Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UPDATE National Forum on Education statistics JULY 27 and 28, 2010 Annual Mandatory Collection of Elementary and Secondary Education Data through EDFacts.
Advertisements

ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
Nonpublic School Service Updates April 3, Presenters Regina Lukich, Consultant Karl Koenig, Consultant Office of Federal Programs.
Presented at the NAEHCY Conference Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania November, 2011 Presenters: William Cohee Kristi Peters Carl Love.
1 Homeless Students & Title I May Homeless Students & Title I May 2011 Welcome & Introductions Agenda –Do we have homeless students in Massachusetts?
Title III, Part A Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Virginia Department of Education April 2015.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
Annual State Coordinator Meeting Feb 28 – Mar 1, 2012 Arlington, VA.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
MIS Data Conference Office of Reporting EDFacts Federal Reporting SY
Ross Santy, U.S. Department of Education Beth Young, Quality Information Partners.
February 27,  PI-1202 / PI-1203 / PI-1280  Data Element Changes  October 1 Child Count  Schedule  Areas needing improvement  Future enhancements.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
Office of Federal Programs TITLE I, PART A, Neglected TITLE I, PART D, Delinquent TITLE X, McKinney-Vento Homeless Education.
Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Coding, Counting, and Collecting: It’s A Numbers.
ISES CD/YE Enhancements Fall 2007 – Segment 1. Topics for Today Preparing for the ISES Collection Common Errors from Fall 2006 ISES Collection Changes.
CTE Data and EDFacts September 22 & 23, Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) For , due December 31, 2010 – Either CAR or EDFacts, not both –
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved Annual District Assessment Coordinator Meeting VAM Update.
Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students (OELA) Presented by:Margarita.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
EHCY Program Office Q4 Updates 1September 19, 2012John McLaughlin, Federal Coordinator.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Marlys Bucher Dan Smith. Secondary Consortium Data Reports 1S1 Academic Attainment in Reading/Language Arts 1S2 Academic Attainment in Mathematics 2S1.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17-18, 2009.
ANNUAL MEASURABLE ACHIEVEMENT OBJECTIVES (AMAO) North Carolina Department of Public Instruction K-12 Programs Title III/ESL Office.
VDOE Updates VESA Meeting October 1, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
MCKINNEY-VENTO HOMELESS EDUCATION GRANT AWARDEE TRAINING Division of Performance and Accountability September 30, :00AM(MDT)
K-12 Data Standards in Education  4 th Annual Conference on Technology and Standards 1 K-12 Data Standards and the U.S. Department of Education Accomplishments.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
> Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Title of Presentation > Tom Corbett, Governor Ron Tomalis, Secretary of Education Education.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
McKinney-Vento Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program (EHCY) Improving the Quality of LEA Level Data February 28, 2013 Prepared for: Office.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
State Coordinator Webinar CSPR Data Information and Federal Updates June 28, 2012 Presented by: John McLaughlin, Federal Program Officer, EHCY Program.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
IDEA EDFacts File Specifications 101
Final Jeopardy – MEP Services
New SELPA Directors November 2016 Presented by Heather DiFede
IDEA Assessment Data Anne Rainey, IDEA Part B Data Manager, Montana
Common Core of Data (CCD)
Annual October Count of Children in
Presented by Sarah Martinez and Patricia Meyertholen June 2, 2016
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen June 23, 2016
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Common Core of Data (CCD)
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Presentation transcript:

Data in Perspective: A view of national, state, and local data collection, compilations and systems Presented by : Beth Hartness Program Specialist, National Center for Homeless Education Christina Endres McKinney-Vento State Coordinator, Indiana Department of Education Dave Schrandt Homeless Education Liaison, Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District

Part 1: National CSPR Data Collection Process and Results What is the CSPR ? The Consolidated State Performance Report is a data collection tool administered annually by the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education What is the purpose of the data collected by the CSPR: o Self-assessment and program improvement o National performance evaluation and funding decisions 2

o Is an initiative begun in 2005 to establish a federally coordinated K -12 education data repository o Data is submitted on ongoing basis through Education Data Exchange Network (EDEN) Submission System (ESS), a centralized data submission portal o All information is aggregated, usually by categories such as grade level o Individual student-level or staff-level data is not collected. Most data is LEA and school level and can be traced to individual LEAs. 3 EDFacts: History and Purpose

State CSPR Coordinator o Can usually be found in IT or data division of SEA o Responsible for submitting data collected from SEA & LEAs o Designated ESS User for the State o Responsible for revisions to data collected on an ongoing basis through ESS o Can usually be found in a Federal programs or accountability division of SEA. o Responsible for coordination of the preparation and certification of annual CSPR submissions o Can assist State Coordinator with data collection schedules and review of data from LEAs State EDFacts and CSPR Coor dinators 4 State EDFacts Coordinator

File Specifications o Are: documents which provide detailed technical information for including definitions and reporting indicators which may be found online at specifications.html o Most states used the Non-XML file specifications 5 EDFacts: File Specifications

N/X043 CSPR Question : Number of Homeless Children and Youths SERVED in LEAs with McKinney-Vento Subgrants CSPR Question : Subgroups of Homeless Children and Youths Served in LEAs with McKinney- Vento Subgrants N/X075 CSPR Question : Academic Achievement in Mathematics of Homeless Children and Youths Served in LEAs with McKinney- Vento Subgrants N/X078 CSPR Question : Academic Achievement in Reading and Language Arts of Homeless Children and Youths Served in LEAs with McKinney-Vento Subgrants N/X118 CSPR Questions (Total Enrolled) and (Primary Nighttime Residence)* * The data for these questions are collected manually, but governed by this file spec 6 File Specs for EHCY Section 1.9

N/X032: Dropouts N/X037: Title I Part A SWP/TAS Participation N/X040: Graduates/Completers N/X081: Assessment Participation 7 Additional File Specs Which Collect Homeless Served Data for Programs other than EHCY

State Accountability Workbook What is it: State devised plan to meet federal accountability requirements for SEAs and LEAs accepting federal funds for education programs under ESEA. What it Details: o State’s definition of proficiency o How is proficiency measured o Data collection requirements for certain populations 8

WHO IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA COLLECTION All children and youth who meet the McKinney-Vento definition of homelessness WHO MUST PARTICIPATE IN THE DATA COLLECTION Every LEA in the United States. State coordinators are responsible for overseeing the collection and submission of data. WHAT IS A SCHOOL YEAR A school year is determined to be the period July 1 through June 30. Summer school and year-round programs would fall in this definition. MAY ESTIMATED DATA BE SUBMITTED? Estimated data is UNACCEPTABLE. All data submitted must be verifiable. WHAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE COMMENT BOX? Any discrepancies or data collection problems should be noted in the comment box. All explanations should fit within the 4,000 character limitation. WHAT IF THERE IS MISSING DATA? All questions must be filled out completely. Distinctions should be made between zero counts and missing information. 9

o Efforts should be made to eliminate duplicated counts at both LEA and state level o Students should be reported once for the SEA – this may be aided by the use of universal student identifiers o Students should be reported for any LEA where the students was identified as homeless and enrolled in a school in the LEA. A student could be reported in more than one LEA if the student was enrolled and identified as homeless in those LEAs o Some SEAs include Regional Consortia. These are defined as: “a combination of school districts or counties that is recognized in a state as an administrative agency for its public elementary schools or secondary schools.” Examples are ISDs, ESCs, BOCES, RESAs, etc. o Every individual LEA affiliated with or served by a consortium or other regional entity should be counted individually. o Only an individual LEA within a consortium providing services to a homeless student should report that student. DUPLICATED COUNTS

o August: Data Collection Webinar o September: LEA subgrant data should be collected for submission to EDFacts coordinator o October: Finalized CSPR Format; EDFacts data populate CSPR; EDFacts pre-fill reports available o November: CSPR Part 1 Opens o December: CSPR Part 1 Closes (December 17, 2010) o January: ESS opens for current SY file submission. Verification reports issued. o February: CSPR Part 1 re-opens for data revision o March: CSPR Part 1 data finalized and certified o April: National data compiled by NCHE o May: National data report and 3- year comparison published o June: Changes for next year data collection format determined and publicized o July: Data collection guide revised and published 11 Annual CSPR Timeline

Section 1.9 Education of Homeless Children and Youth CSPR Questions Questions Pertaining to LEAs with and without subgrants Question 1.9: Number of LEAs with and Without Subgrants in the State o Collects the number of LEAs with and without subgrants in the state and the number of those LEAs which reported data Question : Number of Homeless Children and Youths by Grade Level ENROLLED in Public School at Any Time During the School Year o Collects the number of children and youths identified as homeless who were enrolled in LEAs with and without subgrants. Enrolled is defined as “those students attending classes and participating fully in school activities.” A child for whom a current record exists is considered “enrolled.” Question : Primary Nighttime Residence of Homeless Children and Youth o Collects the total number of homeless children and youths enrolled in LEAs with and without subgrants categorized by primary nighttime residence. Categories are Doubled-Up, Sheltered, Unsheltered and Hotels/Motels o Data counts should correspond with data counts recorded for number of homeless children and youth enrolled. For each one child reported, one type of residence should be reported for this child. 12

Questions Pertaining to LEAs with Subgrants Only Question : Number of Homeless Children and Youths by Grade Level SERVED by McKinney-Vento Subgrants o Collects data on the total number of homeless children and youths who were served by in LEAs with McKinney-Vento subgrants at any time during the school year. o Definition of “served” includes homeless children who have been served in any way through McKinney-Vento funds. Services would include both direct services and indirect services. The data counts regarding number served may or may not correspond with the data counts for Total Enrolled in LEAs with subgrants. Question : Subgroups of Homeless Students Served by McKinney-Vento Subgrants o Collects data on the total number of homeless children and youths by subgroup who were served by in LEAs with McKinney-Vento subgrants at any time during the school year. o Subgroups include Unaccompanied Youth, Children with Disabilities (IDEA), Limited English Proficiency (LEP) and Migrant o All Subgroups must meet the McKinney-Vento definition of homelessness as well as the definition of their subgroup. o The data counts regarding number served may or may not correspond with the data counts for Number Served in LEAs with subgrants.

Academic Progress of Homeless Students Question Reading Assessment Question Mathematics Assessment o Data submitted by SEA via ESS per File Spec N/X078 for Reading and N/X075 for Mathematics o Collects data on the number of homeless children and youths served by McKinney- Vento subgrants who were o tested on the state Reading/Language Arts assessment and on the state Mathematics assessment and o the number of those tested on each topic that scored at or above the state’s proficiency level. o Data should include all students served by McKinney-Vento subgrants during the testing window that received a valid score and were assigned a proficiency level. o State Accountability Workbook should be consulted to determine how proficiency is measured in the individual state, particularly regarding how many levels of proficiency are measured. o Data for Grades 3-8 should be submitted by individual grade level. Grades 9-12 are consolidated into aggregate figure entitled “High School.” Data for any other grades are not required. o Data should not be disaggregated by the type of test a state administers. Data should be disaggregated by grade level only.