A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Year-Long Learning Communities Rethinking the Summer Bridge Nikolas Huot, Assistant Director for First-Year Programs.
Advertisements

State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia GEAR UP Summer Programs.
Georgia State University Sadé Tramble, M.Ed- Academic Advisor
Higher Education Conference. Engaging Faculty in Retention Issues Part II Presidential Summit on Retention The Need and Scope February 20, 2007 Dr. Richard.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
High Risk Factors for Retention Freshman Year Experience Review of the Literature Review of Preliminary Data.
THE E.O.P. ACADEMY Increasing retention for low- income, first generation students.
1 COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) UCLA’s Higher Education Research Institute COOPERATIVE INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM (CIRP) Presentation.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
Institutional Research & Effectiveness Who Are the Freshmen at Austin Peay? Institutional Research & Effectiveness Ellen Smyth May 2009.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Facts about First-Year Students at Central Connecticut State University Presented by Braden J. Hosch, Ph.D. Director of Institutional Research & Assessment.
Undergraduate Persistence and Graduation Rates Bernadette Gray-Little Faculty Council September 15, 2006.
OU Student Profile Who are OU’s Students? June 7, 2006 Laura Schartman.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
The Role of the Office Institutional Research and Program Assessment at Baruch College Presented by: John Choonoo, Director Jimmy Jung, Assistant Director.
Expectation & Experience Surveys 1998 & 2002 AIRPO, June West Point, New York.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
Step Into Your Future: Understanding College Fit.
From Recruitment to Retention: Focusing Campus Efforts to Promote Transfer Student Success National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January.
1 College Student Expectations Questionnaire Presentation by the Office of Assessment Division of Student Affairs Mississippi State University Research.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Institutional Effectiveness 2010/2011 Core Indicators Institutional Research Wendy Dove – October 2011 COMMON GROUND “Progress towards a decade of student.
Dual Enrollment. What is Dual Enrollment  Dual enrollment classes are taken at your local high school and taught by high school instructors. Students.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Profile of an Engineering Education and Professions Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and.
New Faculty Orientation AUGUST 2012 Scott Belobrajdic Assistant Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management Rendleman Hall 1313 X 2043 siue.edu/factbook.
1 Retention Update Susan Awbrey November Why Retain Students?
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
YOUR ROAD TO SUCCESS MONTIE MONTGOMERY MHS COUNSELOR WHERE WILL IT TAKE YOU.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Regular Versus Shorter University Orientations: A Comparison of Attendee Make-up Carla Abreu-Ellis & Jason Brent Ellis.
The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).
ISECON 2008 Strategies for Increasing IT Enrollment: Recruiting, Retaining and Encouraging the Transfer of Women and Underrepresented Groups to Four-Year.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Ms. Leslie Croot, Analyst.
Helping Freshmen Succeed February 2013 Scott Belobrajdic Assistant Vice Chancellor for Enrollment Management Rendleman Hall 1313 X 2043.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Institutional Research WEST VIRGINIA ADVENTURE ASSESSMENT Created by Jessica Michael & Vicky Morris-Dueer.
A Brief Look at Enrollment Management and Admissions.
Student Affairs 08/10. Enrollment 11,648 undergraduate students –9,855 Full Time –1,793 Part Time 2,222 graduate students –1,237 Full Time – 985 Part.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
Making Connections Dimensions of Student Engagement 2010 Findings.
Your future. Our Mission. futurestudents.mst.edu Founded 1870 | Rolla, Missouri.
Selected Results of President’s Office Survey of Alumni Graduating in 1997/98 The Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies July 15, 2003 Jennifer.
Provost’s Address to the University Senate December 13, 2004.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
Transfer Student Survey Enrollment Management Student Assessments for Missouri S&T Transfer Conference | October 9, 2008
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Miami University Hamilton Campus Visit Welcome to Miami University Hamilton.
GRADUATE IN FOUR MAKING A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION INTO COLLEGE.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
College: Making it Happen Source: College - Making it Happen A Guide for California Middle School Families and Educators.
2012 Summer Assessment Academy June 14, Overview Data Barriers Solutions Identification of Best Practices Partnerships – Adult Education, P-12 &
GRADUATE IN FOUR MAKING A SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION INTO COLLEGE.
Retain a Freshman Today…
Bridging the Gap for Students at Risk: A Data-Driven Case
NFO - Overview of WCU Students
Getting to Know Our AHS Undergraduate Students
Presentation transcript:

A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008

 Who They Are?  What They Expect from Life and BGSU?  What They Are Doing?  What They Think of BGSU and BGSU Faculty?

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  15,638 main campus undergraduates  2,981 main campus graduate students  2,065 Firelands students  20,684 total  Full/Part Time: Full Time Part Time main campus undergraduates93% 7% main campus graduate students52% 48% Firelands undergraduates 57% 43%

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  Residency: In-State Out O.S. Int’l main campus undergraduates88% 10% 2% main campus graduate students67% 19% 15% Firelands99.6% 0.4% 0%  Average Age: main campus undergraduates: 21 main campus graduate students:31 students at Firelands:25

Enrollment (Fall 2007)  Gender: FemaleMale main campus undergraduates54%46% main campus graduate students63%37% Firelands65%35%  Ethnicity : Minority Eu.A Oth/UN main campus undergraduates15% 81% 4% main campus graduate students 9% 73%18% Firelands 9% 87% 3%

Applications and Admissions: (main campus first year students) Fall 02Fall 03Fall 04Fall 05Fall 06Fall 07 Applicants Admitted Acceptance Rate91.5%90.1%89.8%89.5%89.4%87.1% Enrolled Matriculation Rate39.2%38.3%39.0%36.3%35.1%33.2% Among incoming Fall 2008 freshmen:  67% of them had at least one other college besides BGSU admitted them  81% of them said BGSU was their First Choice

Family (main campus first year students, 08)  Parents both alive and living with each other: 66%  Parents both alive, divorced or living apart: 30%  One or both deceased 4%  Mother and father high school or less 19%  At least one parent a college graduate 63%  Both parents college graduates 27%  Less than $30,000 12%  $30,000-$49,999 15%  $50,000-$74,999 26%  $75,000-$99,999 20%  $100,000 or More 28%

College Expense $1500 and more from … (main campus first year students)  Parents, Relatives, Friends74% 62%  Other College Grant/Scholarship24% 52%  Other College Loan24%52%  Other Loan13% 25%  Pell Grant 9% 21%  College Work Study 6% 20%  Part-Time Job On Campus 4% 13%  78% of incoming freshman has concerns about their ability to finance their college education  About 60% of them are planning to work 10 hours or more per week during school year

Academic Background (main campus first year students)  Average HS GPA: 3.2  Average ACT Scores: 22  Special tutoring/remedial work in Mathematics21%27%32% Science 6% 7%10% Foreign Language 7% 7%10% Fall 2002Fall 2003Fall 2004Fall 2005Fall 2006Fall 2007 N%N%N%N%N%N% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % <= %511.6%621.7%611.8%401.2%481.6% Total % % % % % % Average ACT

What They Expect from Life and BGSU?

Values for Life (main campus first year students, 2008)  being very well off financially 85%  raising a family 80%  helping others in difficulty 73%  becoming an authority in my field 66%

Why They Attend College (main campus first year students, 2008)  to prepare for a professional career 92%  to get a better job 74%  to make more money 71%  to learn more about things that interest me 69%

Reasons to Pick BGSU (main campus first year students, 2008)  BGSU graduates get good jobs 58%  My BGSU visit was pleasant and friendly 55%  BGSU offers unique educational programs 49%  BGSU’s academic reputation 49%

What They Expect from BGSU (main campus first year students, 2008)?  get a Bachelor’s degree 85%  find a job in my major after graduation 75%  be satisfied with BGSU 69%  get a job to help pay for college expenses 59%  make at least a “B” average 52%  need extra time to complete your degree 4%  transfer to another college before graduation 4%  fail one or more courses 0%  drop out of college temporarily/permanently 0%

Graduation Rates (main campus undergraduates) The main campus four-year and six-year freshmen graduation rates are higher than for other moderately selective universities that participate in the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange. The actual six-year graduation rate has consistently been higher than predicted by the U. S. News America’s Best College publication. (  33%-35% in four years (33.6% for )  53%-57% in five years (54% for )  57%-60% in six years (57% for )

Graduation Rates Reasons for taking more than four years to graduate (reported by recent graduating senior):  I changed majors  I worked while enrolled  The class that I needed were not offered when I needed them  I received poor academic advising Predictors of decreased time-to-degree:  Average student credit hours completed per semester  Student credit hours transferred  Ohio’s Success Challenge program and The Summer Success Challenge tuition discount

One Year Retention Rates (main campus first year students)  74.0% in  74.2% in  77.9% in  79.1% in  76.1% in  75.9% in These rates are lower than the 82.2% retention rate achieved in with students with a similar academic profile, but higher (except for the most recent year) than the retention rates for other moderately selective universities that participate in the Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange.

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if They…( ):  Female  Lived on campus  Had higher HS GPA and ACT  Had higher levels parent income, expected family contribution, gift aid, college work study; and had lower levels of gross need and unmet need.  Did not test into or enroll in any developmental courses except for Math  Had higher College GPA and greater credit hours earned; did not fail any courses; were in good academic standing after the fall and spring semesters

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if They… ( ):  Participated in the Center for Multicultural and Academic Initiatives or the President’s Leadership Academy; in any residential learning community; were not enrolled in UNIV 131 and UPAS program;  Had greater scores of social involvement, university involvement, and satisfaction with living arrangements from the New Student Transition Questionnaire; and were not identified as being at risk of attrition  Had no university-level disciplinary actions;  returned for their first spring semester;

Students were more likely to be retained to their second fall semester if they… ( ):  Enrolled in a major in the College of Education and Human Development; were not in Academic Enhancement;  Enrolled in a greater number of first year classes taught by full-time non-tenure-track faculty members (instructors and lecturers)  Changed their majors a greater number of times.

What They Are Doing? (NSSE, FSSE Study)

Hours per Week Preparing for Class (main campus, 2007 NSSE)  More than 90% of BGSU faculty expected their students (full-time) to spend 12 hours or more per week preparing for class (2003 FSSE Study). FreshmanSenior  None0% 0%  %23%  %28%  %30%  %14%  > 30 3% 4%

Hours per Week Relaxing and Socializing (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 1% 0%  % 19%  % 32%  % 35%  % 8%  > 30 9% 5% Study: Freshman Senior  None 0% 0%  % 23%  % 28%  % 30%  % 14%  > 30 3% 4%

Hours per Week Working for Pay (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 82% 58%  1-5 3% 5%  % 8%  % 17%  % 7%  > 30 1% 6%

Hours per Week Participating in Co- Curricular Activities (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  None 24% 36%  % 32%  % 14%  % 14%  % 4%  > 30 3% 1%

Academic Experiences (main campus, 2003 Study) Faculty Freshman Senior L.D. U.D  Frequently asked questions in class or contribute to class discussions 55% 71% 29% 44%  Frequently come to class without completing readings or assignments 19% 26% 41% 30%  Used to comm. with an instructor 85% 80% 25% 38%  Received prompt feedback from faculty on your academic performance (written or oral) 51% 63% 93% 91%  Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor 60% 68% 23% 36%  Talked about career plans with a faculty member 31% 47% 13% 23%  Worked harder than you thought you could to meet an instructor's standards or expectations 53% 59% 22% 38%

What They Think of BGSU and BGSU Faculty?

Relationships with... friendly, helpful,and understanding (main campus, 2007) FreshmanSenior  Other students 81%85%  Faculty members 81% 80%  Adm. office and staff67% 56%

Satisfied with... (main campus undergraduates, 2007 Student Opinion Survey)  BGSU in general 85%  attitude of faculty towards students 83%  Class size and variety 83%  the out-of-class availability of my instructors 82%  Course content in your major field 82%  instruction in my major 78%  Testing/grading system 74%  Preparation you are receiving for your future occupation 64%  availability of your advisor 64%  Value of the information provided by your advisor 61%  availability of classes at the times I want them 41%

Satisfied with... (main campus, Graduating Senior, )  BGSU overall 83%  The overall quality of instruction 83%  Class size 82%  Ease of access to instructors 81%  feedback on assignments 76%  availability of classes at the times I want them 55%  concern for me as an individual 54%  the overall quality of academic advising 52%  helpfulness in preparing for further education 48%  helpfulness in preparing for employment 47%  service to commuters 35%

References BGSU Office of Institutional Research ( u BGSU Fact Book u BGSU First Year Student Questionnaire u National Survey of Student Engagement u Faculty Survey of Student Engagement u Student Opinion Survey u Graduating Senior Survey u BGSU Portfolio u Student Retention Report u Towards A Comprehensive Predictive Model of Time to Bachelor's Degree Attainment: A Reprise (Spring 2003)