Review for final exam. Structure of essay Your thoughts?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

MDAW 2013: DCH & MBK.  Realism  Idealism  Liberalism  Marxism  Critical Theory(s)
International Relations Theory
Where Are We Now? Get Out The Map 1.What is PA’s response to Plunkitt? We will build new organizations that reconcile bureaucracy and democracy. We know.
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
The Realist Paradigm- Hans Morgenthau
Realism States main actors States are unitary States are rational States’ primary interest is national security.
International Relations Grand Debates
Introducing Governance.  Much used term especially ‘good governance’ and ‘democratic governance’  From Greek word kubernân = to pilot or steer  Originally.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
International Relations
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
PAD190 PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Theories of International Relations- Liberalism Robert Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence (1977)  The liberal conceptualization.
International Relations
Structural Functionalism Theory
International Relations
Outline News items Iran nuclear agreement How to prepare for quizzes Main takeaways for today Revisit power from end of last class Structure for comparing.
Outline Intro to feminist/disenfranchised theories of IR Feminist/disenfranchised theories in a nutshell Facts that need explaining Six tenets of feminist/disenfranchised.
Midterm Review. RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? ConflictCooperationGender/racial conflicts rather than interstate.
Social Constructivism
International Political Economy The Rational Choice Approach in IPE Ch. 5 Lecture 8.
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Constructivism.
 Intro, readings, etc.  Theoretical introduction / intro to alternative theories of IR  How international relations differ from domestic politics 
IR theories: Institutionalism
Chapter 3 Contending Perspectives: How to Think about International Relations Theoretically.
Montclair State University 10/12/2015. Sociological Inquiry Families do not exist or evolve in isolation Rather, they react to and have an influence on.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
 10 questions  1 minute per question  Quiz ends at 10:10am  If you have any concerns that your I>clicker is not working, get out a piece of paper.
Three perspectives on international politics IR theories: Realism.
INT 3131 Lecture Outline Theories of Political Integration 1. Functionalism 2. Neo-Functionalism 3. Interdependence 4. International Regimes 5. Systems.
Post-Modern Views and Critiques of IR. A commonality of Post-Modern views of IR is an emphasis on how political action is affected by language, ideas,
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Lenses – The Great Debate Unit 1 – Theories of World Politics.
I NTERNATIONAL R ELATIONS AND I NSTITUTIONS LAW213 by TEP Punloeu, LLM.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
Course Evaluations Please fill out the course evaluation for this course – I value your feedback on the course and future students will benefit from the.
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
1. Interstate system is not anarchic. 2. Actors (states) are not unitary in nature. 3. Behavior is not (fully) rational. 4. Military force is not all-
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
Pearson Education, Inc. © 2006 CHAPTER 3 Alternatives to Power Politics INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Seventh Edition Joshua S. Goldstein.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Realism vs Liberalism. What would you do? To be able to define the competing international relations theories of realism and liberalism.
IR 306 Foreign Policy Analysis
International Relations
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Please fill them out. Thanks!
Global Politics: Comparative theories Key terms
Power & IR theorıes.
Lecture #2 Alternative Theoretical Perspectives: Constructivism, Marxism, Feminist Theory.
** Emergence of Realism
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Introduction to International Relations
Midterm Review Midterm online office hours TONIGHT 8-9pm via CHAT link on Canvas – see you there.
Case Study 1: Grading Rubric
IR in the news Steel/aluminum tariffs and responses to them
Introduction to Global Politics
Outline for today Midterm Review
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Outline Case Assignment 1 Summarize institutionalism
CREATE REPLACEMENT FOR SYRIA EXERCISE AT START OF CLASS
Introduction to Global Politics
Introduction How to read for this class Plagiarism Office hours today
Midterm evaluation of teaching
Theories of International Relations
Lecture 3: Realist Theory of IR
Presentation transcript:

Review for final exam

Structure of essay Your thoughts?

Structure of essay: My thoughts Lots to cover: 2 issue areas, 3 theories, 6 tenets Cover as many tenets as you can cover well, at least Ensure you Cover major points Compare across theories and across issue areas Show clear knowledge of theories and application Keep intro and conclusion short Use headings

My suggested structure Intro Focus Describe facts about Focus: conflict is common in issue 1 but cooperation among people in different countries more common in issue 2; in both issues there is some cooperation among countries Facts of Issue 1 fit best with focus of Realists while facts of Issue 2 fit better with focus of Feminist/Disenfranchised view; similarities in interstate cooperation fit better with institutionalism Repeat for A-G-M-O-D Compare issues: overall, Institutionalism explains more of Issue 1 but Realism plus Feminist theories explains more of Issue 2 Conclusion

RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like?

RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? Conflict Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self- help Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power

RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? ConflictCooperation Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Asymmetry in interdependence; issue-specific power Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self- help Anarchy mitigated by norms, rules, & institutions Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power Alternation of cooperation & conflict

RealismInstitutionalismFeminist Theory Focus – what is being explained? ConflictCooperationConflict between genders, rather than between states Actors – who are considered the main actors to watch? States are primary and act as unitary rational actors Multiple actors (states, MNCs, NGOs); not always unitary or rational Individuals gendered as masculine and feminine Goals – what are the goals of the main actors? Survival, security, and hence, power Econ & social goals as well as security Individual security and well-being Means – what means do actors use to achieve their goals? Military force is usable, effective, and fungible Asymmetry in interdependence; issue-specific power use of gender identities, even by the state, in service of the state Organizing Principles – how is the international system organized? Anarchy and self- help Anarchy mitigated by norms, rules, & institutions Patriarchy, gendered hierarchical structure Dynamics – what does the process of international relations look like? Acquisition and balancing of power Alternation of cooperation & conflict Reconstruction & maintenance of gendered hierarchies

Applications to different issue areas Security IPE Human rights Environment

Concepts Security Conflict, cooperation, harmony Power Role of states Goals of states Means states use Roles of institutions

The future of IR Focus Actors Goals Means Organizing Principle Dynamics

Individuals can make a difference Structure vs. agency as deep theme of course How to act in small ways that make big changes to structure over time 1,000s of small decisions each year – bias your decisions toward your goals Individuals can make a difference Jody Williams and Campaign to Ban Landmines Razia Jan: Afghan-born, lives in Massachusetts, provides free education to Afghan girls Razia Jan: Skateistan (min 1-8) Skateistan