Current trends and problems in Tbilisi public transport system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Ready Steady Safe! Safety tips and advice for National Personal Safety Day 2009.
Transportation in Amsterdam Final Presentation. The Randstad.
Latest Trends in Urban Modal Split in Warsaw Dr Jacek Malasek IBDiM – Road and Bridge Research Institute COST 355 Torino, 3 October 2007.
Traffic Congestion Cause and Effect Essay.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Class 6 Designed by Marina V. Bedniagina School 32 Nizhniy Tagil 2010.
Ageing of population and changes in mobility of the elderly WG2 meeting of COST 355 Action Brno 24th of June 2005 Mgr. Alexandr Pešák
Modelling individual vehicle and driver behaviours Stephen Cragg Associate – SIAS Limited.
Transportation Policies Why is public transit in Zurich the way it is today? 1970s- Vehicular traffic and congestion ruled Proposal for Underground.
Matakuliah : G1184 Travel Management Tahun : 2005 Pertemuan ke-: Chapter 7 (Power Point 21.1) Pokok Bahasan: Transportation Materi:  External Environment.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Understanding Changes in Ridership Unit 7: Forecasting & Encouraging Ridership.
Modelling Service Quality for Public Transport Contracts: Assessing Users’ Perceptions Gabriela Beirão José Sarsfield Cabral 9th Conference on Competition.
Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Institute for Transport Studies FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT Why don’t more people cycle in the city:
Kenia Garcia Monica Molina UC MERCED CAT TRACKS. SURVEY QUESTION 1.
Transport Modelling– An overview of the four modeling stages
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
The Civic Recommendations: some informations Out of 42 draft recommendations, 18 showed an average value exceeding 50% of high priority. These Civic Recommendations.
At the seaside (47) In the country (25) In their native town (20) In the foreign country (5) In the mountains (3)
CHAPTER 5 SOCIAL EQUITY AND GUIDELINES FOR MOBILITY GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
The Use of EMME/2 by Transek – an Overview “Fantasy and imagination is the limit” by Göran Tegnér Transek Consultants, Solna, Sweden Presentation for the.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
Everyday travel mode choice and its determinants: trip attributes and lifestyle Markéta Braun Kohlová Faculty of Social.
LETS TAKE THE BUS!.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Public Transport in Gauteng Province: Order out of Chaos Prof Nevhutanda Alfred Department of Transport(South.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Methodology /12 uk/gcse/coursework/introduction.html.
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
Friends Outside Visitor Center Program. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is legally mandated to contract with a non-profit.
Travelling to Destinations. Model -Advantages and Disadvantages of train travel Direct travel to cities No driver error/tiredness Low environmental impact.
Evaluating the Factors Affecting Student Travel Mode Choice A Methodology to Prioritize Safe Routes to School Programs Meead Saberi, Portland State University.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Axiological interpretation of the elements affecting citizens’ choice of transport mode in Eastern Europe countries.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Created by Martin Hůla T3.C, Means of Transport Basic means of transport: Bike Car Tram Train Bus Plane On foot.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
Shuttle Service in Mumbai Vijay Madanu17 Ankur Rathi37 Vishal Roge38 Sachin Shah42 Deepak Singh47 Nikhil Thadani52.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.
Methodological Problems Speed of movement and barriers 300m ≠ 15 min walk Quality of public space or services.
THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF LUAS ON TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR Mr. Hazael Brown Dr. Aoife Ahern Dr. Margaret O’Mahony.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
How far people are willing to walk to public transport? A case study in Munich City Walk21,Vienna Rumana Islam Sarker Research Assistant, Institute.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
+ Travel Survey How to write a questionnaire and collate the data.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Where are you going for National Vacation? How do you get there ? I want to get there by ….
Means of transport. How can you move from one place to another? How can you move from one place to another? What kind of means of transport do you know?
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
Does the Passenger Train have a Future? DAVID BURNS RAILROAD INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT CHICAGO, USA.
Impacts of Free Public Transport – An Evaluation Framework Oded Cats Yusak Susilo Jonas Eliasson.
Means of transport. Means of transport Types of transport private x public Private transport – cars, motorbikes, bicycles Public transport – trams,
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Yoram Shiftan and Shlomo Bekhor Transportation Research Institute Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Sustainable Transportation In Israel.
5A : Unit 4  I live in the city. Who am I ?  I can take many people at a time.  No one can stop me while I am working ! I work in the city with.
Problem Solving Choose 1
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Means of Transport.
Mass Transit Usage According to IBISWorld, the public transportation industry increased 14.3%, from $63 billion during 2013 to $72 billion for 2017,
SATC 2017 Influence Factors for Passenger Train Use
Presentation transcript:

Current trends and problems in Tbilisi public transport system

Research methodology 800 people were interviewed within the framework of field research; Questionnaire was standardized (respondents had to choose between predetermined several possible answers) Selection of respondents were made randomly according to predetermined quotas for sex, age and employment; Interviews were held face to face at the house of respondents.

I. Demographic data

About 50% of respondents (398 out of 800) is employed

Only about 45% of respondents assess changes in transport system as positive II. Issues regarding public Transport

About 66% is satisfied with new bus routs in Tbilisi

Eliminating “rout taxis” is regarded negative by majority (53%) of inquired.

About 43% regards eliminating trolleybuses in the city center positive, while 41% is against the change

About 62% of respondents in dissatisfied with the triangle type traffic movement in the city center

Recent changes in transport system affected about 52% of inquired

What are the most influential factors affecting your choice between different modes of transport Frequency% Price Crowdedness Comfort Safety Environmentally friendly Trustworthy (must be sure it comes) Flexibility Waiting time Speed (must drive fast) Straightness of rout (must drive between points as little as possible) Transfer (no or little need of transfer) Other20.14

Assessment of different modes of transport according to price IIIIII I. Low/little Frequency% % % II. Normal/ Acceptable Metro III. High/big Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Walking Out of all kinds of public transport, metro, bus and “rout taxi” are mostly used today. Prices for metro and bus are perceived normal by 57% of population, while 23% think that prices for “rout taxi” are high.

Assessment of different modes of transport according to the level of crowdedness IIIIII I. Low/little Frequency% % % II. Normal/ Acceptable Metro III. High/big Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Walking

Assessment of different modes of transport according to the level of comfort IIIIII I. Low/little Frequency% % % II. Normal/ Acceptable Metro III. High/big Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Walking

Assessment of different modes of transport according to the level of safety IIIIII I. Low/little Frequency% % % II. Normal/ Acceptable Metro III. High/big Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Walking

Assessment of different modes of transport according to the waiting time IIIIII I. Low/little Frequency% % % II. Normal/ Acceptable Metro III. High/big Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Walking

Everyday usage of metro in 2006 decreased 1.3 by times compared to 2004

Everyday bus usage in 2006 increased by 2.5 times compared to 2004

Everyday “rout taxi” usage in 2006 decreased by 1.3 times compared to 2004

Frequency of everyday usage of different modes of transport in 2006 compared to everyday usage of these modes in Change In numbers% %Increased %Decreased% Metro Bus "Rout taxi" Trolleybus Tram Taxi Private car Work car Walking

Reasons of avoiding metro Frequency% I do not avoid metro It is crowded It is not clean It is not safe of thieves I do not like to go under the ground There are unpleasant people It needs more time compared to other transportation means It is not close to my house It is not close to my point of destination I need to transfer between two lines of metro I need to transfer to other transport modes, which is not comfortable I drive a car, no need of metro Other100.98

Reasons of avoiding bus Number% I do not avoid bus It is crowded It is not clean It is not safe of thieves Usually, need to wait much time There are unpleasant people It needs more time compared to other transportation means It is not close to my house It is not close to my point of destination I am not sure if it comes to the bus stop I need to transfer to other transport modes, which is not comfortable I drive a car, no need of bus Other70.64

Peak Hours Morning peak hour starts at 9:00 and lasts till 10:00; Evening peak hour starts at 6:00 and lasts till 7:00.