Carbon, soil moisture and fAPAR assimilation Wolfgang Knorr Max-Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany 1 Acknowledgments: Nadine Gobron 2, Marko.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Advertisements

Extension and application of an AMSR global land parameter data record for ecosystem studies Jinyang Du, John S. Kimball, Lucas A. Jones, Youngwook Kim,
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS Variation of land surface albedo and its simulation Shusen Wang Andrew Davidson Canada Centre for.
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Exploitation of MODIS and MISR Surface Albedos in Support of SVAT Models LANDFLUX meeting, Toulouse, May 28-31, 2007 JRC – Ispra Bernard Pinty, T. Lavergne,
Lucinda Mileham, Dr Richard Taylor, Dr Martin Todd
Slide 1 Assimilation of near real time GEOV Albedo and Leaf Area Index within the ECMWF modelling system Souhail Boussetta, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Emanuel.
Diagnosis and Prognosis of Effects of Changes in Lake and Wetland Extent on the Regional Carbon Balance of Northern Eurasia Dennis P. Lettenmaier (University.
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
Class project presentation Dec 3, 2007 ATMO 529 Causes for Persistence in Inter Annual Variability of 3 Layer Soil Moisture Estimates in the Colorado River.
Biosphere Modeling Galina Churkina MPI for Biogeochemistry.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to infer atmosphere- biosphere CO 2 exchanges and their uncertainties Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner.
Outline Background, climatology & variability Role of snow in the global climate system Indicators of climate change Future projections & implications.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) and its link to CAMELS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 3, Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Remote Sensing Data Assimilation for a Prognostic Phenology Model How to define global-scale empirical parameters? Reto Stöckli 1,2
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Modeling climate change impacts on forest productivity with PnET-CN Emily Peters, Kirk Wythers, Peter Reich NE Landscape Plan Update May 17, 2012.
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement P. Peylin, C. Bacour, P. Ciais, H. Verbeek, P. Rayner Flux data to highlight model deficiencies.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
A Decade of Progress in Modeling the Hydroclimatology of the Amazon System Marcos Heil Costa Universidade Federal de Viçosa III LBA Scientific Conference.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
1 A Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System at LSCE using multiple data streams (CARBONES / GEOCARBON EU-project ) Philippe Peylin, Natasha MacBean, Cédric.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 MAP (Maximum A Posteriori) x is reduced state vector [SST(x), TCWV(w)]
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
A Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to Infer Atmosphere- Biosphere CO2 Exchanges and Their Uncertainties Marko Scholze1, Peter Rayner2,
1 CAMELS Carbon Assimilation and Modelling of the European Land Surface an EU Framework V Project (Part of the CarboEurope Cluster) CAMELS.
State-of-the-Art of the Simulation of Net Primary Production of Tropical Forest Ecosystems Marcos Heil Costa, Edson Luis Nunes, Monica C. A. Senna, Hewlley.
Ocean Color Remote Sensing Pete Strutton, COAS/OSU.
Variation of Surface Soil Moisture and its Implications Under Changing Climate Conditions 1.
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Importance of Recent Shifts in Soil Thermal Dynamics on Growing Season Length, Productivity, and Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial High-Latitude Ecosystems.
1 Motivation Motivation SST analysis products at NCDC SST analysis products at NCDC  Extended Reconstruction SST (ERSST) v.3b  Daily Optimum Interpolation.
Vegetation Phenology and the Hydrological Cycle of Monsoons
Application of the ORCHIDEE global vegetation model to evaluate biomass and soil carbon stocks of Qinghai-Tibetan grasslands Tan Kun.
Non-Linear Parameter Optimisation of a Terrestrial Biosphere Model Using Atmospheric CO 2 Observation - CCDAS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang.
Inferring terrestrial CO 2 fluxes from a global-scale Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1,
Quantitative network design for biosphere model process parameters E. Koffi 1, P. Rayner 1, T. Kaminski 2, M. Scholze 3, M. Voßbeck 2, and R. Giering 2.
CAMELS CCDAS A Bayesian approach and Metropolis Monte Carlo method to estimate parameters and uncertainties in ecosystem models from eddy-covariance data.
FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,
Dublin - 18 June 2010 –CEOs LPV Phenology1 MERIS FAPAR: Towards Phenology Products Nadine Gobron, Jan Musial, Michel Verstraete and Wolfgang Knorr.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research Vegetation dynamics in simulations of radiatively-forced climate change Richard A. Betts, Chris D.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
Climate–Carbon Modelling, Assimilation & Prediction Wolfgang Knorr, QUEST NCEO/Carbon Fusion Sheffield, 29 February 2008.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
Data assimilation in Marko Scholze. Strictly speaking, there are so far no DA activities in QUEST, but CCDAS (as part of core team activities) CPDAS and.
A data-driven model of the state of the African biosphere Martin Jung, Eric Thomas.
Copernicus Observations Requirements Workshop, Reading Requirements from agriculture applications Nadine Gobron On behalf Andrea Toreti & MARS colleagues.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
Contact © European Union, Monitoring the State of the Global Terrestrial Surfaces The state of vegetation is analysed using.
Earth Observation Data and Carbon Cycle Modelling Marko Scholze QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol GAIM/AIMES Task Force Meeting,
Whats new with MODIS NPP and GPP MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting May 20, 2015 Steven W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group College of Forestry.
FastOpt A prototype Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Inferring interannual variations of vegetation- atmosphere CO 2 fluxes Marko Scholze.
1 Xiaoyan Jiang, Guo-Yue Niu and Zong-Liang Yang The Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin 03/20/2007 Feedback between the atmosphere,
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
THE FUTURE CLIMATE OF AMAZONIA Carlos Nobre 1, Marcos Oyama 2, Gilvan Sampaio 1 1 CPTEC/INPE, 2 IAE/CTA LBA ECO São Paulo / 2005 November.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Actions & Activities Report PP8 – Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany 2.1Compilation of Meteorological Observations, 2.2Analysis of.
Role of ECVs in climate-carbon feedback assessment Claire Magand Patricia Cadule, Jean-Louis Dufresne Institut Pierre Simon Laplace CMUG Integration Meeting,
Alexander Loew1, Mike Schwank2
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
Community Land Model (CLM)
Kostas M. Andreadis1, Dennis P. Lettenmaier1
Presentation transcript:

Carbon, soil moisture and fAPAR assimilation Wolfgang Knorr Max-Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany 1 Acknowledgments: Nadine Gobron 2, Marko Scholze 3, Peter Rayner 4, Thomas Kaminski 5, Ralf Giering 5, Heinrich Widmann FastOpt QUEST / 2 IES/JRC LSCE

Overview CO 2 – climate linkages Satellite fAPAR as soil moisture indicator Assimilation of fAPAR

Atmospheric CO 2 Measurements CCDAS inverse modelling period... and more stations in CCDAS

Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) CCDAS Step 2 BETHY+TM2 only Photosynthesis, Energy&Carbon Balance CO 2 + Uncert. Optimized Params + Uncert. Diagnostics + Uncert. satellite fAPAR + Uncert. CCDAS Step 1 full BETHY Phenology Hydrology Assimilated Prescribed Assimilated Background CO 2 fluxes* * * ocean: Takahashi et al. (1999), LeQuere et al. (2000); emissions: Marland et al. (2001), Andres et al. (1996); land use: Houghton et al. (1990)

Terr. biosphere–atmosphere CO 2 fluxes ENSO … preliminary results from extended CCDAS run

ENSO and global climate normalized anomalies ENSO –precipitation temperature … global drying and warming trend

for more information see:

Overview CO 2 – climate linkages Satellite fAPAR as soil moisture indicator Assimilation of fAPAR

canopy soil Remotely Sensed Vegetation Activity I  TOC I  TOC ISIS ISIS fAPAR: [(I  TOC +I  S )–(I  TOC +I  S )] / I  TOC

SeaWiFS fAPAR archive  developed by Nadine Gobron, Bernard Pinty, Frédéric Melin, IES/JRC, Ispra  3-channel algorithm taylored to SeaWiFS ocean color instrument (blue, red, near-infrared)  cloud screening algorithm  requires no atmospheric correction  starts 10/1997, continuing...  being extended by same product for MERIS

Precipitation – fAPAR leaf area index precipitation fAPAR soil moisture gridded station data satellite observations BETHY simulations

1-month lag precipitation vs. fAPAR from SeaWiFS satellite obs. 4-month lag r>0 r<0 0.5°x0.5°, ≥50% cloud free, ≥75% temporal coverage percent area with 99% significant correlation

precipitation vs. fAPAR: satellite and model 1-month lag percent area with 99% significant correlation r>0 r<0 SeaWiFS fAPAR BETHY simulated fAPAR

precipitation vs. fAPAR: satellite and model 4-month lag BETHY simulated fAPAR percent area with 99% significant correlation r>0 r<0 SeaWiFS fAPAR

1-month lag precipitation vs. satellite fAPAR and simulated soil moisture percent area with 99% significant correlation SeaWiFS fAPAR BETHY simulated soil moisture r>0 r<0

precipitation vs. satellite fAPAR and simulated soil moisture percent area with 99% significant correlation SeaWiFS fAPAR BETHY simulated soil moisture r>0 r<0 4-month lag

ENSO – SeaWiFS fAPAR lagged correlation 3-month lag

Overview CO 2 – climate linkages Satellite fAPAR as soil moisture indicator Assimilation of fAPAR

fAPAR Assimilation BETHY carbon and water fluxes climate & soils data** Prescribed PFT distribution* model-derived fAPAR ecosystem model parameters satellite fAPAR mismatch optimization

The Cost Function Measure of the mismatch (cost function): model diagnostics error covariance matrix of measurements measurements assumed model parameters a priori error covariance matrix of parameters a priori parameter values aim: minimize J(m) [for each grid point separately]

The Parameters parameter vector m={m 1,m 2,m 3 }: m1m1 m2m2 m3m3 TT w max fcfc shift of leaf onset/shedding temperature maximum soil water holding capacity fraction of grid cell covered with vegetation temperature limitation water limitation residual, unmodelled limitations (nitrogen, land use) vector of prior parameter values m 0 :  T  =0 w max,0 (derived from FAO soil map) f c,0 (function of P/PET and Temp. of warmest month) represents:

Prior Parameter 1 prior values: map reflects presence of crops; red: unvegetated note: each 0.5°x0.5° has mixture of up to 6 PFTs T  =5°C T  =12°C for crops T  =15°C ^

w max,0 [mm] Prior Parameter 2 bucket model: precipitation =input runoff =overflow full bucket: w max current bucket: w

Prior Parameter 3 f c,0 =P annual /PET annual  W  T warmest month )/  ^

Prior Parameter Errors error covariance matrix of parameters C m0 :  off-diagonal elements assumed 0 here = no prior correlation between errors of different parameters

The Assimilated Data model diagnostics vector y={y 1,y 2,...,y 12 }: yiyi modelled fAPAR of month i satellite-derived diagnostics vector y 0 ={y 0,1,y 0,2,...,y 0,12 }: y 0,i SeaWiFS derived fAPAR of month i

Prior Errors of Measurements error covariance matrix of measurements C y :  off-diagonal elements again 0 = no prior correlation between errors of different months i=ji=j

Parameter 2 (regional) soil water-holding capacity prioroptimized local site

Local Simulations Paragominas 3°S 48°W 63 m Paragominas 3°S 48°W 63 m - - precipitation [mm/month] evapotranspiration [mm/month] fAPAR no remote sens. data fAPAR prescribed fAPAR assimilated NPP [gC/(m 2 month)] 1992 remote sensing data

Measured Soil Moisture Paragominas 3°S 48°W 63 m Paragominas 3°S 48°W 63 m - - precipitation [mm/month] fAPAR no remote sens. data fAPAR prescribed fAPAR assimilated m depth 0...8m depth remote sensing data

evapotranspiration (regional) prioroptimized mm/year

July soil moisture (regional, dry season) prior Parag. optimized mm

Conclusions The carbon cycle is highly sensitive to climate fluctuations Vegetation can be quantified reliably from space fAPAR lags precipitation by ~1–4(?) months seems to behave similar to soil moisture assimilation of fAPAR can deliver valuable information on soil moisture status

Conclusions Need to improve phenology model Implement sequential 2-D var assimilation scheme Assimilate fAPAR into coupled ECHAM5-BETHY model (hope not too distant) goal: make fAPAR what SST is for ocean-atmosphere interactions... and improve seasonal forecasts

Thank You For Your Attention!