (CP) (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16, 2005 Gary Foley, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIVING WITH RISK : AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO REDUCING SOCIETAL VULNERABILITY TO DROUGHT ISDR AD HOC DISCUSSION GROUP ON DROUGHT ISDR TF April 2003.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
WELCOME TO THE USER INTERFACE COMMITTEE MEETING 15 November 2009 Gary J. Foley, PhD Earth Observation Systems Executive Senior Advisor to the EPA Chief.
UIC Draft Report to C4: Issues and Recommendations 25 September, 2008 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.
Health impact assessment explained
6th EC Framework Programme for Research Scientific Support to Policies: “Integrating and Strengthening the European Research Area” Area (i) Policy-oriented.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Workshop Framework: Addressing the 3 Questions Jay Barclay, Quentin Chiotti, John Shortreed and Stephanie Gower Policy Analysis Tools for Air Quality &
GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Air Quality and Health Scenario David McCabe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
COST ES0602: Towards a European Network on Chemical Weather Forecasting and Information Systems.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Overview GEO Secretariat September 2007.
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
Runway Safety Teams (RSTs) Description and Processes Session 5 Presentation 1.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
 Vision: Typhoon Committee is World’s best intergovernmental, regional organization for improving the quality of life of the Members’ populations through.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew,
The IUCN Programme Nature+ Proposal, May 2011.
Life Cycle Overview & Resources. Life Cycle Management What is it? Integrated concept for managing goods and services towards more sustainable production.
John M. White, Health Services 1 Building a Healthy Culture Key Elements of a Comprehensive Health Strategy John M. White, Ph.D. Global Health Promotion.
EARLINET-ASOS Symposium 20 September 2010, Geneva, Switzerland EARLINET: Future plans Gelsomina Pappalardo Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto.
Water & Health Community of Practice (CP) Taking a Watershed Approach (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16,
Action Plan Intermodal & ITS Experts Group June 2011 Update.
Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia 1 – 5 July 2013 Thirty Eight APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting, Bali, Indonesia.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
RESPONSIBLE CARE ® POLLUTION PREVENTION CODE David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
EPA’s Strength in Both GEOSS & ESIP; Environmental Health Decisionmaking January 10, 2008 George Gray, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator EPA Office of Research.
NCHS and Public Health Data Standards Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
WRAP Committee and Forum Updates WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 15, 2003.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Environmental Management System Definitions
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, GLOBAL CHANGE AND ECOSYSTEMS A Edwards – ADC, Seattle, 2006 Slide 1 European Community RTD Framework Programmes ADC.
STATUS REPORT ON WA TASK DESCRIPTION: “Organize workshops on water observations, encompassing space-based, airborne, and in-situ observing systems,
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
Challenges of developing national capacity for PRTR systems in Central and Eastern Europe Magda Tóth Nagy Public Participation Program June 2004.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
9th EIONET Workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation James Creswick, Technical Officer Climate change, green health services and.
UN ECE WORKSHOP ON INTERACTION BETWEEN AIR-QUALITY MONITORING AND AIR-PROTECTION STRATEGIES IN EECCA Geneva, 11 June th Pan-European Environment.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit GEO Science and Technology Committee Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit Gilles OLLIER Head of.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
ESIP Vision: “Achieve a sustainable world” by Serving as facilitator and advisor for the Earth science information community Promoting efficient flow of.
AMS 85 Dr. James R. Mahoney Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere | NOAA Assistant Administrator January 10, 2005 From Information.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
The Male’ Declaration Proposal for Phase III. Looking back to think ahead Policy Dialogue Background Materials Ministerial agreement Capacity building.
Air Quality Data User Agencies Draft ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster February, 2005.
Douglas Cripe, GEO Secretariat 3rd African Water Cycle Coordination Initiative Workshop 4-5 February 2013 El Jadida, Morocco Introduction to GEO.
A Workflow-Accounting Methodology to Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality A Contribution from the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice.
Splinter Session 1a : Identify topics Europe would like to have included in the GEO WP Chair: Luigi Fusco, ESA Reporting: Luca Demicheli, EuroGeoSurveys.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
User Requirements for Air Quality and Encoding for the GEO URR R. Poirot, S. Falke, M. Schulz., K Hoijarvi, K. Torsett, E. Robinson, J Husar, A, Surijavong,
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
Daniel Deybe – Ewald Pertlik DG RTD – I-1 Brussels – Jan 20, 2005
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Workshop on Gap Analysis and Prioritization
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
Presentation transcript:

Air & Health Community of Practice (CP) (a draft for review) GEO User Interface Workgroup Geneva, Switzerland December 16, 2005 Gary Foley, USA

Presentation Outline Objectives of the CP, GEOSS Societal Benefit Area addressed by the CP Justification - What value will the CP add over existing collaborative activities Membership- Typology of members sought Working methods - how will this CP operate Plan of Activities to contribute to the GEOSS implementation in relation to the targets set out by the 10 Year Implementation Plan Schedule of proposed activities - in particular for 2006

Objectives of the CP To improve and maintain (1) the health and well- being of the population with regard to airborn, atmospherically-transported contaminants, (2) the local and regional air quality and (3) the atmospheric deposition quality considering its potential impact on the human food chain, (4) while sustaining and enhancing the economy of the countries and regions. To operationally provide forecasts of next day air quality to the local and regional air quality managers and public health officials as well as to industry, the public-at-large, sensitive subpopulations, the political leaders and public interest groups.

Objectives of the CP To routinely make measurements of ambient air quality using the optimal combinations of fixed- site monitoring, satellite & aircraft observations and operational modeling to meet the combined requirements of the users participating in the CP To perform research and development to continually improve the air quality-related science and to upgrade the observational instruments & methodologies, the atmospheric and air quality models, and the decision support tools used by the users participating in the CP

Societal Benefit Areas addressed by the CP Health: Understanding environmental factors affecting human health and well-being (4.1.2 ) Health issues with Earth observation needs include: airborne pollution.... GEOSS will improve the flow of appropriate environmental data and health statistics to the health community, promoting a focus on prevention and contributing to the continued improvements in human health worldwide.

Societal Benefit Areas addressed by the CP Health: Weather: Improving weather infor- mation, forecasting & warning (4.1.6).... Access to weather data for the other societal benefit areas will be facilitated.

Impacts of Poor Air Quality on Society – US Estimates 60,000 deaths per annual (mean) [Science 289, 2000] $143 billion per annual (mean) [American Lung Association, 2001]

Impacts of Poor Air Quality on Society – Europe Consistent air quality legislation and emission reduction measures, based on integrated research and monitoring activities, over the last 30 years in Europe has achieved significant progress, Ground level ozone concentrations are still a threat for human health and vegetation throughout the EU. Every year, numerous exceedances of limit values for ozone occur every year in many European countries (in summer 2001, concentration limits of summer smog were exceeded on two days out of three somewhere in Europe). During the 2003 August heat wave, ozone peak events overlap a large part of France and of Western Europe, yielding enhanced mortality due to the heat wave effect by a few percents.

Public Officials – What Benefits Might Interest Them? 1.The air is cleaner and safer to breath 2.Stimulate and encourage early adopters of new technologies 3.Widespread voluntary measures occur 4.Maintain the Country’s competitiveness (electricity and energy) 5.The Public is well-informed with real-time information, uses it & sees the benefits

The Public – What Benefits Might Interest Them? 1.The air is cleaner and safer to breath 2.How do I protect myself and my family when air pollution alerts occur? 3.What voluntary measures can I take? 4.How do my lifestyle & activities lead me and my family to greater involuntary risk? 5.How do my lifestyle & activities lead to greater pollution episodes and risk to my community? 6.How do I keep well-informed with real-time information and how should I use it?

Air Quality & Health CP The Public Public Officials

The Atmospheric Observation Community Ground-based AQ monitoring networks Satellite measurements Groups working on "fusion of data" Researchers developing new observation methodologies

The Operational Forecasting Community Air Quality forecasters Atmospheric & AQ model developers

The Air Quality Managers Air Quality Index operations Air Quality regulatory officials Regulated industrial groups Traffic planning & management groups Forest & agricultural fire management officials AQ management decision support tool developers

The Public Health Officials Public Health outcome officials Epidemiologists Hospital & Emergency Room management groups Asthma, birth defect and cardiovascular disease researchers

The Hazard Alerting Community Air Quality Index operations Public Health outcome officials Wireless & internet service providers The media

How will this CP Operate? To engage potential participants in different geographic regions where there are common air pollution problems, possibly encouraging them to set up regional CPs To engage globally and regionally each of the "communities" in the CP to do an inventory of activities that would be relevant to each of the elements in the GEOSS framework diagram as it might be applied to this CP

How will this CP Operate? To ask participants and potential participants to complete a "Users and their Decisions" survey form Using the information from the inventory and the surveys, plan, organize and conduct at least one large workshop to create the CP and/or regional CPs.

The Survey Questions What do they do in their occupation and what does their organization do? Is there a web-site? Looking at the potential "typology" of CP Members, which would describe your activities? Which would describe those of your organization? What decision-making are they involved in, either directly or indirectly by providing research or decision support tool development? What impact/benefits result or might potentially result from this decision-making, including the expected timeframe of the impact/benefits? Does the organization measure the impacts/benefits?

The Survey Questions Do you operate a system or systems that collect observational data, either in-situ or remotely sensed? Describe these systems. Are they part of a larger system? What observational data, geographical data, socio- economic data and/or models/forecasts, if any, are used in the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making What are the needs for additional information that could improve the decision-making or the indirect support to the decision-making? What regional or international working groups are you a member of or on the mailing list of? What is charge or objectives of each of the working groups? Do they have websites? If so, what are the web addresses? If not, is their an address for a key point-of-contact?

Schedule of Proposed Activities Dec 05 User Interface Committee agrees to create this CP Jan 06 First two hour conference call of the organizing members of this CP to agree on the initial activities of this CP and to take on assignments Jan-May Regular conference calls to report on status May 06 ? First face-to-face meeting of the CP (as an add on day to the UIG meeting). Survey results will be reviewed and the Implementation Plan details will be drafted.

Schedule of Proposed Activities Nov 06 First workshop, possibly regional, to bring together the members and participating organization of the CP. Dec 06 Second face-to-face meeting of the CP (as an add on day to the UIG meeting). Additional Survey results and first Workshop results will be reviewed. The Implementation Plan details will be updated. April 07 Second workshop, possibly in a different region, to bring together the members and participating organization of the CP. May 07 Third face-to-face meeting of the CP (as an add on day to the UIG meeting). Additional Survey results and results of the Workshops will be reviewed. The Implementation Plan details will be updated.

Schedule of Proposed Activities Nov 07 Third workshop, possibly in a different region, to bring together the members and participating organization of the CP. Dec 07 Fourth face-to-face meeting of the CP (as an add on day to the UIG meeting). Additional Survey results and results of the Workshops will be reviewed. Progress will be evaluated and the Implementation Plan details will undergo a major rewrite based on the progress-to-date. Dec 07 The UIC will review the progress-to-date and the implementation plan details for the next two years.

Air & Health CP Discussion What are your comments on this concept for an Air & Health CP ? How should this concept be modified? What existing International Orgs bring together these five communities, either individually or in any combination? How do we identify the CP members?