Examples of Technical Evaluation Documentation. Task Evaluation Documentation Agreed to Estimate (Inadequate) TASK: AAC TASK DESCRIPTION: COMM LINK SOFTWARE.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Change Order Missouri Local Programs How to Complete a Change Order & Get it Approved.

Advertisements

M EASURING P ERFORMANCE – N EW R EQUIREMENTS FOR D O D P ROJECTS AND P ROGRAMS IPMR I NTEGRATED P ROGRAM M ANAGEMENT R EPORT (IPMR) (DID) DI- MGMT-81466B.

Introduction to Military Certification Office

Chapter 15 Closing the Bid. Objectives Upon completion of this chapter, you will be able to: –Describe the estimate summary process –Describe items that.

1 Cost/Price Proposal Overvi ew Communications, Outreach, Multimedia and Informational Technology (COMIT) John Moore Cost/Price Analyst February 18, 2015.

Metrics for Process and Projects

Department of Tourism Computerization Project Phase I Training Module July 2009.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) Current: 14 January 2015.

COSYSMO Reuse Extension 22 nd International Forum on COCOMO and Systems/Software Cost Modeling November 2, 2007 Ricardo ValerdiGan Wang Garry RoedlerJohn.

May 11, 2004CS WPI1 CS 562 Advanced SW Engineering Lecture #5 Tuesday, May 11, 2004.

Update and Version Management1 Klaus Bothe 3rd Workshop Software Engineering Education and Reverse Engineering, Ohrid, Macedonia, 2003 Institute of Informatics,

Project Management Session 7

COMMERCIAL “SOLE SOURCE” PROPOSAL ANALYSIS ROADMAP 1. Is information available within the Government? Step 1 – Information within the Government If Yes.

Software Cost and Schedule Estimation [and Tracking] By: Richard D. Stutzke Presenter: Stephen Lopez-Couto.

Chapter 9. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Sourcing and Contracts Management System (CMS) Solution Request for Proposal FQ

SharePoint PREP Administration Chris Felknor MIT iCampus

Managing Project Procurement

Best Procurement Practices and Helpful Information August 2011.

MASTERING THE RFQ PROCESS Genanne Wilson, DJJStu Potlock, DMS Gina Gibson, STOBill Zimmerman, DOHVonnie Allen, AWI Department of Management Services Division.

1 QUALITY ASSURANCE EVALUATOR TRAINING ADVISORY & ASSISTANCE SERVICES CONTRACTS.

Module 9 Session 9.2 Visual 1 Module 9 Designing Control and Reporting Systems (Time, Cost, Resources and Scope (Performance and Quality)) Session 9.2Managing.

1 Lecture 3.9: RFP, SOW and CDRL (SEF Ch 19) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.

November 1-4, 2011 Project Scope Document. Facts Creates a common understanding Prepared by team or team contractor Has a lot of detail.

09/04/2008 Wallops Institutional Information Management System WIIMS An Overview.

Lecture 10. Review of Lecture 9 – Project Risk “…an uncertain event or condition that, if it occurs, has a positive or a negative effect on a project.

Project Management Project Planning HR, Procurement, Quality, Communications

Copyright 2008 Introduction to Project Management, Second Edition 2  Many people have heard the following sayings: ◦ If you fail to plan, you plan to.

Chapter 11. Intro  What is Project Management?  Project Manager  Project Failures & Successes Managing Projects  PMBOK  SDLC Core Process 1 – Project.

SOW Update SOW Update Mike Matzko AIM Team 21 August 2014.

. Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration GSA Schedule Contracts Industry Day-Modifications May 26, 2010 GSA Schedule Contracts.

Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Business & Enterprise Systems The Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and the Integrated Master Schedule.

Felix Sanchez Estimating the Budget and Cost (Part 1) Project Management for ARA Engineers and Scientists Developing a Bottoms Up Estimate.

Processing Project Proposals

Disciplined Software Engineering Lecture #2 Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by the U.S. Department.

Copyright © 1994 Carnegie Mellon University Disciplined Software Engineering - Lecture 1 1 Disciplined Software Engineering Lecture #2 Software Engineering.

Project Management All projects need to be “managed” –Cost (people-effort, tools, education, etc.) –schedule –deliverables and “associated” characteristics.

Request for Proposal (RFP)

1 Final RFP Pricing WebEx JSC Engineering, Technology and Science Contract (JETS) May 3, 2012 Rosa Arevalo Cost/Price Analyst.

11/24/2015Dr. SASTRY-PROJ SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Dr. M V S PERI SASTRY. B.E,Ph.D.

SOFTWARE PROCESS AND PROJECT METRICS. Topic Covered  Metrics in the process and project domains  Process, project and measurement  Process Metrics.

Examples of Questions Asked During an Evaluation.

CS 350: Introduction to Software Engineering Slide Set 2 Process Measurement C. M. Overstreet Old Dominion University Fall 2005.

Module 5 Session 5.2 Visual 1 Module 5 Refining Objectives, Scope, and Other Project Parameters Session 5.2 Reviewing the PAR and refining key project.

CSE SW Project Management / Module 15 - Introduction to Effort Estimation Copyright © , Dennis J. Frailey, All Rights Reserved CSE7315M15.

Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006

Project Setup and Execution For PMPlan Enterprise Presented by AlNik Solutions Copyright ©

© Mahindra Satyam 2009 PM/PL/ML Module QMS Training Mahindra Satyam Confidential.

Copyright , Dennis J. Frailey CSE7315 – Software Project Management CSE7315 M15 - Version 9.01 SMU CSE 7315 Planning and Managing a Software Project.

Project Schedule & Gantt Chart Unit 4 – Virtual Project.

Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Independent Cost Estimates and Cost/Price Analyses Unit 3.

1 Introduction to MBProject. 2 Part I: MBProject and how it is used. Part II: What MBProject might do in the future. Also, as-built data collection and.

DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.

Supplier Management Can’t live with them, Can’t live without them!

SE-280 Dr. Mark L. Hornick 1 Measuring Software Size.

Title. 1 Breakout Session: D3 Gene Pickarz, Senior Policy Analyst, National Reconnaissance Office Date: November 6, 2012 Time: 11:15am - 12:30pm Four.

Breakdown Work Structure Applying Management Tools to a Project.

System Level Performance Spec System Level Performance Spec

Chapter 8 Specifications & Special Provisions

Causal Analysis & Resolution (CAR) Support Category

Chapter 8 Specifications & Special Provisions

Why Do We Measure? assess the status of an ongoing project

Cost or pricing data John Cancellara 7 March 2018.

Advice to Industry Panel – Contract Management Perspective

Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management

FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session

Why Do We Measure? assess the status of an ongoing project

COGAIN Kick-Off 5-6 September, 2004 FINANCIAL GUIDELINES

Presentation transcript:

Examples of Technical Evaluation Documentation

Task Evaluation Documentation Agreed to Estimate (Inadequate) TASK: AAC TASK DESCRIPTION: COMM LINK SOFTWARE WBS SOW REF: PAGE: 26 GROUP: SOFTWARE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1/98 - 6/98 BUDGET CODE: SE1 (SR S/W DEVELOPER) BASIS OF ESTIMATE: 1060 HRS Per Government / Contractor IPT agreement.

Task Evaluation Documentation Agreed to Estimate (Adequate) TASK: AAC TASK DESCRIPTION: COMM LINK SOFTWARE WBS SOW REF: PAGE 26 GROUP: SOFTWARE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 1/98 - 6/98 LABOR CATEGORY: SE1 (SR S/W DEVELOPER) BASIS OF ESTIMATE: Current Comm Link software modules contain 320 lines of code (LOC). 100 LOC will be useable, as is. Adding new functionality will require modification of 100 lines of code and an additional 220 LOC. Based on CERs derived from FSD experience (Contract F19628-x-xxxx) the estimate for design, integration and test is: MODIFIED CODE: 100 LOC x 1.8 HRS PER LOC = 180 HOURS NEW CODE: 220 LOC X 4.0 HRS PER LOC = 880 TOTAL ESTIMATE = 1060 HOURS SE1

Task Evaluation Documentation Estimate Not Agreed To (Inadequate) DATE 16 Dec 92 PROPOSAL VOLUME: V, PART II PAGE 5-7 WBS 40xx.x GOING -IN POSITION: Delete all Hours OBJECTIVE POSITION: 28 Hours based on Judgment EVALUATED BY: _____________________ PROG MGR COORDINATION _______________ PCO/BUYER COORDINATION_______ What’s Wrong? No proposed hours identified No description of KTR task No rationale for AF positions

Task Evaluation Documentation Estimate Not Agreed To (Adequate) DATE 16 Dec 92 PROPOSAL VOLUME: V, PART II PAGE 5-7 WBS 40xx.x LABOR CATEGORY: ENGR SUPT PROPOSED GOING-IN OBJECTIVE BASIS OF PROPOSAL: CONTRACTOR BASED ESTIMATE ON THE FOLLOWING CERs DERIVED FROM FSD EXPERIENCE: ICWG MTGS - 16 HRS PREP/ 24 HRS MTG/ 8 HRS FOLLOW-UP * 4 MTGS =192 HRS GOING -IN POSITION: DELETE ALL HOURS. THIS GROUP HAS NEVER BEEN REPRESENTED AT PREVIOUS ICWG MTGS. OBJECTIVE POSITION: ATTENDANCE AT 1 MTG MAY BE NECESSARY BUT FSD CERs ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTION. MTGS HAVE BEEN LASTING 2 DAYS WITH FEW ACTION ITEMS RESULTING. ALLOW 8 HRS PREP & 4 HRS FOLLOW-UP 8 HRS PREP/16 HRS MTG/4 HRS FOLLOW-UP * 1 MTG = 28 HRS EVALUATED BY: _____________________ PROG MGR COORDINATION _______________ PCO/BUYER COORDINATION_______