Estimation of Modal Diversion and Economic Benefits due to Rail Service Improvements in South Carolina by Omor Sharif 1 ECIV 790U INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
Advertisements

Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART II: FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics Key Improvements and Initial Findings in 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Steven Beningo Adapted from a presentation that.
Truck Size & Weight Reform Timothy Lynch Senior Vice President American Trucking Associations Talking Freight May 20, 2009.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Physical Distribution Marketing Co-Op. What is Physical Distribution? The key link between a business and its customers – also known as logistics.
Final Round - Question 2 In the United States, which of the following modes was deregulated first? A.railroads B.trucking C.air passenger service D.air.
Regional and Short Line Railroads
Disaggregate State Level Freight Data to County Level October 2013 Shih-Miao Chin, Ph.D. Ho-Ling Hwang, Ph.D. Francisco Moraes Oliveira Neto, Ph.D. Center.
Freight Data - A Transportation Perspective September 2010 Michael Sprung – FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations.
Logistics Costs in an Advanced Freight Model for Florida 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 17-21, 2015.
Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Limits Study Presentation to AASHTO Subcommittee on Highway Transport July 10, 2013 Tom Kearney, FHWA Ben Ritchey,
CE 515 Railroad Engineering Armstrong Chapter 8: Railroad Operation – Moving From Here to There “Transportation exists to conquer space and time -”
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Shipper/Carrier Network Strategies. Purpose of Network Strategies Shipper Strategy –Purchase/Manage transportation services to meet customers’ needs Carrier.
Motor Carriers.
Overview of the Freight Analysis Framework Rolf R. Schmitt January, 2008.
TRANSPORTATION PL201 FUNDAMENTAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
T IFFANY & C O. Transportation Analysis Presented by: Ping-Chun Chang Hsi-Chuan Chen Satish Mallya Chris Offensend Antonio Rodriguez.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Texas Freight Forecasting Rob Bostrom Monisha Khurana Liza Amar Planning Applications Conference 2015.
Transport support international commercial transactions
Railroads. Railroad Industry Characteristics Return on Investment –Increased from 5.7% in 1984 to 9.4% in Accounts for 1% of GDP Employs over 200,000.
TRANSEARCH Data for Planning in Tennessee By Jerry Everett The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Freight Analysis Framework version 3 (FAF3) __________ Talking Freight Webinar October 2010.
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT
6-1 Transport Fundamentals CR (2004) Prentice Hall, Inc. Chapter 6 When the Chinese write the word “crisis,” they do so in two characters—one meaning danger,
Transportation Infrastructure
Florida Multimodal Statewide Freight Model
Public Education Partnership Seminar September 1, 2015
The Logistic Network: Design and Planning
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Federal Railroad Administration Karen McClure, Economist
Logistics and Tools: Transportation and Transshipment Models
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Distribution Customer Services and Logistics
Postal Logistics & Transportation Jeff Kruepke Quad/Transportation Services (414)
Logistics Management CHAPTER ELEVEN McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Talking Freight Seminar Freight Analysis Framework, version 3 Diane Davidson Center for Transportation.
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES Update of the Freight Rail Bottom Line Report: Continuing Study of Freight Rail Supply Meeting Demand Briefing.
Innovation for a Nation on the Move U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Purpose,
An Evaluation of the Potential for Commercial Navigation to Further Facilitate Freight Transportation in the Tennessee River Valley Larry G. Bray, Ph.D.
Materials Management Systems
11DSCI4743 Physical Distribution Definition Physical distribution is the movement & storage of finished goods from the end of production to the customer.
1 1 Solutions to Exam #1 John H. Vande Vate Fall, 2002.
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Network Assignment of Highway Truck Traffic in FAF3 Maks Alam, PE Research Leader Battelle.
State of Freight Data & Models: Rail, Truck-Load (TL) & PickUp & Delivery (PUD) Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
Section 22.1 Transportation Chapter 22 physical distribution Section 22.2 Inventory Storage.
CHAPTER 8 PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY.
Chapter 22 Physical Distribution
1-1 Logistics Management LSM 730 Dr. Khurrum S. Mughal Lecture 19.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Chapter 13 Transportation in the Supply Chain
I’ve Been Working on the Railroad... Marketing Opportunities.
The Freight Transportation System Background on domestic highway, rail, and waterborne freight modes.
Section 22.1 Transportation Chapter 22 physical distribution Section 22.2 Inventory Storage.
Transport System.
Level Two Supply Chain Management
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
April 27, 2016 You need paper & pencil NO Test on Friday! 
Freight Demand Analysis
AASHTO Spring Meeting Portland, Maine May 2017 Jennifer W
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Routing and Logistics with TransCAD
Freight Demand Analysis
Physical Distribution Definition
Presentation transcript:

Estimation of Modal Diversion and Economic Benefits due to Rail Service Improvements in South Carolina by Omor Sharif 1 ECIV 790U INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORT Project Presentation

Introduction 2 Transportation policy/infrastructure changes in South Carolina How much ‘Modal Diversion’ will occur? How much ‘Economic Benefits’ of the changes? The ITIC Model -Intermodal Transportation and Inventory Cost Model

The ITIC Model 3 A spreadsheet based computer model Version 1.0 of the model was published in 2005 by US Department of Transportation and Federal Railroad Administration Highway to Rail Intermodal Version Follows a logistics managers perspective who choose a mode and shipment size Transportation alternatives is chosen based on minimum total logistics costs

Estimate the diversion of highway freight traffic to rail intermodal service Estimate the economic benefits of changes Understand the underlying methodology Application of TRANSEARCH Data 4 Objective

Contribution Selecting suitable data sources for the model Development of Inputs for the model such as Freight Rates, Rail Miles, Dray Miles, Junction Frequency Understanding the modal diversion impact of rail service improvement 5

Prior Research The model itself refers to many sources regarding previous research Case studies: using the model by various organizations at federal/state/local governments 6

Methodology - Cost 7

Methodology- Data 8 1.Serial Number 2.Commodity Description 3.Commodity Code—Standard Transportation Commodity Code* 4.Pounds per Year* 5.Pounds per Shipment* 6.Value of Commodity—Dollars per pound* 7.Origination State 8.Destination State 9.Origin FIPS 10.Destination FIPS 11.Observed Mode (Truck)* 12.Truck rate per mile for 3S2* 13.Truck highway miles* 14.Truckload per shipment* 15.Number of Trailer on Flat Car (TOFC)/Number of Container on Flat Car (COFC) (0)* 16.Rail Junction Frequency (0)* 17.Observed Rail revenue per hundred weight (cwt) (1)* 18.Rail variable cost per cwt* 19.Rail miles* 20.TOFC pickup miles* 21.TOFC delivery miles*

Transportation Cost Formulas in TSW worksheet: 1. Lb/day = (lb/year) / Days between orders = final lbs in the shipment / (lb/day) 3. Transit time (Rail) = Rail Miles / Rail Speed + Dray Miles / Dray Speed + Dwell time at origin and destination terminals (0.5 days at each) + Interchange delays (1.5 days – if there is an interchange) [Both rail and dray speed is based on 24 hours] 4. Transit time (Truck) = Truck Miles / Truck Speed [truck speed is based on 10 hours a day] 5. Expected L&D claim per shipment = L&D as percent of gross freight revenue X transport charges per shipment 6. Transport charges per shipment (Rail) = (Load/unload hours X Hourly wage) + final lb in shipment X rail rev per cwt / Transport charges per shipment (Truck) = Handling cost per shipment + Linehaul cost per shipment = (Load/unload hours X Hourly wage) + (Linehaul miles X Linehaul cost per mile + Linehaul miles X Additional fee per mile + One time additional fee) 8. Number of shipments/yr = final lbs in shipment X lb/year 9. transport charges/yr = transport charges per ship X Number of shipments/yr 9

Non Transportation Logistics Cost Formulas in TSW worksheet: 1. Order cost = (Order cost per shipment + Dunnage) X Number of shipments/yr [for ‘truck’ dunnage is 0] 2. In-transit stock carrying cost = Lb/day X Dollars/lb X Transit time X Interest 3. cycle stock carrying cost = Dollars/lb X inventory carrying cost factor X final lbs in shipment / 2 4. Loss & damage claims = Expected L&D claim per shipment X Number of shipments/yr 5. Capital cost on claims = claim payment days X loss & damage claims X Interest 6. Safety stock carrying cost = safety stock (lb) X Dollars/lb X inventory carrying cost factor 7. Total Non-Transportation Logistics Costs = Order cost + In-transit stock carrying cost + cycle stock carrying cost + Loss & damage claims + Capital cost on claims + safety stock carrying cost 10

A sample analysis Transearch 2008 as Preliminary Data Source Origin- South Carolina Destination- Florida and Virginia Total Records STCC Commodity codes are kept at 4 digit level 11

An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking: 2012 Update By ATRI 12 ( )

Forecast of 2023 Freight Rate 13 Inadequate Historical data Longer forecast horizon makes forecasting difficult Extrapolation techniques have higher success in short time horizon Regression, Time Series Analysis?? A value of $2.10 was assumed in the sample analysis for now!

Rail Miles SC 2008 Transearch does not provide county outside SC, only BEA Possible Alternative: County-to-County Distance Matrix at CTA and use regression Matrix of distances and network impedances between each pair of county centroids via highway, railroad, water, and combined highway-rail paths Regression between Intermodal Rail and Highway Miles based on 125 samples 14

Dray Miles For combined highway-rail CTA provides Highway and Rail miles here for each pair of county Take Dray miles as a percentage of Rail Miles and use data fitting Best Fit Distribution is ‘Gamma’ out of seven tested using ‘fitdistrplus’ package in R (Anderson-Darling statistic: ) based on 125 samples Fitting of the distribution ' gamma ' by maximum likelihood Parameters : estimate Std. Error shape rate Use GAMMA.INV(RAND(),1.359,1/0.192) * Rail Miles / 100 in EXCEL. 15

Preparing Input File for analysis (truck itic input.xls) -Discard Transearch records when ‘shipment weight’ is zero -Discard Transearch records when ‘truck miles’ is zero -Format ‘STCC’ codes as ‘Text’ in Excel, not as ‘Numbers’ -Add zero before one digit STCC code (01, 08, 09 instead of 1, 8, 9) -Put ‘unknown’ in ‘rail VC per cwt’ column and ‘1’ in ‘obs rail rev per cwt’ -Junction Frequency = 1 if Truck Miles > 1000, otherwise 0. 16

A sample analysis By Year 2023 Rail is offering the following service improvements- Increase rail speed by 8 mph (30 mph to 38 mph, Truck = 50 mph) Improve reliability from 0.45 to 0.42 (Truck = 0.40) Reduce Loss & Damage Claims 20% to 10% (Truck = 7%) 17

Results 18 TRUCK-TO-RAIL INTERMODAL OUTPUT SUMMARY STATISTICS BasePolicy Case Results CaseTruckDiversion TruckMovesto Rail Number of Records17,733 0 Number of Shipments314,473 0 Tons Shipped6,004,312 0 Truck VMT148,171,808 0 Intermodal Dray VMT000 Rail Ton-Miles000 Logistics Costs($) About records were selected for policy analysis after base case run of about records. Not many Mis-assigned, mostly excluded because they failed cost < revenue criteria.

Exclude when ‘Variable Cost > Revenue’ $ / 100 lb comparison Not considered if ‘Variable Cost > Revenue’ Rail Revenue = 0.95 X Cost per mile of 3S2 X 3S2 Miles X 100 / Shipment weight in lb Rail Variable Cost = Dray Pickup charge / Shipment weight in lb X ((Variable Cost per mile X Rail Miles + Total Lift charges at Origin and Destination) / Shipment weight in lb X 100) / So, short transport distances have higher chances of being excluded. 19

20 Spartanburg, SC to Fort Myers, FL

21 Thank You!