AGU Dec 2000 The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoid Observed During Whole Sun Month 3 Lyndsay Fletcher Sarah Gibson, and the WSM3 sigmoid structure working.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The flare-CME relationship – determining factors (if any!) Sarah Matthews, Lucie Green, Hilary Magee, Louise Harra & Len Culhane MSSL, University College.
Advertisements

RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Observations on Current Sheet and Magnetic Reconnection in Solar Flares Haimin Wang and Jiong Qiu BBSO/NJIT.
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
A flare compilation Lots of people including Louise Harra, Lidia van Driel Gesztelyi, Chris Goff, Sarah Matthews, Len Culhane, Cristina Mandrini, Pascal.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
A Multi-Wavelength View of an Active Region Structure around a Filament Channel L. Lundquist, 1 K. Reeves, 1 A. van Ballegooijen, 1 T. Sakao, 2 and the.
Low-Energy Coronal Sources Observed with RHESSI Linhui Sui (CUA / NASA GSFC)
TRACE Downflows and Energy Release Ayumi ASAI Kwasan Observatory, Kyoto University Magnetic Reconnection and the Dynamic Sun 9 September, Andrews.
Hard X-ray Production in a Failed Filament Eruption David, Alexander, Rui Liu and Holly R., Gilbert 2006 ApJ 653, L719 Related Paper: Ji. H. et al., 2003.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Sigmoidal Active Regions on the Sun: Statistical and Detailed Studies Lily Hanson Advisors: Ed DeLuca and Antonia Savcheva
General Properties Absolute visual magnitude M V = 4.83 Central temperature = 15 million 0 K X = 0.73, Y = 0.25, Z = 0.02 Initial abundances: Age: ~ 4.52.
Ryan Payne Advisor: Dana Longcope. Solar Flares General  Solar flares are violent releases of matter and energy within active regions on the Sun.  Flares.
COOL STARS and ATOMIC PHYSICS Andrea Dupree Harvard-Smithsonian CfA 7 Aug High Accuracy Atomic Physics In Astronomy.
Intense Flares Without Solar Energetic Particle Events N. V. Nitta (LMSAL), E. W. Cliver (AFRL), H. S. Hudson (UCB) Abstract: We study favorably located.
Coronal HXR sources a multi-wavelength perspective.
Solar-B Science MeetingKyoto, Nov. 9, 2005 Quantifying Reconnection* Dana Longcope, Dave McKenzie Jonathan Cirtain, Jason Scott Montana State University.
White-Light Flares and HESSI Prospects H. S. Hudson (UCB and SPRC) March 8, 2002.
Observations of the failed eruption of the magnetic flux rope – a direct application of the quadrupolar model for a solar flare Tomasz Mrozek Astronomical.
Chapter 7 The Sun. Solar Prominence – photo by SOHO spacecraft from the Astronomy Picture of the Day site link.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Twist & writhe of kink-unstable magnetic flux ropes I flux rope: helicity sum of twist and writhe: kink instability: twist  and writhe  (sum is constant)
Kinematics and coronal field strength of an untwisting jet in a polar coronal hole observed by SDO/AIA H. Chen, J. Zhang, & S. Ma ILWS , Beijing.
High Resolution Imaging and EUV spectroscopy for RHESSI Microflares S. Berkebile-Stoiser 1, P. Gömöry 1,2, J. Rybák 2, A.M. Veronig 1, M. Temmer 1, P.
Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.
1Yang Liu/Magnetic FieldHMI Science – 1 May 2003 Magnetic Field Goals – magnetic field & eruptive events Yang Liu Stanford University.
Simulation of stereoscopic EUVI image pairs Markus J. Aschwanden David Alexander Nariaki Nitta Thomas Metcalf Richard Nightingale James Lemen (LMSAL) 2nd.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated decimetric/metric radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
SLIDE SHOW 3 B changes due to transport + diffusion III -- * * magnetic Reynold number INDUCTION EQUATION B moves with plasma / diffuses through it.
Time evolution of the chromospheric heating and evaporation process Case study of an M1.1 flare on 2014 September 6 Peter Young 1,2, Hui Tian 3, Katharine.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Flare Energy Build-Up in a Decaying Active Region Near a Coronal Hole Yingna Su Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Collaborators: A. A. van Ballegooijen,
Pre-flare activity of M1.2 flare 김수진 1,2, 문용재 1, 김연한 1, 박영득 1, 김갑성 2 1. Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute 2. Kyung Hee University.
SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August 28, 2008, Ghent SOHO-20 “Transient events on the Sun and In the Heliosphere” – August.
POST CME EVENTS: COOL JETS AND CURRENT SHEET EVOLUTION A. Bemporad, G. Poletto, S. T. Suess IAU Symposium 226 Coronal and Stellar Mass Ejections September.
Spectral Signature of Emergent Magnetic Flux D1 神尾 精 Solar Seminar Balasubramaniam,K.S., 2001, ApJ, 557, 366. Chae, J. et al., 2000, ApJ, 528,
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Coronal loops: new insights from EIS observations G. Del Zanna 1,2, S. Bradshaw 3, 1 MSSL, University College London, UK 2 DAMTP, University of Cambridge,
Solar seminor: 4 Oct (1)Eruption of a multiple-turn helical magnetic flux tube in a large flare : Evidence for external and i ternal reconnection.
Properties of CME Acceleration in the Low Corona Jie Zhang George Mason University SHINE June 28 – July 2, 2004 Big Sky - Montana Address.
Observations and nonlinear force-free field modeling of active region Y. Su, A. van Ballegooijen, B. W. Lites, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, P. C. Grigis,
Jet Phenomena in the Solar Atmosphere with Rotational Eruption or Spinning Motion; Observation associated with Our MHD numerical Simulations 2004 年 4 月.
IMAGING AND SPECTOROPIC INVESTIGATIONS OF A SOLAR CORONAL WAVE: PROPERTIES OF THE WAVE FRONT AND ASSOCIATED ERUPTING MATERIAL L OUISE K. HARRA AND A LPHONSE.
Nov. 8-11, th Solar-B science meeting Observational Analysis of the Relation between Coronal Loop Heating and Photospheric Magnetic Fields Y. Katsukawa.
Jet Phenomena in the Solar Atmosphere with Rotational Eruption or Spinning Motion; Observation associated with Our MHD numerical Simulations 2004 年 4 月21日.
Magnetic Helicity and Solar Eruptions Alexander Nindos Section of Astrogeophysics Physics Department University of Ioannina Ioannina GR Greece.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
Observations –Morphology –Quantitative properties Underlying Physics –Aly-Sturrock limit Present Theories/Models Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) S. K. Antiochos,
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Active Region Loops - Observational Constraints on Heating from Hinode/EIS Observations Helen E. Mason DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University.
Coronal hard X-ray sources and associated radio emissions N. Vilmer D. Koutroumpa (Observatoire de Paris- LESIA; Thessaloniki University) S.R Kane G. Hurford.
Helicity Thinkshop 2009, Beijing Asymmetry of helicity injection in emerging active regions L. Tian, D. Alexander Rice University, USA Y. Liu Yunnan Astronomical.
Observation of Sigmoids with Solar-B
Sun: General Properties
Limb prominences seen in UV, EUV and SXR
RHESSI Working Group 4 Program – Taos workshop
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
TRACE Downflows and Energy Release
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
Teriaca, et al (2003) ApJ, 588, SOHO/CDS HIDA/DST 2002 campaign
Studying Transition Region Phenomena with Solar-B/EIS
Preflare State Rust et al. (1994) 太陽雑誌会.
Magnetic connection between the photosphere and the corona
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
-Short Talk- The soft X-ray characteristics of solar flares, both with and without associated CMEs Kay H.R.M., Harra L.K., Matthews S.A., Culhane J.L.,
Downflow as a Reconnection Outflow
Presentation transcript:

AGU Dec 2000 The Structure and Evolution of a Sigmoid Observed During Whole Sun Month 3 Lyndsay Fletcher Sarah Gibson, and the WSM3 sigmoid structure working group.

AGU Dec 2000 The WSM 3 working group is S. Gibson, L. Fletcher, D. Alexander, D. Biesecker, J. Burkepile, G. Del Zanna, P. Demoulin, C. Mandrini, H. Mason, Y. Liu, N. Nitta, C. D. Pike, J. Qiu, K. Ko, B. Schmieder, B. Thompson The sigmoid study uses data from: Yohkoh SXT, TRACE, SoHO CDS, EIT and UVCS, BBSO, MLSO CHIP and PICS

AGU Dec 2000 The importance of sigmoids Canfield, Hudson and McKenzie (1999) found that large, sigmoidal active regions have a high correlation with eruptive signatures (seen in SXT).

AGU Dec 2000 From Canfield Hudson and McKenzie 1999 Bundle of field lines, twisted beyond ~  becomes kink-unstable?

AGU Dec 2000 Sigmoids as Predictors of Eruptive Activity Glover et al. (2000) find: • Of the ~100 sigmoidal regions studied by Canfield et al, only ~40% are ‘ single loop ’ sigmoids • Other sigmoidal regions are formed by two or more sets of loops arranged in an ‘ S ’ configuration.  35% of ‘ single loop ’ sigmoids were found to have eruptive signatures in LASCO - a slightly higher percentage than for multiple loop sigmoids. • Sigmoids may form prior to or following an eruption So the situation is somewhat more complex than the initial thoughts regarding the loss of stability of a twisted flux tube.

AGU Dec 2000 •The sigmoid region, AR 8668 was tracked across the disk. •It underwent several eruptions, visible in SXT  The H  filament formed in stages, partially disappeared and then reformed in a slightly different orientation. •Small flares on Aug are being analysed by Canfield et al. •Detailed magnetic field modelling on Aug 19th by Liu et al. •The analysis of a jet seen on Aug 26 is being led by Ko Overall evolution of WSM sigmoid region

Aug UTAug UT Eruption in southern SXT loops Eruption in northern SXT loops H  filament not seen Southern part of H  filament visible

Aug UTAug UT SXT sigmoidal appearance begins? Southern SXT loops brighten S-shaped H  filament fully formed Southern part of H  filament thickens

21-Aug UT22-Aug UT SXT sigmoid well-formed H  filament starts to break up H  filament disappears

H  filament reforms in south - longer and less ‘ bent ’ 23-Aug UT •Periods of eruption in SXT loops followed by H  filament formation.  H  sigmoidal filament present without clear SXT sigmoid •SXT sigmoid well-formed as H  filament starts to break up.

AGU Dec 2000 H alpha filament evolution movie •Filament (southern part) first visible on 16th •Grows between 17th (17:30) and 18th (14:30) •Stable until eruption on 21st; 22nd onwards S part reforms movie

AGU Dec 2000 August 19 - well-formed filament. Liu et al. have performed various field extrapolations Potential Linear FF Non-linear FF Non-linear FF fields show twisted, dipped field lines which could provide filament support.

On August 21st the coronal sigmoid was well-formed. Events include a small EUV loop brightening and (probably associated) filament disappearance CDS Observations show a backwards ‘ s ’ pattern visible in many wavelengths, from chromospheric to high coronal. This is clearly (at low heights at least) not a consequence of a single twisted field structure. Observations of August 21

He IMg IX Si XIIFe XIX Comparisons with TRACE identify the CDS sigmoid at <1MK with ‘ moss ’ - the transition-region of high-pressure loops

AGU Dec 2000 The low-lying sigmoid shape is determined by the distribution of magnetic plage.

Overlaying with contours of SXT emission show also longer sigmoidal loops connecting to plage further south. AGU Dec 2000

Comparison of SXT and Mg X emission suggests two sets of sigmoidal loops. A short set, connects in the neighbourhood of the sunspot. Above this lies a longer set. A linear force-free field extrapolation also shows this.

AGU Dec 2000 CDS rasters suggest a shear between short loops and their footpoints Fe XIX He IO V Si XII

AGU Dec 2000 A small brightening (not a GOES flare) on Aug 21 at 18UT reveals short 1.5MK loops in an apparently sheared structure.

AGU Dec 2000 CDS density, temperature, abundance ratios before the brightening

AGU Dec 2000 CDS density, temperature, abundance ratios after the brightening

Following the brightening, CDS Si XII lineshifts show upflows of ~ km/s at the ends of the short sigmoidal loops This may suggest that the brightening leads to evaporation of chromospheric material into the loops -Could be used to assist in the identification of ‘ active ’ field lines in magnetic modelling?

AGU Dec 2000 TRACE movie of region from Aug Evolution beyond Aug 21 •shows long, low-lying TRACE loops •Flux emerging into centre of sigmoid •small northern filament apparently overlying unipolar plage •southern part of filament becomes visible in absorption at limb.

CDS spectroheliograms on the limb show the remaining southern part of the filament, and both cool and hot loops in the north. The filament is embedded in diffuse, hot emission. From Si X diagnostic: Coronal density ~ cm -3 footpoint density ~10 10 cm -3 But no strong evidence for density variations around filament.

Summary •All wavelengths show evidence of sigmoidal shape  Complex relationship between presence of H  s-shaped filament and coronal sigmoid - eruptions can both (a)result in field-lines necessary to support filament material (b)lead to destabilisation and ejection of filament • Two (or more) sets of loops? Interfaces may provide locations for reconnection and loss of stability ( e.g. brightening on 21st followed by filament eruption) • Helicity or just complexity? Short TRACE/SXT loops must be fit with non-potential fields; long ones with potential fields (interface with rest of corona?) •Excellent set of sigmoid data for comprehensive analysis