1 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 3/24/05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6-7 July 20051B. C. Bigelow - UM Physics Finite element analysis of DECam May 11 C1 corrector lens – gravity and thermal load cases Bruce C. Bigelow, Physics.
Advertisements

SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
A vertical-flexure CCD module Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 10/7/04.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Project #3: Design of a MEMS Vertical Actuator Jianwei Heng Alvin Tai ME128 Spring 2005.
Ceramic Focal Plane Components For SNAP B. C
Silicon Carbide: Manufacturing Processes and Material Properties
M2 Assembly and Feed Optics Ron Price August 25, 2003.
Preliminary ANSYS Results: CCD Fixture and Lens Frame Andrew Lambert.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Mechanical Systems Peer Review, March 27, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-0XXXX Section 7.1 Stress Analysis 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope:
MOSAIC focal plane leveling V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories 01/22/2008 1Caltech Optical Observatories (01/22/2008)
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
Cryostat Structural, Thermal, and Vacuum Systems 14 October 2008 Martin Nordby, Gary Guiffre, John Ku, John Hodgson.
Space Frame Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 11/04/04.
Scaling Down - The Optimal Choice? Fritz B. Prinz Departments of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford,
Design Analysis ‘n Manufacturing By - Yogesh Arora and Sangam Sinha.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
Determinate Space Frame Telescope Structures for SNAP Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 7/28/04.
Department of Flow, Heat and Combustion Mechanics – Ghent University – UGent Linear stability analysis of a supercritical loop C.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Standardized CCD and MCT detector mounting configurations B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 2/2/05.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
LBNL CCD Packaging “Yale Mount” Mechanical Analysis Dan Cheng LBNL.
Grid Thermal Distortion 16 September 2008 Martin Nordby, John Hodgson.
Sag of ZTF components Callahan 9/4/2014. Corrector Trim Plate analysis.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.
Design of Recuperative Heat Exchanger Presented by -- Jinying Zhu.
Thermo-mechanics J. Cugnoni, LMAF / EPFL Three kind of « thermo-mechanics » 1. Un-coupled: Known temperature field => mechanical model (linear statics.
05/04/05 FEM Analysis of PA 44 Engine Mount PIPER SEMINOLE –PA-44 TWIN ENGINE AIRCRAFT.
Structural and Thermal Calculation for Recuperative Heat Exchanger Recuperative Heat Exchanger Presented by -- Jinying Zhu.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
VG1 i T i March 9, 2006 W. O. Miller ATLAS Silicon Tracker Upgrade Upgrade Stave Study Topics Current Analysis Tasks –Stave Stiffness, ability to resist.
BTeV Pixel Substrate C. M. Lei November Design Spec. Exposed to >10 Mrad Radiation Exposed to Operational Temp about –15C Under Ultra-high Vacuum,
Opto-Mechanics for SNAP at UM
FVTX substrate FEA1 FVTX Substrate FEA C. M. Lei March 02, 2006.
LAT TVAC Test Delta-PDR1 GLAST LAT Project25 May 2005 LAT Environmental Test Planning and Design Delta-Preliminary Design Review 25 May 2005 LAT T-Vac.
August 7, 2003K. Chow, LHC Luminosity Detector Thermal Analysis1 Analysis cases Approach: Start simple to get information— with speed with confidence that.
An alternative spectrograph mount Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/14/04.
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Calculate Displacement Due to Random Vibration For A Space Based Focal Plane Anthony J. Davenport Senior Mechanical Engineer.
Design and Development of the FSM (Fast steering Secondary Mirror)
GIGATRACKER SUPPORTING PLATE COOLING SYSTEM SIMULATION 1Vittore Carassiti - INFN FECERN, 11/12/2007.
IRMOS Diffraction Grating Integral Tab Design  Performance of an optical system is highly sensitive to the surface distortion of the optics in the system.
SEPTEMBER 2002 Pixel Support Tube A. Smith LBNL 1 ATLAS Pixel Detector Heater Panel Testing Alexis Smith September 17, 2002.
18/02/20161 ASU Mechanical aspects Julien Bonis
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 1 – Sub-modules Bruce C. Bigelow University of Michigan Department of Physics 5/17/04.
SNAP CCD packaging study Flex-fold Internal flexure frame Robin Lafever September 2003 CCD Aluminum Nitride Invar frame CRIC, Clocks Molybdenum frame CCD.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
FVTX substrate FEA1 FVTX Substrate FEA C. M. Lei March 02, 2006.
Thermal modeling, interfaces, test results LBNL Composites Workshop February 29-March 3, 2016.
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
Stave thermal analysis Cooling connections CO2 warm Test
Mechanical aspects of SiW Ecal PCBs
Thermal Shield Connection Study
FP420 Detector Cooling Thermal Considerations
By Arsalan Jamialahmadi
Hybrid Mechanical/Thermal Design ideas
Department of Physics, University of Michigan
Thermo-mechanics J. Cugnoni, LMAF / EPFL 2009.
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
SNAP NIR Detector Packaging Development: Universal SiC Package
Department of Physics, University of Michigan
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Another Modular Focal Plane: Part 2 – FP assembly
Space Frame Structures for SNAP: Another secondary structure…
Standardized CCD and MCT detector mounting configurations
Thermo-mechanics J. Cugnoni, LMAF / EPFL 2012.
Presentation transcript:

1 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts B. C. Bigelow, UM Physics 3/24/05

2 Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts Motivations: 1.Provide a common mount design for Vis and IR detectors 2.Minimize detector package SS thermal stresses 3.Minimize detector package SS temperature gradients 4.Accommodate various detector package materials (Invar, TZM) 5.Accommodate various FPA baseplate materials (TZM, SiC, ?) 6.Accommodate local detector PCBs, connectors, heaters, etc. 7.Minimize weight, maximize first resonance

3 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts Detector space frame! – but fabrication unfriendly…

4 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts A fabrication-friendly version…

5 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts Fabrication options for hexapod: 1.Fabrication method may depend on hexapod material choice 2.Powder metallurgy methods (HIP, laser sintering) 3.Abrasive water-jet cutting 4.Laser cutting 5.Plunging and/or wire EDM 6.Stress-relieve rough blanks prior to cutting 7.Polish blanks flat and parallel prior to cutting 8.Final grind/polish mounting pads to spec. after cutting 9.Other?

6 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts

7 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts Arbitrary mount height of 12mm – can be lower

8 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts

9 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts

10 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts

11 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Finite Element Analyses Quantify performance via FE analyses : 1.Hexapod flexures are 1mm wide x 3mm high (all cases) 2.Hexapod material is TZM (Invar another option) 3.Static analyses: 100g deflections and stresses 4.Dynamic analyses: first 10 frequencies and mode shapes 5.Steady-state thermal: stress for -150K temp excursions 6.Steady-state thermal: heat flow and temperature gradients 7.Summary follows individual results

12 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Focal Plane Material Properties Material Properties TZM (Moly) Invar 36SiC (CVD) E (GPa) Yield (MPa) Density (kg/m^3) CTE (PPM/K) K (W/mK) Room temp. material properties

13 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA - static Static FEA: 1.100g accelerations, Gx, Gy, Gz 2.Det. package base models only, no AlN, MCT, epoxy, etc. 3.Two material combinations – Invar/TZM, and TZM/TZM 4.Simplified model of hexapod mount (no “pads”) 5.Max deflections: microns 6.Max stresses: MPa (Invar/TZM) Invar yield = 300 MPa TZM yield = 860 Mpa 7.Low stress in package material - max. 20 Mpa (point load)

14 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA - static Gz, Z-axis deflections – 1.4 microns max Deflections in meters, 1.4 microns max.

15 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA - static Gz, Z-axis deflections – 1.4 microns max Stress in Pa, 26 MPa max., (point loads)

16 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA - dynamic Dynamic FEA: 1.Det. package base models only, no AlN, Si, MCT, epoxy, etc. 2.Two material combinations – Invar/TZM, and TZM/TZM 3.Simplified model of TZM hexapod mount 4.First resonances: TZM/invar – 3000 Hz TZM/TZM – 3053 Hz

17 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA - dynamic Gz, Z-axis deflections – 1.4 microns max

18 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Steady-state thermal stress: 1.Minus 150 K temperature excursion 2.Baseplate, hexapod mount, and package base 3.Four material combinations for baseplate and package: TZM/Invar, TZM/TZM, SiC/TZM, SiC/Invar 4.Simplified model of hexapod mount (no “pads”) 5.Deflections: 6.9 – 8.7 microns (TZM/TZM, TZM/Invar) 6.Deflections: microns (SiC/Invar, SiC/TZM) 7.Pkg stresses: 2.3 Mpa (TZM/Invar) 8.Pkg stresses: Mpa (SiC/TZM, SiC/Invar)

19 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Gz, Z-axis deflections – 1.4 microns max Elements

20 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Stress in Pa, 14.8 MPa max. (point loads)

21 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Steady-state heat flow: 1.Baseplate, hexapod mount, and package base mW heat load imposed on top surface of package 3.Baseplate – back side sunk to a cold source at 140 K 4.Four material combinations for baseplate and package: TZM/Invar, TZM/TZM, SiC/TZM, SiC/Invar 5.Simplified model of TZM hexapod mount (no “pads”) 6.Max. temp variation: 0.56 K (TZM/Invar) 7.Min. temp variation: 0.05 K (SiC/TZM and TZM/TZM) 8.Min final temp: K (SiC/TZM) 9.Max final temp: K (TZM/Invar)

22 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Boundary cond.

23 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA – steady state thermal Temp variations (K) – SiC/TZM

24 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics FEA summary MaterialsPkg, 100g, X,Y,ZFn-150Khexpkg D T TfTf BasePkguxuyuz s,MPa Hz uz s, Mpa s, MPa KK TZMInv TZM SiCInv SiCTZM deflections, u, in microns

25 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Detector mount taxonomy Yale flexLBL flex UM flexUM hexapod

26 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Detector mount comparison Pkg thermal stress, -150K Pkg temp gradient First resonance Design:MPaKHz Yale flex LBL flex UM flex UM hexapod

27 3/24/05Bruce C. Bigelow -- UM Physics Hexapod Detector Mounts Conclusions: 1.Hexapod mount kinematically connects detectors to focal plane: Low thermal stress for -150 K temperature change Large conduction cross-section minimizes thermal gradients Common mount design works for both NIR and VIS detector packages Very low thermal stresses in base plate, mount, and packages 2.Hexapod provides “optimal” support for detectors: Minimum mass, maximum stiffness solution Very high first resonance – 3000 Hz or higher 3.Hexapod mount is readily fabricable by standard methods 4.Hexapod performance demonstrated via FE analysis