Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Campus Improvement Plans
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Massachusetts Department of Education EDUCATOR DATABASE Informational Sessions Overview: September 2005 Web:
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
The 2013 Legislative Session and You – Statute Changes Affecting Schools Iowa Department of Education.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Session Materials  Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Common Principles of Effective Practice (CPEP)
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A joint presentation of the Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and Higher Education Collaboration and the Stanford University School of Education.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Using data for instructional decision-making
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director

Iowa’s Approach to Evaluation, Professional Development, & Compensation The Iowa Context Infrastructure in place Intent of the Legislation The Iowa Student Achievement and Teacher Quality Program Components that provide support and accountability Cross-walk of essential elements Going to scale state-wide Lessons learned Next steps

The Iowa Context Infrastructure Well functioning Area Education Agencies (AEAs) Strong pre-service programs State initiatives in content already underway Cooperative atmosphere between teacher unions, administrator organizations, DE, and AEAs

The Iowa Context Iowa Student Achievement and Teacher Quality Program (2001) Establishes structure for Mentoring and Induction, Professional Development, Evaluation, and Career Levels

Intent of the Iowa Legislation To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding teachers are a key component in student success. Senate File 476

The program's goals are to: enhance student achievement and to redesign compensation strategies and teachers' professional development. Senate File 476

Teacher Quality Program Supports: are designed to increase student achievement by increasing teacher quality offer teachers opportunities to improve their instructional practices attract and retain high performing teachers reward teachers for improving their skills and knowledge in a manner that translates into better student learning establish increased accountability for quality teaching build on already existing supports

Standards in Iowa Code: Criteria established by stakeholder group and adopted by State Board Provide a set of knowledge and skills that reflects the best evidence available regarding effective teaching. Provide teachers and administrators consistent criteria for determining what constitutes effective teaching in Iowa schools. Foster ongoing dialogue about effective practices. Teachers and the evaluator use the standards and criteria for determining what evidence to collect for the comprehensive evaluation for beginning teachers and the performance reviews for career teachers. Iowa Teaching Iowa Teaching Standards

Eight Iowa Teaching Standards 1.Demonstrates ability to enhance academic performance and support for implementation of the school districts’ student achievement goals. 2.Demonstrates competence in content knowledge appropriate to the teaching position. 3.Demonstrates competence in planning and preparing for instruction. Senate File 476

4.Uses strategies to deliver instruction that meets the multiple learning needs of students. 5.Uses a variety of methods to monitor student learning. 6.Demonstrates competence in classroom management. 7.Engages in professional growth. 8.Fulfills professional responsibilities established by the school district. Senate File 476

Beginning Teachers Salary minimum Initial License (2 year) Evaluation (Comprehensive Evaluation) Must meet teaching standards Evaluation determines eligibility for standard license

Mentoring and Induction Provided for all 1st and 2nd year beginning teachers Funds are appropriated for districts/AEAs based on the number of 1 st and 2 nd year teachers ($1,300 per mentee) AEAs provide technical assistance and training for mentors A model plan has been developed to assist districts in their work

Mentoring and Induction 4 th year of program – 100% of districts have a mentoring plan At the end of the 2 nd year the beginning teacher’s evaluator makes a decision to move the teacher from an initial license to a standard license A 3 rd year of mentoring is available to beginning teacher who needs additional assistance to move to a standard license. The district must pay for the program. (Title II)

Career Teachers Salary Evaluation (Performance Reviews) Classroom observation Implementation of individual career plan Documentation from other evaluators, peers, students, parents Not meeting Iowa Teaching Standards Intensive Assistance 5 th year in career level ineligible for pay increases

Professional Development Iowa Professional Development Model District Career Development Plans Iowa Content Networks Individual Teacher Career Development Plans

Key Elements of the Model Focus on curriculum and instruction Study of implementation All site personnel Specific student learning goals Intensive professional development Collaboration Ongoing follow-up, support, & technical assistance Formative and summative evaluation Focus on curriculum and instruction Study of implementation All site personnel Specific student learning goals Intensive professional development Collaboration Ongoing follow-up, support, & technical assistance Formative and summative evaluation

Iowa Professional Development Standards District Career Development Plans address: Iowa Teaching Standards Research-based instructional strategies District student achievement goals Training and learning opportunities that target instruction and design that includes: Theory, demonstration, practice, observation Collaboration and study of implementation Integration of instructional technology Evaluation (instructional practice & student learning) All staff responsible for instruction

Individual Teacher Career Development Plan Based on Iowa Teaching Standards and district/building student achievement goals Annual meeting with teacher and evaluator to review goal(s) and refine plan Individual Plans should be a direct fit with District Career Development Plans Based on Iowa Teaching Standards and district/building student achievement goals Annual meeting with teacher and evaluator to review goal(s) and refine plan Individual Plans should be a direct fit with District Career Development Plans

Professional Development Resources Iowa Content Networks Source for reviews of research studies for use by local districts Iowa PD Model Training Materials Set of print resources for local districts Case studies of Iowa Districts e/tqt/tc/prodev.html

Content Network About This ProjectAbout This Project Selecting Content Definitions Upcoming Additions How to Get Studies HelpSelecting ContentDefinitionsUpcoming AdditionsHow to Get StudiesHelp What you will find on the Content Network website is an initial organization of research in the areas of reading, mathematics, and science.

Search Path: State of Iowa > Educate > Teacher Quality > Professional Development > Content NetworkState of IowaEducateTeacher QualityProfessional Development Updated Search Path: State of Iowa > Educate > Teacher Quality > Professional Development > Content NetworkState of IowaEducateTeacher QualityProfessional Development Updated The Research Continuum The Content Network Teams reviewed the research articles based on a continuum that measured the research according to specific criteria.

Evaluation System Evaluation processes locally driven Evaluations are required at the end of year two for beginning teachers and every three years for career level teachers Includes an intensive assistance component Statewide adoption of standards and criteria for teachers Uniform summative evaluation tool for beginning teachers

Preparing Evaluators Extensive evaluator training provided $1,000 awarded for completion of training The Evaluator Training process developed skills in the following areas: Support for Teaching Standards Data Collection Skills Feedback Techniques Data-driven Leadership

Evaluator Training Process: Train administrators to make license recommendations at the end of a 2 year induction program. Integrates with district career development planning efforts. Is an interagency effort. Higher education programs are certified to provide training.

Going to Scale DE provided: State-wide capacity building efforts to support PD, MI and Evaluation Rules/procedures to create structures and accountability for PD, MI, & Evaluation Models of quality professional development in Reading and Math (Science to be added)

Legislative Proposal 2007 Revamp Career II/Advanced Focus on strengths of professional development Establish Regional Academies Establish “teacher leaders” Establish Administrator Quality Program Mentoring/Induction Iowa Leadership Standards Evaluation Professional Development

Implementation Timeline Districts volunteered to implement – over 95% Mentoring and Induction Salary increases for beginning and career teachers (year 3) Team-based variable pay pilots implemented Content networks formed

Implementation Timeline… All districts implementing 10 days of training for evaluators Stakeholder group develops Iowa professional development model Content networks release initial information Team-based variable pay evaluation

Implementation Timeline… Salary increases $24,500 (1 st & 2 nd year teachers) $25,500 (3 rd year teachers) $26,000 (4 th year teachers) TBVP Pilot continues School districts implement district career plans as approved in their Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Regional Academies implemented/ summer ’05 Addition of equivalent of 1 PD day to teacher contracts

Evaluation TBVP pilots did not reveal any conclusive results Mentoring and Induction are viewed as a retention factor and supportive of new teachers Salary rankings in US have not improved (budget shortfalls, etc. have not provided additional increases as expected) Comprehensive evaluation of program due in 2007

Professional Development Evaluation Examining District PD Plans Iowa Teacher Development Academies Studying teacher implementation and student results Preliminary input shows students are responding to changes in instruction

When Quality PD is provided positive things happen… Kids are excited about the books from which they can choose. Kids like coming to this class! A student who refused to pick a book to read, so I picked for him, hated the book, dislikes reading, told me last Friday, “Hey, this is really a good book!” I’m surprised about the number of my students who have finished books and gone on to the second or third. Also, the smiles on their faces when they proudly show me how much they have read. Several students have said they are really happy they can read their book.

04-05 Costs $1,300 per new teacher for 2 years = $4.2M One day of PD = $10M District allocation for teacher salaries = $46.3M Department costs for staffing, technical assistance = state funds $400,000 and is supplemented with federal funds

For Additional Information ese/tqt/tc/index.html