Wireless Trace Analysis Suyong Lee and Renata Aryanti Advisor: Prof. Suman Banerjee With assistance of : Vladimir Brik and Michael Blodget Fall 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENI/CCNIE Workshop: UW-Madison Key components & approx timetable/milestones 100Gbps (campus to Internet2 & ESNet) (6/30/13) Science DMZ (8/15/13) Openflow/SDN.
Advertisements

SEMESTER EXAMS & EXEMPTIONS
IPv4 to IPv6 Migration strategies. What is IPv4  Second revision in development of internet protocol  First version to be widely implied.  Connection.
CodeTorrent: Content Distribution using Network Coding in VANET Uichin Lee, JoonSang Park, Joseph Yeh, Giovanni Pau, Mario Gerla Computer Science Dept,
SLAW: A Mobility Model for Human Walks Lee et al..
IEEE PIMRC A Comparative Measurement Study of the Workload of Wireless Access Points in Campus Networks Maria Papadopouli Assistant Professor Department.
Peeking Behind the NAT An Empirical Study of Home Networks Sarthak Grover, Mi Seon Park, Srikanth Sundaresan, Sam Burnett, Hyojoon Kim, Bharath Ravi, Nick.
1 William Lee Duke University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Durham, NC Analysis of a Campus-wide Wireless Network February 13,
Analysis of a Campus-wide Wireless Network David Kotz Kobby Essien Dartmouth College September 2002.
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
Brainstorm About Computer Networks Take 3-4 minutes to write –Include your name (I’ll collect and read, but not grade) What are some network applications?
Fresh Analysis of Streaming Media Stored on the Web Rabin Karki M.S. Thesis Presentation Advisor: Mark Claypool Reader: Emmanuel Agu 10 Jan, 2011.
By Libo Song and David F. Kotz Computer Science,Dartmouth College.
VIPER – Voice over IP with Enhanced Resiliency Abstract: VoIP call quality is subject to Internet conditions, and users may experience periods of low quality.
1 Introduction to Wireless Networks Michalis Faloutsos.
Multi-level Application-based Traffic Characterization in a Large-scale Wireless Network Maria Papadopouli 1,2 Joint Research with Thomas Karagianis 3.
Location Clustering Peter Kamm Marcel Flores Peter Kamm Marcel Flores.
SEAS Acad Mtg – 8/26/03Prof. Frank Sciulli Introduction - Physics SEAS Academic Meeting l Intro: Frank Sciulli – Professor in the Physics Dept. u Lecturing.
Optical Ring Networks Research over MAC protocols for optical ring networks with packet switching. MAC protocols divide the ring bandwidth according to.
The Effect of Gender on the Response to Technological Error Calvin Chan and Jamie Jin PSY/ORF 322 Spring 2005.
Damian Gordon.  When we hook up computers together using data communication facilities, we call this a computer network.
Capacity of Ad Hoc Networks Quality of Wireless links Physical Layer Issues The Channel Capacity Path Loss Model and Signal Degradation MAC for.
A Measurement-driven Analysis of Information Propagation in the Flickr Social Network WWW09 报告人: 徐波.
Digital Entertainment on Campus: The Ruckus Approach Michael Bebel CEO, Ruckus Network, Inc.
Add image. 3 “ Content is NOT king ” today 3 40 analog cable digital cable Internet 100 infinite broadcast Time Number of TV channels.
Detecting Node encounters through WiFi By: Karim Keramat Jahromi Supervisor: Prof Adriano Moreira Co-Supervisor: Prof Filipe Meneses Oct 2013.
Dynamic versus Static Traffic Policing: A New Approach for Videoconference Traffic over Wireless Cellular Networks Author: Polychronis Koutsakis Anukrati.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He J. Sobrinho and A. krishnakumar.
Problem Statement Map of OSU Routers Gopi Krishna Tummala Rupam Kundu Graduate Students The Ohio State University.
Chapter 4. After completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Explain “what is the Internet? And how we connect to the Internet using an ISP. Explain.
Joel Evans Flipping an AP Statistics Class.
Trends and Implications Online Learning Taken from “Staying the Course - Online Education in the United States, 2008,” a survey of more than 2,500.
CS380y Junior Thesis1 The Performance of TCP/IP over Bluetooth Chris Snow Supervisors: Serguei Primak, Electrical Engineering Hanan Lutfiyya, Computer.
Author: Sali Allister Date: 21/06/2011 COASTAL Google Analytics Report March 2011 – June /03/2011 – 08/06/11.
DEVICES AND COMMUNICATION BUSES FOR DEVICES NETWORK
Data and Computer Communications Chapter 10 – Circuit Switching and Packet Switching (Wide Area Networks)
NETWORK HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MR ROSS UNIT 3 IT APPLICATIONS.
Networking Components Starla Wachsmann. COMPUTER NETWORKING COMPONETS Today’s wireless and enterprise networks are more complex than ever, delivering.
Characterising the Use of a Campus Wireless Network 徐 志 賢 Paper From: D. Schwab and R.B. Bunt, "Characterising the Use of a Campus Wireless Network", Proc.
Syllabus Classroom Responsibilities Be respectful. Be on time. –Third lateness = teacher detention Be prepared. Students need to come to class.
The Changing Usage of a Mature Campus-wide Wireless Network CS525m – Mobile and Ubiquitous Computing Andrew Stone.
1 Real-Time Traffic over the IEEE Medium Access Control Layer Tian He.
Wireless Trace Analysis. Project Goals Summary of project goals: First goal: analyze wireless access patterns Second goal: implement Markov predictor.
Patterns in Academic Library Computer Use Tito Sierra North Carolina State University TRLN Annual Meeting 2009 July 24, 2009.
January 23-26, 2007 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida Deployment Challenges of Wi-Fi Telephony John DiGiovanni Director of Marketing Staff Technologist
Measurement-based Analysis of the Video Characteristics of Twitch.tv Mark Claypool, Daniel Farrington, and Nicholas Muesch Computer.
Pin-Yun Tarng / An Analysis of WoW Players’ Game Hours Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw IEEE/IFIP DSN 2008 Network and Systems Laboratory.
Rajashri Joshi Research Scholar P G Tadasad Professor and Chairman Department of Library and Information Science Karnataka State Women’s University, vijayapura.
Exploring the IT Datascape What does our IT data tell us about our users?
Doc.: IEEE /1263r2 Submission Dec 2009 Z. Chen, C. Zhu et al [Preliminary Simulation Results on Power Saving] Date: Authors: Slide.
1 Long-Range Dependence in a Changing Internet Traffic Mix STATISTICAL and APPLIED MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES INSTITUTE Félix Hernández-Campos Don Smith Department.
1 Apricot2001 Effectiveness of VLAN Chan Wai Kok Faculty of Information Technology Salim Beg Faculty of Engineering.
Examples: Find the derivative Higher Order Derivatives 1 st Derivative: 2 nd Derivative: 3 rd Derivative: 4 th Derivative:
Cyber Physical Systems (Green Networks) Prof. Nicholas Maxemchuk Manu Dhundi.
1 Number Practice Money, Time, Age, etc. 2 New added Sign Mins - Time Month - Context Year - Length Hour (1 - 10) Hour (11 upward) Pence Twist - 1 st.
COMP2322 Lab 1 Introduction to Wireless LAN Weichao Li Apr. 8, 2016.
Mind the Gap: Modelling Video Delivery Under Expected Periods of Disconnection Argyrios G. Tasiopoulos, Ioannis Psaras, and George Pavlou Department of.
Geethanjali College Of Engineering and Technology Cheeryal( V), Keesara ( M), Ranga Reddy District. I I Internal Guide Mrs.CH.V.Anupama Assistant Professor.
12.Nov.2007 Capacity of Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Jinyang Li Charles Blake Douglas S. J. De Coutu Hu Imm Lee Robert Morris Paper presentation by Tonio Gsell.
Heterogeneous WiFi Transfer Characteristics
Routers and Redundancy
5G MOBILE TECHNOLOGY By J.YOGESH 08M31A0425.
Flow Charts & Psuedo Code
2.02G Publishing Animated Videos
The Drop-in Librarian David Edens Instructional Services Librarian
Shuttle Sort Example 1st pass Comparisons: 1
How classroom seating might affect marks
ANNOUNCEMENTS 5/14/18    .
Shuttle Sort Example 1st pass Comparisons: 1
Presentation transcript:

Wireless Trace Analysis Suyong Lee and Renata Aryanti Advisor: Prof. Suman Banerjee With assistance of : Vladimir Brik and Michael Blodget Fall 2007

What we are doing …  Analyzing the wireless traffic traces in Helen C. White College Library building, located in 600 N. Park St, Madison, WI. 1. Contention 2. APs’ Popularity and Traffic Distribution Among APs 3. Mobility Pattern 3. Users’ Connection Trend (length and number of APs the user usually connect in a day) 4. Data Rate Distribution 5. Download VS Upload Stream 6. Traffic Distribution Among APs 7. Control Packet Distribution

HCW AP location

Network Usage Of all the wireless traces collected in HCW College Library: –86% is using UW-Net- Helen-C-White network –6% is using other UW network, such as: Memorial Union, Memorial Library, Science Hall, or Water Science network. –8% are using foreign network.

Contention  We will show the number of nodes connected on each AP over time. Each color on the diagram represent different APs.  The data is taken from the AP logs on May 15 th – 17 th, This is the final exam week of Spring 2007 term.  The busiest time (when many nodes are connected) for 1 st – 3 rd floor is shown to be evening, around 7pm – 1am.

Contention – 1 st floor On May 17 th, the number of nodes connected to the 1 st floor AP did not go up in the evening (as it did in May 15 th and May 16 th ), as people tend to move up to the 2 nd and 3 rd floor (there are larger space to study in 2 nd and 3 rd floor).

Contention – 2 nd floor

Contention – 3 rd floor

Contention – 4 th floor The busiest time in 4 th floor tends to be in the afternoon, between 9am – 3pm. The 4 th floor is used as offices, so most nodes are connected during business hour.

AP Popularity -- Association, Disassociation, MaxRetries, and Roaming May 15 th, 2007 In the first and second floor, the users are not distributed very well among AP. In the third to fifth floor, the distribution of the users among AP are better. 1 st Floor: 1200 is the least popular AP 2 nd Floor: 2191a is extremely popular and 2257 is the least popular 6 th and 7 th floor: only 1 AP is dominant on each floor.

Association, Disassociation, MaxRetries, and Roaming (Continue) May 16 th, 2007 –The trend is similar to May 15 th. –In the first floor, the users are not distributed very well among AP, 1200 is the least popular AP. –In the second floor, 2191a is the most popular AP and 2257 is the least popular. –In the third floor, the distribution of the users among AP are better. –3191d and 3205a are the most popular. - In the 4 th floor, 4191a is the most popular - In the 5 th the difference among APs are not very significant. - In the 6 th – 7 th floor, only 1 AP is dominant in each floor.

Association, Disassociation, MaxRetries, and Roaming (Continue) May 17 th, 2007 We have slightly different trend of AP popularity on the 1 st – 3 rd floor. 1 st floor : is no longer the least popular is the most popular 2 nd floor: is the most popular, instead of 2191a as in the previous 2 days. 3 rd floor: 3205 and 3215 are the most popular 4 th – 7 th floor: only 1 AP is dominant on each floor.

Traffic Distribution between APs  The traffic go pass each APs

Mobility  Analyze the prevalence of each user.  Prevalence : the fraction of length each user connected on each AP compared to the whole connection time to the whole network.

Prevalence  May 15 th, 2007  40.2 % users are staying in 1 location.  36% users are moving around but are dominant in 1 location (0.8 1) May 15 th, 2007

Prevalence May 16 th, 2007  May 16 th, 2007  50 % users are staying in 1 location.  26% users are moving around but are dominant in 1 location

Prevalence May 17 th, 2007  May 17 th, 2007  61 % users are staying in 1 location.  16 % users are moving around but are dominant in 1 location

Users’ Connection Pattern  The data is taken from the AP logs May 15 th – may 17 th  We are looking at these trends: How long each user connected to the network every day. How many APs the users usually connected to in a day.

Length of Connected for users  May 15 th – May 17 th 2007  ~ 40% users were connected less than 1 hr.  20%- 30% users are connected between 1-3 hrs a day.

Number of APs users get connected in a day  May 15 th – May 17 th  ~ 70% of users are connected to 1–2 APs everyday.  ~ 25% of users are connected to 3 APs – 5 APs everyday.  Only about 5% of users are connected to more than 6 APs.

Data Rate Distribution  Only a few packets are sent using higher data rate, such as 54Mbps and 48Mbps.  The dominant data rate is 11Mbps.  The reason is that DoIT tries to force the data rate to be 11Mbps when there are a lot of users connected at the same time. This way they can share the bandwidth even though there are many users connected.

Download VS Upload Stream  Analyze the download VS upload stream for each AP.

Control Packet Traffic Distribution  CTS is dominating the control packet sent through the network.  CTS >> RTS

- END - Thank you !!