CA*net 4 International Grid Testbed Tel: +1.613.785.0426.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Visualization Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago EVL Optical Networking Research Oliver Yu Electronic Visualization Laboratory University.
Advertisements

Why is optical networking interesting?
CANARIE CA*net 4 Update CA*net 4 Design and OBGP documentation
Storage System Integration with High Performance Networks Jon Bakken and Don Petravick FNAL.
The International Grid Testbed: a 10 Gigabit Ethernet success story in memoriam Bob Dobinson GNEW 2004, Geneva Catalin Meirosu on behalf of the IGT collaboration.
Rationale for GLIF November CA*net 4 Update >Network is now 3 x 10Gbps wavelengths – Cost of wavelengths dropping dramatically – 3 rd wavelength.
Future Optical Internet ATM will play a key role Different Protocol Stacks Integrated to provide different size bandwidth pipes and CoS HDWDM OC-3084 OXC.
End to end lightpaths for large file transfer over fast long-distance networks Jan 29, 2003 Bill St. Arnaud, Wade Hong, Geoff Hayward, Corrie Cost, Bryan.
OBGP: A mechanism for optical peering and lightpath trading George M. Porter Sahara Retreat UC Berkeley January 2002.
GridPP meeting Feb 03 R. Hughes-Jones Manchester WP7 Networking Richard Hughes-Jones.
CANARIE “CA*net 4 Customer Empowered Networking” Tel:
DataTAG - WP3 Objectives, activities and progress by UvA: Wim Sjouw, Hans Blom, Jason Lee, Cees de Laat INRIA: Mathieu Goutelle CERN: tbd.
Networking Basics: A Review Carey Williamson iCORE Chair and Professor Department of Computer Science University of Calgary.
1 Networking Basics: A Review Carey Williamson iCORE Professor Department of Computer Science University of Calgary.
Optical Networks for the Rest of Us “Customer Empowered Networking” NANOG 17 – Montreal Background Papers on Gigabit to The.
02 nd April 03Networkshop Managed Bandwidth Next Generation F. Saka UCL NETSYS (NETwork SYStems centre of excellence)
ARIN on the Road – Halifax
Questionaire answers D. Petravick P. Demar FNAL. 7/14/05 DLP -- GDB2 FNAL/T1 issues In interpreting the T0/T1 document how do the T1s foresee to connect.
Introduction 1-1 Lecture 3 Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley March 2012 CS3516: These slides.
Why is optical networking interesting? Cees de Laat
Large File Transfer on 20,000 km - Between Korea and Switzerland Yusung Kim, Daewon Kim, Joonbok Lee, Kilnam Chon
CANARIE Web services architecture for management of customer owned optical networks
Impact of “application empowered” networks >The semi-conductor revolution reduced CAPEX and OPEX costs for main frame computer >But its biggest impact.
UCLP Roadmap Bill St. Arnaud CANARIE Inc –
CA*net3 International Transit Network (ITN) Service Internet2 International Task Force Meeting Oct 29, Atlanta, Georgia tel:
LHC Tier 2 Networking BOF Joe Metzger Joint Techs Vancouver 2005.
LambdaGRID the NREN (r)Evolution Kees Neggers Managing Director SURFnet Reykjavik, 26 August 2003.
HEPiX, CASPUR, April 3-7, 2006 – Steve McDonald Steven McDonald TRIUMF Network & Computing Services Canada’s National Laboratory.
Update on CA*net 4 Network
What is not and is User Controlled LightPaths (UCLP)? JT Vancouver 2005 Hervé Guy Monday
CA*net 4 Open Grid Services for Management of Optical Networks CENIC Workshop May 6, 2002
Thoughts on Future LHCOPN Some ideas Artur Barczyk, Vancouver, 31/08/09.
Copyright AARNet Massive Data Transfers George McLaughlin Mark Prior AARNet.
23 January 2003Paolo Moroni (Slide 1) SWITCH-cc meeting DataTAG overview.
TRIUMF a TIER 1 Center for ATLAS Canada Steven McDonald TRIUMF Network & Computing Services iGrid 2005 – San Diego Sept 26 th.
Canada. Ottawa Fredericton St. John’s Yellowknife Iqaluit Charlottetown Quebec Regina Whitehorse Edmonton Victoria Winnipeg Halifax Calgary TorontoMontrealVancouver.
Université d’Ottawa University of Ottawa UCLPv2. 2 Agenda UCLP objectives UCLPv2: Definitions and use cases UCLPv2: Users and privileges.
1 Dynamic Service Provisioning in Converged Network Infrastructure Muckai Girish Atoga Systems.
Packet switching network Data is divided into packets. Transfer of information as payload in data packets Packets undergo random delays & possible loss.
Networking Fundamentals. Basics Network – collection of nodes and links that cooperate for communication Nodes – computer systems –Internal (routers,
Prospects for the use of remote real time computing over long distances in the ATLAS Trigger/DAQ system R. W. Dobinson (CERN), J. Hansen (NBI), K. Korcyl.
Online-Offsite Connectivity Experiments Catalin Meirosu *, Richard Hughes-Jones ** * CERN and Politehnica University of Bucuresti ** University of Manchester.
Points of pain Campus vs backbone Bill St. Arnaud
First of ALL Big appologize for Kei’s absence Hero of this year’s LSR achievement Takeshi in his experiment.
Keeping up with the RONses Mark Johnson Internet2 Member Meeting May 3, 2005.
Networks, Grids and Service Oriented Architectures
Performance Engineering E2EpiPEs and FastTCP Internet2 member meeting - Indianapolis World Telecom Geneva October 15, 2003
30 June Wide Area Networking Performance Challenges Olivier Martin, CERN UK DTI visit.
Chapter 11.4 END-TO-END ISSUES. Optical Internet Optical technology Protocol translates availability of gigabit bandwidth in user-perceived QoS.
18/09/2002Presentation to Spirent1 Presentation to Spirent 18/09/2002.
APAN Lambda BoF 1 TWAREN/TAIWANLight : Research and Development 2005 / 01 /26 Te-Lung Liu.
WAN Transmission Media
Optical Networks and eVLBI Bill St. Arnaud
TransLight Tom DeFanti 50 years ago, 56Kb USA to Netherlands cost US$4.00/minute Now, OC-192 (10Gb) costs US$2.00/minute* That’s 400,000 times cheaper.
The EU DataTAG Project Richard Hughes-Jones Based on Olivier H. Martin GGF3 Frascati, Italy Oct 2001.
User-Controlled E2E Lightpath Provisioning over CA*net 4 May 26, 2003 Lead Participant: University of Ottawa Participant: Communications Research Centre.
ESLEA Closing Conference, Edinburgh, March 2007, R. Hughes-Jones Manchester 1 The Uptake of High Speed Protocols or Are these protocols making their way.
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
© 2007 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Internet Protocol Storage Area Networks (IP SAN) Module 3.4.
CA*net3 - International High Performance Connectivity 9th Internet2 Member Meeting Mar 9, Washington, DC tel:
Wide Area Network.
Networking for grid Network capacity Network throughput
CERN-USA connectivity update DataTAG project
LHC Collisions.
Wide Area Networking at SLAC, Feb ‘03
Network Core and QoS.
Switching Techniques.
EE 122: Lecture 7 Ion Stoica September 18, 2001.
Wide-Area Networking at SLAC
Network Core and QoS.
Presentation transcript:

CA*net 4 International Grid Testbed Tel:

Problem 1.TCP throughput over long fat pipes very susceptible to packet loss, MTU, TCP kernel, Buffer memory, trail drop, AQM optimized for commodity Internet, etc 2.Packet loss can result from congestion, but also underlying BER – achieve a gigabit per second with TCP on a coast-to-coast path (rtt = 40 msec), with 1500 byte packets, the loss rate can not exceed 8.5x10^-8 packets – “End to end” BER for optical networks 10^-12 to 10^-15 which means packet loss rate of approximately 10^-8 to 10^-11 – The bigger the packet the greater the loss rate!!! 3.Cost of routers significantly greater than switches for 10 Gbps and higher (particularly for large number of lambdas) 4.Lots of challenges maintaining consistent router performance across multiple independent managed networks – MTU, auto-negotiating Ethernet, insufficient buffer memory 5.Require consistent and similar throughput for multiple sites to maintain coherency for grids and SANs and new “space” storage networks using erasure codes e.g. Oceanstore 6.For maximum throughput OS and kernel bypass may be required 7.Many commercial SAN/Grid products will only work with QoS network

Possible Solutions 1.For point to point large file transfer a number of possible techniques such as FAST, XCP, parallel TCP, UDP, etc – Very scalable and allows same process to be used for all sorts of file transfer from large to small – But will it address other link problems? 2.Datagram QoS is a possibility to guarantee bandwidth – But requires costly routers and no proven approach across independent managed networks (or campus) – Does not solve problem of MTU,link problems, etc 3.E2E lightpaths - all solutions are possible – Allows new TCP and non TCP file transfers – Allows parallel TCP with consistent skew on data striping – Allows protocols that support OS bypass, etc – Guarantees consistent throughput for distributed coherence and enables news concepts of storing large data sets in “space” – Uses much lower cost switches and bypasses routers

What are E2E lightpaths? >Customer controlled E2E lightpaths are not about optical networking – E2E lightpaths do not use GMPLS or ASON >The power of the Internet was that an overlay packet network controlled by end user and ISPs could be built on top of telco switched network – CA*net 4 is an optical overlay network on top of telco optical network where switching will be controlled by end users >More akin to MAE-E “peermaker” but at a finer granularity – “Do you have an e2e lightpath for file transfer terminating at a given IX? Are you interested in peering with my e2e lightpath to enable big file transfer?” – Lightpath may be only from border router to border router >With OBGP can establish new BGP path that bypasses most (if not all) routers – Allows lower cost remote peering and transit – Allows e2e lightpaths for big file transfer

e2e Lightpaths Of elephants and mice Normal IP/BGP path x.x.x.1 y.y.y.1 OBGP path Only y.y.y.1 advertised to x.x.x.1 via OBGP path Only x.x.x.1 advertised to y.y.y.1 via OBGP path Optical “Peermaker” Application or end user controls peering of BGP optical paths to set up dedicated route for transfer of elephants Small mice traffic is routed over normal IP path

CA*net 4 Halifax Edmonton Seattle Vancouver Winnipeg Montreal Ottawa Chicago Halifax New York Regina Fredericton Charlottetown Victoria Saskatoon Minneapolis St. John's Calgary Toronto CA*net 4 Node Existing CA*net 4 OC192 Boston TransLight OC192

Canada sets land speed record Vancouver Geneva CANARIE 2xGbE circuits StarLight SURFnet 2xGbE circuits NetherLight for more info on iGrid for more info on iGrid2002

VANCOUVER Sustained Throughput ~11.1 Gbps Ave. Utilization = 93% 8 x OC-12 (622Mb/s) SAN land speed record

ATLAS/CMS: Data Grid Hierarchy Tier 1 Tier2 Center Online System CERN 700k SI95 ~1 PB Disk; Tape Robot FNAL: 200k SI95; 600 TB IN2P3 Center INFN Center RAL Center Institute Institute ~0.25TIPS Workstations ~ MBytes/sec 2.5 Gbps 0.1–10 Gbps Physics data cache Low level Trigger data ~PByte/sec ~2.5 Gbps Tier2 Center ~2.5 Gbps Tier 0 +1 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier2 Center Tier 2 Experiment

International Grid Testbed >Joint CERN, SURFnet, STAR LIGHT, TransLight project >Objectives: 1.To validate and test software for customer control and routing of lightpaths 2.Test remote processing of of low level trigger data from the ATLAS test beam. 3.Develop and adapt grid applications which are designed to interact with a LightPath Grid Service which treats networks and network elements as grid resources which can be reserved, concatenated, consumed and released. 4.Characterize the performance of bulk data transfer over an end-to end lightpath. 5.To investigate and test emerging technologies and its impact on high speed long distance optical networks. These technologies include 10 Gbit Ethernet, RDMA/IP, Fibre Channel/IP, serial SCSI, HyperSCSI over long distance ethernet, etc. 6.Collaborate with the EU ESTA project which is developing 10 GbE equipment with CERN, industrial and other academic partners.