Communication in Heterogeneous teams? Richard Joiner.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

How Learning Theories Account for Group Development and Readiness Assurance: Piaget, Vygotsky and Bandura Michael Sweet Division of Instructional Innovation.

Advertisements

A Framework for Looking at Group Work in Asynchronous Online Courses Dr. Susan Lowes Teachers College/Columbia University VSS, November 2009.

Mag. Maria Peer1 Projects are all the work we do once. Every project produces an outcome and every project has a beginning and an end. Each one produces.

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Virtual Math Teams (VMT), Group Cognition Gerry Stahl.

When a word becomes fashionable - as it is the case with "collaboration" - it is often used abusively for more or less anything. P Dillenbourg (1999)

1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams

Communication is the KEY: Co-Teaching & Co-Planning

Introduction to SAFE Appraisals Safety Appraisals For Everyone

A SharePoint site is a Web site that provides a central storage and collaboration space for documents, information, and ideas. A SharePoint site is a tool.

1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams

FROM DIALOGUE TO SYNERGY: BUILDING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS Janet Salmons, Ph.D.

DIALOGUE. What does ‘Dialogue’ mean to you? WHAT DOES DIALOGUE MEAN TO YOU? A – General Discussion B – Random thoughts C – Focused problem solving D.

Smarter Together! Rigorous Mathematics for All Students through Complex Instruction Marcy Wood Teaching, Learning, and Sociocultural Studies

Smarter Together! Rigorous Mathematics for All Students through Complex Instruction Marcy Wood Teaching, Learning, and Sociocultural Studies

CEP Welcome September 1, Matthew J. Koehler September 1, 2005CEP Cognition and Technology Who’s Who?  Team up with someone you don’t.

Advanced Technical Communication Blay Whitby

Starting a project 1 Starting a Project Where do we now start? Where are we going? Will we know when we arrive?

Effective Team Management

© 2011 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Learning and Performance Management Learning Outcomes 1.Describe behavioral theories of learning.

MEETINGS THAT GET THINGS DONE Ideas To Go. Agenda Defining ‘Effective’ Preparation Facilitation Follow up.

Four Models of eDemocracy Associate Professor Øystein Sæbø, CAHDE 2nd plenary, Strasbourg, October 07.

UNCLASSIFIED Value Focused Metrics Professor D.F. Davis Presentation to 28 ISMOR 1 September 2011.

Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”

Establishing Effective Committees & Communication

Countdown Contributed by Mary Thompson All resources in the "Contributions" section of our resource bank have been submitted by delegates on our Taking.

Problem Solving.  Critical Thinking enables a person to solve problems and make decisions. Therefore - Problem solving and decision making are practical.

MEETINGS ?? BLOODY MEETINGS!!. CHAIRMAN OR DISCUSSION LEADER Sets the boundaries of the discussion The diabetes protocol is on the agenda We will discuss.

Making the Most of Brainstorming Presenter’s Name Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved.

Community Leadership National College for School Leadership April 21, 2005 by Paul Born.

Before the Team Project Cultivate a Community of Collaborators Deb LaBelle.

LEADERSHIP AND FOLLOWERSHIP. DISCUSSION CONTENTS  Leadership and Followership as a subject, and a relationship  Definitions and awareness  Basic Types.

Human Services Integration Building More Effective Responses to Peoples’ Needs.

Teamwork and Leadership Skills

Teamwork Goal 4.01: Demonstrate characteristics of effective leadership.

Team Building Skills Communications I Ms. Johnston and Mr. Bundy.

Effective Intercultural Workgroup Communication Theory (John G. Oetzel)

SPREAD THE WORD! SOCIAL MEDIA ESSENTIALS. AN INVITATION “ It is important to know how to dialogue, and how to enter, with discernment, into the environments.

Establishing Nurturing, Good Committee Work …or How to Avoid “Death by Meeting” Jann Marks, RN, MBA, NEA-BC.

School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.

TOOL5100: CSCL Intersubjectivity Lecture 9, /11 Collaboration & learning I: Intersubjectivity and common ground Pål Fugelli.

Working in Teams, Unit 4 Individual Roles and Team Mission Working in Teams/Unit 41 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.

Human Resource Training and Individual Development Employee Development March 1, 2004.

Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Promoting Learner Autonomy Ivan Moore, Director Dr Jo Elfving-Hwang, Researcher/developer Developing Communities.

Conclusions theory building, Emphasis on theory building, specific focus on teacher mediation: reframing socio-cultural theory was recontextualised, integrated.

Collaborative Problem Solving

Cooperative Learning Explain meeting clocks and have them set the appointments.

Session 2.1.3: Using competencies in staff recruitment Learning objectives: By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Apply the Core Humanitarian.

Small Group Communication. Discussion Cooperative exchange of information, opinions, and ideas.

Karma L/O: To enquire into the Hindu concept of Karma.

Improvement Leaders Collaboratives Residential Module Effective teams.

Project Management Basics. 2 Please introduce yourself…  Name  Business Unit / Function / Process  Current Project / Process  Team Size  Ice Breaker.

Project Management Process

September 2010 Arlene W. Williams Marshall School of Business PLEASE SIT IN TEAMS.

Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.

Group Definition  A group is a collection of two or more people who work with one another regularly to achieve common goals.  Groups: Help organizations.

Reflective Thinking. Reflective thinking Critical thinking and reflective thinking are often used synonymously. However, where critical thinking is used.

PowerPoint Presentation to Accompany Management, 8/e John R. Schermerhorn, Jr. Prepared by: Jim LoPresti University of Colorado, Boulder Published by:

Multinational Retailer Structure MGT 310 Week 4 Group Project Names of members who participated in the group project.

Student-Led Conferences Team Shomin Sue Sylvester.

Leadership Skills. Team Meetings Set the agenda by defining goals and desired outcomes Set the agenda by defining goals and desired outcomes Keep the.

Team Teaching Methods “Teachers learn best from other teachers, in settings where they literally teach each other the art of teaching.” (Little, 1987)

© 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. 1 CHAPTER 10 Social Constructivist Approaches © 2011 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights.

Working Systemically To Increase Student Achievement Collecting, Interpreting, and Using Data.

Evaluating Efforts to Support Collaborative Research: Lessons Learned from the AHRQ MCC Research Network Jessie Gerteis, MPH Abt Associates, Inc. 27 th.

The process of change. 1. active initiation 2. pressure and support.

MY TEACHING PHILOSOPHY Joana Melo PhD Candidate – Architectural Engineering.

Influencing Group Dynamics

Italian Presidency July-December 2003

Work Breakdown Structure Tasks and Sub-Tasks

Management and Leadership Course

Presentation transcript:

Communication in Heterogeneous teams? Richard Joiner

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 2 Tools One common theme is that papers are looking at how different tools are used to support or not the development of shared understanding –Bettina-Maria Becker online communication –PJ Beers Ntool –Jiri LallimoBoundary objects

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 3 Shared Understanding Sanne Akkerman reviews 22 papers and all talk about shared cognition PJ Beers talks about good team work requiring common ground Bettina-Maria Becker talks about breakdowns in communication and how that is NOT desirable in expert-layperson communication. Jiri Lallimo The importance of the development of boundary

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 4 Shared Understanding The idea is that the development of shared understanding or intersubjectivity is important and something that should be supported. This is known as the cognitive model However, there is an alternative Sociocultural definition of Intersubjectivity

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 5 Shared Understanding In the cognitive model attaining shared cognition or consensus is seen as the definition of Intersubjectivity. Intersubjectivity has been defined as a state of overlapping individual subjectivities

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 6 Shared Understanding Task Model Dialogue Focus Task Focus

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 7 Shared Understanding Sociocultural defines intersubjectivity as the coordination of individual contributions to the joint activity –Intersubjectivity is NOT a state of agreement between participants. –Intersubjectivity is taken for granted –Intersubjectivity is always there in some degree it does not need to be achieved

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 8 Shared Understanding Intersubjectivity is NOT a state of agreement between participants. Intersubjectivity is taken for granted Intersubjectivity is always there in some degree it does not need to be achieved

Communication in Heterogenous Teams 9 Shared Understanding Does learning require the development of shared understanding Does success in an activity require the development of shared understanding How does viewing intersubjectivity as the coordination of individual contributions to the joint activity help me design tools to support it.