Professional Practice Required Elements Self-Reflection, Professional Growth Planning To be completed by all principals and assistant principals annually.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Advertisements

LOGO Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Conducting Meaningful Site Visits.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN: DEVELOPMENT SEPTEMBER 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Principal & Assistant Principal
Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Principal & Assistant Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (PPGES)
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Principal Roles and Responsibilities
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
EVALUATIONS Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
RI Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting October 25, 2010.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
KVEC Principal Goal Development July 29, Administer Val-Ed (Refer to CEP-District Timeline and number of administrations ) Site-Visit by Superintendent.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Bridgeport Public Schools Administrator Evaluation and Support Plan
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
AHEAD PPGES Goal Development Workshop for Principals/Assistants and Superintendent/Designee of the CURVE.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Springfield Effective Educator Development System (SEEDS)
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing. As you arrive... Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com Log in to ovecisln.wikispaces.com Log in to todaysmeet.com/OVECISLN.
Low Performing Schools Plan Presentation New Hanover County Schools October 20, 2015.
Diagnostic Reviews for Cohort 2 Priority Schools and Districts  Kentucky Department of Education and AdvancED Kentucky  A diagnostic review/leadership.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Pulaski County Schools June
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Clinical Educators Design Team CAEP State Alliance for Clinical Partnership Presented by team members Laurie Henry, University of Kentucky & Nicole Nickens,
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Principal Evaluation Process
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Administrators Retreat
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
State Board of Education Progress Update
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Professional Practice Required Elements Self-Reflection, Professional Growth Planning To be completed by all principals and assistant principals annually Overview provided annually by superintendent/designee by September 1 Completed at administrators retreat! Initial discussions between building and superintendent/designee occur by October 15, including identifying and prioritizing a limited number of standards to be addressed in the PGP each year Formative discussions by February 1 Summative discussions by June 15.

How we will do it… Self Assessment using the standards and indicators (completed before PGP meeting by principal) Then… New principals will identify a limited number of “most impactful” indicators in each standard for their focus Year II and beyond: Minimum of 2, no more than 3 standards with collaboratively agreed upon “most impactful” indicators in each standard for evidence collection.

Professional Practice Required Elements Site Visits Conducted for principals at least twice annually by superintendent/designee. Formative evaluation visits will occur by February 1 and Summative evaluation visits will occur by June 15. Each site visit will include discussion of various aspects of the principal’s work, including the successes and challenges associated with ongoing school improvement as these successes and challenges relate to performance standards. Not required for assistant principals.

Professional Practice Required Elements Val-Ed 360 Survey To be completed by all teachers as feedback for principals at least once every two years during the school years when TELL Kentucky is not administered. Survey results will be included as a source of data to inform each principals’ professional practice rating. Will complete in the Spring. Not required for assistant principals.

Professional Practice Required Elements TELL Kentucky Survey Principals are responsible for setting one Working Conditions Growth Goal based on the 2013 TELL Kentucky Survey. Assistant principal(s) adopt this goal. The purpose is to positively impact school culture and student success. Discussion of progress toward meeting this goal will be documented as part of the mid-year site visit conducted for the principal. Results may be informed by referencing other survey results and anecdotal data.

Products of Practice May be provided by principals, assistant principals and superintendent/designee to provide additional evidence to support assessment of professional practice. This evidence should be directly related to performance standards. Examples: SBDM minutes Faculty meeting agendas, notes Department/grade level agendas, notes PLC agendas, notes Leadership team agendas, notes Learning walk documentation Budgets Professional learning experience documentation Parent/community engagement survey results, events documentation Other—must establish a direct relation to work in performance standard areas

Student Growth Goals General Information: Principals will set one State Contribution Growth Goal (KPREP / EOC) and one Local Contribution Growth Goal (MAP / College and Career Readiness %) At least one of the Student Growth Goals set by the principal must address subgroup populations. Assistant principals will inherit the Student Growth Goals (both state and local contributions) of the principal.

Student Growth Goals Tied directly to the Comprehensive School Improvement Plan (CSIP) located in ASSIST. The superintendent/designee and the principal will meet to establish the year’s goal and discuss the long-term trajectory for the goal by Oct. 15 each year. State contribution goals will be based on proficiency as measured by KPREP (elementary, middle school gap group students) and EOC (high school gap group students) assessments. Growth measures Low—less than 3% increase in proficiency of identified sub-group Expected—3 - 7% increase in proficiency of identified sub-group High—more than 7% increase in proficiency of identified sub-group

Student Growth Goals Local Contribution—Based on School Need. Principals will develop one local growth goal through collaborative work with the superintendent/designee prior to Oct 15 each year. Local contribution goals will be based on MAP 80/80 grade level performance of elementary and middle school students and on CCR grade level performance of high school students. Growth measures: Low—less than 3% increase in number of students meeting MAP 80/80 or CCR grade level goals Expected—3 - 7% increase in number of students meeting MAP 80/80 or CCR grade level goals (when school level goals are met, expectation is to maintain that level of performance). High—more than 7% increase in number of students meeting MAP 80/80 or CCR grade level goals.