1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22 -23, 2008 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Frank O. Holcombe,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast Dissolve Dosage Form
Advertisements

Ramana S. Uppoor, M.Pharm., Ph.D., R.Ph.
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development.
Asthma  Most common chronic illness of childhood, affecting approximately 10% children.  Available preventive therapies for persistent asthma include.
Pharmaceutical Nomenclature Issues and challenges Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Acting Director Office of New Drug Chemistry (ONDC) OPS, CDER, FDA Advisory Committee.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Medical Ergonomics and Drug Delivery Systems D. John Doyle MD PhD FRCPC March 2003.
Pharmaceutics I Introduction 1. Pharmaceutics Pharmaceutics is the science of dosage form design. There are many chemicals with known pharmacological.
Medical Ergonomics and Drug Delivery Systems D. John Doyle MD PhD FRCPC Cleveland Clinic Foundation Revision 1.6 April Slides Revision 1.6 April.
Development and Review Process of NDA, ANDA/AADA and OTC Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Associate Professor Department of Pharmaceutics KLE.
Office of New Drug Chemistry, OPS, CDER, Food and Drug Administration Establishing Dissolution Specification Current CMC Practice Vibhakar Shah, Ph.D.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Drug Formulation in Pediatrics: If it tastes bad it must be good for you Jeffrey Blumer, Ph.D., M.D. Professor of Pediatrics and Pharmacology Case Western.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
VINOD P. SHAH, PH.D. SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Pharmacy.
1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science May 3, 2005 Factors Impacting Drug Dissolution and Absorption : Current State of Science Lawrence X. Yu,
Assessing Quality-by-Design A CMC Review Perspective
FDA Nasal BA/BE Guidance Overview
Venkata Ramana S. Uppoor, M.Pharm., Ph.D., R.Ph.
Quality By Design and Dissolution PhRMA 10/25/05
Atieno Ojoo Technical Specialist, Pharmaceuticals
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
Information poster for the administration of commonly used medication in dysphagia Emma Lowe, Hilary Oldham, Joan Karasu, Sharon Platt Clinical service.
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
Drug - Device Combination Issues : Oncology Perspective Ramzi Dagher, M.D. DODP/CDER/FDA.
Formulation factors By Dr. A. S. Adebayo.
1 Suspension 1. 2  Suspension:  Suspension: A suspension is a two-phase system consisting of a finely divided solid particles dispersed in liquid, or.
SYSTEMIC ABSORPTION AS THE MOST ACCURATE AND SENSITIVE METHOD OF DETERMINING BIOEQUIVALENCE OF GENERIC TOPICAL PRODUCTS Chris Hendy Ph.D. Novum Pharmaceutical.
About OMICS Group OMICS Group is an amalgamation of Open Access Publications and worldwide international science conferences and events. Established in.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Calculating Oral Dosage
Remoxy In Vivo Abuse Resistance Studies Ping Ji, PhD Senior Clinical Pharmacologist Office of Clinical Pharmacology Center of Drug Evaluation and Research.
1 Abu Alam Ph.D. Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 23, 2008.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
Dr. Muslim Suardi, MSi., Apt. Faculty of Pharmacy University of Andalas.
Guidance Update: Average, Population, and Individual Approaches to Establishing Bioequivalence Mei-Ling Chen, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
Table of Contents.  Introduction to Pharmacology Go Go  Drugs Go Go.
Selection of essential medicines Richard Laing and Deidre Dimancesco TBS 2011 Department of Essential Medicines & Pharmaceutical Policies TBS 2008.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Solid dosage forms Tablets
Bioequivalence Criteria Research Plan Stella G. Machado, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics and the Replicate Design Technical Committee Advisory Committee.
Lawrence X. Yu, Ph.D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER, FDA ACPS Meeting, ACPS Meeting, Oct. 22, 2003 Office of Generic Drugs Research.
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products Subcommittee Introduction and Objectives Eric B. Sheinin Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center.
FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July 22-23, 2008 Introduction and Update Helen N. Winkle Director, Office of.
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
1 Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh. 2 Biopharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics is the science that examines this interrelationship of the physicochemical.
CAPSULES (KAPSUL) Prof. Dr. Henny Lucida, Apt. Definition Capsules: dosage forms in which unit doses of powder, semisolid, or liquid drugs are enclosed.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
content’s  Definition  Significance  Requirements of FDT  Formulation methodologies  Patented technologies  Potential candidates for FDT  Survey.
Topic : Compression & Consolidation
Introduction What is a Biowaiver?
Solid dosage forms Tablets
Capsules, Tablets, and Powders
Biopharmaceutics of modified release drug products
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
Introduction; Scope of Pharmacology Routes of Drug Administration
Tablet Dosage Form Lab 1.
Pharmaceutics I Introduction 1. Pharmaceutics Pharmaceutics is the science of dosage form design. There are many chemicals with known pharmacological.
Selected Calculations in Contemporary Compounding
Module 5: Acceptability
Aram I. Ibrahim University of sulaimani College of pharmacy
Pediatric Formulation Development - A quality perspective
Tablets Lecturer: dr. Asmaa abdelaziz Mohamed Faculty of pharamcay
University of sulaimani
Presentation transcript:

1 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology July , 2008 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Frank O. Holcombe, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director for Chemistry Office of Generic Drugs July 23, 2008

2 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Issue Orally Disintegrating Tablets are considered a distinct dosage form by the Food and Drug Administration. The dosage form definition describes expected functionality – i.e., disintegration. Because of the general nature of the definition, questions remain about variations and scope of the dosage form. The development of effective guidance is important for characterization and evaluation, but has been impeded by difficulty in determining meaningful criteria for this dosage form.

3 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Initial Products Produced by lyophilization Formed in blister packaging cavity Cake-like Porous/Glassy state Fragile Low weight Designed to dissolve/disintegrate on contact with saliva

4 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Initial Products Intended as a treatment advantage for target populations Trouble swallowing (pediatric, geriatric, dysphagia) General compliance issues Convenience

5 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Initial Products Considered to be a new and distinct dosage form Physical form Manufacturing technology Administration and use

6 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Initial Products Defined as: Tablet, Orally Disintegrating A solid dosage form containing medicinal substances which disintegrates rapidly, usually within a matter of seconds, when placed upon the tongue.

7 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Other Tablet Forms Based on Method of Use Tablet, Chewable Tablet, Dispersible Tablet, Effervescent Tablet, for Solution Tablet, for Suspension Tablet, Orally Disintegrating, Delayed Release Tablet, Soluble

8 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Technology Development Manufacturing process shift from lyophilization to direct compression Simpler process Less time consuming Less expensive Avoids patented technology

9 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Technology Development Direct compression tablet Allowed use of common tablet excipients Larger tablet than lyophilized product More robust product

10 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Technology Development Tablet disintegration aided by Soluble binders Effervescence Superdisintegrants

11 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Challenges “Orally Disintegrating Tablet” should represent a dosage form easily distinguishable from other tablets Definition includes “disintegrates rapidly, usually in … seconds”

12 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Challenges Trend to Compressed Tablets Larger tablets Longer disintegration times

13 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Challenges Question of When is a tablet no longer an ODT? Important issue in product labelling Critical issue for 505(j) products (ANDAs) because of requirement to be same dosage form as the reference NDA product

14 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Guidance Development Early Considerations included Disintegration times of less than 60 seconds Labelling description of product characteristics

15 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Guidance Development Current Draft Guidance General discussion of intention of dosage form Should disintegrate or dissolve rapidly on contact with saliva, eliminating need for chewing or swallowing intact tablet, or taking tablet with additional liquids.

16 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Guidance Development Current Draft Guidance General discussion of expectations for dosage form General product development considerations Recommendation for in-vitro disintegration time of no more than 30 seconds Recommendation for use of USP disintegration test method Suggested tablet weight limitation of 500 mg

17 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Public Comments on Draft Guidance Tablet Weight – Several OTC products larger than 500 mg - Would restrict use for high dose drugs - Issues can be addressed by formulation Disintegration Time – Should not be 60 seconds (can be higher or lower) - USP not an appropriate method - in-vivo/in-vitro correlations not good

18 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Public Comments on Draft Guidance Disintegration Time – in-vitro criteria not relevant to successful use of product In-vivo Evaluation – should be required, including sensory evaluation and palatability

19 Classification of Orally Disintegrating Tablets Questions 1.What properties (in-vivo or in-vitro) do you consider critical to this dosage form? 2. Should physical properties (e.g., size, formulation, and disintegration times) be a primary factor in determining conformance to this dosage form? (Yes/No/Abstain) a.If so, how specific or restrictive should the criteria be? 3. Can labeling (i.e., instructions for use) be considered sufficient to define the dosage form? (Yes/No/Abstain) a.If so, should labeling describe/include differences between/among NDA and ANDA products? 4. What, if any, special issues should be considered (e.g. Patient compliance, target populations/conditions)?