Safeguarding Children SUI reporting & performance management London Safeguarding Children Board Conference 9 th December 2009 B. Ladbury and Karen Green.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Reporting & Learning System (NRLS) Reporting systems are vital in providing a core of sound, representative information on which to base analysis.
Advertisements

Commission for Health Improvement CHI: The national perspective Emilie Roberts Development Manager 10 December 2003.
Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Roles and responsibilities of elected members and senior officers in local safeguarding services Cllr Shireen Ritchie Cabinet Member for Family and Childrens.
Improving Safeguarding in the London NHS
Working Together Briefing Tim Beach: Independent Chair BSCB & Helen Elliott BSCB Manager.
Bromley Barnados DV Training 2009 Nicky Brownjohn Designated Nurse for Safeguarding Children Bromley.
Introduction The London Safeguarding Children Board has taken the decision to revise the current London Child Protection Procedures to make them more:
Developing a culture of reflective safeguarding: from compliance to learning and adapting Eileen Munro November 24 th 2011.
Critical Incidents PRIMARY CARE. AGENCIES CHI-Commission for Health Improvement CHI-Commission for Health Improvement NPSA National Patient Safety Agency.
Child Death Review Process
When a Child Dies An Introduction to Child Death Review Processes Tees Child Death Review Project, hosted by Redcar & Cleveland Safeguarding Children Board.
Implementing the Significant Incident Learning Process (SILP) Heather Pick Assistant Director Personal Care and Support Leicestershire County Council Heather.Pick.
Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
Dr Rachel McEnery GP trainer Kilmeny Group Medical Practice
Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
The role of the NYSCB. a)to coordinate what is done by each person or body represented on the Board for the purposes of safeguarding and promoting the.
SERIOUS CASE REVIEW PROCEDURE NICKY BROWNJOHN DESIGNATED NURSE FOR SAFEGUARDING CHILDREN SEPTEMBER 2009.
Standards for Better Health implementation Suzie Loader Director of Nursing.
Children’s Social Care Workload Management System (WMS) A Two-fold approach DSLT 16 th November 2010 Updated with new SWRB standards.
Bureau of Workers’ Comp PA Training for Health & Safety (PATHS)
Safeguarding Adults The Care Act 2014 Jo Wilkins Team Manager, Safeguarding Adults Team Reading Borough Council.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Isle of Wight Local Safeguarding Children Board Roles And Responsibilities.
Cambridgeshire Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) and Schools in Cambridgeshire Josie Collier – LSCB Business Manager Sally.
Last Time – Duty of Care What are the consequences of unsatisfactory duty of care? List one key point of your complaints procedure, share this with another.
Child Sexual Exploitation National Context Safeguarding Children And Young People from Sexual Exploitation, DCSF, 2009 Tackling Child Sexual Exploitation.
Presentation for Age Cymru ADULT PRACTICE REVIEWS Mick Collins
NPSA Incident Decision Tree RCA Tool (the representatives perspective)
Lead Practitioner (Safeguarding) Briefings Autumn 2013.
Investigation and case planning Your responsibilities under the Children Act 1989 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 9.
Revalidation Implementation for doctors in training Dr Lorna Burrows, National Revalidation Fellow, NHS South of England.
Commissioner Feedback for SLAM CQC Inspection in September 2015 Engagement with Member Practices 1.
Scrutiny Panel Serious Case Review Group Activity and outcomes April September 2014 Keith Ibbetson Independent Chair SCR Group.
Getting it right for people with complex needs: whose responsibility? David Behan, Director General Social Care Local Government and Care Partnerships.
Southwark Safeguarding Children Board Introduction Ann Flynn Development Manager 4th July 2013.
Safeguarding Children Marie-Noelle Orzel Director of Nursing & Patient Care Executive Lead for Children.
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Healthcare Commission update Sue Fraser-Betts Senior Assessment Manager October
Role of NHS England in protecting and maintaining patient/service user dignity Arden, Herefordshire & Worcestershire Area Team.
14 June 2011 Michael Wright Clinical Governance Team, Department of Health The Responsible Officer: Moving Forward.
Government Office for London Managing Allegations 12 th June 2008.
Induction toolkit 2. WHAT DOES MY TRUST LOOK LIKE? © GovernWell
Multi-Agency Case File Audits (MACFA) Learning Briefing Nicki Pettitt, Independent MACFA Auditor 18 th September 2015.
Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report 2015 Presentation to Council January 12 th 2016 John Harris – Independent Chair.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material 2 Day Lead Investigator.
RCA Report Writing.
1 Module 4 Learning From When Things Go Wrong A Resource to Support Training Activity in Clinical Settings.
Working Together has been modified by Working Together 2015 Regulation 5 of the Local Safeguarding Children Boards Regulations 2006 sets out the.
… because safeguarding children is everyone’s responsibility Enfield Safeguarding Children Board (ESCB) Annual Report 2014/15 Geraldine Gavin – ESCB Independent.
To Learn & Develop Christine Johnson Lead Nurse Safeguarding (named nurse) - STFT Health Visitors Roles and Responsibilities in Domestic Abuse.
CHILD DEATH REVIEWS Child deaths at Bristol Royal Infirmary Kennedy Report into Infant Deaths Laming Inquiry – Victoria Climbie Children Act 2004 Working.
Incident Management The Investigation. London Protocol System analysis Structured reflection Consistent approach Promotes openness.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material Analysing the Problems Identifying.
Content from National Patient Safety Agency material 1 Day Support Investigator.
Race equality in the NHS: Raising the standard Jude Williams, Lead for Public Health March 7 th 2005.
WHY USE THE RCGP OUT OF HOURS CLINICAL AUDIT TOOLKIT ? Dr. Agnelo Fernandes MBE FRCGP 6 th March 2008.
Isle of Wight Local Safeguarding Children Board Development Day 17 June 2010.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
The role of the NYSCB.
Chapter 7 Multi-professional Perspectives
Cardiff Partnership Board
IAEA E-learning Program
The RCA Process Getting Started
1 November 2017 Serious Case Reviews
Root Cause Analysis-RCA
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Cardiff Partnership Board
Doncaster Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report
Commissioner Feedback for SLAM CQC Inspection in September 2015
Presentation transcript:

Safeguarding Children SUI reporting & performance management London Safeguarding Children Board Conference 9 th December 2009 B. Ladbury and Karen Green NHS London

Independent reviews 2009 Forty four cases audited, many fell below an acceptable quality standard. Named and Designated Professionals confused about role, responsibilities, authority and accountability Very few reports demonstrated skills in structured investigation, root cause analysis or meaningful report writing. Crossed borough boundaries confused NHS agencies about responsibility for ensuring that health recommendations were implemented Similar issues emerged in NHSL internal independent Post Baby P incident report

Recommendations NHSL to monitor serious incidents and the SCR process more effectively (work with GOL) PCTs and provider Trusts to inform NHSL of the progress of SCRs, and ensure that the final reports are of high quality and signed off at Board level. PCTs and NHS Trusts to submit their SCR Individual Management Reports and action plans to NHSL as well as to the Local Safeguarding Children Board. SCR action plans require performance management, and tracking until full implementation (will be audited). Lessons must be learned and embedded into practice.

Working Together 2006 Chapter 7 – Child Death Review (CDR) Rapid Response and Overview Panel Chapter 8 – Serious Case Reviews (SCR) Defines Role of SHA SHA is member of LSCB SHA must manage performance against core and developmental standards and Trusts implementation of child protection SCR action plans 2.43 LSCBs should ensure that the SHA is briefed about SCRs so they in turn can fulfil their responsibility with regards to briefing the DH of emerging issues 8.83 Defines operational structures for NHS 2.58 – 2.96 Designated and Named Professional Role 2.58 – 2-65 Outlines Health responsibilities for CDR & SCR Designated Professionals have key responsibility 8.18 Rewrite has taken into account role of SHA Will clarify accountabilities

Issues for NHS action All child deaths 0-18 Child Dies anticipated Child Dies Unexpected Child Dies Unexpected ??? circumstances Unknown: need more information Child protection circumstances identified No suspicious circumstances Rapid Response Referred to Child Death Overview Panel Concerns Identified No concerns identified LSCB SCR Panel decision to undertake SCR YES NO SUI

LSCB SCR Panel Decisions LSCB full multi-agency Serious Case Review under Chapter 8 of WT LSCB commissioned Multi-agency Internal Management Review LSCB commissioned Single Agency Individual Management Review One or more NHS services All use systems approaches including structured investigation and RCA principles

PCT SUI system for all NHS incidents Incident = notification via STEIS system Structured investigation (RCA) Specific time line (NB parallel but not the same as for SCR) Analysis using RCA Report (NB parallel format, but not the same as SCR) Recommendations Action Plan Tracking system Follow up on quality, actions and embedding learning

SCR and SUI Processes Incident – initial SUI notification Feedback SCR decision to SHA PCT notify as SUI/SCR (reminder sent from SHA one month following incident) 60 day reminder – Feedback to SHA on progress IMRs to PCT Designated Lead to produce PCT Overview. Reports to Overview writer 6 months PCT Overview, chronology, all IMRs and all action plans to SHA Incident notified to GOL SCR panel meets to decide / SCR is triggered SCR panel meetings and multi- agency discussions 5 months – all SCR Individual Management Review reports to independent overview writer 6 months SCR completed Timelines can be extended in exceptional circumstances, by Ofsted 6 SUI SCR

SCR Process summary Defined in Working Together Child deaths & Serious Injuries Further guidance in London CP procedures Local Authority LSCB lead on process but are not accountable for NHS actions, NHS delivery or performance management – PCTs & SHA hold this function SCR coordinated by Independent Chair of SCR panel Health components coordinated by Designated Professional (doctor or nurse) Regulated by Ofsted and CQC Can become a Public Enquiry Parallels to SUI process – with some variations !!

What is RCA? Root cause analysis is a systematic investigation technique that looks beyond the individuals concerned and seeks to understand the underlying causes and environmental context in which the incident happened. Seven Steps to Patient Safety 2004

Basic elements of a good RCA investigation WHAT happened HOW it happened WHY it happened Unsafe Act (CDP/SDP) Human Behaviour Contributory Factors Solution Development & Feedback

How do accidents happen? 2. Prior conditions - contributory factors 3. Unsafe acts, errors & omissions 4. Multiple defences/ controls/ barriers Patient Safety Incident 1. Organisation and process deficiencies

Service Delivery Problem (SDP) Latent failure Arises from weaknesses in the organisation or environment Distant from direct patient care e.g. failure to undertake an environmental risk assessment in a ward

Care Delivery Problem (CDP) Active failure Arises in process of direct patient care Act or omission by member of staff e.g. failure to undertake 15min observations of patient

Contributory factors Patient factors Individual factors Task factors Communication factors Team & social factors Education & training factors Equipment and resource factors Working condition factors Organisational & management factors

What are contributory factors? Influencing or causal factors that contributed to the incident. May vary in the significance of impact on the CDP/SDP. May have a negative or a positive impact.

Care/Service Delivery Problem Education & Training Organisational & Strategic Factors Working Conditions Team Factors Individual (staff) Factors Task Factors Patient Factors Fishbone Diagram

Five whys Simple tool that helps you look underneath each problem (CDP/SDP). Best suited to simple and non-complex problems. Quick and easy to teach 3 – 5 – 7 whys?

What is a root cause? A fundamental contributory factor One which had the greatest impact on the system failure. One which, if resolved, will minimise the likelihood of recurrence across the organisation. Rarely is there ever just one root cause, usually there are several.

Process Gathering Data / Info Mapping Data / Info Identify Care / Service Delivery Problems Analyse the Problem / Identify Root Causes Develop Targeted Recommendations Write Report