Llad Phillips1 Part I Strategies to Estimate Deterrence Part II Optimization of the Criminal Justice System
Llad Phillips2 Testing crime control
Llad Phillips3 Crime Generation Crime Control Offense Rate Per Capita Expected Cost of Punishment Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Weak Link
Llad Phillips4 Suicide AS A Proxy For Causes of Homicide
Llad Phillips5 FBI Vs. Vital Statistics
Llad Phillips6 Homicide Rate & Suicide Rate
Llad Phillips7 Schematic Model Causes Homicide Controls: Imprisonment rate Clearance ratio
Llad Phillips8 The story over time
Llad Phillips9 A Control Story: US _ _ Clearance ratio for homicide was falling from n _ _ This could explain the rising homicide rate from _ _ Imprisonment rate was pretty stable until 1980 when it started rising _ _ This could explain the falling homicide rate from
Llad Phillips10 Empirical Study of Certainty and Severity
Llad Phillips11 Empirical Study of Certainty, Severity, & Causality
Llad Phillips12 Outline _ Human Capital & Other News _ Studying for the Midterm _ Deterrence: _ Evidence pro _ Evidence con
Llad Phillips13 Human Capital news
Llad Phillips14 About 60% Of 9 th graders Get a diploma somewhere
Llad Phillips15 The high Hurdle? Algebra
Llad Phillips16 Studying For the Midterm _
Llad Phillips17
Llad Phillips18
Llad Phillips19
Llad Phillips20
Llad Phillips21
Llad Phillips22 Deterrence: conceptual issues _ _ Controlling for causality _ _ Simultaneity
Llad Phillips23 Source: Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice Expect Get
Llad Phillips24 Crime Generation Crime Control Offense Rate Per Capita Expected Cost of Punishment Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Weak Link Control for Causality
Llad Phillips25 Crime Generation Crime Control Offense Rate Per Capita Expected Cost of Punishment Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Weak Link Recognize Simultaneity
Llad Phillips26 News Over the Weekend _ Deep Recession high Unemployment rate Keynesian Economics drop money from a helicopter? Or invest in infrastructure? TransportationEnergyindependencegreen
Llad Phillips27 Greening the Earth _ Greening UCSB _ Rec-Cen
Llad Phillips28 Human development Index and Electricity Use
Llad Phillips29 Production Function
Llad Phillips30
Llad Phillips31
Llad Phillips32
Llad Phillips33 Policy Comment About Economic Development _ _ An Obama Keynesian strategy: invest in infrastructure _ _ Past investments in infrastructure _ _ Canals _ _ Railroads _ _ Paved roads _ _ Airways _ _ ?
Llad Phillips34 Cesare Marchetti “Fifty-Year Pulsation In Human Affairs” Futures 17(3): (1986) MARCHETTI-069.pdf MARCHETTI-069.pdf Cesare Marchetti “Fifty-Year Pulsation In Human Affairs” Futures 17(3): (1986) MARCHETTI-069.pdf MARCHETTI-069.pdf _ _ Example: the construction of railroad miles is logistically distributed
Llad Phillips35 90%10%
Llad Phillips36 Cesare Marchetti
Llad Phillips37
Llad Phillips38 Cesare Marchetti: Energy Technology: Coal, Oil, Gas, Nuclear 52 years57 years56 years
Llad Phillips39 Cesare Marchetti
Llad Phillips40 Theodore Modis Figure 4. The data points represent the percentage deviation of energy consumption in the US from the natural growth-trend indicated by a fitted S-curve. The gray band is an 8% interval around a sine wave with period 56 years. The black dots and black triangles show what happened after the graph was first put together in 1988.[7] Presently we are entering a “spring” season. WWI occurred in late “summer” whereas WWII in late “winter”.
Llad Phillips41
Llad Phillips42
Llad Phillips43 Causality? Misery IndexOffense Rate Mystery Force
Llad Phillips44
Llad Phillips45 Crime Generation Crime Control Offense Rate Per Capita Expected Cost of Punishment Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Weak Link Control for Causality
Llad Phillips46
Llad Phillips
Llad Phillips48
Llad Phillips49
Llad Phillips50 Part I Strategies to Estimate Deterrence
Llad Phillips51 Questions About Crime _ Why is it difficult to empirically demonstrate the control effect of deterrence on crime? _ What is the empirical evidence that raises questions about deterrence? _ What is the empirical evidence that supports deterrence?
Llad Phillips52 Evidence Against the Death Penalty Being a Deterrent _ Contiguous States _ Maine: no death penalty _ Vermont: death penalty _ New Hampshire: death penalty _ Little Variation in the Homicide Rate _ Source: Study by Thorsten Sellin in Hugo Bedau, The Death Penalty in America
Llad Phillips54 Isaac Ehrlich Study of the Death Penalty: _ Homicide Rate Per Capita _ Control Variables _ probability of arrest _ probability of conviction given charged _ Probability of execution given conviction _ Causal Variables _ labor force participation rate _ unemployment rate _ percent population aged years _ permanent income _ trend
Ehrlich Results: Elasticities of Homicide with respect to Controls Source: Isaac Ehrlich, “The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment
Llad Phillips56 Critique of Ehrlich by Death Penalty Opponents _ Time period used: _ period of declining probability of execution _ Ehrlich did not include probability of imprisonment given conviction as a control variable _ Causal variables included are unconvincing as causes of homicide
Llad Phillips57 U.S. United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips58 U.S. United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips59 What is the Empirical Evidence that Supports Deterrence? _ Domestic violence and police intervention _ Experiments with control groups _ Traffic Black Spots _ Focused enforcement efforts
Llad Phillips60 Traffic Black Spots _ Blood Alley _ Highway 126 _ San Marcos Pass _ Highway 154
Llad Phillips61 San Marcos Pass Experiment _ Increase Highway Patrols _ Increase Arrests _ Total accidents decrease _ Injury accidents decrease _ Accidents involving drinking under the influence decrease
Llad Phillips62
Los Angeles Traffic Map
Llad Phillips64 Domestic Violence & Police Intervention
Llad Phillips
Llad Phillips66 Female Victims of Violent Crime,
Llad Phillips67 Homicides of Intimates,
Llad Phillips68 Female Victims of Violent Crime _ In 1994 _ 1 homicide for every 23,000 women (12 or older) _ females represented 23% of homicide victims in US _ 9 out of 10 female victims were murdered by males _ 1 rape for every 270 women _ 1 robbery for every 240 women _ 1 assault for every 29 women
Victims of Lone Offenders* Annual Average Numbers
Llad Phillips70 United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips71
Llad Phillips72 Average Annual Rate of Violent Victimizations Per 1000 Females
Llad Phillips73
Llad Phillips74 Declining Trends in Intimate Violence: Homicide
Llad Phillips75 Nonfatal Violent victimization Rates
Llad Phillips76 United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips77 United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips78 United States Bureau of Justice Statistics
Llad Phillips79
Llad Phillips80 Nonfatal intimate Victimization Rates By Age
Llad Phillips81
Llad Phillips82 Female victimization rates by relationship
Llad Phillips83
Llad Phillips84
Llad Phillips85
Llad Phillips86 Intimate homicides by weapon type
Llad Phillips87 Domestic Violence in California
Llad Phillips88
Llad Phillips89 Domestic Violence Rates in California: : per : per 100,000
Llad Phillips90 Domestic Violence in California 1988: 94% Male Arrests 1998: 83.5% Male Arrests
Llad Phillips91 Police Intervention with Experimental Controls _ A 911 call from a family member _ the case is randomly assigned for “treatment” _ A police patrol responds and visits the household _ police calm down the family members _ based on the treatment randomly assigned, the police carry out the sanctions
Llad Phillips92 Why is Treatment Assigned Randomly? _ To control for unknown causal factors _ assign known numbers of cases, for example equal numbers, to each treatment _ with this procedure, there should be an even distribution of difficult cases in each treatment group
Llad Phillips call (characteristics of household Participants unknown) Random Assignment code blue code gold patrol responds settles the household verbally warn the husbandtake the husband to jail for the night
Llad Phillips94 Part II Optimization of the Criminal Justice System
Llad Phillips95 Questions About Statistical Studies of Deterrence _ Do we know enough about the factors that cause crime? _ Can we find variables that will control for variation in crime generation? _ We have better measures for the factors that control crime than for the factors that cause crime. _ Unknown variation in crime generation may mask the effects of crime control.
Llad Phillips96 Crime Generation Crime Control Offense Rate Per Capita Expected Cost of Punishment Schematic of the Criminal Justice System Causes ? (detention, deterrence) Expenditures Weak Link
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control 1 2 3
Source: Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice
control Causal factors
Expenditures per Capita Offenses Per Capita Crime Control Technology South Dakota North Dakota 2500 Index crimes per 100,000 people $100 $0 0
Llad Phillips101 Optimization of the Criminal Justice System (CJS) _ Minimize damages to victims plus the costs of control, subject to the crime control technology _ damages to victims per capita = loss rate per offense * offense rate per capita _ Costs of control = per capita expenditures on CJS _ Total cost = damages + expenditures
Expenditures per Capita Offenses Per Capita Crime Control Technology South Dakota North Dakota 2500 Index crimes per 100,000 people $100 Total cost = expenditures per capita $200 $0 0
Expenditures per Capita Offenses Per Capita Crime Control Technology South Dakota North Dakota 2500 Index crimes per 100,000 people $100 Total cost = expenditures per capita Total cost = damages to victims $200 $ Index offenses per 100,000 people = 0.05 per capita
Llad Phillips104 Expenditures per Capita Offenses Per Capita Crime Control Technology South Dakota North Dakota Index crimes per capita $100 Total cost = expenditures per capita Total cost = damages to victims Total cost = $200 per capita = damages to victims = loss rate*0.05 so loss rate = $4,000 per Index Crime in South Dakota $200 $0 0
Source: Phillips: Lecture One
Llad Phillips106 Expenditures per capita Offenses Per Capita 2500 Index crimes per 100,000 people $100 Total cost = expenditures per capita Total cost = damages to victims Family of Total Cost Curves High Low
Llad Phillips107 Expenditures per Capita Offenses Per Capita Crime Control Technology South Dakota North Dakota 2500 Index crimes per 100,000 people $100 Total cost = expenditures per capita Total cost = damages to victims
Llad Phillips108 Application of the Economic Paradigm _ Specify the feasible options _ the states of the world: Crime control technology _ Value the options _ loss rate per offense _ Optimize _ Pick the lowest cost point on the crime control technology
That’s all folks!
Crime Generation 1. variation of offense rate per capita with expected cost of punishment 2. Shift in the relationship with a change in causal factors Offense rate per capita Expected cost(severity) of punishment crime generation function
Crime Generation 1. variation of offense rate per capita with expected cost of punishment 2. Shift in the relationship with a change in causal factors Offense rate per capita Expected cost(severity) of punishment crime generation function High causal conditions Low causal conditions
Production Function for the Criminal Justice System (CJS) 1. Variation in expected costs of punishment with criminal justice system expenditure per capita Expected costs of punishment Criminal Justice System expenditures per capita production function
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square 45 0
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
per capita expenditures on CJS offense rate per capita expected cost of punishment Crime Generation Four-Way Diagram: Crime Generation & Crime Control per capita expenditures on CJS Production Function square
Llad Phillips123 Female Victims of Violent Crime
Llad Phillips124
Llad Phillips125
Llad Phillips126
Long Swings in the Homicide Rate in the US: Source: Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice
Llad Phillips128 United States Bureau of Justice Statistics Long Swings in The Homicide Rate
Llad Phillips129