Psychosocial consequences of false- positive screening results - breast cancer as an example John Brodersen MD, GP, PhD The Department of General Practice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Advertisements

†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
Epidemiological study of mild cognitive impairment and pilot evaluation of methods of early dementia detection in Chinese community Yueqin Huang MD MPH.
Controversies in Breast Cancer Allan Arkush, DO, FACOS.
Small Group Exercise: Measurement Roberto Castano, Monica Floricel, Susie Lau, Zubin Punthakee October 6, 2003.
Introduction Women experience distress and heightened anxiety in relation to further diagnostic evaluation of pre-cancerous cell changes of the cervix,
HOW STANDING ORDERS HELPED US IMPROVE CANCER SCREENING: REPORT FROM A NEW PPRNet MEMBER JULIO A SAVINON, MD RIO GRANDE MEDICINE INC. HARLINGEN, TX.
Somaiya Medical College and Maina Foundation Five Year Project for Raising breast Cancer Awareness in Pratikshanagar - Mumbai.
Visit our websites: PhD Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Incredible.
Qualitative study on acceptability of screening Research team: Alison Heawood (PI, Bristol), Clare Emmett (Qualitative Researcher, Bristol), Niamh Redmond.
Maternal Perception of Child Vulnerability in Preschoolers Born Very Low Birth Weight Peggy MacLean, Ph.D., Sarah Erickson, Ph.D., & Jean Lowe Ph.D. Perceptions.
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Jan Weiss, PT, DHS, CLT-LANA
Otis W. Brawley, M.D. Chief Medical and Scientific Officer Executive Vice President American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology, Medical Oncology,
By Sanjay Kumar, Ph.D National Programme Officer (M&E), UNFPA – India
Breast Cancer 101 Barbara Lee Bass, MD, FACS Professor of Surgery
Screening for Disease Guan Peng Department of Epidemiology School of Public Health, CMU.
What is Screening? Basic Public Health Concepts Sheila West, Ph.D. El Maghraby Professor of Ophthalmology Wilmer Eye Institute Johns Hopkins University.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Health Screening. Should you go for health screening? Health screening helps to discover if a person is suffering from a particular disease or condition,
報 告 者 王瓊琦. postpartum depression : identification of women at risk.
Prevalence and Correlates of Depressive Symptoms in Pregnancy African American Women Nancy Jallo, PhD, FNP-BC, WHNP-BC Virginia Commonwealth University.
Depression and anxiety in correlation to will to meaning of life and quality of life in Slovenian HIV-infected patients Depression and anxiety in correlation.
The Nature of Disease.
Clare Rogers Consultant Breast Surgeon Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals.
1 Lecture 2: Types of measurement Purposes of measurement Types and sources of data Reliability and validity Levels of measurement Types of scale.
Baby Extra: “The birth of a baby is a unique moment in the life of parents. It makes parents more capable than they ever thought they would be.”
Atoosa Adibi MD. Department of Radiology Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences.
® From Bad to Worse: Comorbidities and Chronic Lower Back Pain Margaret Cecere JD, Richard Young MD, Sandra Burge PhD The University of Texas Health Science.
Amany M. Shebl Professor Of Medical-surgical Nursing Dean. Nursing Faculty, Mansoura University, Egypt.
Breast Cancer Treatments and their Impact on Quality of Life Kim Arias.
Goldstein (1988) Gottesman & Shields (1966)
Purpose The present study examined the psychometric properties of the SCARED in order to begin establishing an evidence base for using the SCARED in pediatric.
Introduction: Medical Psychology and Border Areas
1 Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs.
Improvement in Screening Radiologists’ Performance in an Organized Screening Program Nancy A. T. Wadden, MD, FRCPC Gregory Doyle, BSc, MBA Breast Screening.
Mississippi Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan (2006 ~ 2011) Overview Mina Li, MD (FMG), MS Director, Comprehensive Cancer Control Mississippi Department.
PROMIS ® : Advancing the Science of PRO measurement Common Data Elements NIH CDE Webinar September 8, 2015 Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH Chief, Outcomes.
Power Point and Syllabus h3443.html.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction BACKGROUND Breastfeeding is very beneficial to the health and development of infants and is therefore highly.
Factors associated with abnormal PAP Smears in a health center X – Costa Rica, 2009 Leandra Abarca 1, Julia Freer 1, Maricela Salas 2 1, MD, MsC, FETP,
HW215: Models of Health & Wellness Unit 7: Health and Wellness Models Geo-political Influences.
The Health and Wellbeing Study: An Investigation into the Perceived Health and Wellbeing of Irish Adults Living with Asthma in Ireland Dr Mary Hughes,
Barriers to seeking diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer in a selected Philippine population Victoria M. Medina.
Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension: the effect of lipoatrophy but not lipohypertrophy on hypertension is independent.
Overcoming the Disconnect between Desired Outcomes and Educational Design MODIFYING THE CURRICULUM TO ADDRESS MAJOR HEALTH PROBLEMS John Horton, M.B.,
“Ready to Act“ - a health education programme 16 th Nordic Congress of General Practice Copenhagen, May 14, 2009 Helle Terkildsen Maindal, RN, MPH, PhD.
Introduction Psychological factors have been implicated to be etiologies for idiopathic environmental illness (IEI) in many studies. No study has ever.
Teaching of psychosocial issues in occupational medicine and case management FROM THE NORWEGIAN PERSPECTIVE EASOM Summer school 2015 Lake Bled Kristin.
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
Psychosocial issues for the diabetic patient 2010 Diabetes Area Workshop Fiona Little-CNC Mental Health.
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY Angela M. Theobald Fort Hays State University.
1 Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs.
Screening 15. May BMJ 2003; 327: ”To ask about the ethics of screening, generally aimed to make healthier people healthier, sounds, if.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
Psychosocial difficulties in head and neck cancer; the development of an evidence based measurement instrument Lucy Ziegler Rob Newell.
CoRPS Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases subjective cognitive functioning in patients with breast problems.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Drinking to cope, alcohol and cigarette use, and quality of life in successfully treated HNSCC patients A.K.H. Aarstad  H.J. Aarstad J. Olofsson Department.
Sleep Disturbance & Psychological Functioning in Respiratory Diseases Daljinder Virk 1, Rebecca Stores 1 & Anoop Chauhan 2 1 School of Health Sciences.
Differences in Fatigue and Depressive Symptoms Between Long and Average Sleeping Older Adults Introduction Methods Results Discussion Support Major Depressive.
Predictors of Stress Related Growth in people with SCI compared to the Stress Related Growth of their close persons Lude P 1,2,3, Kennedy P 4,5, Elfström.
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation on Diagnostic Interval, Anxiety, and Satisfaction of Minority Women with Abnormal Mammograms: a Randomized Controlled.
Quantification of dyspnea using descriptors: Development and initial testing of the Dyspnea-12 J Yorke, S H Moosavi, C Shuldham, P W Jones (Thorax
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville,
The communication of benign biopsy results in breast cancer screening
TEXILA AMERICAN UNIVERSITY
84 Breast Cancer patients
Presentation transcript:

Psychosocial consequences of false- positive screening results - breast cancer as an example John Brodersen MD, GP, PhD The Department of General Practice Institute of Public Health Centre of Health and Society University of Copenhagen

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example2 Content of presentation  Medical screening  Breast cancer screening  Psychosocial consequences  Conclusions and perspectives

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example3 Content of presentation  Medical screening  Breast cancer screening  Psychosocial consequences  Conclusions and perspectives

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example4 Screening the coal

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example5 Outcome of medical screening

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example6 Outcome of medical screening

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example7 Outcome of medical screening Healthy Disease Arbitrary scale

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example8 Content of presentation  Medical screening  Breast cancer screening  Psychosocial consequences  Conclusions and perspectives

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example9 Proportion  2,000 women, age 50 – 69, screened every second year for 10 years – 5 rounds: 1 death of breast cancer prevented > 200 false-positive result 1:200 P. C. Gotzsche and M. Nielsen. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database.Syst.Rev. (4):CD001877, 2006.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example10 Content of presentation  Medical screening  Breast cancer screening  Psychosocial consequences  Conclusions and perspectives

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example11 Adequacy of measurement  23 studies identified  Most commonly used measures: The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) The Psychological Consequences Questionnaire (PCQ) The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)  These 4 measures used in 17 studies Brodersen J., Thorsen H., Cockburn J. The adequacy of measurement of short and long term consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Review. Journal of Medical Screening 11 (1):

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example12 Focus groups - content validity ExaminationsUltrasound & clini-cal mammography Plus needle biopsy Plus surgical biopsy No. of women577 Mean age ExaminationsPlus early recall Plus needle biopsy Plus surgical biopsy No. of women557 Mean age J. Brodersen and H. Thorsen. Consequences Of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire. Scand.J Prim.Health Care 26 (4): , 2008.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example13 Result from interviews  Part I: 33 items on negative psychosocial consequences At invitation At screening After diagnosis  Part II: 13 items on long-term psychosocial consequences After diagnosis J. Brodersen and H. Thorsen. Consequences Of Screening in Breast Cancer (COS-BC): development of a questionnaire. Scand.J Prim.Health Care 26 (4): , 2008.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example14 Statistical methods  Reliability Cronbach’s alpha Person Separation Index Test-retest (part II)  Validity Rasch analysis Confirmatory factor analysis Concurrent validity Know group validity J. Brodersen, H. Thorsen, and S. Kreiner. Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography. Value in Health 10 (4): , 2007.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example15 COS-BC part I  Psychosocial consequences of false positive screening results Anxiety – 6 items Behavioural aspects - 7 items Sense of dejection – 6 items Sleep problems - 4 items Breast examination - 2 items Sexuality - 2 items Single items – 3 items J. Brodersen, H. Thorsen, and S. Kreiner. Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography. Value in Health 10 (4): , 2007.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example16 COS-BC part II  Psychosocial consequences of false positive screening results Anxious about/belief in (not) having breast cancer – 2 items More or less relax - 2 items Social relationship – 3 items Existential values - 6 items J. Brodersen. Measuring psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example, Department of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen:Månedsskrift for Praktisk Lægegerning, Copenhagen. ISBN: , 2006.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example17 Scores of anxiety (0-18) GroupMean score Abnormal screening6.39 Breast cancer7.38 False-positive3.04 Undiagnosed4.38 Normal screening0.97 J. Brodersen, H. Thorsen, and S. Kreiner. Validation of a condition-specific measure for women having an abnormal screening mammography. Value in Health 10 (4): , 2007.

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example18 5 response category After the examinations I have thought about the broader aspects of life:  Much lessLessThe same as beforeMoreMuch more Fewer thoughts about life More thoughts about life

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example19 Know group validity - 1

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example20 Know group validity - 2

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example21 Know group validity - 3

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example22 Know group validity - 4

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example23 Know group validity - 4

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example24 Content of presentation  Medical screening  Breast cancer screening  Psychosocial consequences  Conclusions and perspectives

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example25 Conclusion 1  The conclusions drawn from previously conducted studies regarding long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography should remain tentative

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example26 Conclusion 2a  A valid and reliable condition- specific instrument measuring psychosocial consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography has been established

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example27 Conclusion 2b  Consequences of Screening on Breast Cancer (COS-BC) 1. Psychosocial consequences of abnormal and false-positive screening mammography 2. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example28 Conclusion 3  There are substantial negative psychosocial consequences associated with having an abnormal screening mammography later confirmed to be false-positive

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example29 Implications for practice  Letters and folders posted at invitation to screening should contain information on the negative psychosocial consequences arising from abnormal and false-positive screening results

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example30 Implications for research  Need for valid instruments in the area of psychosocial consequences of screening for any cancers  To establish core-items and core-subscales relevant for any kind of cancer screening

Psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results - breast cancer as an example31 Consequences Of Screening Lung cancer P1: 17 items P2: 4 items Cervical cancer P1: 40 items Breast cancer P1: 4 items Core P1: 26 items P2: 22 items