The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Fifth Annual African-American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 24, 2009 Christine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Please note, these are the actual video-recorded proceedings from the live CME event and may include the use of trade names and other raw, unedited content.
Advertisements

PSA: Fact or Fiction The debate as it stands
The Great PSA Testing Controversy Does PSA Testing Do More Harm Than Good? Associate Professor Anthony Lowe.
HEALTHY PEOPLE. Aims  Interpret evidence about a screening programme and decide whether it is worthwhile – for individuals or groups  Demonstrate an.
US TOO INTERNATIONAL, INC US TOO GREATER QUAD CITIES PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT GROUP.
PSA Testing William J Catalona MD Northwestern University.
Support for pesticides playing a role in onset of multiple myeloma
RESULTS TITLE; Prospective randomized controlled trial of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening protocol.
Michael Birrer, PI, Director, Gynecologic Medical Oncology, MGH Lari Wenzel, Co-PI, Prof. of Medicine, University of California, Irvine
Department of Health and Human Services Measuring Clinical Lab Ordering Quality: Theory and Practice Steven M. Asch MD MPH VA, RAND, UCLA April 29, 2005.
Pancreas Cancer Nimisha K. Parekh, MD, MPH
What is the evidence of benefits of PSA screening for prostate cancer? Outpatient Medicine.
Prostate Cancer Screening: Con
What is the role of free PSA? Total PSA Range 2.5 to 4.0 ng/ml Age Range (Years) %Free PSA=60 (yrs)All Ages
Prevention Strategies Rajesh G. Laungani MD Director, Robotic Urology Chairman, Prostate Cancer Center Saint Joseph’s Hospital, Atlanta.
Otis W. Brawley, M.D. Chief Medical and Scientific Officer Executive Vice President American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology, Medical Oncology,
Genetic Causation for Mortality Disparity among Young African-American Men.
EVIDENCE AND DEBATE SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER.
Objectives: Our first segment focused in the anatomy and functions of the prostate gland, to get a clear understanding of the male Genito-Urinary System.
Prostate Cancer Screening 2012 Paul L. Crispen, MD Department of Surgery University of Kentucky.
Prostate Cancer Screening Assistant Professor Charles Chabert Men’s health Seminar Ballina April 2011 prostates.com.au.
M Ravanbod Medical oncologist Bushehr – 11/91 A 50 y/o white man comes for check up and wants to discuss about prostate cancer. Negative family history.
Modern Management of Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance PROSTATE CANCER SYMPOSIUM NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE SEPTEMBER 10,
Stage-specific survival of screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed colorectal cancer - evidence from the FOBT screening trials- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar.
Medical Therapy of Prostate Symptoms (MTOPS) Jeannette Y. Lee, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Prostate Screening in 2009: New Findings and New Questions Durado Brooks, MD, MPH Director, Prostate and Colorectal Cancer.
Prostate Cancer in 2009, part I. Now and the future! Why we have ‘Active surveillance, its purpose, its outcome and other matters. Monique J. Roobol, PhD,
Finding N.E.M.O. Marvin R. Balaan, MD, FCCP System Division Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh.
Prostate Cancer James B. Benton,M.D.. Prostate Cancer Significant of the clinical problem Early detection/screening Prevention/Management.
EPIB-591 Screening Jean-François Boivin 29 September
The Need for Organ Site Specific Cancer Research John T Isaacs Chemical Therapeutic Program Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins.
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
J. Jacques Carter, MD, MPH Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Medicine Harvard Medical School Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston, Massachusetts.
Neonatal ECMO Study of Temperature NEST. Basic ECMO circuit.
Annual prostate cancer symposium February 23, 2013 The Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 2nd “ Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Prostate Cancer ”
Michigan Cancer Registry Update: Cancer Data and Highlights MCC Board of Directors Meeting June 19, 2013.
EDRN Approaches to Biomarker Validation DMCC Statisticians Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Margaret Pepe Ziding Feng, Mark Thornquist, Yingye Zheng,
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School.
A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROSTATE CANCER. PROSTATE CANCER 101 SPONSORED BY THE CALIFORNIA STATE PROSTATE CANCER COALITION AND THE NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF STATE.
Implications of lung cancer screening in the new millenia Andrew R. Haas, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Interventional Pulmonary and.
Biostatistics Case Studies Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 2: Diagnostic Classification.
Prostate Cancer: Just The Facts A Mandate for Patient Centered Research Wednesday, June 16, :00 noon – 1:30 pm Rayburn House Office Building Room.
“The African American Prostate Cancer Crisis in Numbers”
A Glimpse of the Science Behind the American Cancer Society Access to Care Campaign Impact of Being Uninsured or Underinsured on Individuals with Cancer.
Overdetection of prostate cancer ESMO Brussel 2007 Chris H.Bangma Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PROSTATE CANCER PROSTATE CANCER What you should know about Prostate Cancer:  Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer found in American men,
PCa Screening New Areas of Research Francesco Montorsi Milan.
Prevention with Finasteride Ian M. Thompson, MD October, 2009.
Data Sources-Cancer Betsy A. Kohler, MPH, CTR Director, Cancer Epidemiology Services New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services.
PSA Testing Importance of Multiple Markers Ian Thompson MD Department of Urology University of Texas HSC San Antonio, TX.
Prostate Cancer: Treatment choices Prostate Cancer: Treatment choices Winston W Tan MD FACP Winston W Tan MD FACP Senior Consultant Senior Consultant Genitourinary.
A Clinical Profile of Male Health in the Bahamas “Real Men Die from Prostate Cancer” A Clinical Profile of Male Health in the Bahamas “Real Men Die from.
Implications of lung cancer screening in the new millenia Andrew R. Haas, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Interventional Pulmonary and.
Prostate Cancer Screening Risk Management Ben Inch.
Il PSA nello screening del carcinoma della prostata PRO Franco Gaboardi Urologia Ospedale San Raffaele Turro Milano.
MpMRI in Prostate cancer A Urologist’s Perspective Diagnosis Treatment Choice Surgical Planning Dr. Peter Heathcote, Adjunct Professor APCRC-Q QUT, Senior.
Per-Anders Abrahamsson, Department of Urology Malmö University Hospital Sweden EAU, Berlin, March 24, 2007 What´s New in Prostate Cancer?
Widening of Socioeconomic Disparities in U.S. Mortality from Major Cancers Ahmedin Jemal, PhD Elizabeth Ward, PhD June 10, 2008 Kinsey T, Jemal A, Liff.
REDUCED LUNG-CANCER MORTALITY WITH LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCREENING The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team N Engl J Med 2011;365:
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention Ongoing Activities at Frederick Facilities Presented By: Lori Minasian, M.D. Robert Shoemaker, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
PSA screening Cost Conscious Project Kristopher Huston January 2016.
Robert E. Schoen, MD MPH Associate Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Division of Gastroenterology University of Pittsburgh Hereditary Colorectal Cancer:
Requirements to run clinical trials: Research fee calculation, patient consent Kyoung Hwa Ha.
Intermediate Atypical Carcinoma: Novel Histologic Subtype of mCRPC in Patients Resistant to Androgen Receptor Agonists CCO Independent Conference Highlights.
Prostate Cancer Dr .Gehan Mohamed.
Genomics and Genetic Testing
Hereditary Colorectal Cancer: From Genetic Testing to Prevention
Genomic Testing: When and Why
Presentation transcript:

The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Fifth Annual African-American Prostate Cancer Disparity Summit September 24, 2009 Christine D. Berg, M.D. Project Officer, PLCO Chief, Early Detection Research Group Division of Cancer Prevention

PLCO Trial: Study Design Screening Centers: 10 Screening Centers: 10 Participants: 154,935 Participants: 154,935 Gender: 50:50 Gender: 50:50 Age: years Age: years Recruitment: Recruitment: Screening: Screening: Prostate – Annual DRE x 4 and PSA x 6 Prostate – Annual DRE x 4 and PSA x 6 Follow-up for 14 years (T0 – T13) Follow-up for 14 years (T0 – T13) Annual surveys: active Annual surveys: active Monitoring and QA: active Monitoring and QA: active Mortality searches: active and NDI, passive Mortality searches: active and NDI, passive Annual interim analysis Annual interim analysis

PLCO Screening Centers

PLCO: Selected Characteristics RaceScreeningControlWhite Black Hispanic Asian Other Missing2.45.0

Prostate Cancer Detected by 10 years Clinical Stage ScreeningControl I 18 (0.5) 18 (0.5) 15 (0.5) 15 (0.5) II II 3297 (95.5) 3297 (95.5) 2790 (93.8) 2790 (93.8) III III 49 (1.4) 49 (1.4) 56 (1.9) 56 (1.9) IV IV 73 (2.1) 73 (2.1) 79 (2.7) 79 (2.7) Unknown Unknown 15 (0.4) 15 (0.4) 34 (1.1) 34 (1.1)

Comparison of Gleason Scores Gleason score on biopsy Screening Screening Control Control (6.4) 222 (6.4) 137 (4.6) 137 (4.6) (59.3) 2047 (59.3) 1656 (55.7) 1656 (55.7) (23.6) 815 (23.6) 779 (26.2) 779 (26.2) (8.4) 289 (8.4) 341 (11.5) 341 (11.5) Unknown Unknown 79 (2.3) 79 (2.3) 61 (2.1) 61 (2.1)

Compliance and Contamination Screening before entry (screening/control) Screening before entry (screening/control) PSA test DRE PSA test DRE Once: 34.6/ /31/9 Once: 34.6/ /31/9 Two or more: 9.4/ /22.0 Two or more: 9.4/ /22.0 Compliance Compliance PSA 85%; DRE 86% PSA 85%; DRE 86% Testing in the control group Testing in the control group PSA: 40% in first year to 52% in sixth year PSA: 40% in first year to 52% in sixth year DRE: Range from 41 to 46% DRE: Range from 41 to 46%

Andriole GL et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360: Number of Diagnoses of All Prostate Cancers and Number of Prostate-Cancer Deaths

PLCO Trial Results Annual screening with DRE and PSA results in more prostate cancer compared to community screening practices Annual screening with DRE and PSA results in more prostate cancer compared to community screening practices Seven years: 2820 versus 2322 Seven years: 2820 versus 2322 Ten years: 3452 versus 2974 Ten years: 3452 versus 2974 Few Prostate cancer related deaths in either group Few Prostate cancer related deaths in either group 50 screening and 44 controls at 7 years 50 screening and 44 controls at 7 years 92 screening and 82 control at 10 years 92 screening and 82 control at 10 years Continued follow-up to be done Continued follow-up to be done

UCLA CA-125, PSA Assays Blood Collection Protocol Biorepository Etiology & Early Marker Studies Serum T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 2 ml S Serum T0 (2), T1, T2, T4, T5 2 ml X 2 S S Plasma, Buffy Coat, RBC T0, T3 2 ml X 4 P PBR Serum T0 2 ml S Plasma, Buffy Coat, RBC T3, T4, T5 (2) 2 ml X 4 P PBR Whole Blood T3 (2) 2 ml X 6 W WW W Samples Collected Per Patient Serum13 vials26 ml Plasma12 vials24 ml Buffy Coat6 vials14 ml RBC3 vials6 ml Whole Blood12 vials24 ml Total46 vials92 ml TubesAdditiveSizeSpecimens Red/GrayClot Activator6 mlSerum RedNone10 mlSerum Green Sodium Heparin 10 ml Plasma, Buffy coat & RBC Royal BlueNone7 mlZinc-free Serum Lavender Liquid EDTA 10 ml Plasma, Buffy Coat &RBC YellowACD-A8.5 mlWhole Blood

Specimens Available by Cancer Sites and Specimen Types 75,476 34,043 17,206 17,084 9,490 8,837 6,723 5,734 4,829 4,489 1,735 1,900 2,138 2,289 3,507 3,501 1,434 1,242 1,193 1,086

TMAs with PLCO Tumors Supports multiple histologies per spot

PLCO Trial Conclusions PSA not a perfect test PSA not a perfect test Low mortality rates achieved at high rate of overdiagnosis Low mortality rates achieved at high rate of overdiagnosis Important to have better biologic understanding of aggressive prostate cancer and means of differentiating from indolent disease Important to have better biologic understanding of aggressive prostate cancer and means of differentiating from indolent disease PLCO biospecimen repository useful PLCO biospecimen repository useful genetic and somatic risk assessment genetic and somatic risk assessment development and validation of early markers of detection development and validation of early markers of detection

With appreciation PLCO Research Colleagues PLCO Research Colleagues PLCO Site Coordinators and Staff PLCO Site Coordinators and Staff NCI Colleagues NCI Colleagues The trial participants without whom these studies would not have been possible The trial participants without whom these studies would not have been possible