.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Multimission Ground Systems & Services MOS 2.0: A View of the Next Generation in Mission Operations Systems Duane L. Bindschadler, Carole A. Boyles, Carlos.

Advertisements

MBD in real-world system… Self-Configuring Systems Meir Kalech Partially based on slides of Brian Williams.

20 October International Telemetering Conference Flying CFDP MESSENGER Christopher J. Krupiarz and Brian K. Heggestad The Johns Hopkins University.

PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.

An overview of the MESSENGER spacecraft Joshua V. Nelson Chairman, SEDS-USA Note: All images contained in this presentation are courtesy NASA/JPL unless.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.

GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.

GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

SpaceDrone: Bringing Spacecraft Flight Software Closer to Earth

November 2011 At A Glance GREAT is a flexible & highly portable set of mission operations analysis tools that increases the operational value of ground.

Leeha Herrera Nov 2005 L Herrera Developing a Common Telemetry Archiving Architecture Presented at: Space Telescope Scientific Institute.

MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Environmental Review May , 2012 Flight Software Peter R. Harvey Mars Atmosphere and Volatile.

The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.

1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.

Space Applications Measurement Testbed N. B. Toomarian Jet Propulsion Laboratory

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.

Understand how space organizations use concepts of operations and system integration plan to ensure the success of their program Space Concept of Operations.

At A Glance VOLT is a freeware, platform independent tool set that coordinates cross-mission observation planning and scheduling among one or more space.

Command and Data Handling (C&DH)

JPL AUTONOMOUS RENDEZVOUS OVERVIEW Rob Bailey Jet Propulsion Laboratory Inter-Agency AR&C Working Group Meeting May , 2002 Naval Research Laboratory.

1 Description and Benefits of JWST Commanding Operations Concept TIPS/JIM Meeting 17 July 2003 Vicki Balzano.

1 SpaceOps 2002 Autonomous Operations For The Swift Mission T3-47 John Ong/Swift Software Systems Manager NASA/GSFC Code 582/ Mike Rackley/Swift.

Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.

Supernova/Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Mission/Science Operations Irene Bibyk Tim Rykowski Bob Schweiss June 28, 2001.

NMP ST8 Dependable Multiprocessor Precis Presentation Dr. John R. Samson, Jr. Honeywell Defense & Space Systems U.S. Highway 19 North Clearwater,

All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.

Page 1 Reconfigurable Communications Processor Principal Investigator: Chris Papachristou Task Number: NAG Electrical Engineering & Computer Science.

Eye-Sat : an astronomy student nanosatellite CCSDS meeting, March 23, 2015.

1 Jillian Redfern Orbital Express Presentation TITAN All-Hands 07/08/2003.

Mercury Observations with MESSENGER Images By: Frank J Melillo.

03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.

MAPLD 2005/254C. Papachristou 1 Reconfigurable and Evolvable Hardware Fabric Chris Papachristou, Frank Wolff Robert Ewing Electrical Engineering & Computer.

March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.

1 JWST Functional Flow Diagrams and Schematic Block Diagrams.

NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June

March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 NMP 2-1 EW M ILLENNIUM P ROGRA NNMM Program Overview Dr. Christopher Stevens Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of.

STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.

Future Integrated Satellite Architecture Brief to Third GOES-R Users Workshop Broomfield, Colorado Michael Crison NOAA Satellites and Information Service.

NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.

Kelley Case Concept Design Methods Chief JPL Innovation Foundry Caltech Space Challenge March 24, 2013.

Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,

Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.

Markland J. Benson, Computer Systems Manager, White Sands Complex, (575) , Technology Infusion of CodeSonar into the Space.

LRO SRR LRO Mission Overview.

Space Systems Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology AUTONOMY MIT Graduate Student Open House March 24, 2000.

ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.

Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.

SAS_05_Contingency_Lutz_Tal1 Contingency Software in Autonomous Systems Robyn Lutz, JPL/Caltech & ISU Doron Tal, USRA at NASA Ames Ann Patterson-Hine,

Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.

1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002

ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.

March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.

1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:

Millennium Engineering and Integration Company Millennium Engineering and Integration Company Millennium Engineering and Integration Company Corporate.

Mapping Formal Methods to NASA Capability Needs Connecting the Dots Dr. Michael Lowry.

Engineering and Science Directorate Organization Structure June 2016.

Higher Active Logic Build Three (HAL 3) PLMDM Bundle Update Express Rack 4 Update David K Deitsch Marshall Space Flight Center Payload Operations & Integration.

Adopting the Python language for On-board Programmable Payload Autonomy Steven Doran 2016 Flight Software Workshop 12/14/2016.

USNA Next Generation Ground Station

I&T&C Organization Chart

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

NASA Ames Research Center

NASA Hypersonic Research

Colorado Space Grant Consortium

Launch and On-orbit Checkout

Technology for a NASA Space-based Science Operations Grid Internet2 Members Meeting Advanced Applications Track Session April, 2003 Robert N. Bradford.

Mercury Observations with MESSENGER Images

Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination

GLAST Large Area Telescope:

Presentation transcript:

.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment

.2 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Rationale ST7 Experience Has Shown That Dedicated Autonomy Experiments are not Cost Effective. The Technology Must Be Introduced into an Existing Mission Framework. but Various Studies Have Concluded that Autonomy Capabilities and Requirements Must Be Considered At System Design Time To Achieve Significant Cost/Capability Impact. The MESSENGER Mission Provides a Unique Opportunity to Achieve Cost-Effective Operational Autonomy by  Deep Space Environment  Capable On-board Processing Baseline.  On-board Fuel Resources for Extended Orbital Ops (Currently Unplanned)  Development Can Parallel multi-year Cruise Phase  PI Support for “Autonomous Science Platform” Concept

.3 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Reference Mission MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry and Ranging (MESSENGER) Mission. April 2004 Launch June 2006 Orbit Insertion Four RAD6000 Processors Onboard (25 MHz Clock, 24MB SRAM) Dedicated Fault Protection Processor Architecture Legacy Onboard Autonomy Engine

.4 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary MESSENGER Mission Timelines Launch Venus Flyby 1 Venus Flyby 2 Mercury Flyby 1 Mercury Flyby 2 Mercury Orbit Insertion End Scheduled Mercury Ops End Extended Mercury Ops Potential Autonomous Mercury Ops Phase Development Operations PDRCDRStart I&T Pre Ship Review Launch DFS/ECS MiniME

.5 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Objectives Conclusively Demonstrate Direct NASA Relevance of Model-based Programming and Execution Frameworks in Science-driven Mission Scenario.  Verifiable Autonomous Behavior  Reactive Time Scales Establish Essential Connection Between Autonomy Technology Developers and Mission Systems and Software Engineering. Bridge Current Practices into New Technology Frameworks.  Rule-based Systems into Model-based Systems

.6 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Model-based Executive Architecture Comparison Deductive Controller Telemetry Commands Plant Model Control Sequencer Configuration Goals State Estimates Execution Model Activity Selection Autonomy “Rule Engine” Telemetry Commands Safe-hold & Earth Acq Rule List Command Processing Commands Command Sequence Clock Mission Planning (ground) Mission Planning Safe-hold & Earth Acq Baseline Model-based Clock

.7 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary “Autonomy Rules” in Current Application Example from MESSENGER Safing and Fault Protection Requirements Specification. (Flight Software Design to Support 1280 Rules)

.8 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary General Plan Initial Science Concept Study and Technology Development Development of Ground Operations Decision Support Tool  Realistic Scale Model Development  Shadow Mode Performance Assessment  Operator Interface Flight Architecture Build Update & Bench Test Operator Training Spacecraft Reconfiguration and Checkout Autonomous Planetary Operations in Extended Mission Phase

.9 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Master Schedule

.10 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Mission Operations Automation Framework Activity Merging Sequence Validation & Expectation Generation S/C State Model Command Uplink Telemetry Downlink Performance Assessment State Update State Recovery S/C Science Goals S/C Maintenance Requirements State Recovery Goals Real-time Mission Ops Anomaly Sequence Generation Maintenance Activity Generation Science Activity Generation Epoch 2000 Contact Automation Planning & Scheduling Contingency Operations Near Term Focus