PS4529/30 Applications of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ch. 6 MEMORY.
Advertisements

Key points for lecture 4 Forgetting: good or bad?
Core Features of Episodic Memory l (1) Memory for specific events from your past l (2) Involves retrieving the bound together contents and context (what.
PS2015 Lecture 2 Cognitive Models of Memory. Cognition Lecture 2 l Key issues where cognitive psychology parts from common sense »1. Deterministic (by.
PS4529/30 Applications of Cognitive Neuroscience.
PS4529/30 Applications of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Memory and Cognition Lecture 10: Filling in the gaps… ENCODING RETRIEVAL Seeing Word Hearing Word MTL.
The consensus view of memory + a self module + the constructive memory framework (CMF) = The best functional Account of memory there is… The End (of lecture.
Module 11 Types of Memory.
Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink Claire Sergent, Sylvain Baillet, & Stanislas Dehaene.
Identification and Individualization
Is it Science?. The beginning The father of the US polygraph machine was Doctor William Marston He designed the first device that measured blood pressure.
Word Imagery Effects on Explicit and Implicit Memory Nicholas Bube, Drew Finke, Darcy Lemon, and Meaghan Topper.
Learning and Educational Technology. Objectives To look into some principles of learning relevant to educational technology To discuss the four revolutions.
Eye-witness testimony
When Memories Go Wrong What happens when your memory of an event does not correspond to what actually happened? –In what ways can our decisions get warped.
EXPLORING PSYCHOLOGY EIGHTH EDITION IN MODULES David Myers PowerPoint Slides Aneeq Ahmad Henderson State University Worth Publishers, © 2011.
By: Catchupdates.com. CONTENTS (1)INTRODUCTION (2) BASED ON (3) WHAT IS MERMER (4) INSTRUMENTS (5) HOW IT WORK (6) Brain Fingerprinting VS Lie detector.
Two cities… Both have big bridges… Otherwise, not much else in common.
BHS Memory and Amnesia Memory and Reality.
Dr. Lawrence A. Farewell Presented by Tonya Slager
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
Repressed Memories Elizabeth Loftus. Recalling Episodic Memory Recall is a generative processes rather than simply calling up stored data.
Observation Skills Chapter 1
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Recalling Memories Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information Levels-of-Processing Theory.
Intro to Forensics Science What is Forensic Science? Forensic Science is the study and application of science to matters of the law.
CHAPTER SIX CHAPTER SIX Attention and Memory. The Information Processing Model Uses a computer metaphor to explain how people process stimuli The information-processing.
Presented by Louise & charlotte.. Psychologists over the years have been trying to develop memory retrieval techniques aimed at trying to entice more.
Memory Chapter 6.
Forensic Science and the Law
SLB /04/07 Thinking and Communicating “The Spiritual Life is Thinking!” (R.B. Thieme, Jr.)
Assessing Credibility. Assessing Credibility is the substance of most trials. Credibility = Honesty + Reliability.
C Pearson Allyn & Bacon Encoding and Retrieval Processes in Long-Term Memory Chapter 6.
Three forms of consciousness in retrieving memories Autonoetic Consciousness Self-Knowing Remembering Presenter: Ting-Ru Chen Advisor: Chun-Yu Lin Date:
Encoding Specificity Memory is improved when information available at encoding is also available at retrieval.
Skills of a Forensic Scientist & Frye vs. Daubert Standards
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
- Recall / Recognition - - Forgetting.  Identify several memory retrieval processes.  Explain the processes involved in forgetting.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x Fall Semester Period 6/7 Period 6/7.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009.
Cognitive Theories of Learning Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
1 Three Questions for the Study of Memory 1. Do we learn only with intention? 2. When we exert control over the process, what do we control? 3. If we learn.
THREE MEMORY PROCESSES  Encoding – making a mental representation to be placed into memory (meaningful association)  Storing – placing encoded information.
Module 11 Types of Memory. INTRODUCTION Definitions –Memory ability to retain information over time through three processes: encoding, storing, and retrieving.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, Chapter 1 1 x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009.
WHS AP Psychology Unit 2: Memory (Cognition) Essential Task 2-4: Describe special topics in memory with specific attention to eidetic memories, and eye-witness.
 Approximately 75,000 defendants are implicated by eyewitnesses in the U.S. every year, but unfortunately, some eyewitnesses make mistakes.
 Evidence : Something that tends to establish or disprove a fact.  Examples of evidence: › Documents › Testimony › Other objects.
Chapter One: Observation Skills
MEMORY PART TWO Dr Mushtaq T Hashim Dr Mushtaq T Hashim.
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, 2e Chapter 1 1 All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
1 Chapter 1 Observation Skills By the end of this chapter you will be able to: o Define observation and describe what changes occur in the brain o Describe.
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Define observation and describe what changes occur in the brain
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Chapter One: Observation Skills
BRAIN FINGERPRINTING BY YASHASREE.T 08891A0515.
Word Imagery Effects on Explicit and Implicit Memory
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009

Memory (Cognition) AP Psychology Essential Task:
Brain Fingerprinting.
x All rights Reserved South-Western / Cengage Learning © 2012, 2009
Module 11 Types of Memory.
Psychological Foundations
Unit 2: Memory (Cognition)
Presentation transcript:

PS4529/30 Applications of Cognitive Neuroscience

Do ERPs reveal modality specific retrieval processes? Subjects SAW and HEARD words at study Performed a word-stem (e.g. MOT__) cued recall task ERPs were formed to stems completed with l Studied SEEN items l Studied HEARD items l Unstudied NEW items ERP retrieval effects for each sensory modality:- l SEEN – NEW difference l HEARD – NEW difference Allan, Robb and Rugg (2000), Neuropsychologia,

No! ERPs are insensitive to differences in modality at retrieval Recall auditory episodeRecall visual episode As retrieval ends… As retrieval begins…

ERP Modality Experiment: Conclusions Multiple retrieval processes, active at different times –Onset ~ 0.5s after retrieval cue! Retrieval of visual and auditory episodes involves common processes. No evidence for modality specific retrieval processes. ERPs reflect a core component of retrieval? –Changes in neocortical activity driven by the Hippocampus during early stages of retrieval (prior to modality specific activations)? –Or: attention to retrieval products?

Episodic Memory Mechanisms Consolidation Mechanisms Attentional Control EncodingStorageRetrieval Attentional Control Semantic Records Perceptual Records Binding Context Semantic Records Perceptual Records Binding Context

Exclusion tasks (following Jacoby, 1991) Exp. 1Blocked Encoding. Block 1: Generate a sentence incorporating each word Block 2: Rate each word for pleasantness Exp. 2Blocked Encoding. Block 1: Generate a sentence incorporating each word Block 2: Read each word aloud Retrieval Words from block 2 always defined as target context Herron and Rugg (2003) Can we control what we recollect?

NewTargetNon-Target Exp (0.05)0.76 (0.16)0.83 (0.06) Exp (0.11)0.63 (0.13)0.84 (0.08) Herron and Rugg (2003) Target context easy (exp 1) vs. hard (exp 2) to recollect

0600ms0 + 5µV TARGNONTARGNEW Exp. 1 Exp. 2 LEFTRIGHT Herron and Rugg (2003) ERP data when control exerted over recollection

(1)ERPs may reveal covert retrieval strategy The size of parietal old/new effects reflect the attention paid to particular retrieval products. Neural correlates of remembering are present, or absent, dependent on strategy If retrieved information is not task-relevant, it wont be attended and there wont be a neurophysiological sign of its recollection (Herron and Rugg, 2003) Bottom line

1. Farwells claims. 2. Their validity from scientific perspective. 3. The basics of his view on cognition and the brain. 4. His MERMER technique, the data pattern and interpretation. 5. Its application in forensic settings. 6. Suggested reading from his web-based material. ERPs as memory detectors..?

Brain Fingerprinting Page.php …The Brain never lies… …99.99% for sure… …Find the MERMER and youve found the Murderer… …the infallible witness…

Farwellian view on Cognition and the Brain What does a criminal always take from a crime scene that records their involvement with it? Their brain How is this knowledge expressed? –By a unique neurophysiological signature called a MERMER

CMF view of Memory and the Brain Subjective experiences of memory reflect a highly fallible (and malleable) system –Memories for events that never happened can be generated –Memories for events that did happen can be deliberately forgotten, altered and possibly inhibited. –Strategic changes during retrieval can eliminate ERP evidence of recollection in exclusion-type tasks

MERMER Memory and Encoding Related Multi- faceted EEG Response When details of a crime are known to the suspect, a MERMER will be detected. A MERMER will not occur in an innocent subject.

Multiple test for your brain Three kinds of information are used to determine whether a subject has specific crime-related information in their brain: –Target –Irrelevant –Probe Target information elicits a yes response or a MERMER. This is used as a control. Irrelevant information will not elicit a MERMER. A MERMER in response to probe stimulus indicates recognition or the presence of certain information.

Targets: information the subject definitely knows; this can be ensured by telling the subject before the test starts.

Irrelevants: information that subject definitely does not know; this can be ensured by simply making up the information

Probes: information relevant to the crime or situation, which the subject may or may not know.

Journal of Forensic Sciences (2001) Involving 3 pairs of subjects (A/B), who knew each other –Days beforehand, A (the informer) was interviewed about events in Bs life (e.g. Bs Birthday party at Boscos diner). –B was tested on this information (probes) Knowing –A from another pair was tested on the same stimuli Unknowing -All subjects were given a list of Target stimuli prior to the test -Exclusion-type test instructions

Subject 1 (Knowing)

Subject 6 (Unknowing)

Prior and succeeding MERMER work Knowledge of FBI acronyms –Farwell reports 100% accuracy in discriminating FBI trainees from non-trainees. knowledge in the public domain about the MERMER technique –US PATENTS –Internal CIA reports –The JFS study –A couple of conference abstracts

Forensic Applications of MERMER Harrington case –26 years into life sentence –MERMER for alibi-relevant probes but not crime scene- relevant probes –Key prosecution witness hears about this and changes testimony –Harrington goes free! –IOWA supreme court rules such evidence is admissible in court JB Grinder case –Led to a conviction JR Slaughter case

Forensic Applications of MERMER The Daubert standard used by the IOWA supreme court:- 1.Has the science been tested? 2.Has the science been peer reviewed and published? 3.Is the science accurate? 4.Is the science well accepted in the scientific community?

Key scientific issues to consider Farwell quite clearly does not deny the imperfection of human memory –An eyewitness testifies to the the content of their memory, not to the truth of what happened. But he believes that the MERMER reveals –… what IS present in a persons brain. –This makes no sense, whatsoever, without knowledge of the function revealed by the MERMER –What function(s) does the MERMER reflect? The Daubert criteria imply that there is a clear answer to this critical question

A Scientific evaluation 1.Has the science been tested? A little, by Farwell 2.Has the science been peer reviewed and published? Twice, I think. 3.Is the science accurate? Unknown Is the science well accepted in the scientific community? By definition, it cannot be.

Is the MERMER an Old/New ERP effect? Inadequate work on neurophysiology of –MERMER What is its scalp distribution? –Very long-term memory retrieval Possible lack of Hippocampal involvement during retrieval Lack of distinct recollective qualities Preponderance of interpretation –Repeated retrieval of single episodes Almost nothing known…

Is Farwell right or wrong to apply his technique with this level of knowledge? Are moral considerations relevant? On empirical grounds? –Compare Farwells scientific basis to that for the introduction of a new drug In principle? If someone doesnt generate a MERMER, what can be concluded if we dont know what functions it reflects? Is the distinction between what the person knows or reports versus what their brain reports meaningless?

Readings Farwells website –Particularly his research subsection Review Dan Schacters work on memory errors –7 sins paper from proceedings of the royal society –Neural bases of true and false memory –See also Ken Pallers recent work Gonsalves and Paller (2003) Media portrayal – 6809,00.html

If accuracy / truthfulness matter, then personal report cannot be trusted Motivation to lie Unreliability of memory Even if valid testimony is given, issues of personal responsibility and lapses of self-control still arise Key Issue: The supposed objectivity of scientific neural data vs. the subjectivity of personal report

Questions and Answers?