Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 14 – Pension Plan Experience Analysis By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January, 2007 Lecture 2 – Life Annuity By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Advertisements

Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 An electronic presentation by Norman Sunderman Angelo State University An electronic presentation by.
1 Understanding Coronado’s CalPERS Rates. 2 Agenda  Basic Concepts  How Rates are Set  What causes rates to rise and fall?  Coronado Rates – historically.
LAPERS Presentation Gary S. Curran, FCA, MAAA, ASA, EA CONSULTING ACTUARY G. S. Curran & Company, LTD N. Glenstone Place Baton Rouge, LA (225)
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Sid Glandon, DBA, CPA Associate Professor of Accounting University of Texas at El Paso.
Pensions ACCTG 5120 David Plumlee.
© 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 17 Pensions.
Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Slide 17-1 Chapter Seventeen Pensions Pensions.
ORP Contribution Concepts IFS-Sponsored Presentation Denise Yunker, Benefits Director Human Resources Division, OUS
Chapter 20: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
Pension Accounting Chapter 17
Powerpoint slides by: Copyright © 2003 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited, Canada Michael L. Hockenstein  Commerce Department Vanier College Intermediate Accounting.
Helping You Plan For Your Retirement Retirement Plan for the Employees of the Christian Brothers University.
Contribution Rates and Benefits of the U.S. Pension System International Pension Conference FIAP and the Chilean Pension Funds Administrations Association.
Retirement Planning and Employee Benefits for Financial Planners
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting Clinic VII McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Illinois SURS Member Guide –Contributions (page 2) –Disability Benefits (pages 7-9) –Disability Retirement Allowance (page 10) –Retirement Benefits (pages.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 4 – Life Insurance Reserve & Minimum Capital By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
OPEN – C&HR – INFO 1-2 UM Retirement Plan Annual Valuation Board of Curators January 31, 2013.
FCERA April 2008 Interest Crediting FCERA Board Interest Crediting and Excess Earnings Policy Discussion Wednesday, April 16, 2008 Paul Angelo,
Fritzie Archuleta, ASA, MAAA, Senior Pension Actuary Actuarial Office.
City of Hallandale Beach Retirement Plan Actuarial Review June 1, 2011.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review April 15, 2013.
1 Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 19.
City Rates and Actuarial Issues 2007 Annual Training Seminar 2007, Texas Municipal Retirement System.
Chapter 21: Accounting for Pensions and Postretirement Benefits
County of Onondaga GASB Valuation Presentation Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEBs) December 5, 2007.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68 Net Pension Liability Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Introduction to the Actuarial Valuation: Funding and Assumptions January 12, 2006 P.
Vancouver Webcast Financial and Operational Review Accountable To You 4th Annual General Meeting October 15, 2005.
OPEBs: Implementation Issues for Public Power Joni Davis, Manager Financial Accounting and Reporting Omaha Public Power District September 27, 2005.
Spring Conference Update on Pensions and Other Long Term Obligations April, 2012 David Boomershine.
1 Interpreting Actuarial Information Fritzie Archuleta, ASA MAAA Senior Pension Actuary, CalPERS February 21, 2013.
Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits Chapter 15 Robinson, Munter and Grant.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning Unit #6.
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 13– Funding Methods for Defined Benefit Plans By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
CALPERS AND PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS City Council Workshop July 13, 2005.
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
Gregory M. Curran, FCA, MAAA, ASA, EA Consulting Actuary G. S. Curran & Company, Ltd N. Glenstone Place Baton Rouge, Louisiana (225)
Board Retreat – Oct 20, 2011 FCERA 2011 Retirement Board Retreat October 20, 2011 Paul Angelo, FSA Andy Yeung, ASA The Segal Company, San Francisco v2.
P 3 Actuaries you can understand 1 Response to Segal Audit of June 30, 2005 Actuarial Valuation August 16, 2006 P.
1 Mid-Atlantic Plan Sponsors (MAPS) Trustee Educational Conference June 9, 2011 What Type of Retirement Plan Do You Want & Can You Afford It? David Boomershine.
Unfunded Actuarial Liabilities For a Defined Benefit Plan: UAL t = AL t – F t ”Funding Ratio” = F t / AL t We can calculate this Unfunded Actuarial Liability.
General Principles of Pension Valuation
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Firefighters’ Pension Scheme
PricewaterhouseCoopers IAS 19 Employee benefits. PricewaterhouseCoopers Objectives and scope Accounting and disclosure of Short term employee benefits.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
Copyright © 2015 GRS – All rights reserved. RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan January 13, 2015 Pension Fund Status As of January 1, 2014.
20-1 An arrangement whereby an employer provides benefits (payments) to retired employees for services they provided in their working years. Pension Plan.
Pensions GOMB Response to Budgeting For Results Commission Pension Questions.
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits C hapter 20 COPYRIGHT © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning.
Actuarial Status Update of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth May 4, 2010 Presented by Doug Anderson, EA, ASA, MAAA Gallagher Benefit.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Presented By: Bradley R. Heinrichs, FSA, EA
Teachers’ Pension Scheme
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Oklahoma County Employees Retirement System
Insurance and Pension Fund Operations
Presentation transcript:

Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 14 – Pension Plan Experience Analysis By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA

Agenda Reasons for experience analysis Major components of experience analysis –Data reconciliation –Liability analysis –Asset analysis –Aggregate analysis –Detailed components

Reasons for Experience Analysis Pension plans are for the long-term There is relative stable patterns of development of liabilities and assets One of the best way to detect errors –Results out of line from previous years typically signify potential errors Good way to detect potential problems –Understanding the cause for undesirable developments help to avoid potential future problems

Data Reconciliation One of the most important steps Traces the ins and outs of the pension plan population Causes for changes of active population –Death, termination, retirement, new employees Causes for changes of retired population –Death, new retirement

Reconciliation of Actives Actives last year – deaths – terminations – retirements + new employees = actives this year Deaths: gains/losses – may be gains or losses –Decrease in active liabilities –Increase in survivor spouse liabilities Terminations: gains/losses – typically gains –Decrease in active liabilities –Increase in payments equal to termination benefits Retirements: gains/losses – typically small –Decrease in active liabilities –Increase in new retiree liabilities

Reconciliation of Retirees Retirees last year – death + new retirees = retirees this year Death: gains/losses – may be gains or losses –Decrease in retiree liabilities –Expected deaths according to mortality table New retirees: gains/losses – typically small –Decrease in active liabilities –Increase in retiree liabilities

What is Expected? Assets and liabilities will behave in accordance with the assumptions Expected Assets Expected Liability Expected Surplus (Unfunded)

Some Notations Assets and liabilities last year = assets and liabilities at beginning of last year (BOY) Assets and liabilities this year = assets and liabilities at end of last year (EOY) Normal cost, contributions, and payments are assumed to be made in mid-year

Expected Liability EOY Expected Liability =BOY Liability + Normal Cost - Payments + Interest EOY Expected Liability =BOY Liability * (1 + i) + NC * (1 + i/2) - Payments * (1 + i/2)

Aggregate Liabilities Experience Expected liabilities this year = Liabilities last year x (1 + i) + Normal cost x (1 + i/2) Actuarial gain/(loss) from liabilities = Expected liabilities this year - actual liabilities this year This gain/(loss) = sum of gains/(losses) from actives and retirees

Liability Gain and Loss Analysis

Analysis of Retiree Liabilities Expected retiree liabilities this year = Retiree liabilities last year x (1 + i) - Benefit payment x (1 + i/2) + New retiree liabilities Actuarial gain/(loss) for retirees = Expected retiree liabilities this year - Actual retiree liabilities this year

Analysis of Active Liabilities Expected active liabilities this year = Active liabilities last year x (1 + i) + Normal cost x (1 + i/2) - New retiree liabilities Actuarial gain/(loss) for actives = Expected active liabilities this year - actual active liabilities this year

Expected Assets EOY Expected Assets =BOY Assets + Contributions - Payments + Interest EOY Expected Assets =BOY Assets * (1 + i) + Contributions * (1 + i/2) - Payments * (1 + i/2)

Asset Experience Analysis Expected assets this year = Assets last year x (1 + i) + Contributions x (1 + i/2) - Benefit payments x (1 + i/2) Asset gain/(loss) = Actual assets this year - Expected assets this year

Asset Gain and Loss Analysis

Expected Surplus (Unfunded Liability) Expected Surplus = Expected Assets - Expected Liability = [BOY Assets * (1+i) + Contributions * (1+i/2) - Payments * (1+i/2)] - [BOY Liability * (1+i) + NC * (1+i/2) - Payments * (1+i/2)] = BOY Assets * (1+i) - BOY Liability * (1+i) + (Contributions – NC) * (1+i/2) = BOY Surplus * (1+i) + (Contributions – NC) * (1+i/2)

Pension Plan Gain/Loss Expected unfunded liabilities this year = Unfunded liabilities last year x (1 + i) + Normal cost x (1 + i/2) - Contributions x (1 + i/2) Pension plan gain/loss = Expected unfunded liabilities this year - Actual unfunded liabilities this year This gain/(loss) should equal sum of asset and liability gain/(loss)

Example

Example -- 2 Methods

Which Changes Affect the Valuation? Data Assumptions Methods

Which Changes Affect the Valuation Any change that is not expected! For example:Date of Birth Date of Employment Credited Service Plan Amendments Change of Assumptions and/or Methods

Quantifying the Changes... through a series of examples Data Assumptions Methods

Quantifying the Changes Example 1 Flat $ plan (union negotiated) Benefit at = $20/month/year of service - non-contributory Cost Method: Accrued Benefit Improvement at : Increase to $22 retroactive/month/year of service Actuarial Liability at = $400,000 before increase Normal Actuarial Cost at = $20,000 before increase Q: How will Actuarial Liability and Normal Cost change, due to the plan improvement? $

Quantifying the Changes Example 1 A: At after change: AL = 22 * 400,000 = 440, NC = 22 * 20,000 = 22, Q: How will Actuarial Liability and Normal Cost change, due to the plan improvement?

Quantifying the Changes Example 2 Q:The date of birth of an employee was wrongly coded when the data was requested for the valuation at It was corrected for the valuation. Using the following information, calculate the plan gain or loss at due to the error.

Quantifying the Changes Example 2 Plan formula:1.2% Career Average Plan Cost Method:Accrued Benefit Wrong Date of Birth:January 1, 1966 Actual Date of Birth:January 1, 1948 Accrued pension at :$1,000 per month Salary rate at :$35,000 Interest rate assumption:7% Retirement date:Age 65 Annuity factor at age 65:10 Decrement before retirement:None

Quantifying the Changes