First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UW River Falls, May 15-16, 2003 Searching for Dark Matter Through South Pole Ice Kurt Woschnagg University of California - Berkeley.
Advertisements

Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope Kyler Kuehn Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics The Ohio State University Novel Searches for Dark Matter CCAPP.
The IceCube Neutrino Telescope Project overview and Status EHE Physics Example: Detection of GZK neutrinos TAUP2003 Shigeru Yoshida, Chiba University.
IceCube.
SUSY06, June 14th, The IceCube Neutrino Telescope and its capability to search for EHE neutrinos Shigeru Yoshida The Chiba University (for the IceCube.
Search for Extremely-high Energy Cosmic Neutrino with IceCube Chiba Univ. Mio Ono.
IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.
Optical Sensor and DAQ in IceCube Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison Chiba July, 2003.
The IceCube High Energy Telesope The detector elements Expected Sensitivity Project Status Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics CHIBA Univ. ICRC 2003.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison “New Views of the Universe” Chicago, 10 December 2005.
The ANTARES Neutrino Telescope Mieke Bouwhuis 27/03/2006.
IceCube a kilometer-scale deep-ice observatory in Antarctica Olga Botner Uppsala university, Sweden Neutrino 2004, June 14-19, icecube.wisc.edu.
1. Introduction 2. IceCube Detector 3. Neutrino Detection Principles 4. Status of the Construction and Performance 5. Summary IceCube neutrino
1 IceCube: A Neutrino Telescope at The South Pole Chihwa Song UW-Madison photographed by Mark Krasberg 4 th Korean Astrophysics Workshop May 17-19, 2006.
Design and Performance of the IceCube Electronics High Energy Neutrino Astronomy IceCube Detector DAQ and Electronics Performance Summary and Outlook.
Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university1 NSF Review March 25-27, 2003 Introductory remarks Per Olof Hulth Stockholm university.
A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration.
IceCube S Robbins University of Wuppertal Moriond - “Contents and Structures of the Universe” La Thuile, Italy, March 2006 Outlook for Neutrino Detection.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
The next generation of Neutrino telescopes -ICECUBE Design and Performance, Science Potential Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin-Madison
Frontiers in Contemporary Physics: May 23, 2005 Recent Results From AMANDA and IceCube Jessica Hodges University of Wisconsin – Madison for the IceCube.
AMANDA Results from the AMANDA neutrino telescope Carlos P. de los Heros Department of High Energy Physics Uppsala University.
Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole David Boersma UW Madison Lake Louise Winter Institute Chicago, 23 February 2006.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
Computing in IceCube Georges Kohnen, Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium for the IceCube Collaboration The IceCube neutrino telescope.
CIPANP 2006K. Filimonov, UC Berkeley From AMANDA to IceCube: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov University of California, Berkeley.
Why Neutrino ? High energy photons are absorbed beyond ~ 150Mpc   HE  LE  e - e + HE s are unique to probe HE processes in the vicinity of cosmic.
The Status of IceCube Mark Krasberg University of Wisconsin-Madison RICH 2004 Conference, Playa del Carmen, Mexico Dec 3, 2004.
News from the South Pole: Recent Results from the IceCube and AMANDA Neutrino Telescopes Alexander Kappes UW-Madison PANIC ‘08 November 2008, Eilat (Israel)
Searching for Quantum Gravity with AMANDA-II and IceCube John Kelley November 11, 2008 PANIC’08, Eilat, Israel.
COSMO/CosPA 2010 Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Searches for the Highest Energy Neutrino with IceCube Aya Ishihara ( Fellow) (JSPS.
B.Baret Vrije Univertsiteit Brusse l Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium The AMANDA – IceCube telescopes & Dark Matter searches B. Baret on behalf of the.
Collisions: Cosmic Accelerators the sky > 10 GeV photon energy the sky > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8.
IceCube a new window on the Universe Muons & neutrinos Neutrino astronomy IceCube science Status & plans Tom Gaisser for the IceCube Collaboration Arequipa,
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Aspen Institute for Physics 02 Francis Halzen the sky the sky > 10 GeV photon energy < cm wavelength > 10 8 TeV particles exist > 10 8 TeV particles.
IceCube and AMANDA: Neutrino Astronomy at the South Pole Brennan Hughey February 22nd, 2007.
1 Jan Conrad (CERN) GLAST Lunch, 09. Mar. 2006, Jan Conrad (KTH) The AMANDA neutrino telescope: Results from GRB and dark matter searches Jan Conrad (KTH,
KEK, Feb 27, 2006Tom Gaisser1 Cosmic-ray physics with IceCube IceTop the surface component of IceCube.
XIX European Cosmic Ray Symposium Firenze (Italy) Neutrino Astronomy and Cosmic Rays at the South Pole Latest.
Science Advisory Committee March 30, 2006 Jim Yeck IceCube Project Director IceCube Construction Progress.
Status and Results Elisa Bernardini DESY Zeuthen, Germany VLVnT Workshop Amsterdam, Oct (
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
IceCube project Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics, Chiba University.
Searching for Quantum Gravity with AMANDA-II and IceCube John Kelley IceCube Collaboration University of Wisconsin, Madison, U.S.A. October 27, 2008 KICP.
Icecube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole Kirill Filimonov, University of California, Berkeley, for the IceCube Collaboration.
I Taboada, GA Tech High-energy neutrino astronomy with IceCube Ignacio Taboada Georgia Institute of Technology for the IceCube collaboration Madison, NDM.
IceCube: A km-scale Detector David Nygren, LBNL ISVHECRI 6-12 September 2004.
1 Particles and Nuclei International Conference (PANIC05) Santa Fe, NM (U.S.A.) October 24 th, from Quark n.36, 02/01/04 Neutrino.
31/03/2008Lancaster University1 Ultra-High-Energy Neutrino Astronomy From Simon Bevan University College London.
1 slide Brennan Hughey University of Wisconsin – Madison for the AMANDA Collaboration Recent Results From the AMANDA Experiment Rencontres du Vietnam August.
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole Brendan Fox Pennsylvania State University for the IceCube Collaboration VLVNT08 - Very.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Albrecht Karle University of Wisconsin - Madison for the IceCube Collaboration IceCube Current status, recent results and future prospects.
Dark Matter Searches with AMANDA and IceCube Catherine De Clercq for the IceCube Collaboration Vrije Universiteit Brussel Interuniversity Institute for.
1 IceCube Christian Spiering for the IceCube Collaboration EPSC, Cracow July 2009.
Measuring the total neutrino cross section using the IceCube detector
Imaging the Neutrino Universe with AMANDA and IceCube
Julia Becker for the IceCube collaboration
Imaging the High-Energy Neutrino Universe from the South Pole
The Antares Neutrino Telescope
Performance of the AMANDA-II Detector
IceCube Neutrino Telescope Astroparticle Physics at the South Pole
Status and prospects of the IceCube Neutrino Telescope
Presentation transcript:

First Results from IceCube Physics Motivation Hardware Overview Deployment First Results Conclusions & Future Plans Spencer Klein, LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration See Paolo Desiati’s AMANDA talk

S. Klein, LBNL USA (12) Europe (12) Japan New Zealand Alabama University, USA Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA Alabama University, USA Bartol Research Institute, Delaware, USA Pennsylvania State University, USA UC Berkeley, USA UC Irvine, USA Clark-Atlanta University, USA Univ. of Maryland, USA IAS, Princeton, USA University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA University of Kansas, USA Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, USA IAS, Princeton, USA University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA University of Wisconsin-River Falls, USA LBNL, Berkeley, USA University of Kansas, USA Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, USA Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universiteit Gent, Belgium Humboldt Universität, Germany Universität Mainz, Germany DESY Zeuthen, Germany Universität Dortmund, Germany Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Université de Mons-Hainaut, Belgium Universiteit Gent, Belgium Humboldt Universität, Germany Universität Mainz, Germany DESY Zeuthen, Germany Universität Dortmund, Germany Universität Wuppertal, Germany Kalmar university, Sweden, Uppsala university, Sweden Stockholm university, Sweden Imperial College, London, UK Oxford university, UK Utrecht university, Netherlands Universität Wuppertal, Germany Kalmar university, Sweden, Uppsala university, Sweden Stockholm university, Sweden Imperial College, London, UK Oxford university, UK Utrecht university, Netherlands Chiba university, Japan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ Chiba university, Japan University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ ANTARCTICA The IceCube Collaboration

S. Klein, LBNL Physics Motivation n Search for cosmic-ray accelerators u Protons are bent in galactic magnetic fields  are produced by hadron accelerators u HE (>5*10 13 eV) photons are absorbed by interaction with 3 0 K microwave background photons   --> e + e - n Study the High-Energy Universe u ~100 GeV – eV F Cross section & effective area rise with energy, so a single detector can cover a very wide energy range

S. Klein, LBNL Physics Topics n Source searches u Active Galactic Nuclei u Supernova remnants u Gamma-Ray Bursts  Calculations predict 1-10 /km 3 /year from many source models n Neutrino physics  Expect 100,000 atmospheric /year u Cross-section measurements F Absorption in earth u Decoherence u Oscillations Searches for supersymmetry, WIMPs, MeV from supernovae, monopoles, Q-balls…. Crab Nebula Active Galactic Nucleus

S. Klein, LBNL Detector Requirements n Need 1 km 3 area for a good chance to see signals n Requires a natural material u Ice or water n South Pole Ice has u Long absorption length u Shorter scattering length F Depth dependent u Low dark noise rates Ice model: Scattering vs. wavelength and depth

S. Klein, LBNL Lessons from AMANDA AMANDA pioneered  astronomy at the South pole u Deployed first OMs 1993/4 Observed atmospheric  n Deep ice (> 1 km) has good optical qualities n Data transmission to surface nontrivial n Paolo Desiati’s talk will present AMANDA results A muon in AMANDA

S. Klein, LBNL n 1 gigaton instrumented volume n 80 strings of 60 digital optical modules u m deep F 17 m spacing u 125 m hexagonal grid n Each DOM is an autonomous data collection unit n IceTop air shower array u 160 surface water tanks F Each contains 2 DOMs AMANDA String 21 IceCube 1 string + 8 tanks deployed Jan. 2005

S. Klein, LBNL , e and  IceCube will distinguish , e and  based on the event characteristics   -->  produce long muon tracks F Good angular resolution, limited energy resolution  Atmospheric  are a significant background to searches for extra-terrestrial Soft energy spectra --> may improve signal to noise ratio by optimizing for higher energy  e --> e produce EM showers F Good energy resolution, poor angular resolution  Above ~10 16 eV   produce ‘double-bang’ events  One shower when the  is created, another when it decays

S. Klein, LBNL E µ =6 PeV, 1000 hits E µ =10 TeV, 90 hits Simulated  Events

S. Klein, LBNL A e would appear as a single shower n.b.  c  =300 m for E  = 6 TeV A simulated multi-Pev  event

S. Klein, LBNL Digital Optical Module main board LED flasher board PMT base 25 cm PMT 33 cm Benthosphere Hardware

S. Klein, LBNL Analog Front-End n Want to measure arrival time of every photon n 2 waveform digitizer systems u Megasamples/s, 10-bit F switched capacitor array F 3 parallel digitizers give 14 bits of dynamic range F 128 samples --> 400 nsec range F Dual chips to minimize dead-time u 40 Megasamples/s, 10-bit ADC  256 samples --> 6.4  s range n Self-triggered u Also, ‘local-coincidence’ circuitry looks for hits in nearby modules An ATWD waveform Time bin (3.3 ns)

S. Klein, LBNL DOM Readout n Each DOM is a ‘mini-satellite’ u FGPA + ARM7 CPU for control, data compression… n Packetized data is sent to surface n Baseline data transmission u waveforms for local coincidence data F Rate ~ Hz u timing and charge info for isolated hits F Rate ~ 700 Hz n ‘Rapcal’ timing calibration maintains clock calibration to < 2 nsec A ‘Main Board’

S. Klein, LBNL Surface DAQ n Trigger based on multiplicity & topology (in a sliding time window) n Selected data saved to tape n High-priority data sent north over a satellite link n GPS clock for overall timing

S. Klein, LBNL Amundsen-Scott South Pole station South Pole Dome (old station ) “Summer camp” road to work IceCube Skiway AMANDA

S. Klein, LBNL The drilling site in January, 2005 Hot-water drilling Hose reel Drill tower IceTop tanks Hot water generator

S. Klein, LBNL The 5 MW water heater for the hot water drill (car-wash technology) Hose Reel

S. Klein, LBNL Each 2 m dia. IceTop tank contains two DOMs. An IceTop tank  signals from IceTop DOMs

S. Klein, LBNL Schedule & Logistics n Can work December --> mid-February n Logistics are a huge concern u Freight, power, … are expensive! u Weather is always a factor The new South-Pole station

S. Klein, LBNL 27.1, 10:08: Reached maximum depth of 2517 m 28.1, 7:00: preparations for string installation start 9:15: Started installation of the first DOM 22:36: last DOM installed 12 min/DOM 22:48: Start drop 29.1, 1:31: String secured at depth of :40: First communication to DOM IceCube’s First String: January 28, 2005

S. Klein, LBNL 2 high-multiplicity muon events Time Residual (ns) Depth (m)

S. Klein, LBNL First Results from String 21 Time calibration Muon reconstruction Timing verification with muons Timing and Energy measurement with LED flashers Coincidence events  IceCube - IceTop

S. Klein, LBNL Time Calibration for 76 DOMs Time IceTop In-ice DOMs IceTop

S. Klein, LBNL Muon and Flasher Reconstruction n Observe Cherenkov radiation from charged particle tracks n Muons produce ~ km long tracks u + hadronic shower at interaction point n EM cascades produce ~ point sources  LED flashers are a surrogate for e n Reconstruct both with maximum likelihood techniques u Use arrival times of all photons, as determined from waveform information ~10m-long cascades, e  neutral current

S. Klein, LBNL Muon zenith angle distribution

S. Klein, LBNL Timing studies with muons The random and systematic time offsets from one DOM to the next are small, ≤ +/- 3ns Residual Timing (ns) Scattering  (1/m)

S. Klein, LBNL A flasher event Equivalent to ~ 60 TeV e Flasher Color --> arrival time Circle size --> Amplitude

S. Klein, LBNL Timing resolution from flashers 1.74 ns rms All 60 DOMs { Photon arrival time difference between DOM45 & 46

S. Klein, LBNL Energy Measurement for flashers n Reconstruct energy of flash for each flashing DOM, using known position n Variation due to u Ice models u LED intensity u Detector Response.. n Good agreement across entire string All LEDs Side LEDs 45 0 LEDs ~1/3 Intensity

S. Klein, LBNL IceTop and in-ice coincidences Some of the difference is due to shower curvature

S. Klein, LBNL Conclusions & Outlook IceCube will explore the high-energy sky. u With a 1 km 3 effective area, IceCube has the power to observe extra-terrestrial neutrinos. n We deployed our first string in January, u 76 out of 76 DOMs are working well. u Timing resolution is < 2 nsec n Next austral summer, we will deploy 8-12 more strings. u Largest neutrino observatory in the world. n By 2010, we will have instrumented ~ 1 km 3.

S. Klein, LBNL Extras/Backup n IceCube reviewers – read no farther

S. Klein, LBNL 10” PMT Hamatsu- 70

S. Klein, LBNL Muon Angular Resolution Waveform information not used. Will improve resolution for high energies !

S. Klein, LBNL Timing verification with light-flashers Photons going up Photons going down 47