INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2014 NAMEPA: Winds of Change in Offshore Oil & Gas Regulatory: Coast Guard Introduction CAPT David Nichols US Coast Eighth District Outer Continental Shelf.
Advertisements

United States Coast Guard Marine Safety, Security, and Stewardship 1 U.S. Coast Guard Regulations “Making a difference” 1 Jeff Lantz Director, Commercial.
INTERTANKO Hellenic/Mediterranean Panel Meeting Athens, Greece CAPT John W. Koster U.S. Coast Guard Activities Europe United States Coast Guard.
Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) Towing Vessels.
MARPOL RECEPTION FACILITIES USCG CERTIFICATE OF ADEQUACY (COA) PROGRAM
Update on Ballast Water Management Latin American Panel Meeting Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Compliance is Cheaper!! Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy U.S. COAST GUARD.
United States Coast Guard Marine Safety, Security, and Stewardship U.S. Coast Guard INTERTANKO North American Panel Presentation Jeff Lantz Director of.
XII International Seminar of Russian Maritime Register of Shipping Port State Control in the United States – 2008 Annual Report & Recent Developments Mr.
Leading the way; making a difference North American Panel March 17, 2014 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Alternative compliance program
1 Public Release Authorized National Academy of Engineering / National Research Council National Academy of Engineering / National Research Council Captain.
INTERTANKO ISTEC Meeting 26 – 28 March ISPS Code Areas of particular concern during Shipboard Verifications.
Port State Control New Orleans Industry Day May 2014 LCDR Nick Neely.
Classification Societies – Contribution to Martime Safety Gesa Heinacher-Lindemann LL.M., Legal Director.
Leading the way; making a difference Latin American Panel November 6, 2013 BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
North American Emission Control Area
Online Learning 1 Marine Facility Personnel with Security Responsibilities Canaport LNG
INTERTANKO Latin American Panel 13 March 2008
Maritime Law Association Spring Meeting April 28-30, 2015
USCG Port State Control and Qualship 21 Programs Presented by Commander Paul Thorne, USCG Chief, Foreign and Offshore Vessels Division U.S. Coast Guard.
GWS SMS INTRODUCTION EMS Manual. 3. PROCEDURES FOR BILGE AND WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT OF MACHINERY SPACES As far as possible, the OWS must not be used.
2010 Manila Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code – Port State Control Perspective Jeff Lantz Director, Office of Operating and Environmental Standards.
ISPS CODE UPDATE INTERTANKO North American Panel Meeting Stamford, CT March 22, 2004 Brad L. Berman, President Liberian International Ship and Corporate.
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
PORT STATE CONTROL The Singapore Experience Tan Kim Liang Senior PSCO, MPA 2 December 2003.
U.S. Coast Guard Ballast Water Management (BWM) Requirements LT. Eddie Lesane U.S. Coast Guard Sector Charleston September 2006.
1 Maritime Targeting and Boarding Overview. 2 Objectives Notice of Arrival requirements Targeting Boardings & Examinations –Security Boardings - Targeted.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 12 Vessel boarding and onboard Investigation.
非常感谢中国海事界同事对我们支持 A Guide to The Vetting Process We thank All our Colleagues in the Maritime Industry in China for their Support Capt Howard Snaith – Marine.
United States Coast Guard “Quality Shipping: XXI Century Standard, Seafaring Careers: Raising the Profile” St. Petersburg: October 2008 Jeff Lantz.
LATIN AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 16, 2009 MARINE ISSUES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MARITIME SECURITY STATUS REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO U.S. COAST GUARD.
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19 th September 2005 Ship Inspections & The Screening Process Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director,
Maritime Administration Seminar World Maritime University Malmö 27 August 2008 INTERTANKO and Quality Shipping in the context of Flag State Implementation.
VIII INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR RUSSIAN MARITIME REGISTER OF SHIPPING MARINE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DIRECTOR REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
Ballast Water Management DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
INTERTANKO LATIN AMERICAN PANEL MARITIME SECURITY: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS LATEST DEVELOPMENTS AT IMO JOSEPH J. ANGELO DIRECTOR, REGULATORY AFFAIRS AND THE.
INTERTANKO North America Panel US Coast Guard Presentation RDML Paul Thomas Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy March 2015.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part III.
One Inspection, Two Inspections, Three Inspections, More Peter M Swift.
Leading the way; making a difference GREEN4SEA Athens Forum April 9, 2014 UPDATE ON BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Leading the way; making a difference Lunchtime Seminar October 10, 2012 Ballast Water Management JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Marine Symposium – World Shipping Forum Chennai 19th November 2004
1 USCG UPDATE INTERTANKO North American Panel 27 th Meeting Houston, TX.
Authority: Who Does What?. Los Angeles – Long Beach Area Contingency Plan Marine Firefighting and Salvage Plan.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs Hong Kong, 26 November 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Senior Manager - Environment.
Leading the way; making a difference Ballast Water Management State of Affairs October 2013 Tim Wilkins INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Busan, 21 October.
PORT STATE CONTROL INSPECTIONS 1 Under the new regime established by Directive 2009/16 in the UK. The new EU directive came into force in June 2009 It.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 6: Port State Control.
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
CONCENTRATED INSPECTION CAMPAIGN – CREW FAMILIARISATION ON ENCLOSED SPACE ENTRY Pat Dolby Inspection Operations Manager UK MCA.
PORT STATE CONTROL For MODU or MOUs. Why Port State Control (PSC)?  Everybody knows today why ports States have been obliged to set up Port State control.
INTERTANKO North American Panel RDML Paul Thomas Assistant Commandant for Prevention Policy March 2016.
INTERTANKO Technical Seminar Mumbai 19th September 2005 Port State Control Related Issues Capt Howard N. Snaith. Master Mariner. M.N.I. Director, Marine,
Peter M Swift CMA, March 2004 Trade Associations and how they can represent their members with governments, extra-government organizations, and enforcement.
Chapter 6 Question-and-Answer.
GCC CODE “THE SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR SHIPS THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS” THE CABINET RESOLUTION NO.(29) OF 2013.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
33CFR158 COA.
Vessels and Facilities that are Temporarily Out of Service or Laid-up
Sector Houston Port State Control Division
Mariner Credentialing Program Policy Division CG-CVC-4
29 CFR 1918 – Subpart B Gear Certification.
MEPAC March 2017 Task 95 Inland Fire Fighting Requirement's for towing vessel watch officers MASTERS/PILOTS Maritime Services Group of Louisian, LLC.
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
Conditions of Entry (COE) Requirements
North American Emission Control Area
The ICS/ISF Shipping Industry Flag State Performance Table
Presentation transcript:

INTERTANKO North American Panel 17 March 2008 United States Coast Guard Jeff Lantz Director of Commercial Vessel Regulations and Standards

United States Coast Guard 2 Rate of Detention by Vessel Type

United States Coast Guard 3 Rates of Vessel Arrivals vs. Detentions by Age of Vessel

United States Coast Guard Detainable Deficiencies  Despite required compliance dates of more than 5 years ago, the U.S. continues to find that ISM related deficiencies constitute a very large proportion of detainable items.  One of the largest increases in detainable deficiencies this year was in the area of crew competency. ISPS/Security Related9118% ISM Related8216% MARPOL, Annex I6112% Crew Competency5210% Fire Fighting Appliances489%

United States Coast Guard Summary of PSC Performance % increase Safety Detentions % Major Control Actions354220% Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2006: 1.78% Safety Rolling Detention Ratio 2007: 1.60% 1 Security Major Control Action Ratio 2006: 0.43% 2 Security Major Control Action Ratio 2007: & 2 Note 1: 2007 preliminary data, subject to change Note 2: In 2006, the CAR targeting level was fixed at 1.50% for all flag registries.

United States Coast Guard

QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21 st Century”  Qualifying Registries for 2007: Barbados ChinaMarshall Islands BelizeGreece Philippines BermudaHong KongRepublic of Korea CanadaIsraelUnited Kingdom Cayman Islands  Qualifying Registries for 2008 will be announced in May 2008 and vessel flying their flag will be eligible until May  Due to excellent performance from certain flag States, there will likely be additions to the current qualified flag States. 7

United States Coast Guard Positive Policy Impact  HIV - revised (June 07)  decreased boardings by 50%  1st time US arrivals not automatic HIV  No double jeopardy for Certain Dangerous Cargoes (CDC) vessels  COTP flexibility to downgrade  PSC - revised (June 07)  Smarter targeting = Fewer random *(how much…50%...what are the numbers)  Modification to targeting rules = less redundancy (LPOC rules) 135,240 Vessel Arrivals

United States Coast Guard Conditions of Entry  Additional security measures may be imposed on ships arriving to U.S. ports from countries not maintaining effective anti-terrorism measures as a Condition of Entry  Concerns are discussed with country  Conditions of Entry are a last resort  Advance public notice given  Specific facilities or ports in a country may be exempted if adequate security is found in that particular facility  Countries for which Conditions of Entry are imposed CameroonLiberia Equatorial GuineaMauritania Guinea-BissauSyria Indonesia 9

United States Coast Guard Conditions of Entry Requirements – Vessels must…  While in the foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures:  Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;  Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel.  Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security;  Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and  Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander prior to arrival in the U.S.  While in U.S. ports, after arriving from a foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures:  Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.

United States Coast Guard Interaction with marine industry ALCOAST 108/08, 6 March 2008  Restore professionalism, respect and trust  Openness and transparency will be our hallmarks  Boarding members, marine inspectors, PSCOs will encourage open communication with mariners  Senior leadership contact information will be provided  Resolve issues at lowest level possible – encourage, facilitate and expedite appeals  Identify and resolve pending issues, identify best practices and recommendations  Actions that restrict vessel movement will be affirmed 11

United States Coast Guard 12

United States Coast Guard

United States Coast Guard USEFUL SITES 1.HOMEPORT CFR - search.htmlhttp:// search.html 3.NVIC – 4.E-NOA COFR VRP Info E-VRP Database – 8.Ballast Water PSIX -

United States Coast Guard 15 Thank you

United States Coast Guard 16 USCG Port State Control Exams Conduct Navigation Safety Checks Evaluate the Safety Management System Evaluate the Vessel’s Security System Conduct a Deck Walk and Evaluate the Vessel’s Structure Conduct Steering Gear Tests Test the Oily Water Separator and Bilge Monitor Test the Fire Detection System Test the Fixed Deck Foam System (Oil Tankers Only, use water) Operate the Main and Emergency Fire Pump Examine Emergency Lighting Test the Emergency Generator Witness Fire & Boat Drills Evaluate ILO Conditions That May Be Unacceptable

United States Coast Guard Back – up slides

United States Coast Guard MARPOL Annex I Enforcement U.S. Coast Guard enforcement of MARPOL Annex I has been enhanced by issuance of policy guidance, G-PCV Policy Letter U.S. Government criminal investigations into MARPOL Annex I violations show vessel and crew concealment of pollution discharge caused by poorly maintained or faulty equipment, or by vessels taking short cuts to save money. U.S. Coast Guard continues to partner with IMO and other Port State Control regimes to ensure consistent enforcement of MARPOL Annex I requirements. 18

United States Coast Guard QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21 st Century” Eligibility Requirements: Must not have an IMO Detention in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months Must not have any marine violations (civil or criminal) and no more than one paid Notice of Violation (ticket) case, within the previous 36- month period Must not have a reportable marine casualty that meets the criteria of a serious marine incident (46CFR4.03-2) in U.S. waters within the previous 36-months. Must have completed a successful, U.S. Port State Control exam within the previous 12-month period. Must not be classed by or have their statutory Convention Certificates issued by a targeted class society. 19

United States Coast Guard 20 QUALSHIP 21- “Quality Shipping for the 21 st Century” Eligibility Requirements (Cont): Must not be registered with a Flag State that has an overall U.S. IMO detention percentage of more than 1% over the previous three-year period. Also, the vessel’s Flag State must have at least 10 distinct arrivals in each of the previous 3 years. Vessel’s Flag State must have submitted their Self-Assessment of Flag State Performance to the IMO and provided a copy to the USCG. Qualship 21 Certificates: - Qualship 21 certificates are good for 2 years and the issue date is based on the vessel’s last successful U.S. PSC exam.

United States Coast Guard 21 ISPS/MTSA Security Compliance  Vessel Security Level  Verify ISSC  Verify Ship Security Performance  Review the CSR and other Records  Ship ID (IMO number)  Manning  Non-Convention Vessel Security Compliance Examination Objective - determine whether vessel meets International Conventions and U.S. Domestic Law

United States Coast Guard 22 Verify Ship Security Performance  Verify Ship Security Plan (SSP) is onboard and safeguarded  SSP not subject to direct inspection  If clear grounds exist that required security procedures are not in place, the PSCO will investigate.  PSCO may examine the relevant sections of the plan after exhausting other means to determine compliance.  PSCO must obtain the consent of the vessel’s flag State, or the master of the vessel as specified in ISPS Code Part A, before examining relevant portions of the SSP.

United States Coast Guard 23 Security Records  Training, drills, & exercises  Reports of security incidents/breaches  Changes in Security levels  External communications related to Ship Security  Internal audits/reviews  Periodic reviews of ship security assessments/plans  Maintenance, calibration, & testing of security equipment

United States Coast Guard Conditions of Entry Requirements – Vessels must…  While in the foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures:  Implement measures per the ship’s security plan equivalent to Security Level 2;  Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded and that the guards have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel.  Attempt to execute a Declaration of Security;  Log all security actions in the ship’s log; and  Report actions taken to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Sector Commander prior to arrival in the U.S.  While in U.S. ports, after arriving from a foreign port with inadequate anti-terrorism measures:  Ensure that each access point to the ship is guarded by armed security guards and that they have total visibility of the exterior (both landside and waterside) of the vessel. The number and location of the guards must be acceptable to the cognizant U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port.