THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) PE Coordinator’s Mini-Conference Wednesday, March 14, 2012 Framework for Effective Teaching.
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
The Danielson Framework
The Framework for Teaching An Overview of the Danielson Model.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
The Framework for Teaching Introduction to the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
The Framework for Teaching
The Framework for Teaching: Overview of the Concepts Charlotte Danielson
Domain II Creating and Environment for Learning
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
The Danielson Framework
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson’s Model SHS – Professional Development 14 November 2012 ( Brenda Baker/Marnie Malone)
DPASII Criterion Rubrics for Teachers. Component 1: Planning and Preparation Criterion 1a: Selecting Instructional Goals ELEMENT Value, sequence and alignment.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Welcome Learning Targets for Today I will build schema for Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. I will connect Framework principles to powerful planning.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK

LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework and the role the framework plays in the evaluation process

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REFORM ACT (2010) Requires districts to use a performance evaluation system that assess teachers’ and principals’ professional skills and incorporate measures of student growth. 4 category rating system: Excellent Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory The performance evaluation system that PTHS is using is based on the Danielson Framework for Teaching.

WHY DANIELSON? Aligned to state teaching standards Provides a comprehensive description of what teachers “do” on a daily basis Recognizes and respects the complexity of teaching captured with a clear set of themes Allows for all types of teaching situations, ensuring there is not gotcha opportunities Research-based and validated Provides a common language among professionals Creates opportunities for open discussions about teaching, collaboration, while encouraging staff to self-reflect and evaluate themselves Versatility for all levels of expertise & experience

RIVERS (1999) Can varying sequences of teacher quality vary student chances of passing a high stakes test? oRivers (1999) followed students from 4 th through 9 th grade from two large urban districts. oStudents were grouped into quartiles on the basis of achievement on the 4th grade standardized test. oMath teachers were identified for grades 5-8 and were linked to effectiveness levels (Low, Avg, High), based on their success in facilitating value-added achievement with a prior group of students. oDo these quality distinctions apply to another cohort of students and offer reliable information about how a student will do on a high stakes in the future?

Probability of Passing High School Exam based on Sequence of Teacher Effectiveness Experienced

ACTIVITY O VERVIEW :O VERVIEW : In this activity, you will brainstorm aspects of effective teaching and become familiar with Danielson’s Framework for Teaching as a tool to support improved practice.

ACTIVITY O UTCOME :O UTCOME : You will understand the logic and structure of Danielson’s Framework for Teaching and the alignment between Danielson’s domains and the aspects of effective teaching they have identified, through your own experience.

ACTIVITY G UIDING Q UESTIONS :G UIDING Q UESTIONS : If you were to walk into a classroom, what might you see or hear there (from the students as well as the teacher) that would cause you to think that you were in the presence of an expert? What are some of the key aspects of effective teaching? What would make you think: “Oh, this is good; if I had a child this age, this is the class I would hope for.” What are some of the key aspects of effective teaching? Utilizing post-it notes (1 per aspect), write down key aspects of what you see in a high quality classroom, with a high quality teacher.

ACTIVITY Now with a group of 4 – 5, share your post-its and sort them into groups of related items. Please label each group with one category heading.

ACTIVITY One member from each group share your categories and present some of the brainstormed ideas included in each one. As groups share, please think about similarities and differences do you see between the groups’ work? What patterns do you notice?

22 COMPONENTS CLUSTERED INTO 4 DOMAINS OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY Domain1 – Planning and Preparation 2 – The Classroom Environment 3 - Instruction4 - Responsibilities

1 – Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 1f: Designing Student Assessments

2 – The Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 2d: Managing Student Behavior 2e: Organizing Physical Space

3 - Instruction 3a: Communicating with Students 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

4 – Professional Responsibilities 4a: Reflecting on Teaching 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 4c: Communicating with Families 4d: Participating in a Professional Community 4e; Growing and Developing Professionally 4f: Showing Professionalism

22 COMPONENTS CLUSTERED INTO 4 DOMAINS OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY Domain1 – Planning and Preparation 2 – The Classroom Environment 3 - Instruction4 – Professional Responsibilities Component 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 3a: Communicating with Students 4a: Reflecting on Teaching 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 4c: Communicating with Families 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 2d: Managing Student Behavior 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 4d: Participating in a Professional Community 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 2e: Organizing Physical Space 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 4e; Growing and Developing Professionally 1f: Designing Student Outcomes 4f: Showing Professionalism

1 – Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 1f: Designing Student Assessments 2 – The Classroom Environment 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 2d: Managing Student Behavior 2e: Organizing Physical Space 3 - Instruction 3a: Communicating with Students 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 4 – Professional Responsibilities 4a: Reflecting on Teaching 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 4c: Communicating with Families 4d: Participating in a Professional Community 4e; Growing and Developing Professionally 4f: Showing Professionalism

Digging Into the Domains – Common Themes Equity Cultural sensitivity High expectations Developmental appropriateness Accommodating individual needs Appropriate use of technology Student Assumption of responsibility

ACTIVITY - At your table, assign each member (can be more than one if the numbers don’t work out), to a common theme. Looking through the elements (use slide 27), which items would your common theme fall under (could be multiple) Please write down the Domain, the component and the element Example: Planning and Preparation - 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy – Content Pedagogy) Theme Reminder: Equity, Cultural sensitivity, High expectations, Developmental appropriateness, Accommodating individual needs, Appropriate use of technology, Student Assumption of responsibility

EQUITY Valued Invited and encouraged to participate Given feedback Expected to work to their potential (w/o) preconceived ideas about abilities)

CULTURAL SENSITIVITY Recognizing different cultures of students Learning about students’ backgrounds Lesson is prepared and presented to suit varied cultures

HIGH EXPECTATIONS Belief that all students are capable of high levels of learning Awareness of expectations on students in classroom Establishing a culture of hard work and persistence

DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE Awareness of students’ abilities based on such things as: age of students previous knowledge subject being taught

ATTENTION TO INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS Awareness of each individual students needs Designing lessons to meet a variety of levels of ability Sensitivity to any special accommodations needs Special needs ESL etc

APPROPRIATE USE OF TECHNOLOGY Appropriate Use of Technology Knowledge of instructional technologies Use of technology in all aspects of teaching (planning, act of teaching, and reflection Willingness to learn technologies to enhance own learning or instruction

STUDENT ASSUMPTION OF RESPONSIBILITY Allowing students opportunity to take responsibility for their own learning. Planning so students have chance to give input Conducting lessons where students have some say in what they are doing and how they do it Establishing a “learning community

22 COMPONENTS CLUSTERED INTO 4 DOMAINS OF TEACHING RESPONSIBILITY Domain1 – Planning and Preparation 2 – The Classroom Environment 3 - Instruction4 – Professional Responsibilities Component 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy 2a: Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport 3a: Communicating with Students 4a: Reflecting on Teaching 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 2b: Establishing a Culture for Learning 3b: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques 4b: Maintaining Accurate Records 1c: Setting Instructional Outcomes 2c: Managing Classroom Procedures 3c: Engaging Students in Learning 4c: Communicating with Families 1d: Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources 2d: Managing Student Behavior 3d: Using Assessment in Instruction 4d: Participating in a Professional Community 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction 2e: Organizing Physical Space 3e: Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness 4e; Growing and Developing Professionally 1f: Designing Student Outcomes 4f: Showing Professionalism Domains 2 and 3 include observable classroom practice -8 Components covered in the Training, Practice Videos, and Proficiency Test

BINDERS Binder for artifacts Brainstorm your list Share your lists and weaknesses

PTHS EVALUATION SCALE Link

STEPS TO ENSURING A QUALITY EVALUATION PROCESS The “What” is clearly defined The standards and expectations we have for each student are clearly laid out for both staff and students to understand The “How” is clearly supported Staff are provided access to resources (instruments and procedures) that help provide evidence of their teaching Trained Evaluators All evaluators are certified in the process, helping to ensure consistent judgments based on evidence Teacher PD (Today and Future Opportunities) Staff have an opportunity to learn about the standards, the evaluation criteria, and the thinking behind the framework A process for making the final decisions

35 OVER HOURS OF TRAINING CONTENT OBSERVER TRAINING – MATERIAL ACCESS Over 15 hours of training content including 12 online learning modules and more than 100 master scored videos

HOW IT WORKS EFFECTIVE OBSERVATION FROM PLANNING THROUGH POST-OBSERVATION CONFERENCE 2 Collect Evidence 3 Align Feedback with Framework Components 1 Schedule an Observation 4 Summarize and Report