Invitation to Send, Interface, and/or Receive DMC and LS Data by Manny Furst, Improvement Technologies and Monroe Pattillo, Managing Member, Practical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise IHE Overview Keith W. Boone Interoperability Architect, GE Healthcare Co-chair, IHE Patient Care Coordination PC.
Advertisements

IHE An Introduction for Source Atlantic. IHE PCD: Simplify Specs!
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Patient Care Devices Domain (PCD) Alarm Communication Management (ACM) IHE PCD 2011 Fall Face-to-Face Kansas.
Alarm Communication Management
Raymond Peter Zambuto, CCE, FASHE, FHIMSS, FACCE President, Technology in Medicine, Inc. Co-Chair IHE Patient Care Devices Domain Emanuel Furst, PhD, CCE.
Pathfinding Session: Device Integration IHE North America Webinar Series 2008 Todd Cooper Patient Care Device Domain Breakthrough Solutions Foundry, Inc.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Joe Auriemma Siemens Medical Solutions, Health Services Senior Director, Integration Engineering Siemens Medical Solutions.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Patient Care Devices Domain (PCD) Alarm Communication Management (ACM) Requirements for AM – AC Interoperability.
IHE PCD MEM-DMC CMMS & RTLS Vendor Perspective
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
IHE PCD Interoperability Mini-Showcase at AAMI 2013 Long Beach, CA CMMS New Directions Demonstrations Monroe Pattillo Practical Health Interoperability,
1 IHE PCD F2F IHE PCD Quick Updates IHE PCD Face-to-Face, Cleveland, Ohio Tuesday Q1 and Q2, April 1, 2014 Paul Schluter, GE Healthcare Q1:
DICOM and Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: Five years of cooperation and mutual influence Charles Parisot Chair, NEMA Committee for advancement of.
The HITCH project: Cooperation between EuroRec and IHE Pascal Coorevits EuroRec 2010 Annual Conference June 18 th 2010.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise International Free Educational Webinar Series 2011 Learn More:
Sponsored by. Wouldn’t it be great if all your equipment, software and devices worked together, right out of the box? thinks so, too.
2013 PCD Domain Update Monroe Pattillo Practical Health Interoperability, LLC IHE PCD Planning Committee Co-Chair.
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers IHE Eye Care Integration Profiles Andrew Casertano Department of Veterans Affairs.
Eye Care Domain Connectathon 2014: Preparation & Processes Lynn Felhofer IHE Technical Project Manager.
Software and Systems Division “IHE-PCD F2F Meeting” (NIST Testing Tool Status) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) John Garguilo, Sandra.
Benefits of IHE PCD Standards-Based Interoperability June 1, 2014 | 8:30 AM Jeff McGeath – Iatric Systems, Inc. John Garguilo – NIST Monroe Pattillo –
June-September 2009www.ihe.net IHE 2010 Educational Webinar Series Preparations for the 2010 N.A. Connectathon & HIMSS11 Interoperability Showcase
Federal Health Architecture How to Prepare for an HIE Connectathon Adeola Odunlami, Senior Solutions Architect Health and Civilian Solutions Division 1.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IHE Sponsors and Committee Members Welcome to the Interoperability Showcase.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Patient Care Devices Domain Test Effort Integrating.
ONC FACA HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Hearing on Barriers & Enablers for Medical Device Interoperability March 28, 2011 ~ Washington,
Chapter 6 – Data Handling and EPR. Electronic Health Record Systems: Government Initiatives and Public/Private Partnerships EHR is systematic collection.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 6b EHR Functional Model Standards.
Patient Care Devices HIMSS IHE Showcase ’09 Review & ‘10 Planning.
Incorporating HCT Tools/Functions into Electronic Health Record Systems Stuart T. Weinberg, MD, FAAP Assistant Professor Departments of Biomedical Informatics.
Sponsored by. Wouldn’t it be great if all your equipment, software and devices worked together, right out of the box? thinks so, too.
Planning Committee Ken Fuchs / Steve Merritt Technical Committee John Garguilo / John Rhoads Patient Care Device Domain Update (PCD)
2015 PCD Domain Update Jeff McGeath Iatric Systems IHE PCD Technical Committee Co-Chair.
IHE-Europe – Use Case Based Approach to eHealth Interoperability Peter Künecke, SIEMENS Medical Solutions IHE-Europe „vendor“ co-chair Integrating the.
IHE Profile – SOA Analysis: In Progress Update Brian McIndoe January 18, 2011.
National Institute of Standards and Technology Technology Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Patient Care Devices Domain Test Effort Integrating.
Emanuel Furst, PhD, CCE President, Improvement Technologies, LLC Technical Project Manager, IHE Patient Care Devices Domain IHE Patient Care Device Domain.
PCD - WCM Waveform Communication Management [WCM].
Sponsored by. Wouldn’t it be great if all your equipment, software and devices worked together, right out of the box? thinks so, too.
IHE PCD MEM-DMC CMMS & RTLS User Perspective Monroe Pattillo Practical Health Interoperability, LLC 6/21/2013.
Sept 13-15, 2004IHE Interoperability Workshop 1 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Patient Identifier Cross-referencing Charles PARISOT GE Healthcare.
Interoperability Showcase IHE Domain Updates: Interoperability Showcase IHE Domain Updates: Patient Care Devices Co-Chairs: Todd CooperKen Fuchs Steve.
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Patient Care Devices Domain (PCD) Alarm Communication Management (ACM) Opportunities Manny Furst, Technical.
ACCE Clinical Engineering Symposium Overview of IHE PCD Exhibit at AAMI Y2010.
PCD User Handbook 2010 Purpose The Handbook is designed to help healthcare professionals implement IHE on a new clinical system purchase or upgrade an.
IHE-PCD Testing Supporting Pre-Connectathon and Connectathon Testing John J. Garguilo March 23, 2011.
Software and Systems Division “RTMMS IHE-PCD F2F WG meeting Kansas City, MO (Cerner) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) John.
Device and EMR interoperability (IDCO). Implantable Cardiac Device Information is Collected At Implant … During In Clinic Follow-ups … And in the Home.
Helping the Cause of Medical Device Interoperability Through Standards- based Test Tools DoC/NIST John J. Garguilo January 25,
Author : Elliot B. Sloane, Ph.D. American College of Clinical Engineering, President Villanova University Department of Decision.
IHE Patient Care Device Domain Connectathon/Showcase WG Kick Off Meeting July 30, 2009 © 2009 ACCE, HIMSS, IHE Version
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise The IHE Process: Developing Standards-based Solutions Kevin O’Donnell Co-chair, IHE Radiology Planning Committee.
1 Testing for Medical Devices Communications Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology Information Technology Laboratory
June-September 2009www.ihe.net North American 2010 Connectathon & Interoperability Showcase Series WEBINAR TITLE SESSION.
Jonathan L. Elion MD, FACC Co-Chair, IHE Cardiology Planning Committee The Basics of IHE: Concepts and Process.
Helping IIS Stakeholders Help Themselves! Driving Daily Business Processes with Self-Serve Resources AIRA 2016 – Seattle, WA Presented by: Darrin Rosebrook.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Joyce Sensmeier, MS, RN, BC, CPHIMS, FHIMSS Vice President, Informatics, HIMSS Charles Parisot, GE Healthcare IT infrastructure.
Todd Cooper Co-Chair, IHE Patient Care Devices Manny Furst IHE PCD Technical Program Manager IHE–Korea 2010 Connectathon eWorkshop IHE–Korea 2010 Connectathon.
Practical Health Interoperability, LLC IHE Patient Care Devices Domain
IHE PCD 2015 Fall F2F Profile PC and TC Updates ACM, MEMDMC, MEMLS
IHE PCD F2F Agenda Virtual / projectathon / certification testing program requirements MDPRI progress and next steps Certification plans Potential innovation.
IHE PCD 2016 Fall F2F Profile PC and TC Updates ACM, MEM: DMC, LS, RDC
Philips PCCI EPIS, Boca Raton, FL, USA IHE Patient Care Devices Domain
Wouldn’t it be great if all your equipment, software and devices worked together, right out of the box? thinks so, too.
HL7 Messages per ACM, ECM and WCM profiles Device Specific graphics
Unit 5 Systems Integration and Interoperability
IHE PCD 2015 Spring F2F Profile Updates ACM, MEMDMC, MEMLS
ACM Across Domains and the Enterprise
Presentation transcript:

Invitation to Send, Interface, and/or Receive DMC and LS Data by Manny Furst, Improvement Technologies and Monroe Pattillo, Managing Member, Practical Health Interoperability, LLC PCD Planning Committee Co-Chair, Chair of the MEMDMC and MEMLS WGs PCD Meeting June 23, 2015

You Have The Ability To Dramatically Improve Device Management More effective and efficient management of medical devices – Maintenance – Availability – Reliability Improved safety and better patient care Accomplished with standards-based messages developed by the IHE-PCD

Introductory Meetings Introduction: What and Why Now; Available Support: today’s meeting Detailed Description: 3 Profiles: MEMDMC, MEMLS, ACM – A profile is a tightly constrained message, removing all optionality/variability not needed for the purpose. – MEMDMC: Medical Equipment Device Management Communication – MEMLS: Medical Equipment Device Location Services – ACM: Alert Communication Management NIST Resources: Test Tools and Rosetta Mapping: Available 24x7 at no charge

Introduction To Just A Few Folks The Patient Care Device domain (PCD) of Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) is populated by an extremely competent, collaborative and cooperative group of developers and others who have developed a number of profiles supporting standards-based messaging for patient data. The Medical Equipment Management (MEM) initiative builds upon those HL7 v2 messages to provide interoperability to manage these systems. We cannot introduce all who contribute to PCD success, but will introduce those who will organize these webinars and help facilitate your implementation and assist you in participating in the Connectathon and Showcase demonstrations if you choose to do so.

Monroe Pattillo: Three Profiles Monroe Pattillo leads development of three PCD profiles: MEMDMC, MEMLS, ACM – Monroe is the managing member of Practical Health Interoperability, LLC and is an independent consultant in healthcare systems integration. Monroe is a Planning Committee Co-Chair of the IHE Patient Care Device Domain, the Co-Lead of the Alert Communication Management working group, and lead of the Medical Equipment Management working groups for Device Management Communication and for Location Services.

John Garguilo: Test Tools and Rosetta Mapping John Garguillo leads test tool development at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) – Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, Information Technology Laboratory The Rosetta Terminology Mapping (RTM)Project led by Paul Schluter (GE) provides a database assuring semantic interoperability. This database is hosted by NIST under John’s leadership.

Paul Sherman: Technical Program Manager of IHE-PCD Paul Sherman is Technical Program Manager for Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, Patient Care Devices Domain (IHE-PCD). – Paul is president of Sherman Engineering, LLC, and He retired as Senior Biomedical Engineer with the Dept of Veterans Affairs Center for Engineering and Occupational Health, where he served as the VA's senior in-house medical technology consultant. Paul is also a President of the American College of Clinical Engineering.

Manny Furst: Technical Project Manager, HIMSS Interoperability Showcases Manny Furst is responsible for the technical aspects of PCD demonstrations in HIMSS Showcases. – Until July, 2014 he was also Technical Project Manager for the PCD domain responsible for PCD portions of the Connectathon and other domain responsibilities. Manny has managed clinical engineering departments and provided clinical engineering and environment of care consulting services. – Manny is president, Improvement Technologies, LLC

Your Participation You can make an important contribution to – Patient safety and patient care – Clinical productivity, workflow and job satisfaction – Equipment availability and reliability – Technology management and productivity – Customer satisfaction with your devices and systems

Imagine When Devices report Condition and call for service – Self-test passed/failed, battery charge level, battery or other component failure Devices report Status – In use/standby/paused and on/off Devices report Location – Location by itself or as part of device or patient data

These Profiles Have Been Demonstrated Location (RTLS) along with Patient Physiologic Data, Pump Data, Alerts Device Condition, Status reported to CMMS Location along with Device Condition, Status Alerts (alarms to a person, advisories for later reference) along with Patient and Pump Data

Fast and Easy Implement standards-based messaging Use Gateways/Interface Systems to support receiving and sending proprietary formatted data currently available from devices to avoid delay in implementation Use Gateways/Interface Systems already in place within hospitals as interfaces or aggregators

Standards-Based Messages IHE Standards-Based messages make it economically possible to send and receive data – Only one message profile is required to achieve semantic interoperability for device data and only one for location – Rosetta table provides unambiguous data – NIST test tools facilitate development – Connectathon provides supportive testing

Medical Equipment Management - Device Management Communication (MEMDMC) Messages MEMDMC DMIR MEMDMC DMIC Device Management Information Observation, DMIO PCD-15 CMMS/CEMS Information collected from sources Equipment identification Equipment power source (mains, battery) Network connection transition (wired, wireless) Base configuration and network changes Version data Reporter Consumer Battery status, charging status, self-test status Self-test, last attempted, last status Duty cycle status, # uses, time in use Calibration status, needed, last completed Usability status, clean/in use/dirty

Benefits of MEMDMC Messages MEMDMC DMIR MEMDMC DMIC DMIO PCD-15 CMMS/CEMS Reporter Consumer Benefits Automate maintenance management Device self-reports when repairs and other maintenance is required Self-test passed provides frequent assurance of safe and effective operation Device requests low level actions as well (please plug me in) Provide high level of patient safety Maintenance required linked to “in use” or “standby” requires immediate attention More information populated in CMMS for more complete record More specific report of failure modes Equipment identified prior to disappearance (battery, network) Potential for automatic work ticket generation in CMMS

Gateways as an interim solution If a vendor engineered embedded solution is not currently available then potentially a technically feasible solution can be achieved through the use of gateway systems (integration engines) The gateway can make use of its access to closed data plus open observations to achieve implementation of an open integration

Gateway Produced DMIO PCD-15 Messages MEMDMC DMIR Closed Data Source Open Data Source MEMDMC DMIC DMIO PCD-15 CMMS/CEMS Gateway Interface System Proprietary Reporter Consumer Gateway provides the ability to rapidly participate with whatever data is currently available Device vendors gain rapid participation Developers gain feedback from users regarding real needs Interface vendors add to existing products in place and saleable CMMS vendors need implement only one message

Similarly, Direct or Gateway LS Messages MEMLS LOR Report Location Observation, PCD-16 RTLS System Benefits Location data available wherever, whenever needed Maintenance is more efficient Provide even higher level of patient safety Maintenance required linked to “in use” or “standby” requires immediate attention AND location is known More information populated in CMMS for more complete record More specific data for utilization, accessibility of available devices Equipment identified when alarms are required MEMLS LOC CMMS/CEMS Consumer Reporter Open Data Source Closed Data Source Gateway Interface System

ACM Profile Alert Communication Management (ACM) – Alarms – human response required – Advisories – document for later review, action Alerts can be sent by – The device as is done with physiologic data – The gateway or the CMMS as defined by developers and users

Alert Communication Management (ACM) Basic Elements HL7 Messages per ACM and WCM profiles HL7 Messages per ACM and WCM profiles Parameters, waveforms, etc. as evidentiary data items Parameters, waveforms, etc. as evidentiary data items Device Specific graphics Device Specific graphics Alert Information Source, Phase, State, Priority PatientLocationInstance Alert text CallbackTimestamp Evidentiary data Dissemination Status Instance Accepted by AC UndeliverableDeliveredReadAcceptedRejectedCancelled Callback start/stop AlertCommunicatorACAlertCommunicatorACAlertManagerAMAlertManagerAMAlertReporterARAlertReporterAR Report Alert PCD-04 → ← PCD-05 Report Alert Status Disseminate Alert PCD-06 → ← PCD-07 Disseminate Alert Status Alert Source

PCD History The gateway approach was used in the early days of the PCD domain to demonstrate communication of patient physiologic observations (DEC profile, PCD-01) not yet integrated into observation source systems This provided the DEC profile with the ability to demonstrate its usefulness without having to wait for native integration implementations to be developed In early commercial deployments this approach also provided vendors with time to engineer native support for the DEC profile into their product

History Repeats Itself The gateway approach can once again be used to implement technically feasible solutions to produce… – MEMDMC observation messages from open or closed equipment observation sources – To improve DEC, ACM, and IPEC observations through the inclusion of MEMLS observation data

Profiles and Actor Mutability IHE profile observation message content are not isolated islands of communication Observations included in the messages of one profile can be cached and included in the observation messages of another profile I.e., DMC, LS and ACM messages can be sent at the same time, from the same source as our clinical messages (DEC and other profiles)

Combining Approaches: CMMS + RTLS RTLS Enhanced Messages MEMDMC DMIR Closed Data Source Open Data Source MEMDMC DMIC DMIO PCD-15 CMMS/CEMS Gateway Proprietary DEC DOR IPEC DOR PCD-01 PCD-10 Reporter Consumer Benefits Reduced CE work steps trying to find equipment needing service CMMS doesn’t have to integrate with RTLS system Gateway need only integrate with one RTLS integration interface MEMLS Gateway and CMMS are abstracted from LS implementation technology MEMLS LOR PCD-16 RTLS System

Why Participate? Join your peers in advancing interoperability - In a safe, highly collaborative venue. Focus on your core business - limit your interface design costs. Simplify logistics for updates and recalls benefits.aspx

Available Resources Monroe led weekly (mostly) MEM and ACM WGs – Be Sure You Are In The Google Groups A Sample of IHE Resources – IHE: – Test Tools (General): – IHE-PCD:

For More Detail PCD ftp Site ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/ PCD Tests ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Patient_Care_Devices/ConnectathonsI ncludingProcessAndTesting/YR9-2015Connectathon- NIST-And-Virtual/YR %20North%20American%20Connectathon%20Test ing/

PCD Messages and Test Schedule June – Sep: Review/add/update tests Oct – Nov: Pre Connectathon Late Jan: F2F Connectathon

The Financials The PCD messages are open source and available on line To Join IHE: More than 250 employees: $1,500 4 to 250 employees: $500 Less than 4 employees: $250

Connectathon Participation, Cleveland Connectathon participation is voluntary; however it may be required to participate in a Showcase Systems First system - $8400; may include two people Other systems - $4300 People $300 each preregistered $550 late and on-site

Showcase Participation Fees not yet available for 2016 HIMSS16 AAMI 2016

Discussion Contact Information: – Manny Furst – O: (520) , M: (520) – Monroe Pattillo – M: (954) – John Garguilo – O: (301) – Paul Sherman – O: (314) , M: (314)