Objectives of Canadian Humanitarian Action

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Focus Humanitarian Assistance
Advertisements

Group 2 Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response (AADMER) A common ground for Disaster risk identification, assessment and monitoring; Disaster.
Thailand Disaster Management Structure and Links to the ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response and Beyond ASEAN DEFENCE ESTABLISHMENTS.
The American Red Cross Mission Statement
Pan American Health Organization Inter-American Mechanism for Disaster Response Where do we go? Dr. Jean Luc Poncelet Area Manager Emergency preparedness.
ASEAN Regional Forum Defence Officials Dialogue 18 March 2010 Regional Responses to Disaster Relief: Civil Military Cooperation & Coordination COLONEL.
ASEAN Regional Forum The Sixth Inter-Sessional Meeting on Disaster Relief Qingdao, China September 2006 The Role of Red Cross and Red Crescent in.
Disaster Management Civil-Military Coordination
Unclas OPERATION HESTIA March 2010 Canadian Forces Perspective on support to Canadas Contribution to the 2010 Haiti Earthquake.
1 Legal Challenges Faced by Militaries in Undertaking Disaster Relief Operations Lieutenant Colonel Christopher B. Walters, USMC Deputy Staff Judge Advocate.
Humanitarian Response Presented by Garry Dunbar Director, Humanitarian and Emergencies Section Australian Agency for International Development.
Decision Point 3 - Immediate crisis has been stabilised References: ARF HA/DR SOPs (Draft) ARF DEDR Exercise Instruction.
Too many cooks? Multiplication of actors and effective coordination DG ECHO B1 Disaster Response Unit The Community Civil Protection Mechanism.
The Red Cross Red Crescent Movement
A REVIEW OF THE HUMANITARIAN COUNTRY TEAM (HCT) IN NIGERIA & RECOMMENDATION FOR WAY FORWARD Presented at the HCT 05/06/2014.
US Government Disaster Response Republic of the Marshall Islands Federated States of Micronesia through US Agency for International Development 1.
FEMA Overview. FEMA overview Federal disaster contracting Emergency Preparedness 2.
Department of Defense Support to Foreign Disaster Relief Operations INTERHANDS Seminar Mr. John Christiansen 24 October 2000.
INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENT INTO HUMANITARIAN ACTION Tom Delrue Programme Manager, Environment, Humanitarian Action and Early Recovery.
United Nations Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination
PRESENTATION March 2006 CANADIAN RED CROSS Our Mission To improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity in Canada and around.
UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR THE COORDINATION OF HUMANITARIAN AFFAIRS OCHA.
Post-Cyclone Recovery Policies and Coordination in Myanmar Iizuka Ryoko, MEP13101 Policy Design and Implementation, GRIPS July 19, 2013.
Humanitarian coordination S3.1 session day 5 3 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011.
Laura Hammond Dept of Development Studies, SOAS SOAS/Mo Ibrahim Foundation Seminar on Governance and Development April 2014 Mauritius.
Laura Hammond Dept of Development Studies, SOAS SOAS/Mo Ibrahim Foundation Residential School on Governance & Development March 2015.
Canadian International Development Agency Agence canadienne de développement international CIDA and Crisis Prevention and Recovery.
What are we going to discover and learn today?
Disaster risk reduction – How did we get here?
Needs Assessment Roster and Pool & OCHA Stand-by Partnerships NATF Training on Coordinated Assessments Revinge, Sweden October 28, 2010.
South Asia Earthquake: Transition from Relief to Development Joint Executive Board of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WFP New York, 20 January 2006 Presented by:
INITIAL PLANNING CONFERENCE FOR ARF DiREx 2015
Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean Panama City, Panama United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
PRESENTATION AT THE LAUNCH OF THE ITALIAN IDRL REPORT, BOLGONA, 15 JUNE The Australian Experience in the Cooperation on Disaster Management.
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Session 181 Crisis Communications Audiences Session 18 Slide Deck Slide 18-
The IASC Humanitarian Cluster Approach Angelika Planitz UNDP BCPR Developing Surge Capacity for Early Recovery March 2006.
The Humanitarian Community MPAT Tempest Express – March 2008 Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
SGTM 9: Humanitarian Assistance Slide 1 SGTM 9: Humanitarian Assistance.
Community Coping Skills PAHO Leaders Course November 2006 Jamaica Lois Hue Lois Hue.
OCHA Office of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
Disaster Response in Asia and the Pacific: A Guide to International Tools and Services.
1 Pacific Logistics Cluster. 2 What is Logistics ? Several Definitions… Getting the right thing at the right time in the right place at the right cost…
Humanitarian Priorities for 2008 Improve monitoring and response to needs and protection concerns of the people affected by conflict, internal disturbances.
ARF Strategic Guidance Technical Working Group: Current Status of Initiative ASEAN Regional Forum Statement on disaster management and Emergency Response.
Situation and Response to HADR in ARF April 2009 Dr, Hong-Je Cho Korea National Defense University.
The FRANZ Arrangement: A commitment to Effective Coordination.
Legal Challenges faced by militaries in undertaking Disaster Relief Operations.
Tempest Express 26 Humanitarian Civil-Military Coordination Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance Jesse Wolfe, DMHA.
7 June 2012 Humanitarian and Disaster Management Team, NZ Aid Programme Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade Pacific natural disasters & New Zealand’s.
AIM: – TO ESTABLISH THE BASIC FRAMEWORK FOR FORMALISING AND IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF THE USE OF MILITARY TEAMS AND EXPERTISE IN DISASTER.
International Perspectives on HA/DR: Overarching Principles and Best Practices in International Disaster Relief Operations TITLE: International Perspectives.
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Civilian Humanitarian Agencies Center for Excellence in Disaster Management & Humanitarian Assistance MPAT TE June 2007.
UNCLASSIFIED As of W Mar 08 Mr. Scott A. Weidie, J722 1 Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT) 04 March 2008 Governments and Crises: Roles.
The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Civil -Military Cooperation and Humanitarian Coordination.
IASC Task Force on Meeting Humanitarian Challenges in Urban Areas (MHCUA) Draft Strategic Framework TF meeting GVA Roger Zetter.
ARF SEMINAR ON LAWS AND REGULATION ENHANCING INTERNATIONAL HADR COOPERATION BY LT COL ABDUL RAHMAN ALAVI DEFENCE OPERATION CENTRE, JOINT FORCE HQ, MALAYSIA.
2015 USACE Exercise – December 1, 2015 New Madrid Seismic Zone – Earthquake FEMA Mission, Legal Authorities and Regional Capability Overview Gus Wulfkuhle.
Humanitarian Relief Policy To save and protect lives, alleviate suffering, and maintain human dignity during and in the immediate aftermath of humanitarian.
The Philippines.  The constitutional mandate of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) as well as its ready equipment and training allows the AFP.
MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF MONTENEGRO
Multinational Planning Augmentation Team (MPAT)
Disaster and it’s management
Supporting Local Shelter Coordination Indonesia and ASEAN
The Humanitarian Community
Hurricane Irma Response
United Nations World Food Programme
MID-TERM CONSULTATION
The Humanitarian Community
  Regional Workshop on Temporary Protection Status and/or Humanitarian Visas in Situations of Disaster February 2015.
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for the Unexpected: Government of Canada Response to Natural Disasters Abroad

Objectives of Canadian Humanitarian Action 1. To meet needs: save lives, alleviate suffering, and maintain human dignity; 2. To ensure a coherent, coordinated and timely humanitarian response; 3. To ensure consistency with international legal obligations and principles; and 4. To support effective disaster risk reduction efforts (prevention, preparedness, mitigation, etc.). Needs-based response is grounded in international humanitarian principles, as are our primary objectives of saving lives and alleviating suffering. We seek to ensure that our actions are part of a coherent, coordinated and timely international response by humanitarian actors, supported by the broader international community. We seek to ensure that Canada respects its international legal obligations and principles to which it subscribes. We seek to ensure that disaster risk reduction is part of our response, so that communities are able to build back better. We strongly support Japan and Indonesia’s leadership in this domain, particularly in this region.

Conditions Required for a Government of Canada Response 1. Request for international assistance from the government of the affected country 2. Needs assessments and appeals by professional humanitarian actors 3. Trusted and experienced partners Appeals from trusted humanitarian partners Can fund UN, Red Cross or Canadian international NGOs No funding directly to other governments Request from the affected country: This is grounded in UN Resolution 46/182 Strengthening the Coordination of the Humanitarian System Fundamentally, it ensures respect for the sovereignty of countries affected by natural disasters, as well as the primary responsibility of a government to care for its own people. Needs assessments: Want to ensure that Canada’s assistance is targeted to those who need it the most Want it to be needs driven, rather than supply driven (what is needed, rather than what we’ve got to offer) Partners on the ground Need a trusted partner to channel aid through – e.g. UN, Red Cross Movement or Canadian NGO Canada does not provide humanitarian assistance directly to other governments.

Government of Canada Procedures and Mechanisms Government of Canada Standard Operating Procedures in Response to Natural Disasters Abroad (“the SOPs”) The Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) is the Government of Canada’s policy and operational lead on natural disaster risk reduction and response Standing Interdepartmental Task Force on Natural Disasters Abroad, convened and chaired by DFAIT 24/7 stand-by and response capacity After-action reviews DFAIT has been responsible for the coordination of Government of Canada responses to natural disasters abroad since 1998. Our planning with other government departments and preparedness help ensure that the GoC can rapidly respond to international crises in a timely, effective, coordinated and appropriate manner. SOPs: Established in 1999. Clarify duties of all interdepartmental actors and how given emergency will be managed (before, during, after). Work well, and continually refined following major events and through the findings of after-action reports assessing the GoC response. NOT a decision-making tool. DFAIT: has an officer on duty 24/7 for natural disasters. ■ Interdepartmental coordinator of GoC response (includes convening the standing interdepartmental task force 12-24 hours of major event – decision-making forum based on needs assessments). ■ Drafts situation reports, develops and maintains response tools, trains (courses); facilitates deployments; liaises with foreign governments and International Organisations, organizes after-action reviews. ■ Organizes the deployment of staff to the field (DFAIT, CIDA, DND): “Interdepartmental Strategic Support Teams”.

Government of Canada Humanitarian Response Toolkit Cash contributions in response to appeals Deployment of Canadian technical experts Deployment of relief supplies Canadian Forces assets Other special measures Canada can draw on a number of tools to respond to international disasters. These include, but are not limited to: Cash contributions in response to emergency appeals issued by trusted international partners, such as the International Federation of the Red Cross/Crescent (IFRC), UN humanitarian agencies or Canadian NGO proposals; The deployment of pre-identified technical experts, such as infectious disease specialists from our domestic departments such as Public Health Agency Canada (PHAC), to the World Heath Organization; Relief stocks owned by CIDA, managed by the Canadian Red Cross, that meet international standards (which guarantee their quality and appropriateness for disaster response) and are pre-positioned in close proximity to both the main Canadian Forces air assets and Toronto airport; As necessary and if available, assets of the Canadian Forces, including strategic airlift and personnel, such as – in exceptional circumstances - the Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART). Other special measures in exceptional circumstances: immigration fee waivers, debt relief. What we don’t do: Search and rescue teams, fund independent specialists, bear the costs of transporting unsolicited goods collected by Canadians. We encourage Canadians to provide cash, not goods, to trusted humanitarian actors.

Civil-military Coordination in Humanitarian Action GoC Guidelines for Humanitarian Action and Civil-Military Coordination (based on Oslo Guidelines) Military assets a last resort for humanitarian action in support of civilian actors NOT the primary mandate of the Canadian Forces (CF) Most commonly used CF tool: airlift for relief supplies to the Red Cross Movement The Government of Canada has established Guidelines on Humanitarian Action and Civil-Military Coordination, allowing us to respect the civilian character of humanitarian action.  These follow closely the internationally agreed Oslo Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets In Disaster Relief. The approach of the Government of Canada is to use military assets only as a LAST RESORT in humanitarian action. Canada's policy is to support civilian and humanitarian actors in the first instance. Working through these experienced partners on the ground allows us to use local capacity, rejuvenate the local economy and respect the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality, humanity and independence.  We use military assets (of any kind) as a last resort when no civilian alternative exists, or if civilian capacity has been completely overwhelmed.  This is in keeping with the internationally endorsed Oslo Guidelines and our own Government of Canada guidelines. Humanitarian action is NOT the primary mandate of the CF. Before committing CF assets, the Government will want to be assured that the CF will still be able to fulfill its core mandate and that military assets are indeed available and can be drawn upon. The most commonly used Canadian Forces assets in a Canadian humanitarian response is airlift. CF aircraft can be used to transport relief supplies that are owned by CIDA and meet international humanitarian standards. Normally, these supplies are delivered directly the Red Cross Movement, in response to a specific request for clearly identified items. (Supplies can include: Tents, blankets, tarps, health kits, non-food household items.)

Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) Composition: 200+ CF personnel Capabilities: Produce potable water and provide primary medical care (not trauma care) Provides a stabilization measure against the primary effects of disasters, such as earthquakes Prevents the rapid onset of secondary effects of the disaster, such as water-borne disease Gains time for civilian domestic or international humanitarian aid to facilitate long-term recovery The Canadian Forces Disaster Assistance Response Team is a team of 200+ CF personnel, with the capability to respond to the specific need for water purification and primary health care (not trauma care) THE DART IS A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE INITIAL RELIEF PHASE OF THE DISASTER AND THE AVAILABILITY OF SUFFICIENT Civilian Humanitarian CAPABILITY TO RESPOND OVER THE LONGER-TERM. IT HAS THREE PRIMARY OBJECTIVES 1-TO DEAL WITH THE PRIMARY EFFECTS OF NATURAL DISASTERS SUCH AS EARTHQUAKES OR FLOODS 2-TO PREVENT THE RAPID ONSET OF ANY SECONDARY EFFECTS OF THE DISASTER SUCH AS THE SPREADING OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES 3-TO ACT AS A STOP-GAP MEASURE TO GIVE TIME TO THE HOST NATION AND TO THE INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN SYSTEM TO TAKE ACTION TO FACILITATE LONGER TERM RECOVERY The DART’s mandate is for a maximum of 40 days. After 40 days: -The effects of the disaster have been mitigated to a point where our assistance is not required anymore. -National and/or international agencies are in place and are able to provide the necessary relief.

Criteria for a DART Deployment In response to a catastrophic natural disaster, where water and health have been identified as needs Request from government of the affected country Permissive environment required As a last resort, where no civilian alternative exists – deployed only four times in its history Criteria for DART deployment: Catastrophic disaster – e.g. hundreds of thousands displaced or homeless, infrastructure and services overwhelmed or not functioning. A request from the government of the affected country - we must ensure we respect the sovereignty of the affected country Permissive environment – the DART is not meant to operate in a conflict-affected area, an area of political unrest, or where the local authorities would not welcome such a presence. An identified need by civilian humanitarian actors for water purification and primary health care capabilities (it has to be both – not either or) – Our response is NEEDS-BASED The DART is an option of last resort, where no civilian alternative exists. The DART is an exceptional military response to a natural disaster – it has only deployed four times in its history – since 1998 (Honduras, Turkey, Sri Lanka and Pakistan) Steps: If a disaster appears to be catastrophic, and it seems likely that water purification and primary health care will be an area of need, an interdisciplinary team of Government of Canada officials will deploy to the affected country, along with a Canadian Forces recce team. The interdisciplinary team, led by DFAIT, will assess whether the deployment of the DART would an appropriate response option, based on the needs identified and the permissiveness in the affected country. The CF recce team can provide an assessment of whether it is technically feasible to set up a DART operation in theatre. Once the interdisciplinary team makes a recommendation in favour of a DART, the Prime Minister, our Head of Government, provides the green light and the full DART mobilizes.

Recent Use of CF Assets in Natural Disaster Responses Haiti (Sept. 2008) – Canadian frigate transported relief supplies to affected areas, on behalf of WFP US – Hurricane Gustav (Sept. 2008) – CF airlift used to evacuate US citizens from Louisiana China – Sichuan Earthquake (May 2008) – CF airlift delivered 700 tents to the Chinese Red Cross Burma – Cyclone Nargis (May 2008) CF airlift delivered 2,000 emergency shelter kits to the Burma Red Cross; CF arranged for the transport of 4 WFP helicopters from Ukraine to Bangkok The most common response from the Canadian Forces in support of DFAIT and CIDA is the airlift of relief supplies. 2008 was a very busy disaster season and saw CF military assets being relied upon more than ever before. Here are a few examples of our responses last year: Haiti (Sept. 2008) – One of our frigates, the HMCS St. John’s, was in the region on an unrelated mission, and was used to transport relief supplies from Port-au-Prince to affected areas in the south of Haiti, on behalf of the World Food Programme. US – Hurricane Gustav (Sept. 2008) – CF airlift was used to evacuate US citizens from Louisiana. The request for this capability was made under the Canada-US Civil-Assistance Plan, which provides for the military of one country to assist the military of the other country in support of a civilian-led response emergency in either country. Although Canada and the United States cooperate often across borders in an emergency, in order for federal assistance to be provided, there must first be an exchange of diplomatic notes between the foreign ministries of the two countries. China – Sichuan Earthquake (May 2008) – CF airlift delivered 700 tents to the Chinese Red Cross Society Burma – Cyclone Nargis (May 2008) CF airlift with a C-17 delivered 2,000 emergency shelter kits to the Burmese Red Cross Society and further arranged for the airlift of four helicopters from Ukraine to Bangkok, at the request of the Executive Director of WFP.