Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy 2009 10/2/09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optical Astronomy Imaging Chain: Telescopes & CCDs.
Advertisements

Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
Astronomical Detectors
A bit about CCD imaging Paul McGale. Signal-to-noise ratio SNR = C star T / √(C star T + C sky T+ C dark T + R 2 ) where: T is the total integration time.
CCDs. CCDs—the good (+)  Linear response  photometry is “simple” +High efficiency, compared to other detectors +Sensitive to many wavelengths +2-D arrays.
Silicon PIN Diodes: A Promising Technology for UV-Optical Space Astronomy 11 April 2003 Presentation at NHST Workshop Bernard J. Rauscher, Donald F. Figer,
RIT Course Number Lecture Noise
ENERGY a proposal for a Multi-channel Cmos Camera F. Pedichini, A. Di Paola, R. Speziali INAF Oss. Astr. Roma h e-
RIT Course Number Lecture CMOS Detectors
06/02/2008CCDs1 Charge Coupled Device M.Umar Javed M.Umar Javed.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. Correction of Raw Image with Bias, Dark, Flat Images Flat Field Image Bias Image Output Image Dark Frame Raw.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
Signal vs Noise: Image Calibration First… some terminology:  Light Frame: The individual pictures you take of your target.  Dark Frame: An image taken.
CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
Your Observing Challenge: White Dwarfs in Open Star Clusters.
Processing of exoplanet full field images Farid Karioty CoRoT Week 12/06/2005.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
SPiDeR  First beam test results of the FORTIS sensor FORTIS 4T MAPS Deep PWell Testbeam results CHERWELL Summary J.J. Velthuis.
Limits on Reciprocity Failure in 1.7  m cut-off NIR astronomical detectors Wolfgang Lorenzon T. Biesiadzinski, R. Newman, M. Schubnell, G. Tarle, C. Weaverdyck.
Super-hot pixels, hot pixels and DSNU on Hawaii-2RG detector
Science Impact of Sensor Effects or How well do we need to understand our CCDs? Tony Tyson.
Beating Noise Observational Techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 11 Textbook.
Quantum Efficiency Measurements of a NIRSpec infrared sensor in the ODL* Peter McCullough, Project P. I. Mike Regan, ODL Lead Kevin Lindsay Eddie Bergeron.
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
DfA Garching NIR wavefront sensing 1 Low-Noise IR Wavefront Sensing with a Teledyne HxRG David Hale Gustavo Rahmer & Roger Smith Caltech 1.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
Observational Astrophysics I
SNAP Collaboration meeting / Paris 10/20071 SPECTROMETER DETECTORS From science requirements to data storage.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
NICMOS Calibration Challenges in the Ultra Deep Field Rodger Thompson Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
11-Jun-04 1 Joseph Hora & the IRAC instrument team Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope.
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
NIRISS NRM bad pixel tolerance analysis David Lafrenière 2012 February 21.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
February 21, 2002TIPS meeting1 "Data contained herein is exempt from ITAR regulations under CFR 125.4(13) -- data approved for public disclosure." TIPS.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
Observations with AMBER  General overview  P2VM  OB preparation with P2PP P2PP / OB / templates Available templates for observation procedure Typical.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
LSST CCD Chip Calibration Tiarra Stout. LSST Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Camera – 1.6 m by 3 m. 3.2 billion pixels kg (~6173 lbs) 10 square.
Comparison of a CCD and the Vanilla CMOS APS for Soft X-ray Diffraction Graeme Stewart a, R. Bates a, A. Blue a, A. Clark c, S. Dhesi b, D. Maneuski a,
Topic Report Photodetector and CCD
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
JWST-MIRIM (The MIRI Imager)
Observation of RR Lyrae Variable RS Boo Results and Future Work
“ Who will I blame my mistakes on. ” Dr
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
CCD Image Processing …okay, I’ve got a bunch of .fits files, now what?
Institute of Cosmos Sciences - University of Barcelona
Detectors of JWST Near IR Instruments
C.Baltay and S. Perlmutter December 15, 2014
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Intra-pixel Sensitivity Testing Preliminary Design Review
Persistence Experiment Preliminary Design Review
Intro to CCD Imaging Joe Roberts
Detector Parameters Marco Sirianni - ESA.
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
Announcements HR Diagram lab will be extended for one week. I’ll talk about it today. Homework: Chapter 9 # 1, 2 & 3 Next week is a Dark Sky Night. If.
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
Persistence Experiment Preliminary Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09

Overview of Talk Brief overview of Hybrid SiPIN CMOS and the HyViSI Specs of our H2RG in context of guiding Persistence: the X-factor Results from Kitt Peak 2.1m unguided Results from guiding the Kitt Peak 2.1m telescope with a HyViSI H2RG 8/2/092

10/6/09 HyViSi SiPIN Arrays H4RG MUX H4RG detector Teledyne’s Hybrid Visible Silicon (HyViSi) PIN (P-Intrinsic-N) Diodes p + implant n-n- V SUB

H2RG /2/09 Specs and Fe 55 Spectra for H2RG Most of these specs can be folded into centroid accuracy calculations….so what’s the point of testing guide mode for an empirical result?

H2RG Telescope Data Picture taken of Saturn after Exposure + Dither shows Persistence Very interesting that contrast is still detectable in persistent image even though all pixels in previous exposure were saturated Raw Read; No subtraction Where Saturn is in this exposure Where Saturn was in last exposure

6 Persistence from Stars Persistence Effect seen in all HyViSIs “Core” Pixels rapidly gain counts “Halo” pixels see a decrease in counts, but eventually integrate positively “Sky” pixels are unaffected, providing measure of what photocurrent should be Effect lasts for ~ seconds depending on offending star flux and fluence Core Halo Sky *Image snippets have first read subtracted; Plot shows raw ADU Where star is in this exposure Where star was in last exposure time

Effect on Centroid Measurement 8/2/09 7 1st ramp 2nd ramp *Image snippets have first read subtracted “Wedges” in atmospheric turbulence can cause large displacements of image for hundreds of milliseconds What happens if bright star light is displaced? Does image persistence create large error in calculated centroid? 7

Persistence Model 8/2/098

Attempt to Simulate 8/2/099

Observing at Kitt Peak We brought the RIDL Dewar to the Kitt Peak 2.1m Tested 3 HyViSi detectors on 3 separate runs –4/24/07-5/1/07H4RG-007 –11/13/07-11/20/07H1RG-022 –12/11/07-12/19/07H2RG Lovely snow storm in December! 8/2/0910

Kitt Peak 2.1m Details Up Right: LSST Baseline Filters Above: Dewar attached to 2.1m Telescope Right: Oscillations in Right Ascension and Declination caused by periodic error of worm gear in motors

Application of Guide Windows In a CCD, frame rate depends on size of CCD even when using a “window” In CMOS, window frame rate is independent of imager size 8/2/09 LSST Focal Plane Wouldn’t it be nice if all LSST detectors could be used for guiding?

Guide Mode HxRG multiplexers have a “Guide Mode” - Full frame integration while subwindow is readout - Readout is interleaved …. Pixels integrating charge Full frame drop or read Window reset or read We used guide mode to guide 2.1m telescope with sequence on right

Short Exposures without Guiding 8/2/09 NGC26813 Combining multiple short exposures yields good point spread function Image of NGC2681 from stack of 40 second exposures

Long Exposure Without Guiding 1800 second exposure of M=6.55 in V-band star SAO54817 taken with H1RG-022 Tracking error smears stars and makes them look like jelly beans

Long Exposure With Guiding 8/2/ second exposure of M=7 in V-band star IRAS taken with H2RG PSF is reduced greatly. Guide window affects pixels in shared rows and columns Guide Window sampled at 25 hz for 8 seconds before moving telescope

Guide Mode Comparison

Summary Guide Mode of HyViSI offers unique feature to guide telescope while simultaneously taking deep field exposures Centroid accuracy for guide star can be predicted with standard signal to noise calculations that fold in read noise, dark current, etc. Effect of Persistence is less trivial since analytical fits to latent images have large errors Empirical results from using H2RG at Kitt Peak 2.1m show that persistence of guide star does not negatively impact centroid measurements 8/2/0918

Additional Slides 8/2/0919

Dark Current H4RG shows higher dark current than other SiPIN devices Teledyne indicates source of problem was found in unit cell and fixed New H4RG has order of magnitude less dark current 8/2/0920

Read Noise Total CDS Noise on H4RG ~ 15 e - CDS Noise on H1RG and H2RG ~8 e - Plot on left shows noise with multiple non-destructive samples 8/2/0921

Detective Quantum Efficiency Integrating sphere with monochromator and calibrated photodiode used to obtain QE vs. wavelength 8/2/0922