+ Private or Public? By: Maura Costello Education 610.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition
Advertisements

Social Welfare Policymaking
Types of Analysis Some experts divide Budget Analysis into these types, which deal with different questions:
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
No Child Left Behind The Federal Education Law and Science Education May, 2004.
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act Ben, Eric & Shawn.
What is the Education Investment Incentives (EIIA) Act? The EIIA is designed to provide much needed relief for tuition paying parents, while also enhancing.
Rural Education Achievement Program(REAP) and Rural and Low-Income Schools Grant(RLIS)
Economics – Mr. Graboski 10/3/11 Do Now: If the American economy is in a downward spiral, should the federal government step in with increased spending.
Public interest Bipartisan Governance reform California Forward: Who we are.
Colorado’s Voucher Plan A Case Study Bridget Mullen Director of Policy, Planning and Financial Analysis University of Colorado.
Competition and Education Policy The Role of Vouchers and the No Child Left Behind Act.
ARE CHARTER SCHOOLS A GOOD WAY TO IMPROVE EDUCATION IN OUR COMMUNITY? A CHOICEWORK DISCUSSION STARTER.
Different Types of Schools School Funding. Public Schools  Established by states (10 th Amendment)  Paid for by tax dollars  Usually run by local board.
Public Charter Schools: Leading Public Education to Higher Levels of Student Achievement.
Charter Schools & For-Profit Schools King and Queens of Collaboration.
Education as a Strategic Investment Conference Prepared by Tony Levitas and Marko Paunovic Belgrade, February 14 th 2009.
Pennsylvania Pre-K for All How Pennsylvania Policymakers Should Increase Opportunities for All Families in the Commonwealth to Have Affordable Access to.
Escondido Union School District Budget Update The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Lakewood City Schools Goals Goal #1 To realize a full year of academic growth for each and every student during the school year. To.
Preparing America’s Future Future. No Child Left Behind Key Principles Increase accountability for student performanceIncrease accountability for student.
Brief History of Education Reform A Move to Promote Equity and Equality.
Current Issues. Vocabulary No Child Left Behind (NCLB)Curriculum AccountabilitySilent Epidemic Standardized TestMagnet School Charter SchoolCapitalism.
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 Overview of Federal Regulations for Federal Grants.
2013 SCPTA Legislative Advocacy Platform Presented by Joy Grayson VP Legislation SCPTA Special Thanks to: Public Education Partners of Greenville County.
EDUCATION Chapter 7.
Chapter 14.2 Education and Social Issues. Public Education Local gov’ts began offering free public education in colonial times. Today, elementary and.
Domestic Policy EDUCATION. Domestic Policy Decisions, laws, and programs made by the government which are related to issues in the country. IMPACT: It.
2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 25 – 27, 2015 August 2015.
Chapter 18.  Give examples of the processes used by individuals, political parties, interest groups, or the media to affect public policy.  Describe.
CENTRIST NEO-CONSERVATIVE IDEAS Charter schools help to simulate a free market system among schools. Competition would pressure schools to improve. –Schools.
HISTORY OF ANEMIC PROGRESS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS ON STATE ACCOUNTABILITY TESTS Manuel Barrera, PhD Associate Professor, Metropolitan State University;
EDF 593: RTI Class 2 History of RTI Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D
Higher Education Today Increasing stratification, separate and unequal tiers In many ways reinforcing, and in some ways widening, inequality  Political.
School Funding and School Reform. School Funding- 3 main sources Local44% State50 % Federal 6%
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
Reforms – improve teacher quality & School Curriculum standards (what students should know) If you have questions about yesterday’s material – ask now!!
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.
Group 6 Michael Berg, Scott Gravitt, Joy Singleton, Gina Smeeton, Amy Wagner.
Fraser TEACH © 2011 McGraw- Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Politics: What Is Its Place in Education?
Social Welfare Policymaking
School Vouchers An overview of vouchers, what the government says, and why you should care.
Educate to Lead Workshop November 13, 2009 Dr. Thomas Stewart Qwaku & Associates.
FUNDING FOR EDUCATION. FACTS Every child has a right to free public education (K-12) Education is EXPENSIVE What does money go to?
Dollars Diverted: The Results of NH’s Education Finance Reform.
Elgin Charter School Initiative Envisioning a Math and Science Elementary School that Provides Diversity and Excellence in Education.
Roots of Social Welfare Policy  Early 19 th century attitudes toward social welfare were focused on belt-tightening and charity.  NO governmental.
State and Local Government Chapter 8: School Districts.
Budget Overview Alliance College-Ready Middle Academy 12 1.
We won’t be left behind!. Welcome to the AYP Scavenger Hunt Question 1 How many PA SDs made AYP for the School Year? Question 2 What is the participation.
US Government Mrs. Lacks ON THE ISSUES: EDUCATION.
Today’s Agenda May 15, 2014 Education Records Health Records 30-minute Sakai Quiz in class! Due: Signed Final Project Contract.
Incumbents Always win!. Hey…must be the money! How to Fix a Rigged System “If you aren’t an incumbent or you don’t have personal wealth, there’s almost.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
The Immigration-Industrial Complex: Blurring the lines of private enterprise and public interest By Douglas Epps, MSW (2015) “Those people coming across.
FUNDING LEGISLATION FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL. CONTRIBUTIONS TO EDUCATION- 07/08 vs. 08/09  8%- Federal funds  State funds07/08  43%- State funds07/08.
Public Policy in Texas Chapter 12. LEARNING OBJECTIVES LO 12.1 Analyze and evaluate Texas tax policies. LO 12.2 Describe the politics of state spending.
Independent Fiscal Office Analysis of PA Budget Structural Deficit IFO 1.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Public Policy in Texas Chapter 12. TRENDS IN TEXAS STATE EXPENDITURES— ALL FUNDS, BY BIENNIAL BUDGET PERIODS 1994–2015 (IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) Copyright.
Some Fiscal Issues and School Choice Ben Scafidi Georgia College & State University Georgia GOAL Scholarship Program, Inc. Senior Fellow, Foundation for.
UNIT SIX| EDUCATion.
Chapter 13 Governance and Financing of Elementary and Secondary Schools By Delis Corke EDU /30/13.
Proposed Final General Fund Budget
EDUCATION Chapter 7.
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents
Presentation transcript:

+ Private or Public? By: Maura Costello Education 610

+ History of Charter Schools In 1991 Minnesota passed the first charter school law. By 1995, 19 states had signed laws allowing charter schools, and by 2003 that number increased to 40 states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia. Charter schools are one of the fastest growing innovations in education policy with much political support In his 1997 State of the Union Address, former President Clinton called for the creation of 3,000 charter schools by the year 2002 Since 1994, the U.S. Department of Education has provided grants to support states' charter school efforts, starting with $6 million in fiscal year 1995.

+ What makes Charters different? Increase opportunities for learning. Create choice for parents and students within the public school system. Provide a system of accountability for results in public education. Encourage innovative teaching practices. Encourage community and parent involvement in public education. Competition for public schools.

+ Quotes When the taxpayers see that their money is being spent be without progress, it becomes an issue, “Public schools spend increasing amounts of taxpayer money while becoming more and more mediocre”. (Mary Rose McCarthy, 2010)

+ Negatives No place for special education students. (Charter schools do accept special needs students but not nearly as many as public schools) No teacher stability. (Teachers can come and go as they please or as the school pleases- No Unions) Lack of student diversity in some areas No MAJOR improvement with progress among students attending Charters/Private schools. Take funding away from public schools

+ Positive Public education is failing our children, especially in urban areas- Charters give parents choices. Schools can have themes to focus on, good for secondary students. Less violence in schools More parent involvement More choice of resources for students Less scrutiny from tax payers.

+ Summary of Paper Contradicting results for private and charter schools. Critics that are for private institutions argue that these schools improve test scores and performance among the students. Critics against privatization claim that even with these new schools whether they are private or charter, there is not a significant change or improvement in test scores and performance. Either way it is for certain that the students in this country are falling behind on the global scale, so something needs to change.

+ Charts Pennsylvania U.S. (average) Total Revenues PA- $24,973,391,584 US- $11,465,272,463 Total Expenditures for Education PA-$25,346,537,868 US- $11,698,242,308

+ Charts Data From IPEDS: and Pennsylvania Vs U.S. (average) Number of institutions - Total Title IV degree-granting PA-257 US-88 Number of institutions – Public PA- 61 US-32 Number of institutions - Private, not-for-profit PA-114 US-31 Number of institutions - Private, for-profit PA- 82 US- 23

+

+ Websites