S PECIAL A SSESSMENT D ISTRICTS F IRST P UBLIC H EARING * P RESENTATION TO THE B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS F EBRUARY 23, 2010

Public Hearing As required by Fla. Stat. and Alachua County Code §37.11 Properly advertised Purpose: – Adopt resolutions of notice of intent – Establish estimate of assessable cost

Recommendations Adopt Resolutions of Notice of Intent to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment and authorize Chair to sign resolutions for: – District 1: Country Club Estates, Country Club Manor & Country Club – District 2: Prairie Bluff & Social Square Do not adopt Resolution of Notice of Intent: – District 3: Fairway Estates

History S EPT. 2007: Staff receives petition from GGCC asking County to mill and resurface SW 35 th Way S UMMER 2009: Staff conducts petition process in accordance with then-code S EPT. 8, 2009: Board directs staff to: – Amend Chapt. 37, Alachua County Code – Hold hearings for GGCC districts prior to Sept. 15, 2010 O CT. 2009: Property Appraiser & Tax Collector grant extensions N OV. 10, 2009: Board adopts Ordinance 09-09, amending code: – Property Owner Interest Poll: owners of 50% + 1 of properties responding must agree with creation of district – Each potential special assessment district may be attempted once per County Fiscal Year

History, cont. J AN. 2010: Staff conducts Property Owner Interest Polls (3) for districts T ODAY : – Presentation of Property Owner Interest Polls – Public hearing for adoption of Notices of Intent (3) to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment Intent to use uniform method Public necessity Improvement estimate Allocation methodology

District 1: Country Club Estates/Manor

SW 35 TH WAY Roadway Length (mi): 1.15 Roadway Width (ft): 36 SPUR ROADS Roadway Lengths (mi): 1.52 Roadway Width (ft): 24 D1: Country Club Estates/Manor

P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor I MPROVEMENT E STIMATE /A LLOCATION M ETHODOLOGY Improvement:Mill and Resurface, Fog Seal Estimated Construction Cost:$ 282,834.68* Allocation Methodology:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips * Best estimates of construction costs at this time. Final assessable costs would be determined in August/September at 2 nd Public Hearing. Per Parcel Annual Assessment Property Type# of ParcelsADTConstructionFeesTotal Cost Single Family Residence $ $ $ Golf Course $ 9, $ 1, $ 10, Total ADT

D1: Country Club Estates/Manor P ROPERTY O WNER I NTEREST P OLL R ESULTS Potential Respondents:Residential – 187 parcels Commercial – 1 parcel Actual Respondents:133 Response Weights:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips W EIGHTED R ESULTS (%) ForAgainst 75.7%24.3% R ESULTS ForAgainst 83 Residential 49 Residential 1 Commercial

Recommendation District 1: Country Club Estates, Country Club Manor, & Country Club – A DOPT Resolution of Notice of Intent to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment and authorize Chair to sign resolutions for Country Club Estates and Country Club Manor District

District 2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square PRAIRIE BLUFF/SOCIAL SQUARE Roadway Lengths (mi): 0.67 Roadway Width (ft): 20-24

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square P UBLIC N ECESSITY – SW 29 TH W AY

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square P UBLIC N ECESSITY – SW 30 TH W AY

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square P UBLIC N ECESSITY – SW 70 TH L ANE

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square I MPROVEMENT E STIMATE /A LLOCATION M ETHODOLOGY Improvement:Mill and Resurface Estimated Construction Cost:$ 50, Allocation Methodology:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips * Best estimates of construction costs at this time. Final assessable costs would be determined in August/September at 2 nd Public Hearing. Per Parcel Annual Assessment Property Type# of ParcelsADTConstructionFeesTotal Cost Single Family Residence $ $ $ Total ADT

D2: Prairie Bluff/Social Square P ROPERTY O WNER I NTEREST P OLL R ESULTS Potential Respondents:Residential – 36 parcels Actual Respondents:22 Response Weights:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips W EIGHTED R ESULTS (%) ForAgainst 59%41% R ESULTS ForAgainst 13 Residential9 Residential

Recommendation District 2: Prairie Bluff & Social Square – A DOPT Resolution of Notice of Intent to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment and authorize Chair to sign resolutions for Prairie Bluff and Social Square District

District 3: Fairway Estates

D3: Fairway Estates FAIRWAY ESTATES Roadway Lengths (mi): 0.15 Roadway Width (ft): 20-24

D3: Fairway Estates P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D3: Fairway Estates P UBLIC N ECESSITY

D3: Fairway Estates I MPROVEMENT E STIMATE /A LLOCATION M ETHODOLOGY Improvement:Mill and Resurface Estimated Construction Cost:$ 18,767.33* Allocation Methodology:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips * Best estimates of construction costs at this time. Final assessable costs would be determined in August/September at 2 nd Public Hearing. Per Parcel Annual Assessment Property Type# of ParcelsADTConstructionFeesTotal Cost Single Family Residence $ $ $ Total ADT

D3: Fairway Estates P ROPERTY O WNER I NTEREST P OLL R ESULTS Potential Respondents:Residential – 13 parcels Actual Respondents:9 Response Weights:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips W EIGHTED R ESULTS (%) ForAgainst 33.33%66.66% R ESULTS ForAgainst 3 Residential6 Residential

Recommendation District 3: Fairway Estates – D O NOT ADOPT Resolution of Notice of Intent to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment in Fairway Estates District

Resident-Raised Issues

Themes in comments on Property Owner Interest Poll responses – SW 35 th Drive – Speed Tables – GRU Water Lines Repairs

SW 35 th Drive SW 35 TH DRIVE Roadway Lengths (mi): 1 Roadway Width (ft): 22

Improvement:Mill and Resurface Estimated Construction Cost:$ 695, Allocation Methodology:ratio of average daily vehicular trips over total average daily vehicular trips Per Parcel Annual Assessment Property Type# of ParcelsADTConstructionFeesTotal Cost Single Family Residence $ 1, Total ADT * Best estimates of construction costs at this time. Final assessable costs would be determined in August/September at 2 nd Public Hearing. SW 35 th Drive

SW 35 TH WAY Roadway Length (mi): 1.15 Roadway Width (ft): 36 Speed Tables Existing Speed Tables

Speed Tables Speed Tables in GGCC Neighborhoods – 55% of responding property owners supported – Installed 2003 – Design includes reinstallation of speed tables Public Works process for removal of speed tables 1.Written request from HOA 2.Staff-initiated poll requiring 50%+1 of responding

GRU Water Lines Repairs Coordination with GRU

Timelines

Property Owner Interest PollJanuary 2010 Hold 1 st Public HearingFebruary 2010 Adopted Notice of Intent sent to Property Appraiser,February 2010 Tax Collector, and Department of Revenue Mail notices to all potentially affected parcel ownersJuly 2010 Hold 2 nd Public HearingAugust 2010 Assessment implementedOctober 2010 Tax bills mailedNovember 2010 Estimated ConstructionJanuary 2011 Special Assessment District Timeline

Summary of Recommendations Adopt Resolutions of Notice of Intent to Use Uniform Method to Impose Non-ad Valorem Assessment and authorize Chair to sign resolutions for: – District 1: Country Club Estates, Country Club Manor & Country Club – District 2: Prairie Bluff & Social Square Do not adopt Resolution of Notice of Intent: – District 3: Fairway Estates

S PECIAL A SSESSMENT D ISTRICTS F IRST P UBLIC H EARING * P RESENTATION TO THE B OARD OF C OUNTY C OMMISSIONERS F EBRUARY 23, 2010