Identification of the Key Areas for the TIARA R&D Program P. Pierini For the WP4 T.Garvey (PSI), D. Schulte (CERN), B. Launé (CNRS), L. Lilje (DESY), O.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TIARA: Status WP4 C. Omet, GSI 1.Update on WP members 2.Tasks 3.Meetings 4.Schedule 5.Status 14/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting1.
Advertisements

ISIS Accelerator Division
Friday 28 th April Review of the aims and recommendations from the workshop L. Rinolfi.
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Nick Walker KEK-DESY meeting 7 th March 2005.
Helmholtz International Center for Oliver Boine-Frankenheim GSI mbH and TU Darmstadt/TEMF FAIR accelerator theory (FAIR-AT) division Helmholtz International.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Working Group 1: Microwave Acceleration Summary 10 July 2009.
FFAG Fixed Field Alternating Gradient synchrotrons, FFAGs, combine some of the main advantages of both cyclotrons and synchrotrons:  Fixed magnetic field.
Summary of AWG4: Beam Dynamics A. Latina (CERN), N. Solyak (FNAL) LCWS13 – Nov 11-15, 2013 – The University of Tokyo, Japan.
Main Linac Integration Work Packages Chris Adolphsen Dec 11, 2007 High Priority Items in Red.
ESPG R. Aleksan November 28 th, 2011 Accelerator R&D Accelerator R&D 1.Introduction 2.Accelerator Science and Technology 3.Conclusion.
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
UKNF OsC RAL – 31 st January 2011 UKNF - Status, high lights, plans J. Pozimski.
Paris 5 September 2005 HHH Status progress W. Scandale CERN Accelerator Technology Department CARE-HHH Network: coordinators: F. Ruggiero and W. Scandale.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
Pavel Karataev John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science At Royal Holloway, University of London oPAC Advanced School on Accelerator Optimisation 7-11.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
WP4 Status Joint R&D Programming WP4 Presented by Paolo Pierini 27/11/2013.
US LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP) Background  Proposed in 2003 to coordinate efforts at US labs related to the LHC accelerator (as opposed to.
13 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 ML (x.7) Goals and Scope of Work to end FY09 Nikolay Solyak Fermilab Peter Tenenbaum SLAC.
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.
General remarks: I am impressed with the quantity and quality of the work presented here and the functioning of the organization. I thank ILC and FNAL.
Introdcution to Workpackage/Activity Reflection D. Schulte.
ATF status M. Ross October 15, 2004 The ATF is the largest test facility built exclusively for linear collider RD –Utility not reduced by the selection.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement EuCARD-2, ADS, linacs,
RF programme Review for the ESGARD Roadmap to EUCARD2 Peter McIntosh (STFC) Stephane Chel (CEA) Wolf-Dietrich Moeller (DESY)
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
UK X-FEL National Laboratory Perspective Susan Smith STFC ASTeC IoP PAB/STFC Workshop Towards a UK XFEL 16 th February 2016.
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
‘Toward TIARA’ Final Plan for the collaborative R&D Program WP4 Presented by Paolo Pierini 26/11/2013.
GDE FRANCE Why High brillance gun is good for the ERL scheme? And SC GUN? Alessandro Variola For the L.A.L. Orsay group.
EuCARD WP 7 – High Field Magnets EuCARD WP 7 – High Field Magnets Aim and goals Mini Workshop of Accelerators Radiation Mini Workshop of Accelerators Radiation.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Capabilities and Programmes of STFC’s Accelerator Science & Technology Centre (ASTeC)
The FCC Magnet Program seen from CERN Meeting at ASC-2014, Charlotte, August 13t, 2014.
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Accelerator Research and Innovation for European Science and Society
Perspective on future challenges for very high energy hadron colliders
R&D Topics for FOA Funding Proposals
HIGHLIGHTS OF LAST MONTHS OF HSS ACTIVITIES
Sébastien Bousson (CNRS-IN2P3-IPN Orsay)
Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
Why are particle accelerators so inefficient?
Overview of the LINAC12 conference
Instrumentation CALIFES ideal for tests and development that requires frequent access to test setup. CERN BI members already using CALIFES and want to.
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Accelerator Layout and Parameters
Superbeams with SPL at CERN
XFEL Project (accelerator) Overview and recent developments
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
EIC Collaborations EIC Collaboration Workshop, JLAB Oct 28-Nov 1st
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Presentation transcript:

Identification of the Key Areas for the TIARA R&D Program P. Pierini For the WP4 T.Garvey (PSI), D. Schulte (CERN), B. Launé (CNRS), L. Lilje (DESY), O. Napoly (CEA), D. Obradors (CIEMAT), P.Pierini (INFN), B. Skoczen (IFJ PAN), S. Smith (STFC), C. Omet (GSI), V. Zieman (UU)

WP4 «Coordination» workpackage dealing with –Joint R&D Programming Overall status presented on Thursday This Work Package is primarily devoted to –identify the critical technical issues in the field of accelerator science –to define a joint R&D Programme to be carried out with the European distributed accelerator R&D infrastructure, proposed by TIARA Interaction with other Coordination WP3 –Accelerator R&D Infrastructures 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting2

Key Area Identification Analysis of needs of future large accelerator projects and of emerging ideas/technologies Critical Key Accelerator Research Areas / Key Technical R&D Issues R&D Program 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting3 D4.1 KARA/KTI

List KARA/KTI ESGARD survey in 2010 among the 37 EuCARD partners Extended within WP4 members (assisted by colleagues from our home institutions) Collected broad areas needing R&D, with potential impact on community HEP/Nuclear technical requirements for accelerators as drivers of “analytical” facilities (Neutron Sources, FELs, Ultimate light sources, …) 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting4

D4.1: 46 pages Issued December 2011, after approval of GC –Base for WP4 Joint R&D Programme –Mapping R&D items/Projects 16/02/2012WP4 Meeting5 Cannot condense all in 20 m! Outline...

1. Accelerator Components2. Accelerator Technologies3. Accelerator Concepts 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting6

1. Accelerator Components Sources and Injectors RF structures SC magnets Conventional NC magnets Diagnostics and instrumentation Targetry Radiation issues For each of these Key Areas, a further level (Key Technical Issues) is provided, with a ½-1 page description 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting7

Sources/Injectors - Issues Crucial elements for achievement of beam quality and intensity for all facilities under investigation R&D needed to progress the state of the art in –High brightness e- photoinjectors –High intensity ion and proton injectors –High polarisation e- and e+ sources –RFQ design and development –Hollow beam generation –Beam funneling schemes 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting8

Sources/Injectors - PhotoInj High brightness e- photoinjectors –Ultra low emittance/high intensity e- beams needed for FELs and ERLs –Drive laser and cathode technology issues –Explore CW high intensity frontier (SC guns) –Consolidate the design of bunch compression stages using high harmonic schemes, non magnetic compression, and laser heaters to mitigate instabilities (NC and SC versions) –Low emittance/ultra-short pulses at high rep rates are needed for future 4° gen light sources, e.g. for molecular dynamics at high resolution and single shot chrystallography 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting9

Sources/Injectors – Proton/Ion Heavy Ion and Proton Injectors –High intensity beams for heavy ion complexes (FAIR) and high intensity ion beams (IFMIF) ECRIS at high frequency still need R&D Other sources (MEVVA/CHORDIS/MUCIS) may deliver higher ion intensities at low charge states and low duty cycle Neutralized beam transport in LEBT and efficient acceleration in CH structures need to be demonstrated –High intensity proton injectors (ESS, EURISOL, MYRRHA,...) ECR with better RF coupling and plasma diagnostics and control are under development Transport and matching to RFQ in a LEBT is also a challenge for simulation methods 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting10

Sources/Injectors – Sources Highly Polarised e- and e+ Sources –For linear colliders (independent from ML technology) Either from conversion of polarized photons produced in helical undulators by high energy e- beams or based on Compton sources –Both require intensive R&D in most components (lasers, rings, capture RF structures, conversion targets,...) –Essential for the physics program of SuperB Polarized injector and control of polarization in the complex Hollow Beams –Based on Tevatron program, their use would allow to extend conventional collimation systems beyond the limits foreseen by tolerable losses Concept proven, but alignment and control of beam profile and intensity is to be demonstrated 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting11

Sources/Injectors – Injectors... RFQ Development –Key component in low energy chains for proton and ion facilities (ESS, IFMIF, MYRRHA/ADS, RIBs,...) –Specialized devices tailored for specific applications (especially at increasing design intensities) still present significant challenges in the realization and operation tight tolerance budgets during brazing of long sections handling of substantial heat loads for CW structures Beam Funneling –As a mean to double beam current for extremely high currents (e.g. «industrial scale» ADS waste transmuter) 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting12

RF Structures: Gradient Both NC and SC RF structures demand higher gradient than state of art in a reliable way –CLIC towards 100 MV/m at low breakdown rates –C-Band and X-Band structures for moderate gradients as XFEL drivers (SwissFEL, FERMI, SPARC, but also SuperB) –SC structures for electrons need to stabilize high yields at the highest gradients (approaching limiting mechanisms) (XFEL, ESS, EURISOL, ILC,...) Several issues are common: –Surface preparation, cleaning, industrialization –Cross breeding opportunity between separated communities 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting13

RF Structures - SC SC technology for «low beta» still not matched to state-of-the-art of electron cavities (SPIRAL2, ESS, EURISOL, MYRRHA,...) – Margin for bridging the communities and closing the perfomance gap, on the way... Ancillaries for high power operation –SC power couplers at high average power, high duty cycle or even CW operation are needed (ESS, ADS, ERLs,...) –HOM antennas and couplers (and theory...) Beyond Nb limits (> 45 MV/m) –High Tc, multilayer shielding, need to move from samples to realistic RF structure prototypes 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting14

RF Structures - Various Crab Cavities for crab crossing in colliders (HL- LHC, LCs) –NC and SC variants, with many R&D issues to solve concerning feasibility (HOM control, LLRF, engineered solutions,...) 6D Muon beam cooling –Low frequency SC structures at 200 MHz challenge the Nb sputter technology –NC structures challenged by high gradients in strong magnetic fields Variable low-frequency resonators –New materials for MA loader RF structures 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting15

SC Magnets - Field NbTi technology close to max theoretical performances –R&D necessary on material and technologies for the 20 T range and beyond in a staged approach Nb 3 Sn as an intermediate R&D path to access the 15 T range –Already used in NMR magnets and selected for ITER –Accelerator magnets have more stringent requirements in term of coil dimensions/positioning and control of magnetization, to achieve the necessary field quality »Specific R&D technological effort 20 T magnets for HE-LHC could be then reached by a combination of Nb 3 Sn and HT superconductors (HTS) –Ongoing R&D since FP6-NED and FP7-EUCARD-HFM 2G HTS cables (e.g. YBCO) promising for 30 T range 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting16

SC Magnets – Fast Cycling Fast Cycling SC magnets are needed for –More compact and energy-saving injector chains CERN SPS requires 70 MW, a SC version would require about 20 MW –High repetition rate synchrotrons for intense ion beams (e.g. FAIR) R&D for this needs to be focussed on –development of low loss cables –handling and minimization of eddy currents and hysteresis losses in the magnet structure 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting17

SC Magnets – Eng. Challenges The integrated design of high field magnets is an extreme engineering challenge in several aspects: –Production of compact (85-90%) HTS cables capable of carrying 10 kA under high stresses –Restraining of e.m. Forces with compact structures –Dealing with huge stored energies (up to 100 GJ) –Superconductor «grading» (different conductors in same coil) –Radiation resistant materials for coils and structure –Improved He cooling to remove heat in thick coils Especially for higher energy and luminosities –Engineering of fast cycling magnets (5-6 T, 1-4 T/s) 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting18

SC Magnets - Other Cryogen-fee magnet systems for accelerators –Targeting medical, industrial or security applications High field short period SC undulator magnets –E.g. Compact damping ring for LC High field small magnets with rare earth pole tips –E.g. To provide high luminosity for muon colliders 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting19

Conventional NC Magnets Though a well-estabilished technology, new requirements come from light sources and compact accelerators –Compact magnets for small facilities –Radiation resistant magnets Mitigate synchrotron radiation damage –Insertion devices E.g. Short period, In-vacuum ondulators –Fast kickers For injection and extraction in complexes, with individual bunch selection from train for damping rings or beamlines –Compact, large aperture FFAG magnets –Transparent injection schemes for Top-Up Tight tolerance/stability to preserve stored beam 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting20

Diagnostics and Instrumentation Area of constant evolution/improvement, driven by ever increasing demand of resolution, bandwidth, dynamic range, stability –BPM developements Needed for ultimate light sources and high energy colliders –Better resolution for orbit correction, beam based alignemnt, feedback systems and single/multi bunch motion control New ideas (e.g. Hom-BPMs) –Size and emittance monitors (long/transv) E.g. High resolution laserwire systems, sub-ps length by electro-optical methods, otr monitors,... Intense Proton/ion beams require non-invasive non- interceptive techniques to guarantee low beam losses and no activation RIBs need sensitive diagnostics for low currents 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting21

Targetry Several hadron projects have severe demands in this area to deal with the large beam power –LHC upgrades, ESS, ADS, FAIR, EURISOL High power targets for secondary beams –Thick/thin, low/high Z, pulsed/cw: depending on application, but all with many peculiar engineering challenges Radiation damage investigation by PIE –Experimental assessments needed (STIP, Hiradmat) Monte Carlo Codes Validation –Benchmark with experiments needed Crystal channeling for beam collimation 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting22

Radiation issues Radiation protection aspects for high beam power facilities Prompt irradiation and radioactivity estimations –Need new tools for simulation to increase accuracy in low secondary production yelds and investigate regions not covered by nuclear data libraries Benchmarking Collimation schemes to reduce (concentrate) activation –Halo collimation systems/Multiple stage collimators Compact shielding –Important for medical applications, where materials and techniques for improved shielding of neutron/gamma radiation may help deployment in H 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting23

2. Accelerator Technologies There is more than just components, facilities need a complex technological infrastructure for operation. R&D is needed and beneficial, e.g. : Electronics/Software –Cost Driver. Trend is standardization (e.g. uTCA) Vacuum RF power sources and systems –Energy efficiency (large operation cost driver!) Cryogenics –Again energy efficiency especially when COP is low! =750 Alignment/stabilization schemes 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting24

3. Accelerator Concepts Last group of Key Accelerator Research Areas, covering design issues for future facilities or promising technologies, not yet implemented in facilities Accelerator Design Beam Dynamics FEL processes Beam cooling New high gradient acceleration techniques Medical/Industrial accelerators 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting25

Machine Design Design for Reliability and Availability –Important for analytical facilities (users), but a common concern to all machines –For ADS: «nuclear» context requires formal RAM assessements from the early design stages Losses and machine protection at high power Simple and compact application accelerators Energy efficiency and storage –Develop new concepts for the development of energy efficient accelerators, e.g. recovering the large amount of power which is routinely removed by the cooling circuits 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting26

Beam Dynamics Pushing limits of computational tools for simulation and prediction of the achievement of –High luminosity in circular and linar colliders –High energies for hadron colliders, in regimes where synchrotron radiation and damping becomes relevant –High beam stabilities –Beam emittances for «ultimate» rings –Low loss acceleration of high intensity hadron beams –Plasma acceleration schemes –Novel fast acceleration systems for unstable particles Need of new concepts for optics / beam manipulation / beam correction 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting27

... Plus many other specific critical technical issues that are (briefly) described in WP4 deliverable and that need collaborative R&D efforts to find solutions for the future project needs Cannot be all listed in a talk 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting28

Concluding message The Key Area Deliverable is out Base for the TIARA Joint R&D Programme –Space for improvement until end of TIARA-PP, we are only halfway through it You are encouraged to flip through it/read it, send feedback and proposal for improvements to WP4 –Contribute to the process! 13/06/2012TIARA Mid Term Meeting29