Michael B. Johnson P.E. State Asset Management Engineer August 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Advertisements

March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
California Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION ASSET MANAGEMENT (TAM) JOURNEY April 19, 2012.
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
Engineering Services Department of Public Utilities.
London Streets...The Way Ahead Garrett Emmerson Chief Operating Officer: London Streets.
CALTRANS’ TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT & OPERATIONS CTP 2040 PAC 1 Kris Kuhl Assistant Division Chief, Division of Traffic Operations 4/15/2014 CREATING.
Recreation and Visitor Services Bureau of Land Management … the “Purple Book” A Unified Strategy to Implement “BLM’s Priorities for Recreation and Visitor.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
Caltrans 5-Year Strategic Plan D-11 Planning Division Summary.
Indicative Business Case
NYSDOT and NYSERDA Breaking out of our silos Or…..
Facilities Management Category Management Plan Synopsis Version 1.1 (March 2015)
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
Construction Category Management Planning Version 1.1 (May 2015)
Introduction to. Sep. 4, 1997 r Engineering economy relates or applies many concepts from economics, mathematics, finance, accounting, statistics, and.
AASHTO SCOP Linking Planning to Programming P2P Link Rural Transportation Summit January 16, 2014 ADOT Vision and Long-Range Plan Planning to Programming.
Transportation/Land-Use Connections Program Program Evaluation Proposal for FY 2009 Program September 5, 2008 Darren Smith, Sarah Crawford Transportation.
GEMI Survey EHS Risk Management
Economic Analysis: Applications to Work Zones March 25, 2004.
Discussion Document By G How. History LeadershipStructureProcessesInformationEnvironment The path of Shared Services is littered with failed attempts.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Unilever Organizational Change on CRM Organizational Change Management Hanoi, 16 August
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
INVEST (Infrastructure Voluntary Evaluation Sustainability Tool) FHWA’s Sustainable Highways Initiative And Self-Evaluation Tool Constance Hill Galloway.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director
Encouraging Transportation Investment Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce Percolator Breakfast May 2, 2013 Horizons Conference Center Rich Studley, President.
1 THE FACE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION. 2 Public Transportation in the U.S. Today Transit in every state in the Union Of the 464 urbanized areas, all but.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
SECTION 1 THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
The California Performance Review: A Prescription for Change Established by Executive Order S-5-04 To Create the First 21 st Century Government in America.
Workgroup: Delivering and Accounting for Development Results
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
Sustainability Elements of the ARRA, and Getting the Most out of Stimulus Funding Jeannie Renne-Malone, LEED AP National Director – Climate Change & GHG.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
1 Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles (GARVEE) Bond Presented to the California Transportation Commission July 25, 2007.
Federal Funding Strategies Update Internal Working Document Update on Federal Funding California High-Speed Rail Authority In Partnership with: Kadesh.
Proprietary & confidential. © Decision Lens 2012 Modeling Best Practices in Transportation Jon Malpass Director, Decision Solutions.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Driving towards Impact through Development Goals Washington, DC 04/13/2011.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Michael B. Johnson P.E. Nancy Bruton P.E. California Department of Transportation National Bridge Preservation Conference - Orlando April 2014 INCORPORATING.
Making Evaluation Work for Effective Policy Reform and Revision Chris Nelson, Director, Quality and Performance Systems Branch Sophie Davies, Manager Evaluations.
Tackle problems identified by local communities – bottom up problem solving approach Natural links with other DMG projects i.e. Joint assets, high need.
97 th Annual Purdue Road School Presented by: Katie Zimmerman, P.E. Applied Pavement Technology Transportation Asset Management.
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
User Valued Research and the Distinctiveness Agenda.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 1 Inland Marine Transportation System Capital Investment Strategy Jeanine Hoey, PE, PMP Program Manager 15.
RebuildIndy Indianapolis Department of Public Works March 2011.
OUR FOCUS FOR 2011 TO 2012 The CfWI produces quality intelligence to inform better workforce planning, that improves people’s lives.
 SCDOT has over 41,000 miles of pavements and over 8,400 bridges.  4 th largest state maintained system in the country.  Started working on the TAMP.
Prioritising Capital Investment Achieving a Balance
Performance-Based Planning:
Prepared by: Paritosh Kasotia, Iowa Energy Office, IEDA
Progress on LA’s Climate Acting Efforts
INAC Water and Wastewater: Discussion on Current Policies and Processes Presented at: Circuit Rider Trainer Professional Association’s Annual General Meeting.
Becoming a Successful Construction Manager
ARC’s Project Evaluation Framework Atlanta Regional Commission
Implementing Value-Driven Asset Management in a Smaller City
ADA Transition Plan – Brief Overview
Communicating River Data to the Public: the Animas River Community Forum Monitoring Gaps Analysis Committee Chara J Ragland, Ph.D., Querencia Environmental.
VT Transportation Project Selection and Project Prioritization
Presentation transcript:

Michael B. Johnson P.E. State Asset Management Engineer August 2015

Demands on SHOPP Funds (partial listing) Safety Emergency Response Reactive safety Proactive safety Health Active Transportation Reduce criteria pollutants System Preservation Delay major repair – All assets Fund relinquishments System Rehabilitation Transportation assets Facilities Sustainability Reduce VMT Improve Resiliency Climate change Environmental/wildlife Livability Mode Choice/Bike/Ped Transportation Access Vista Points/Landscaping Economy Facilitate Goods Movement Low income transportation System Performance Improve travel reliability Reduce peak hour delay Real time driver information

SHOPP Funding Breakdown

Silo Funding Performance Paradox Pavement Objective Improve Pavement Condition Benefit Improved Pavement Benefit from other work not well captured Activities that cost money and do not improve pavement condition are seen as lower priority

Asset Management Pilot Program Multi-objective project prioritization Combined project benefits from all areas are combined together to determine the total benefit of a project Utilizes data driven parameters that are well defined Improved Transparency in project selection Single fund source programming Eliminates the denial of scope by individual program focused on one primary objective

Multi-Objective Detail Caltrans Strategic Goal #1 – Safety and Health (Conceptual Example) Safety and Health

Multi-Objective Weighting Weighting of the Departments Strategic Goals and Objectives (Conceptual) Safety and Health Safety Health Weighting Vehicle Safety Bike/Ped/Worker Safety Active Trans Criteria Pollutants Weighting

Asset Management Pilot Program

Asset Management Pilot Objectives Improving our prioritization approach is a key Pilot outcome. Capture the full project benefits Independent economic evaluation (monetization) Feedback from all involved is essential to improve going forward How did the multi-asset project approach work? Each evaluation team report how they rated the projects Each district report on lessons learned and suggested improvements External stakeholder feedback important (TAMAC)

Asset Management Pilot Program Key Information: Nomination Due Date: Friday 8/14/15 Must include at least 3 or more objectives Delivery: 2018 SHOPP (2018/ /22) Maximum Nomination Cost $3- $20 Million Committed funds outside of program can supplement total project cost Evaluation: Weighted value of five goal scores Plus independent economic evaluation Plus external stakeholder evaluation

Questions