10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
Advertisements

Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Recent Results on the Possibility of Observing a Standard Model Higgs Boson Decaying to WW (*) Majid Hashemi University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Kevin Black Meenakshi Narain Boston University
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Measuring the Top Quark Cross Section in the Semileptonic Channel Andrea Bangert.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
Status and Plans for the Measurement of the Top Quark Production Cross Section in the Leptons plus Jets Channel Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei.
Update on Pileup Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Young Scientist Workshop, , Ringberg Castle.
Update from UAZ Xiaowen Lei, Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Mario Aletti (U. Arizona)
Di-Lepton Channel in ATLAS S. Tokár, Comenius Univ. Bratislava 9/10/2015S. Tokár, Cz-Sk meeting, Košice1.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Multijet Resonances or how we could totally miss the new physics Amitabh Lath Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey with Sunny Chuang, Rouven Essig,
Steps toward ttH (H->bb) in the Atlas ‘PhysicsAnalysis’ Environment. Chris Collins-Tooth Christian Shaw.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
5/28/2002UTA group meeting1 An update of top to stop analysis How to estimate W->e cross section? Why the w to e cross section I used is so big? Next Choose.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
Study of tt production at NLO Stan Bentvelsen Edwin Bos.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Background Shape Study for the ttH, H  bb Channel Catrin Bernius First year talk 15th June 2007 Background Shape Study for the ttH 0, H 0  bb Channel.
Update on searches for ZZ signal in the 3 electron channel Azeddine Kasmi Bob Kehoe Many Thanks to: David, Pavel, Julia LO NLO.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
VHF working meeting, 4 Oct Measurement of associated charm production in W final states at  s=7TeV J. Alcaraz, I. Josa, J. Santaolalla (CIEMAT,
H->WW->lνlν Analysis - Improvements and results - - Data and MC - Higgs Working group meeting, 6 January 2011 Magda Chełstowska & Rosemarie Aben.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
Methodology and examples to determine fake rate separate signal from background Using fit on sideband. Using independent control sample.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Top Full simulation study B. Zilka, S.Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava.
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Update on Invisible Higgs analysis in the tth channel
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
Top Tagging at CLIC 1.4TeV Using Jet Substructure
Top quark search update
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Bose-Einstein correlations in 8 TeV DATA with jets
NIKHEF / Universiteit van Amsterdam
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
tt+jets simulation comparisons
semileptonic ttbar + jet events
W boson helicity measurement
Generation of samples for VBF H0-->ZZ*-->bbll
Prospects for sparticle reconstruction at new SUSY benchmark points
ttbar Cross-Section Studies leading to ttbar Resonance
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
b-tagging efficiency in L+jets at 7TeV
Top to stop data analysis update
Presentation transcript:

10 TeV Updates on Efficiencies and Event Shapes Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona) Single lepton + jets channel

2 Efficiencies  We updated single lepton selection reference tables with event numbers after each cut mc event weight (either 1 or -1) are taken into account Tables are filled for the following samples:  Ttbar: (mcatnlo), (acermc) in e/mu + jets chn  Wenu+Np: , , ; Wmunu+Np: , , Problems and to-dos:  For sample, we only see dilepton events. Is this a problem with the generation?  We will update the numbers for the background once the new bug-fixed samples are ready.  Will fill the table for KKgluon or Z’->ttbar samples once we can find rel14 samples on the grid. On the twiki page  BenchMark#Single_lepton_channel

3 Cuts from the Spreadsheet  Cut 1 – lepton trigger EF_e20i or EF_mu20  Cut 2 – exactly 1 lepton with Pt>20GeV  Cut 3 – MET>20GeV  Cut 4 – 4 good jets with Pt>30GeV  Cut 5 – 3 good jets with Pt>40GeV  Cut 6 – 150<m_jj<190GeV

4 e+jet Efficiencies  Efficiencies

5 mu+jet Efficiency  Efficiencies

6 10 TeV Top  We made preliminary comparison of samples and samples 5200: T1_McAtNlo_Jimmy; No Full Had; pb* : AcerMCttbarHerwig; No Full Had; pb*2.01  As a first step we looked at jet multiplicity, jet pt, and lepton pt spectrum Loose jet: et > 15GeV, abs(eta) < 2.5 Lepton: plots are without cuts  These plots show that the two samples are almost identical. No big difference are spotted  Further comparison will be made

7 Comparison of and Jet pt:

8 Comparison of and Jet mulplicity: Lepton pt spectrum:

9 Comparison of and  m(jjj) where jjj == highest vector Pt (e+jets):

10 Topological Variables  We use / samples for background, instead of using all (2,3)/108245(6,7) samples Cuts have higher efficiency on 8243 and 8247, thus we get more statistics, and thus the influence of the “repeated events” is relatively small  Use events which passed cuts 1-5 Cut 6 leaves too few events for the background  Added masschisq as one of the event shape variables masschisq = (hadTopMass – TopPDGmass)^2/Sigmajjb^2 + (lepTopMass – TopPDGmass)^2/Sigmalnb^2 + (hadWmass – WPDGmass)^2/Sigmajj^2  A total number of 12 transformed variables are currently used  See following slides for comparison plots  Improved fits to the template functions  See following slides for fittings

Topological Variables – e+jets log(ht): sum(et) for jets et>15GeV log(ht_2): log(et_j1+et_j2) log(ht_3): log(et_j3+et_j4) log(ht’_2): log(Sum(et)_j234/S um(pz)_j1234) log(he) is also used but not shown here 11

Topological Variables – e+jets log(centrality): log(ht/he) exp(-11apla): apla = 3/2Q_1 log(sphe): sphe = 3/2(Q_1+Q_2) 12

Topological Variables – e+jets Log(mjj_min): minimum dijet mass Use 4 leading jets dPhi: angle between leading lepton and missing et log(K’_Tmin): minimum dijet distance * et of the lower in the pair / hadronic W et masschisq 13

14 Topological Variable Fits – e+jets

15 Topological Variable Fits – e+jets

16 Topological Variable Fits – e+jets

17 Topological Likelihood Lt e+jets: mu+jets:

18 Work in Progress to Optimize Topo Vars  We are comparing the jet pt distributions between sig and bkg, for 1 st,2 nd,3 rd,4 th leading jets, to find out what serves as the best combination  We are also learning from CDF to compare different variables and choose the best ones Some of the variables are similar (not exactly the same, for example, they use 3 leading jets for most variables instead of 4 leading jets) They also use some different variables  Also want to try TMVA package to find the best likelihood/discrimator  We need to reduce the number of the variables used since a lot of them are similar  A simple macro for fitting the ratio is ready. Will prepare simple mixed sample to test the likelihood

19 Different Topo Variables from CDF

20 Conclusions  Updated semi-leptonic efficiency tables and made preliminary comparison of and samples  Have improved fits and top likelihood Next will test the likelihood in ratio fitting and continue to optimize  We also would like to study lepton isolation for the trigger  Need additional background samples to increase the statistics Atlfast sample exist but no replicas on the grid? Maybe we should contact W+jets group.  mc *AlpgenJimmyWenuNp*_pt20.recon.AOD.e349_a68  mc *AlpgenJimmyWmunuNp*_pt20. recon.AOD.e349_a68  Will do the same for release 14 KKgluon or Z’->ttbar sample once we can find them on the grid KKgluon not ready yet? Z’->ttbar only privately generated?