Lecture 13: Field-theoretic formulation of Langevin models

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lect.3 Modeling in The Time Domain Basil Hamed
Advertisements

Youjin Deng Univ. of Sci. & Tech. of China (USTC) Adjunct: Umass, Amherst Diagrammatic Monte Carlo Method for the Fermi Hubbard Model Boris Svistunov UMass.
Outline: Geometric Brownian motion, Stratonovich and Ito models
Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs)
A field theory approach to the dynamics of classical particles David D. McCowan with Gene F. Mazenko and Paul Spyridis The James Franck Institute and the.
Lecture 14: Spin glasses Outline: the EA and SK models heuristic theory dynamics I: using random matrices dynamics II: using MSR.
Lecture 3: Markov processes, master equation
Graphs of the form y = x n for n ≥ 1. Graphs of the form y = x n all go through the point (1, 1) The even powers, y = x 2, x 4, x 6 … also go through.
AC modeling of quasi-resonant converters Extension of State-Space Averaging to model non-PWM switches Use averaged switch modeling technique: apply averaged.
Happy 120 th birthday. Mimeograph Constraining Goldstinos with Constrained Superfields Nathan Seiberg IAS Confronting Challenges in Theoretical Physics.
Green’s Functions From Heisenberg to Interaction Picture Useful once we have it, but since we need to know the full ground state and the field operators.
lecture 5, Sampling and the Nyquist Condition Sampling Outline  FT of comb function  Sampling Nyquist Condition  sinc interpolation Truncation.
Stochastic Differential Equations Langevin equations Fokker Planck equations Equilibrium distributions correlation functions Purely dissipative Langevin.
Symmetry. Phase Continuity Phase density is conserved by Liouville’s theorem.  Distribution function D  Points as ensemble members Consider as a fluid.
1 A. Derivation of GL equations macroscopic magnetic field Several standard definitions: -Field of “external” currents -magnetization -free energy II.
Linearisation about point equilibrium n-dimensional autonomous a constant / point equilibrium solution of the dynamics a ‘neighbouring’ solution first-order.
The Klein Gordon equation (1926) Scalar field (J=0) :
Functional renormalization group equation for strongly correlated fermions.
1 Midterm statistics – On campus students only ECEN 5817 Midterm Exam, Spring 2008 On-campus students Average = 86.3 % Averages by problem: / 35.
Course AE4-T40 Lecture 5: Control Apllication
A new continuum limit for the one matrix model
Field theoretical methods in transport theory  F. Flores  A. Levy Yeyati  J.C. Cuevas.
1 10. Joint Moments and Joint Characteristic Functions Following section 6, in this section we shall introduce various parameters to compactly represent.
Quantum One: Lecture 8. Continuously Indexed Basis Sets.
Many-body Green’s Functions
The Statistical Properties of Large Scale Structure Alexander Szalay Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
Lecture 35 Numerical Analysis. Chapter 7 Ordinary Differential Equations.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Monte Carlo Simulation of Interacting Electron Models by a New Determinant Approach Mucheng Zhang (Under the direction of Robert W. Robinson and Heinz-Bernd.
Feynman Perturbation Expansion for Coupon Bond Option Price in a Field Theory of Interest Rates by Belal E. Baaquie Department of Physics NUS.
Lecture 11: Ising model Outline: equilibrium theory d = 1
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
1 CE 530 Molecular Simulation Lecture 6 David A. Kofke Department of Chemical Engineering SUNY Buffalo
Ch 2. Probability Distributions (1/2) Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, C. M. Bishop, Summarized by Yung-Kyun Noh and Joo-kyung Kim Biointelligence.
Finite Temperature Field Theory Joe Schindler 2015.
GASYUKU2002,Kyoto-U @ KAGA 1 Computing Feynman Graphs in MSFT Isao Kishimoto (Univ. of Tokyo) based on Collaboration with I.Bars and Y.Matsuo [ hep-th/ ]
Security Markets VII Miloslav S. Vosvrda Teorie financnich trhu.
Action function of the electromagnetic field Section 27.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
Determine the mathematical models that capture the behavior of an electrical system 1.Elements making up an electrical system 2.First-principles modeling.
The quantum kicked rotator First approach to “Quantum Chaos”: take a system that is classically chaotic and quantize it.
Lecture 6: Langevin equations
Objective 1 You will be able to find the determinant of a 2x2 and a 3x3 matrix.
A.Sako S.Kuroki T.Ishikawa Graduate school of Mathematics, Hiroshima University Graduate school of Science, Hiroshima University Higashi-Hiroshima ,Japan.
Monday, Apr. 7, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #20 Monday, Apr. 7, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Super Symmetry Breaking MSSM Higgs and Their.
Statistical Mechanics and Multi-Scale Simulation Methods ChBE
Quantum Two 1. 2 Time-Dependent Perturbations 3.
Syed Ali Raza Supervisor: Dr. Pervez Hoodbhoy. A brief Overview of Quantum Hall Effect Spinning Disk Spinning Disk with magnetic Field Kubo’s Formula.
The Nuts and Bolts of First-Principles Simulation Durham, 6th-13th December : Linear response theory CASTEP Developers’ Group with support from.
Solid State Physics Lecture 15 HW 8 Due March 29 Kittel Chapter 7: 3,4,6 The free electron standing wave and the traveling wave are not eigenstates.
Quantum One.
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
References Jain (a text book?; IP per se; available)
Theory of Capital Markets
Eigen Decomposition Based on the slides by Mani Thomas and book by Gilbert Strang. Modified and extended by Longin Jan Latecki.
Times in Quantum Kinetic Equations
Quantum One.
Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems: Dynamical Systems
Numerical Analysis Lecture 45.
Eigen Decomposition Based on the slides by Mani Thomas and book by Gilbert Strang. Modified and extended by Longin Jan Latecki.
Victor Edneral Moscow State University Russia
Lecture 5.
Eigen Decomposition Based on the slides by Mani Thomas and book by Gilbert Strang. Modified and extended by Longin Jan Latecki.
Review of Interacting Felds and Feynman Digrams
Eigen Decomposition Based on the slides by Mani Thomas and book by Gilbert Strang. Modified and extended by Longin Jan Latecki.
Noncommutative Shift Invariant Quantum Field Theory
Basic Concepts, Necessary and Sufficient conditions
Eigen Decomposition Based on the slides by Mani Thomas and book by Gilbert Strang. Modified and extended by Longin Jan Latecki.
3.7. Two Theorems: the “Equipartition” & the “Virial”
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 13: Field-theoretic formulation of Langevin models Outline: Functional (path) integral formulation Stratonovich and Ito, again the Martin-Siggia-Rose formalism free fields perturbation theory Stratonovich and supersymmetry

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional:

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional:

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional:

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional:

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional:

generating functionals In the equilibrium case, the partition function is a generating functional: Here we will construct a generating functional for time-dependent correlation functions in the Langevin-Landau-Ginzburg model

Dynamics (single variable) Start from the equation of motion

Dynamics (single variable) Start from the equation of motion or, more generally,

Dynamics (single variable) Start from the equation of motion or, more generally, Discretize time:

Dynamics (single variable) Start from the equation of motion or, more generally, Discretize time: Gaussian noise:

equations of motion Ito:

equations of motion Ito:

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich:

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich:

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M):

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M):

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito)

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito) Jacobian:

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito) Jacobian: ______ diagonal

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito) Jacobian: ______ diagonal ______________ 1 below diagonal

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito) Jacobian: (Ito) ______ diagonal ______________ 1 below diagonal

equations of motion Ito: Stratonovich: Change variables from η (0 < n < M-1) to ϕ (1 < n < M): (Ito) Jacobian: (Ito) ______ diagonal ______________ 1 below diagonal (all elements above the diagonal vanish, so det = product of diagonal elements)

Stratonovich

Stratonovich

Stratonovich Jacobian:

Stratonovich Jacobian:

Stratonovich Jacobian:

Stratonovich Jacobian:

Stratonovich Jacobian:

Stratonovich Jacobian: (back to this later)

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito:

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito:

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito: use

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito: use

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito: use generating function (multivariate characteristic function)

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito: use generating function (multivariate characteristic function)

Martin-Siggia-Rose back to Ito: use generating function (multivariate characteristic function)

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action”

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0 _____ inter- action term L1

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0 _____ inter- action term L1 ________ “source” terms

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0 _____ inter- action term L1 ________ “source” terms note:

a field theory: Δ -> 0: “action” putting space back in, using ______________________ quadratic: L0 _____ inter- action term L1 ________ “source” terms note: (normalization of P(ϕ|h))

correlation functions

correlation functions magnetization

correlation functions magnetization

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions:

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions:

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions:

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions:

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions: = susceptibility / response function

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions: = susceptibility / response function

correlation functions magnetization correlation functions: = susceptibility / response function

free action

free action free action:

free action free action:

free action free action: generating functional:

free action free action: generating functional: in Fourier components:

free fields (invert the matrix in the exponent in S0)

free fields (invert the matrix in the exponent in S0)

free fields (invert the matrix in the exponent in S0) back to time domain:

free fields (invert the matrix in the exponent in S0) back to time domain:

free fields (invert the matrix in the exponent in S0) back to time domain: in agreement with what we found using the direct approach in Lect. 11

perturbation theory

perturbation theory want to evaluate quantities like

perturbation theory want to evaluate quantities like expand

perturbation theory want to evaluate quantities like expand

1st order:

1st order:

1st order: average of product of 6 Gaussian variables: Use Wick’s theorem sum of products of all pairwise averages)

1st order: average of product of 6 Gaussian variables: Use Wick’s theorem sum of products of all pairwise averages) (graphs on blackboard)

1st order: average of product of 6 Gaussian variables: Use Wick’s theorem sum of products of all pairwise averages) (graphs on blackboard) but most of these vanish:

1st order: average of product of 6 Gaussian variables: Use Wick’s theorem sum of products of all pairwise averages) (graphs on blackboard) but most of these vanish:

1st order: average of product of 6 Gaussian variables: Use Wick’s theorem sum of products of all pairwise averages) (graphs on blackboard) but most of these vanish: (Ito)

Feynman graphs The surviving term:

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) 2

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) … 2

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) … 2 Can generate a diagrammatic expansion like that in Lect 7

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) … 2 Can generate a diagrammatic expansion like that in Lect 7 In fact, it is exactly the same diagrammatic expansion

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) … 2 Can generate a diagrammatic expansion like that in Lect 7 In fact, it is exactly the same diagrammatic expansion (except that ϕ and the correlation and response functions now depend on space as well as time)

Feynman graphs The surviving term: C(3,3) G(1,3) 1 3 G(3,2) … 2 Can generate a diagrammatic expansion like that in Lect 7 In fact, it is exactly the same diagrammatic expansion (except that ϕ and the correlation and response functions now depend on space as well as time) all closed loops of response functions (including all disconnected diagrams) vanish because for Ito G(t=0) = 0.

Stratonovich, again

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1.

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables Taylor series expansions terminate:

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables Taylor series expansions terminate:

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables Taylor series expansions terminate: “integrals”:

Stratonovich, again Can take the continuous-time limit of the exponent as in Ito, but now J ≠ 1. Use Grassman variables Taylor series expansions terminate: “integrals”:

determinants

determinants cf for real x

determinants cf for real x and for complex z

determinants cf for real x and for complex z so represent J as

determinants cf for real x and for complex z so represent J as “ghost” variables

Stratonovich generating functional (one variable)

Stratonovich generating functional (one variable)

Stratonovich generating functional (one variable) (field)

Stratonovich generating functional (one variable) (field) free action:

Stratonovich generating functional (one variable) (field) free action: interactions:

ghost correlations:

ghost correlations: Now when we expand

ghost correlations: Now when we expand we get

ghost correlations: Now when we expand we get new terms

cancellation of closed loops Because of the -1 in the ghost correlation function, these just cancel the terms

cancellation of closed loops Because of the -1 in the ghost correlation function, these just cancel the terms

cancellation of closed loops Because of the -1 in the ghost correlation function, these just cancel the terms that were zero with Ito convention but not Stratonovich

cancellation of closed loops Because of the -1 in the ghost correlation function, these just cancel the terms that were zero with Ito convention but not Stratonovich This theory has a supersymmetry

the superfield Define a combination of the real and Grassman fields

the superfield Define a combination of the real and Grassman fields Grassman numbers

the superfield Define a combination of the real and Grassman fields Grassman numbers Then if

the superfield Define a combination of the real and Grassman fields Grassman numbers Then if the generating functional can be written

How does this happen? Expand the potential term:

How does this happen? Expand the potential term:

How does this happen? Expand the potential term: Integrate over the “Grassman time”

How does this happen? Expand the potential term: Integrate over the “Grassman time”

How does this happen? Expand the potential term: Integrate over the “Grassman time” which are the terms in the action involving f.