Progress Report on PSFs and Pixels Jay Anderson, Elena Sabbi, Kailash Sahu, and Matthew Bourque TIPS Feb 19, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced CCD Workshop Arne A. Henden
Advertisements

Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton.
(and especially Robert Lupton and Dustin Lang)
5/13/2015CAM Talk G.Kamberova Computer Vision Introduction Gerda Kamberova Department of Computer Science Hofstra University.
Optimal Photometry of Faint Galaxies Kenneth M. Lanzetta Stony Brook University.
ACS/WFC Geometric Distortion and CTE V. Kozhurina-Platais & ACS team.
How Does WFC3 Geometric Distortion Vary with Time ? Kozhurina-Platais.
Submillimeter Data for SINGS George J. Bendo & Robert D. Joseph (A ''George's Adventures in Learning OpenOffice'' Presentation)
ELT Stellar Populations Science Near IR photometry and spectroscopy of resolved stars in nearby galaxies provides a way to extract their entire star formation.
Aperture Photometry Not too dependent on the particular psf shape Works well when in “clean” fields – not many nearby stars, and smooth sky background.
 Image Search Engine Results now  Focus on GIS image registration  The Technique and its advantages  Internal working  Sample Results  Applicable.
TOPS 2003 Remote Obs 1 Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003 Image copyright, R. Wainscoat, IfA Image courtesy K. Meech.
WFC3/IR LESSONS FOR WFIRST Jay Anderson STScI. WFC3/IR Lessons for WFIRST 1)Absolute astrometry 2)PSF modeling and variation (space/time) 3) Bulge-type.
A Primer on Image Acquisition and Data Reduction Using TheSky6, CCDSoft V5 and Microsoft Excel Thomas C. Smith Dark Ridge Observatory (DRO)
Chapter 12 Spatial Sharpening of Spectral Image Data.
NICMOS IntraPixel Sensitivity Chun Xu and Bahram Mobasher Space Telescope Science Institute Abstract We present here the new measurements of the NICMOS.
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, K. S. Long, J. W. MacKenty, K. Noeske, J. Biretta, and the WFC3 team (STScI) WFC3 : Understanding and mitigating UVIS charge.
STEP2 simulated images Richard Massey with Molly Peeples, Will High, Catherine Heymans, etc. etc.
Optical Imaging (some selected topics)
Distortion in the WFC Jay Anderson Rice University
Dec 2, 2014 Hubble Legacy Archive and Hubble Source Catalog Rick White & Brad Whitmore Current teams: HLA: Michael Dulude, Mark Kyprianou, Steve Lubow,
PACS FM-ILT SPECTROMETER SPATIAL CALIBRATION A. Contursi (H. Feuchtgruber) PACS Science Verification Review – 8/9 November 2007 MPE-Garching.
+ AstroDrizzle Products for HST & JWST 2014 STScI Calibration Workshop Jennifer Mack, STScI.
End to End Simulations. p.2 What’s this ? This is the MUSE datacube of NGC 1068 we just received from ESO Can you remind me how many students we have.
Tod R. Lauer (NOAO) July 19, 2010 The Formation of Astronomical Images Tod R. Lauer.
2004 January 27Mathematical Challenges of Using Point Spread Function Analysis Algorithms in Astronomical ImagingMighell 1 Mathematical Challenges of Using.
High Precision Astrometry and Parallax from Spatial Scanning Part 2 Adam Riess and Stefano Casertano.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
ACS Drizzling Overview J. Mack; DA Training 10/5/07 Distortion Dither Strategies MultiDrizzle ‘Fine-tuning’ Data Quality Photometry.
1 System wide optimization for dark energy science: DESC-LSST collaborations Tony Tyson LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration meeting June 12-13, 2012.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
The Status of HST/WFC3 John W. MacKenty Space Telescope Science Institute 12 August 2014 Calibration Workshop.
Data Analysis Software Development Hisanori Furusawa ADC, NAOJ For HSC analysis software team 1.
Conversion of Stackfit to LSST software stack Status as of Feb 20, 2012.
April 2001 OPTICON workshop in Nice 1 PSF-fitting with SExtractor Emmanuel BERTIN (TERAPIX)
April 2001 OPTICON workshop in Nice 1 The PSF homogenization problem in large imaging surveys Emmanuel BERTIN (TERAPIX)
MOS Data Reduction Michael Balogh University of Durham.
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
Some thoughts on error handling for FTIR retrievals Prepared by Stephen Wood and Brian Connor, NIWA with input and ideas from others...
JWST Time-Series Pipeline Nikole K. Lewis STScI. Data Pipeline for Transiting Exoplanets The foundation for the Spitzer and Hubble data pipelines were.
Difference Image Analysis at OAC Groningen, 1st Dec 2004 AW-OAC team.
July 21, 2004 Natalia Kuznetsova NICMOS Analysis of ACS ● Data Inventory ● Calibration ● Bad pixel mask ● Extracting photometry ● Next steps 1.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. CCDs: noise sources dark current –signal from unexposed CCD read noise –uncertainty in counting electrons in.
Selection and Characterization of Interesting Grism Spectra Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University Gerhardt R. Meurer The Johns Hopkins University.
" Fitting methods with direct convolution for shear measurements." STEP Workshop August 2007 M. Shmakova.
Digital Aperture Photometry ASTR 3010 Lecture 10 Textbook 9.5.
Faculty meeting - 13 Dec 2006 The Hubble Legacy Archive Harald Kuntschner & ST-ECF staff 13 December 2006.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 Performance Summary in Key Science Areas Verify that WFC3 as designed is capable of carrying out the WFC3.
The STIS NUV-MAMA objective prism … … and looking beyond for HST UV slitless spectroscopy Jes ú s Ma í z Apell á niz HST Calibration worskhop 26 October.
Improved ACS Geometrical Distortion Correction Richard Hook TIPS Meeting, STScI, 18th December 2003.
In conclusion the intensity level of the CCD is linear up to the saturation limit, but there is a spilling of charges well before the saturation if.
S. Baggett, J. Anderson, J. MacKenty, J. Biretta, K. Noeske, and the WFC3 team (STScI) HST/WFC3 UVIS Detectors: Radiation Damage Effects and Mitigation.
WFC3 SMOV UVIS and IR Geometric Distortion Calibration and Multidrizzle Vera Kozhurina-Platais and WFC3 team.
All-sky source search Aim: Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Selection criteria Algorithms Iteration Simulations Energy information.
Validation of HLA Source Lists Feb. 4, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Overview 2.Plots 3.Summary.
A.Zanichelli, B.Garilli, M.Scodeggio, D.Rizzo
An Unexpected Hysteresis Effect Seen in Hawaii-2RG Detectors
JWST Pipeline Overview
CCD Image Processing …okay, I’ve got a bunch of .fits files, now what?
NIRSpec simulation data-package
WFPC2 1-Gyro Test Results
Chris Willott, Loic Albert, René Doyon, and the FGS/NIRISS Team
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Basics of Photometry.
CdZnTe Substrate Photoluminescence in HgCdTe Arrays
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
ACS PSF Variations Over The Field of View & ACS Coronagraph Status
Presentation transcript:

Progress Report on PSFs and Pixels Jay Anderson, Elena Sabbi, Kailash Sahu, and Matthew Bourque TIPS Feb 19, 2015

Lots of Inter-related Issues Why do we need a good PSF? (Or do we?) How do we get a good PSF? How do we use a good PSF? Issues involve: – Distortion solutions – Image alignment and reference frames – High-precision transformations – PSF modeling (spatial and time variability) – Forward modeling into data domain – Deconvolution – Background matching – Pixel-area corrections Chicken and Egg Problems

Why Do We Need a Good PSF? Not everyone does… High-precision science – PSF-fitting of bright stars Photometry to 1% Astrometry to 0.01 pixel – PSF-fitting of faint stars Simultaneous photometry to optimize S/N – Fitting barely-resolved galaxies Weak-lensing analysis, profiles, point-source removal, deconvolution

How Do We Get a Good PSF? Deal with undersampled nature of detectors – WFC3/IR: up to 40% of light in central pixel – ACS/WFC: up to 23% of light in central pixel – WFC3/UVIS: up to 18% of light in central pixel Deal with spatial variations – Every ~500 pixels the PSF changes appreciably – Geometric optics, Charge diffusion variation – Tiny Tim models not very good Deal with time variations – Focus changes… model? – Often not enough stars in an image to extract – “Library” PSFs actually quite useful No standard format for PSF models, no obvious tools – “effective” PSF is one approach – Purely empirical -vs- model-based – Will suggest a “standard” format

How to Use a Good PSF? Push through astrodrizzle – Must plant stars in multiple FLTs consistently – “Fuzzy” constraints uneven sampling, correlated noise Fit to the individual FLT/FLC pixels – The only “hard”, independent constraints Can properly treat the errors – Easier for bright isolated point-sources “one-pass” – Harder for faint or resolved objects Must simultaneously interrelate the FLT pixels with scene Must properly convolve model of scene to match pixels

The Impasse Many tasks at once – Provide PSFs – Provide access to pixel mappings – Provide tools to use Institute is in a unique position – Users can’t be expected to solve all these probs Requires astronomer-decades… – Legacy value for HST (higher-level data products) – Practice for JWST (on hook) This talk – Progress report – Stimulate ideas, pique interest

This Talk Intro Mapping – Frontier Fields: hst2galign routine – Enables inter-image mapping PSFs – PSF study of F606W WFC3/UVIS archive – Suggested “standard” PSF format Tools – “bundles”: convenient structure for modeling

Frontier Fields hst2galign

“CENTROID” POSITIONS “TEMPLATE-FIT” POSITIONS

Other Filters/Detectors hst2galign software takes *_flc.fits list and flags it outputs “mat” files of point-association lists allows mapping of FLT to REF frame uses distortion reference images

This Talk Intro Mapping – Frontier Fields: hst2galign routine – Enables inter-image mapping PSFs – PSF study of F606W WFC3/UVIS archive – Suggested “standard” PSF format Tools – “bundles”: convenient structure for modeling

PSFs: Spatial variation F606W WFC3/UVIS Spatial variations

Star Images from Entire UVIS Archive 5,013,607 star images extracted raster of 21×21 pixels extracted for each record (i,j) location and sky and fitted position/flux

Star Images from Entire UVIS Archive 5,013,607 star images extracted raster of 21×21 pixels extracted for each recorded (i,j) location and sky and fitted position/flux S/N Distribution

PSF Moments “A” excess “B” excess

PSF Moments “A” excess “B” excess “A” corner

How the upper-left PSF changes with Focus

Solving for the Focus in an exposure To do: * extend analysis to entire chip * determine how many stars are needed * correlate with focus model Encouraging!

Suggested “Standard” PSF format A 3-D fits image cube – NX×NY = N TOT PSFs Specify i,j fiducial locations – Each PSF is 101×101 pixels Super-sampled ×4 Covers 25×25 pixels (out to r=12.5) Normalized to have flux of 1.0 within 10 pix – Already available for many filters/detectors Tools: –get_psf [i CEN,j CEN,psfloc()] Returns local PSF at detector location –rpsf_phot [Δx, Δy,psfloc()] Returns fraction of light in particular pixel NPSFs % 101

Example of the fits header for a STD PSF

This Talk Intro Mapping – Frontier Fields: hst2galign routine – Enables inter-image mapping PSFs – PSF study of F606W WFC3/UVIS archive – Suggested “standard” PSF format Tools – “bundles”: convenient structure for modeling

A High-level Product: Pixel Bundles Putting it all together – Uses the alignment from hst2galign – Identify an object of interest and size (ie, 21×21 pix) Bundle-extraction routine: hst2bundle bundle_21x21_00630_00979.fits

The Bundle Itself A set of N RAST × N RAST × NIMs fits images – in 8 extensions 1-3 FROM FLT 4-5 DIRECT MAPPING EACH PIXEL TO REF-FRAME 6-7 REVERSE MAPPING FROM REF-FRAME TO LOCAL PIXEL 8 PSF (actually 101 × 101 × NIMs)

The Pixels in the Bundle

A Bundle is Like an “object” Can imagine python “methods” to analyze Bundle2process example routine – DUMP (output P,E,DQ,I,J,U,V,PSF…) – PIXCOMP (to rem artifacts, match sky) – XYZFIT_IND – XYZFIT_SIM – STACKING Point-source fitting Deconv fwd-model Documentation…

This Talk Intro Mapping – Frontier Fields: hst2galign routine – Enables inter-image mapping PSFs – PSF study of F606W WFC3/UVIS archive – Suggested “standard” PSF format Tools – “bundles”: convenient structure for modeling Discussion…