© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Teamwork Data Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Healthcare Safety: How will your next patient be injured?
Advertisements

Test Automation Success: Choosing the Right People & Process
Obtaining Results Desire Vessel Execute Culture is a vessel to cross the quality chasm.
MS-TRIP 2: Disseminating the PPRNet Model for Improving Medication Safety Andrea Wessell, PharmD Lynne Nemeth, PhD, RN AHRQ Grant Number 1 R18HS
Physician Engagement in Quality and Safety Nishi Rawat, M.D. Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
Nina Muscillo and Andrew Hargreaves November 2014 Supporting Medication Reconciliation.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 The Expert In The Room: Engaging Family in Direct Care The Johns Hopkins.
Safety Management Strategies for Extended Care Facilities.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Team Leadership Behaviors Michael A. Rosen, PhD Assistant Professor,
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
How to Design a Quality Improvement Project
Challenging Behaviours- Developing an Alberta Action Plan Nov 21 Provincial Symposium Morning Survey Summary (n=53)
Aurali Dade, PhD Division of Research, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Barriers and Opportunities for Communicating Sustainability on Campus.
Maria Jessing, Clinical Improvement Manager SESLHD Trish Wills, Southern Sector Manger Clinical Practice Improvement Unit Sandra Grove A/Clinical Quality.
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
Morning Briefings and Huddles
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
Everyone Has A Role and Responsibility
REDUCING CENTRAL LINE BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS Going beyond the checklist Richard T. Ellison III, MD June 2009.
Learning Objectives 2 2 Explain the role of the senior executive in addressing technical and adaptive work Identify characteristics to search for when.
Elizabeth A. Martinez, MD, MHS Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions September 10, 2008 Organization of Care and Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery AHRQ grant 1K08HS A1.
Building Your SUSP Team Part I Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Nurse Empowerment.
How NICE supports its guidance Julie Royce Associate Director Implementation Support.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
PATIENT- AND FAMILY-CENTERED CARE: Partnerships for Safety & Quality Staff Physician & Resident Physician Toolkit.
Who We Are ~Where We are Going. Slide 2 Workshop Objectives Describe the purpose and vision of the ICU Safe Care Initiative/Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety.
The Johns Hopkins Comprehensive Unit-based Patient Safety Program (CUSP) Peter Pronovost, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins Univeristy.
CSTS Staff Empowerment Christine A. Goeschel ScD MPA MPS RN.
$100 $200 $400 $600 Fundamentals of Improvement Teamwork and Communication Model of Improvement Leadership.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
RECORDS MANAGEMENT HCS449. Records Management  Urgent Care Clinic Merger  Problem: records management systems differ  Challenges  Implementation &
Assessment of Care Transitions (ACT) Dr. Ayse P. Gurses Dr. Mahiyar Nasarwanji.
STEP UP INTO YOUR NEW ROYAL NORTH SHORE HOSPITAL $1.1 Billion Project Delivered as a PPP 760 beds 4 Stages: Kolling Building 2 Community Health Centres.
Webinar 3: Baseline OR Surgical Safety Culture Survey.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Conducting a Morning Briefing Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety.
Barriers to Articulation Unhelpful practices and attitudesFreqRank Belief that a university course is superior to a college course 91 Having unrealistic.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2012 Optional SUSP Tools: Briefing Audits, Morning Huddle, and Shadowing.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
AN INTRODUCTION Managing Change in Healthcare IT Implementations Sherrilynne Fuller, Center for Public Health Informatics School of Public Health, University.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
COPE ® and Community COPE ® Tools for Engaging Communities in Defining and Addressing Quality of Care.
{ NOPH Unit Council Program Partnering for Excellence.
On the CUSP: STOP BSI Improving Situational Awareness by Conducting a Morning Briefing.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Data Entry Training Welcome to our new CECity platform! Armstrong.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Cross-unit Teamwork: Tools and Data Armstrong Institute for Patient.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Nurse Empowerment Christine A. Goeschel RN MPA MPS ScD (candidate) Tennessee Center for Patient Safety December 2, 2009.
Nurse Empowerment On the CUSP: Stop BSI
Strategies to Improve Clinical Practice Through Guidelines: Experience from Recent Studies Michael Cabana (UCSF) Rebecca Beyth (University of Florida)
COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS NACSO & MET Presented by Maxi Louis.
Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP)
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Providing Feedback: Structural Assessment 2 Results & Exposure Receipt.
Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems Unit 8a Troubleshooting; Maintenance and Upgrades; and Interaction with Vendors, Developers, and Users.
© 2009 On the CUSP: STOP BSI Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care.
High Impact Leadership –Safety First Understanding The System, its Influence on Patient Safety and The Leadership Framework to Manage it Successfully David.
Introduction The majority of telemedicine interactions in Ontario, outside of a hospital, take place among a small number of medical specialities, including.
Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety Adoption in Action AHRQ funded project UNCHCS/RTI partnership.
Using CUSP as a Framework for Improving Patient Safety Steve Levy Director of Operations MHA PSO.
Introduction/Problem Results/Progress to Date
COMMUNICATION WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS
Patient-Centered Care in Cystic Fibrosis
ICU Safe Care Initiative/CUSP November 16, :30 am – 3:30 pm
EmEx-Compare Emergency Department Benchmarking
Tools to Address Adherence Issues in Patients With SIHD
Patient Safety Awareness Week 2018
Teamwork Across Units Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Presented by: Jill A. Marsteller.
Stakeholders Prioritize Six Key Elements When Developing Strategies to Address Population Health Issues Although approaches to population health vary.
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) 2010.
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) October 25, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Teamwork Data Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Presented by: Heather Halvorson, MD; Nana Khunlertkit, PhD; Ayse Gurses, PhD

Goals Thinking about keeping patients safe during entire episode of inpatient care Increased cross-unit interactions would encourage shared goals and problem-solving with respect to quality and safety issues/ initiatives across units within a hospital Improved understanding and interactions across units within a hospital

Toolkit Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 3

Teamwork Across Units Activity Methods Collected from Teamwork Across Units Activity –May 24, 2012 face-to-face meeting Performed analysis of prioritized needs Included ‘triangle’ and ‘circle’ needs –Coded and analyzed coded data for themes –Coded prioritized needs into themes –Analyzed the coded data

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results Total of 399 needs reported –‘What do they need from my unit?’ = 225 –‘What do I need from them?’ = 168 –Across unit needs = 6 Total of 59 needs prioritized –‘Challenging to meet’ / ‘Most frequently not met’ –‘What do they need from my unit?’ = 28 –‘What do I need from them?’ = 30 –Across Units = 1 10 Barrier Themes defined

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results - Barrier Themes Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 8

Teamwork Across Units Activity Barrier Themes, cont. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 9

Teamwork Across Units Activity Barrier Themes, cont. Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 10

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results - Summary Who identified the prioritized needs? –~ 35% reported by one site –~ 40% reported by ICU What was reported? –10 barriers themes identified –Variation in barrier themes between units and sites Top three – all units –Delay in care –Variation in care process –Lack of standard communication

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results - Summary –ICU: delay in care, lack of standardized communication, barriers to team work –Floor: delay in care, lack of standardized communication, variation in care process –OR: variation in care process –Prep/Recovery: lack of shared patient information, variation in care

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results - Summary Barrier theme arising from: Responding UnitWhat they need from my unit What I need from them All48%52% ICU58%42% Floor57%43% OR27%73% Prep/Recovery33%67%

Teamwork Across Units Activity Results - Summary ‘What they need from my unit’ –Delay in care –Lack of standard communication –Variation of care process –Barriers to teamwork ‘What I need from them’ –Variation in care –Delay in care –Lack of shared patient information

Teamwork Across Units Activity Recommendations / Strategies Review site specific results with team –Review barrier themes for each unit –Prioritize barriers Impact on care, impact on teamwork, ease of solution, team buy-in/ownership –Solicit team recommendations to address identified barriers Repeat exercise with additional staff

Results of Teamwork Data Analysis Recommendations / Strategies Barrier Theme: delay in care –Identify reported causes Staffing? Equipment? Space? Medications? –Evaluate organizational/cultural factors Barrier theme: variation in care –Search for source of variation –Is a standardized process in place and not being adhered to? –Is an acceptable standard process available that can be implemented? –Evaluate organizational/cultural factors

Results of Teamwork Data Analysis Recommendations / Strategies Barrier Theme: lack of standardized communication –Is a standardized tool / process in place and not being adhered to? –Is an acceptable tool available that can be implemented? Checklists, forms, communication technique –Can an acceptable tool be developed to that supports needs of involved units? –Evaluate for organizational/cultural factors Share lessons learned

Discussion about the tool Usage of the tool back at the unit Usability of the tool –Barriers –Improvements Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 26