PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Advertisements

For Improvement of IP Infrastructure For Improvement of IP Infrastructure Japan Patent Office.
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
Eugen Stohr Director International Legal Affairs, PCT
Accelerating Patent Prosecution Thursday, October 18, 2012.
1 © 2014 Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP all rights reserved. Advantages and Disadvantages of PPH Mark Abumeri 9 November 2014 Asian Patent Attorneys.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
Q. TODD DICKINSON EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) USPTO PUBLIC MEETING JULY 20, 2010 AIPLA Comments: Enhanced.
International Worksharing and its Perspective Inhong YEO International Cooperation Division.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May, 2010 Report on Patent Prosecution Highway Manny Schecter Chief Patent Counsel
© 3M All Rights Reserved. July 20, 2010 Response to USPTO Request for Public Comment on Enhanced Examination Timing Control Initiative.
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
0 The ‘‘Japanese Model’’ Japan’s Initiatives for Meeting the Future May 14, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Takashi SUZUKI Commissioner Japan Patent Office.
1 Substantive Patent Harmonization and Japan’s Stance Shinjiro ONO Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office 2002 High Technology Protection Summit.
COORDINATION OF NATIONAL and INTERNATIONAL PHASE OF PCT APPLICATIONS Samson Helfgott Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP New York, NY USPTO PCT Public.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Second Session Tokyo, February 4 to 6, 2015.
USPTO PCT Task Force Public Hearing January 13, 2010 Lawrence T. Welch Assistant General Patent Counsel Eli Lilly & Co.
Ashok K. Mannava Mannava & Kang, P.C. Expedited Examination Programs from the PTO February 12, 2012.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Strategic Handling of Applications for Rapid Examination (SHARE) United States Patent and Trademark.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Updates regarding: Global/IP5 PPH pilot program at the USPTO and Patent Law Treaty (PLT)
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
1 Introduction to the Japan Patent Office Japan Patent Office.
1 Worksharing: A Cooperative Approach to Patent Workload Management Charles Eloshway Patent Attorney, Office of External Affairs USPTO.
Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH)
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
The Patent Prosecution Highway: Strategic Considerations in Accelerating U.S. and Foreign Patent Prosecution ACC Quick Hits June 13, 2012 Dr. John K. McDonald.
AIPLA 2012 Annual Meeting Washington 25 October 2012 Worksharing, utilisation and the CPC Niclas Morey Director, International Organisations, Trilateral.
1 USPTO Experiences with the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) Paolo Trevisan Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs United States Patent.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
PPH Introduction to the Patent Prosecution Highway JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association Update regarding PCT and PPH at the USPTO Yuichi Watanabe Joint Meeting of AIPLA and.
PPH from the JPO Point of View Yutaka Niidome Deputy Director Japan Patent Office AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May 19, 2010.
International Patent Filing: The University Perspective Technology Transfer Tactics August 5, 2010.
After Final Practice Linda M. Saltiel June 2, 2015.
New Practice of Unity of Invention (Article 37) "Unity of Invention" and "Shift Amendments" under the Revised Examination Guidelines in Japan JPAA International.
1 IP Infrastructure for Promotion of Work Sharing - Japan’s Perspective - Koichi MINAMI Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office WIPO Global Symposium of.
1 Patent Prosecution Highway -Mottainai Takaki Nishijima Nakamura & Partners January, 2012 AIPLA.
1 EURO REPORTING – Doing Business With The EC –. 2 Index  Relationship Overview  The FAFA Principles  Gain/Loss Scenarios  Financial Risk  Possible.
Revisions to Japanese Patent Law Before the law was revised, a Divisional Applications could not be filed after a Notice of Allowance 2.
1 Overview of USPTO Work-Sharing December 8, 2010 Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting Bruce Kisliuk - Assistant Deputy Commissioner.
QualityDefinition.PPACMeeting AdlerDraft 1 1 Improving the Quality of Patents Marc Adler PPAC meeting June 18, 2009.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Nadya Reingand, PhD Yan Hankin, Esq. Washington DC, USA © Copyright. All rights reserved. Intellectual Property and Business Aspects of Digital Holography.
JPO’s Initiatives for World‘s Best Examination Quality January, 2015 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
2007 Revisions to Japanese Patent Law. 2 #1 Period for Filing Divisional Applications (A) BeforeBefore AfterAfter Notice of Allowance Divisional Application.
1 IP issues from the viewpoint of the JPO Ken-Ichi MOROOKA The Japan Patent Office Fordham IP Conference April 29, 2011.
Toyotaka Abe Foreign Legal Consultant Patent Group, IP& Licensing Microsoft Corporation.
1 Further Developments on Group B+ Agreement concerning SPLT Kay KONISHI APAA Patents Committee, APAA Council Meeting in Adelaide, Nov. 18, 2007.
1 Worksharing n Facilitated in the long-term by: –Legal harmonization –Systems harmonization n Current programs, projects and pilots aimed at worksharing:
Impact of PPH from a Global Perspective Moderator: Neil Henderson, BLG LLP Panel: Leonora Hoicka, IBM Corporation Aki Ryuka, RYUKA IP Law Firm, Japan IPIC.
Accelerated Patent Examination: Green Technology A Summary of Global Initiatives, with specific discussion of the US Speaker: Matt Prater Preparation help.
1 FY08 Restriction Petition Update and Burden Julie Burke Quality Assurance Specialist Technology Center 1600.
1 The Patent Prosecution Highway A Brief History and Current Status Mark R. Powell Director, TC 2600 USPTO.
2 Jesus J. Hernandez Patent Attorney Office of Policy and International Affairs The INPI-USPTO Patent Prosecution Highway Pilot Program Seminario Sobre.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
Patent Cooperation Treaty Improvements Past, Present & Future
Speed of prosecution at the EPO Andy Harding – October 20th, 2017
Accelerating your Patent Prosecution in Mexico
EPO′s QMS Piotr Wierzejewski Quality Management February 2018.
Best practices in the national phase Session 3
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Option C Reviewer Update
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
IPTF Regional Update SIA in Chinese Taipei
Patent Prosecution Highway(PPH)
Presentation transcript:

PPH in APAA Countries i. Status of PPH agreement and Statistics. ii. Benefits for Entering PPH Agreements. iii. Advantages of PPH compared to Other Accelerated Type of Prosecution Schemes. Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 0 Hiroyuki HASHIMOTO MIYOSHI&MIYOSHI Tokyo, Japan

Current Overall PPH Network Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Office All Rights Reserved. 1 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site (

Latest PPH Utilization Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 2 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site Table above shows major PPH participating countries and regions (not all) including APAA countries.

Latest PPH Utilization Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 3 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Latest PCT-PPH Utilization Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 4 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site Table above shows major PPH participating countries and regions (not all) including APAA countries.

Latest PCT-PPH Utilization Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 5 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Effects of PPH (High Grant Rate) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 6 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Effects of PPH (Fast allowance) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 7 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Effects of PPH (Fast prosecution) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 8 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Effects of PPH (Faster prosecution) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 9 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

Effects of PPH (No. of Office Actions) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 10 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site

PCT-PPH Statistics (Overall) Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 11 Source: Patent Prosecution Highway Portal Site Table above shows major PPH participating countries and regions (not all) including APAA countries. * Lower column shows figure of all applications (PPH and non-PPH)

PPH Statistics: Summary Grant Rate 64.3% 92.7% First Action Allowance Rate: 10.2% 48.7% Average Pendency from PPH request to 1 st Office Action: 16.08mo mo. Average Pendency from PPH request to Final Decision: 25.93mo mo. Average number of Office Actions: 1.58 times 0.94 times Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 12 Figures represent PPH applications only (excluding PCT-PPH applications)

Benefits for Entering into PPH 1. Fast Prosecution i. Fast prosecution is expected for both PPH and PCT-PPH applications. Especially, average pendency from PPH request to final decision is quite fast compared to non- PPH applications. ii. PPH participating offices recently agreed to expedite examination not only the First Action (FA) pendency from PPH request but also the period from FA to final decision (e.g., decision to grant or reject a patent). *For more information, please access Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved. 13

Benefits for Entering into PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved Improvement of Examination Quality i. Since Offices of Later Examination (OLE) use search/examination-related information of Offices of Earlier Examination (OEE), examination quality is expected to be improved and unified between OEEs and OLEs. ii. PPH participating offices recently agreed : that OEE should maximize their efforts to improve examination quality, providing reliable work products, and that OLE should be expected to make maximum use of search/examination-related information of OEEs. However, the independence of the OLE is always preserved.

Benefits for Entering into PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved High Grant Rate i. Grant rate is relatively higher than non-PPH applications. ii. Although grant rate of PPH applications is not significantly higher than non-PPH applications, throughout the improvement of examination quality described above, grant rate of PPH applications is expected to be further improved. 4. Mitigation of Workloads in Patent Offices i. From Patent Office perspective, workloads of examination can be mitigated by work-sharing among participating Patent Offices. ii. Accordingly, a heavy increase in workloads of examination at Patent Offices can be avoided.

Advantages of PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved Conditions to be met i. The claims of the OLE are sufficiently correspond to the claims of the OEE. ii. The claims determined to be allowable in OEE. Noted that “decision to grant” is not essential for requesting PPH. The claims determined to be allowable in Office Action can also be candidates of PPH.

Advantages of PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved Comparing with Other Prosecution Schemes i. Accelerated prosecution schemes within Patent Offices (e.g., Accelerated Examination in JPO, AEP/PEP in US, PACE in EPO) do not require claim correspondence between OEE and OLE. Pendency from a request of the examination to Office Action is significantly faster compared to a regular examination. However, special requirements (e.g., limited application types, prior art search by applicant) need to be met. ii. Modified Substantive Examination (MSE): Decision to grant of the corresponding foreign application is essential. Claims must be same as the granted claims of the corresponding foreign applications.

Advantages of PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved Summary i. If conditions are met, i.e., (i) claims are sufficiently correspond between OEE and OLE, and (ii) claims determined to be allowable by OEE, applicant should consider the use of PPH. ii. Especially, even the entire application has not yet been granted, PPH can be requested if at least one claim has determined to be allowable by OEE.

Advantages of PPH Copyright (C) 2014 Miyoshi International Patent Firm All Rights Reserved Summary (Continued) iii. Other accelerated examination schemes do not require to meet above conditions, thus if the above conditions are not met, those examination schemes are alternatively considered. However, it may have to meet special requirements. iv. Modified Substantive Examination (MSE) is performed based on decision to grant of the corresponding foreign applications. Accordingly, claims to be examined under MSE must be same as the granted claims of the corresponding foreign applications.