Spatial and non spatial approaches to agricultural convergence in Europe Luciano Gutierrez*, Maria Sassi** *University of Sassari **University of Pavia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Convergence Scenarios: an Overview Jonathan Temple (University of Bristol)
Advertisements

Functional Form and Dynamic Models
Introduction Describe what panel data is and the reasons for using it in this format Assess the importance of fixed and random effects Examine the Hausman.
Dynamic panels and unit roots
Market Potential, MAUP, NUTS and other spatial mysteries Fernando Bruna Jesus Lopez-Rodriguez Andres Faina 11th International Workshop Spatial Econometrics.
Econometric Analysis of Panel Data Panel Data Analysis: Extension –Generalized Random Effects Model Seemingly Unrelated Regression –Cross Section Correlation.
Data organization.
PSME M1 Economic Growth Tutorial.  Introduction ◦ Review of Classic Solow Model ◦ Shortfalls of Solow ◦ Human Capital Accumulation ◦ Convergence Theory.
Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality: how augmented Kuznets hypothesis could explain ICT diffusion? 30 May 2005 Miguel Torres Preto.
0 Productivity Growth and Convergence in Vietnamese Agriculture Wendi Sun Rockland Trust Company March 25 th, 2015.
Exports & growth in island economies Times series cross-sectional analysis Naren Prasad ILO.
Introduction to Applied Spatial Econometrics Attila Varga DIMETIC Pécs, July 3, 2009.
GIS and Spatial Statistics: Methods and Applications in Public Health
19 th Advanced Summer School in Regional Science GIS and spatial econometrics University of Groningen, 4-12 July 2006 “Income and human capital inequalities.
Correlation and Autocorrelation
Pooled Cross Sections and Panel Data II
National Technological Capabilities and Innovation Performance Krzysztof Szczygielski CASE & Lazarski School EACES workshop, 10. April 2010, Moscow.
The Role of Financial System in Economic Growth Presented By: Saumil Nihalani.
On the Evolution of the World Income by Charles I. Jones.
Why Geography is important.
Spatial Methods in Econometrics Daniela Gumprecht Department for Statistics and Mathematics, University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna.
Linear Regression Models Powerful modeling technique Tease out relationships between “independent” variables and 1 “dependent” variable Models not perfect…need.
Specialization, Diversity And Geographical Diffusion Of Knowledge XREAP Workshop Barcelona - July 1st, 2008 Corinne AUTANT-BERNARD, University of Saint-Etienne.
Tse-Chuan Yang, Ph.D The Geographic Information Analysis Core Population Research Institute Social Science Research Institute Pennsylvania State University.
The Paradigm of Econometrics Based on Greene’s Note 1.
IS415 Geospatial Analytics for Business Intelligence
Innovation Economics Class 3.
Economic Growth IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A County-level Analysis.
Part 1: Introduction 1-1/22 Econometrics I Professor William Greene Stern School of Business Department of Economics.
What affects MFP in the long-run? Evidence from Canadian industries Danny Leung and Yi Zheng Bank of Canada, Research Department Structural Studies May.
1 Convergence and Divergence in the Global Economy University of Hull.
The determinants of foreign investment in Russian food industry companies Draft of the paper Student: Gladysheva Anna Group: 41MMAE Argument consultant:
Time and Space Dynamics PhD-student Elena Kotyrlo Supervisor Prof. Magnus Wikström School of Business and Economics, University of Umeå, Sweden Childbearing.
Chapter 10 Dynamics, growth and geography. Long term equilibrium adjustment: dλ i /λ i = η(w i – ω) Value of η sets the speed of adjustment but in general.
Uneven Intraurban Growth in Chinese Cities: A Study of Nanjing Yehua Dennis Wei Department of Geography and Institute of Public and International Affairs.
Spatial Statistics in Ecology: Area Data Lecture Four.
Infrastructure and Long Run Economic Growth David Canning Infrastructure and Growth: Theory, Empirical Evidence and policy Lessons Cape Town May.
Development Workshop Emiko Nishi and Aleksandra Olszewska.
Various topics Petter Mostad Overview Epidemiology Study types / data types Econometrics Time series data More about sampling –Estimation.
Aemen Lodhi (Georgia Tech) Amogh Dhamdhere (CAIDA)
Comparing Economies Across Time & Space Chapter 8-1.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2005 TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS AND GROWTH: THE GENERAL SOLOW MODEL Chapter 5 – second lecture Introducing Advanced Macroeconomics:
Spatial Econometric Analysis Using GAUSS
Economic Growth IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A County-level Analysis.
OPENNESS CAN BE GOOD FOR GROWTH The Role of Policy Complementarities Roberto Chang (Rutgers U.) Linda Kaltani (American U.) Norman Loayza (World Bank)
David Roodman (2008) Presentation by Faraharivony Rakotomamonjy and Estelle Zemmour.
Udviklingsøkonomi - grundfag Lecture 4 Convergence? 1.
The Effects of Agro-clusters on Rural Poverty: A Spatial Perspective for West Java of Indonesia Dadan Wardhana, Rico Ihle, Wim Heijman (Agricultural Economics.
Openness in growth models  Introduction trade gains, conceptualize trade, trade policy example  Openness and growth what is openness (how to define it)
Dynamic Models, Autocorrelation and Forecasting ECON 6002 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland Adapted from Vera Tabakova’s notes.
Statistical methods for real estate data prof. RNDr. Beáta Stehlíková, CSc
Human Capital The exogenous growth model of Solow presents a number of unresolved questions: –The growth rate of the economy in the steady state is not.
ERSA Summer school Groningen 2006 Convergence among regions of the enlarged Europe: impact of spatial effects Nicolas DebarsyCem Ertur.
1 Empirical methods: endogeneity, instrumental variables and panel data Advanced Corporate Finance Semester
Lecture 1 Introduction to econometrics
AUTOCORRELATION 1 Assumption B.5 states that the values of the disturbance term in the observations in the sample are generated independently of each other.
Economic Growth and Income Inequality in Indiana Counties Valerien O. Pede Raymond J.G.M. Florax Dept. of Agricultural Economics Purdue Center for Regional.
Comparison of Estimation Methods for Agricultural Productivity Yu Sheng ABARES the Superlative vs. the Quantity- based Index Approach August 2015.
Luciano Gutierrez*, Maria Sassi**
Spatial spillovers and innovation activity in European regions
1University of Pavia, Dipartimento di Ricerche Aziendali, Pavia, Italy
Chapter 5 Part B: Spatial Autocorrelation and regression modelling.
Commission of the UE Genedec project (FP )
Sven Blank (University of Tübingen)
GROWTH ECONOMICS and Fund-raising in international cooperation SECS-P01, CFU 9 Economics for Development academic year HUMAN CAPITAL MODELS.
Spatial Econometric Analysis
GROWTH ECONOMICS and Fund-raising in international cooperation SECS-P01, CFU 9 Economics for Development academic year HUMAN CAPITAL MODELS.
Spatial Econometric Analysis
Territorial Trends and Challenges in Regional Policies
Spatial externalities of technological innovation
Presentation transcript:

Spatial and non spatial approaches to agricultural convergence in Europe Luciano Gutierrez*, Maria Sassi** *University of Sassari **University of Pavia

1. Introduction Political and financial perspective Empirical perspective - Real convergence: a key objective of the EU - Interest to agriculture Accelleration of growth and income CAP and RD for territorial disparities reduction - Little attention - Rather small number of studies that deal with theoretical and empirical advancement The role of spatial effects

1. Introduction 2. Outline 1. Barro-style methodology 2. Cross- sectional regressions 3. Panel data regressions Spatial effects 80 EU regions NUTS ( / )

1. Introduction 2. Outline 1. Barro-style methodology 3. Cross- sectional models Annual average growth rate of per capita income parameter of convergence Per capita income at the initial year If  is negative and statistically significant, the neoclassical hypothesis of convergence is verified: a process only driven by the rate of technological progress

1. Introduction 2. Outline Technological diffusion 3. Cross- sectional models Neoclassical perspective Economic geography entirely disembodied and understood as a pure public good a regional public good with limited spatial range differentials of income and growth rate across regions cannot be explained in terms of different stocks of knowledge regions might show different path of growth even in opposite direction knowledge Empiric literature

1. Introduction 2. Outline Spatial effects 3. Cross- sectional models 1. Spatial autocorrelation 2. Spatial heterogeneity Coincidence of attribute similarity and location similarity The value of variables sampled at nearby location are not independent from each others Assumption of independent residuals Unobservable variables and steady state Geographic spill- over effects

1. Introduction 2. Outline 1. Barro-style methodology 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 2. Spatial lag model Endogenous spatial lag variable 3. Spatial error model Omitted variables

1. Introduction 2. Outline Spatial effects 3. Cross- sectional models 1. Spatial autocorrelation 2. Spatial heterogeneity Structural instability or group-wise heteroskedasticity Possibility of multiple, locally stable steady state equilibria Convergence clubs

1. Introduction 2. Outline 1. Barro-style methodology 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 4. GWR models each data point is a regression point that is weighted by the distance from the regression point itself 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 1. Barro-style methodology 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 5. Panel data models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models c. Spatial autocorrelation a. Time dependence b. Space dependence 2. SLMs 3. SEMs

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Serial dependence of the dependent variable Intensity of the contemporaneous spatial effect Space-time autoregressive and space-time dependence 5. Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models 1. Dependence results from the neighborhood locations in the previous time period 5. Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Dependence results from location and its neighborhood in the previous time period 5. Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Time and spatial lag are included 5. Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Spatial panel data models

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 5. Spatial panel data models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models GMM estimator All the special cases of the general specification can be estimated with only few modifications to moment restrictions With spatial lags it shows good properties and can be easly estimated

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Results 4. Results Barro-style methodology

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Results 4. Results

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Results: GWR 4. Results

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Results: GWR and local parameters 4. Results

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models 4. Results GWR and local parameters of convergence ( )

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Results: dynamic spatial panel model ( ) 4. Results

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models 4. Results Results: dynamic spatial panel model ( )

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Conclusions 4. Results 5. Conclusions 4.1 Cross-sectional models 4.2 Panel models Specification of the weight matrix Little formal guidance available for cross-country and panel data spatial models (Florax & de Graaff) Global spatial cross- sectional models Spatial panel data models Exogenous constructed W matrix Binary scheme designed according to the Queesn’s contiguity Euclidian distances – row normalised GWR Enogenous constructed W Fixed vs. adaptive bandwidth n. regions into the kernel Type of spatial weight

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Conclusions 4. Results 5. Conclusions 4.1 Cross-sectional models 4.2 Panel models Convergence clubs Different explanations by theoretical literature Neoclassical perspective Endogenous growth th. Saving rate out of wage larger than saving rate out of capital Different initial values of human capital and knowledge Panel data environment?

1. Introduction 2. Outline 3. Cross- sectional models 3.1 Global spatial cross-sectional models 3.2 Local spatial cross-sectional models 4. Panel data models Conclusions 4. Results 5. Conclusions 4.1 Cross-sectional models 4.2 Panel models Spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity Policy interventions Regions with equilibrium values below the average NUTS2 Administrative units Different agricultural and socio economic regions