© 2002, Karey Perkins Ethical Theories  Act-Based Ethics:  Consequentialist Egoism Hedonism Utilitarianism (Act and Rule)  Deontologicalist Kantianism.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moral, Legal and Aesthetic Reasoning
Advertisements

Frameworks for Moral Arguments
Themes in Ethics and Epistemology
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Show-Me 4-H Character Module Two Character Development Theory.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Show-Me 4-H’ers Character The Six Pillars of Character
Virtue Ethics in Action. TYPES OF ETHICAL THEORY: Utilitarian --based on considering the consequences of actions for people's well-being. Deontological.
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Ethical Theory.
REPORTED BY: Mavee Cabrera Joan Aoki Fatima Carlotta
Dr. Frankena: Moral Value & Responsibility
Ethics (and Morals) Virtue & Character. Ethics and Morals are different Morals are value judgments, beliefs, principles, and rules for ordinary life.
The Ethics of Virtue Virtue ethics date back to Aristotle (325B.C.) in his Nichomachean Ethics. Aristotle’s central question: “What is the.
Applying Moral Philosophies to Business Ethics
Individual Factors: Moral Philosophies and Values
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
Rosalind Hursthouse: Virtue Theory and Abortion
VIRTUE ETHICS The Cultivation of Character. From Duty to Virtue Kant’s examples: what ARE our “duties”? Strict, “perfect,” negative duties (e.g., do not.
Natural Law/Virtue Ethics. Morality and Human Nature  Natural Law Theory  Based upon assumption that the good is consistent with fundamental design.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
PHIL 2 Philosophy: Ethics in Contemporary Society
What is the right thing to do?
Ethics – what is it? eth·ics [eth-iks]–plural noun
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Bioethics 101 Lesson two.
© 2002, Karey Perkins The Commandant Example  The Baby? - or-  The 5,000?
Rule utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
Ethics (and Morals) Virtue & Character. Ethics and Morals are different Morals are value judgments, beliefs, principles, and rules for ordinary life.
© 2002, Karey Perkins The Commandant Example  The Baby? - or-  The 5,000?
Kantian Ethics Introduction.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant By David Kelsey.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
From Last Time The good will is the only good thing in an ‘unqualified way” Acting from duty vs. acting in accord with duty Categorical vs. hypothetical.
Ethical Decision Making , Ethical Theories
ETHICALETHICALETHICALETHICAL PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES.
Christopher Jay Department of Philosophy University of York.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Introduction  Based on something other than the consequences of a person’s actions  Unlike Egoism  People should act in their own self-interest  Unlike.
Ethical Decision Making and Ethical Theory MGMT 491 Management Ethics in a Global Environment Jeffery D. Smith.
MNU Five Other Ethical Systems Dr. Judy Martin Session 7 – February 18, 2014.
Ethical theories tend to suggest a set of principles or rules than all human beings are bound by. Utilitarianism – the greatest good for the greatest.
Ethical Decision Making and Ethical Theory Mgmt 621 Contemporary Ethical Issues in Management Jeffery D. Smith.
What is the right thing to do?
Basic concepts in Ethics
Ethics Topic 3.
Contemporary Moral Problems
Moral Theory Review.
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 2: Ethical Relativism
Ethics: Theory and Practice
Normative Virtue Ethics
Virtue Ethics Aristotle.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 12 Kant
Ethics and Values for Professionals Chapter 5: Virtue Ethics
Ethical Theories Chapter 2
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
ETHICS BOWL kantian ETHICS.
Moral Development The American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg, for example, has concluded on the basis of over twenty years of research that there is a.
What is philosophical ethics?
Moral Development The American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg, for example, has concluded on the basis of over twenty years of research that there is a.
Moral Development The American psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg, for example, has concluded on the basis of over twenty years of research that there is a.
History of Philosophy Lecture 17 Immanuel Kant’ Ethics
VIRTUE ETHICS And Feminist Ethics.
Ethical concepts and ethical theories Topic 3
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Presentation transcript:

© 2002, Karey Perkins Ethical Theories  Act-Based Ethics:  Consequentialist Egoism Hedonism Utilitarianism (Act and Rule)  Deontologicalist Kantianism Relativism Intuitionism Theologism  Character-based/ Self-Realization Ethics Virtue Ethics Developmental  Care Ethics  Meta-Ethics Ethical Nihilism Ethical Skepticism Emotivism/Positivism

Three major kinds of moral theories  Consequentialism: Outcomes Helping others brings the best results …promotes the best consequences  Deontologicalism: Duties and Rules Helping others is a duty …accords with the correct moral principle  Virtue Ethics: Virtues or Character Helping others is the virtue of charity or beneficence …what a virtuous agent would do © 2002, Karey Perkins

Traditional moral theories  Tell us what to DO instead of BE  Consider what we ought to do and be separately rather than together  Do not give proper respect to the value we place on friendship and relationships  Separate beliefs from desires (intellectual desires)  Elevate the “right action criterion” © 2002, Karey Perkins

Virtue Ethics  Second half of 20 th century  Eudaimonia (Aristotle) Happiness, flourishing, well-being TRUE or REAL happiness, the sort of happiness worth having  Virtue: A character trait © 2002, Karey Perkins

A virtue is…  A character trait; people with the character trait of [any virtue, such as honesty] tend to: ACT in a certain way [be honest] KNOW what they are doing For certain REASONS (They don’t want to be dishonest; inarticulacy; because it was needed; other-oriented) With a certain ATTITUDE [disapprove of, deplore dishonesty; approve, like, praise, defend honesty] With certain EMOTIONS [distress at dishonesty] With RELIABILITY, trait strongly entrenched, all the way down (with maturity, reason; not whim, passion or desire like children) Have PRACTICAL WISDOM GET THINGS RIGHT (not too honest, not too generous…) Function as a GUIDE; shame us for our lack of virtues © 2002, Karey Perkins

Nothing is right or wrong, but we should act virtuously. (Aristotle) VIRTUE ETHICS Virtue is a “mean” (middle) between two extremes (“vices”)

STRONG CODIFIABILITY THESIS  An acceptable moral theory will provide universal principles that do two things: Amount to a decision procedure for determining right action Be such that any non-virtuous person could understand and apply them  Hursthouse rejects this for all moral theories Naïve Practical wisdom needed (not codifiable, something experiential and lived) Virtue Ethics can be a guide, but not a codifiable rule © 2002, Karey Perkins

Objection One  Can Virtue Ethics be a guide? HH says yes:  1) Ask what virtuous agent would do But would you know a virtuous agent if you were non-virtuous? HH says yes: imperfectly known.  2) Each virtue/vice generates a moral rule Not just evaluative, but the way we teach children – “mother’s knees rules” Sufficient for moral education and moral guidance V-rules like deontology with different foundations Deontology: not lying is rule, prohibited; virtue ethics: dishonesty is a vice, honesty a virtue © 2002, Karey Perkins

Objection Two  The Conflict Problem Should doctor’s lie or tell the truth about a patient’s condition? (Kindness vs. honesty) Should professors lie or tell the truth about a student’s capabilities for grad school? Should you let a friend down or help a friend in need?  HH: no real conflict, only an apparent one  Irresolvable and Tragic Moral Dilemmas © 2002, Karey Perkins

How do you get virtues  Cultivate it  A continuum; moral motivation a matter of degree from: Perfectly virtuous Exceptionally virtuous Thoroughly Virtuous Fairly Virtuous Basically Virtuous but for X The Viscious © 2002, Karey Perkins

Cases  The Nazi; the Mafioso  Those living in times/societies where a group is oppressed  Blind Spots © 2002, Karey Perkins

Ethics is determined not by the act, but by human character development. The will of the fully mature (ethical) human becomes increasingly less self centered and more aligned with and motivated by larger concerns. (Based on a variety of psychological development theories.) DEVELOPMENTAL ETHICS See STAGE ONE: The Liar, influenced and motivated by power and force, lives for self at the expense of others. STAGE TWO: The Conformist, loyal to one’s social group, obedient to authority, supports values and traditions of own community. STAGE THREE: The Thinker/Scientist, uses reason and self-discovered principles to make ethical decisions, independent and thinking. STAGE FOUR: The Mystic, operates out of compassion and caring for others, willing to sacrifice self for others, even those quite different from self.

Domain of Concern © 2002, Karey Perkins Self, Desires Family, Community The World, Others not like me Principles Rules Love The Entire Universe, seen and unseen Authority

Ethics of Care  Caring for the needs of others is central  Notion of the individual as relational and interdependent  Previous concept of person was public sphere person: independent, autonomous, rational, self-sufficient, self interested  We are born dependent on others, will at times be so, and will end our life so: young, old, ill constitute our identity  We only think we are independent due to a network of social relations that allow us to think so. © 2002, Karey Perkins

What is Care?  ACTIVITY: taking care of someone  ATTITUDE: close attention to needs, feelings, situation from other’s point of view  VIRTUE [Michael Slote; Held disagrees as care is “other” oriented, not self oriented]  PRACTICE AND VALUE: Responding to [any] needs; valuing a person and continuing relations Not “benevolence” b/c caring is other oriented, a social relation, not a dispositional trait © 2002, Karey Perkins

Partiality vs. impartiality  Emotions and partiality are more important than rationality, and not to be rejected  Certain kinds of emotions: sympathy, empathy, sensitivity, responsiveness  Rejects abstract impartial reasoning  Values the private sphere – extends that attitude to the public  Interdependence vs. independence © 2002, Karey Perkins

Care vs. Justice  JUSTICE: fairness, equality, individual rights, ABSTRACT principles, public sphere (politics, law, society)  CARE: attentiveness, trust, responsiveness to need, cultivating caring relationships, nuance, interests of the cared for and one caring wrapped together, private sphere (family and friends)  Combined? Merged? Work together?  Held: Care is most fundamental value, both are good: “There has historically been little justice in the family, and care and life have gone on without it. There can be no justice without care however for without care, no child would survive and there would be no persons to respect” (549). © 2002, Karey Perkins

Objections  Distinct or a kind of virtue ethics?  Limited in scope or whole world applicability: Bioethics, law, political society, war, international relations?  Feminist objection: Women have been subjugated and held back due to caring roles  Can care ethics be action guiding? Case One: Lifeboat Case Two: Robin Hood Case Three: Two conflicting promises © 2002, Karey Perkins

“Meta-Ethics” or “No” Ethics  Ethical Nihilism: There are no right or wrong acts, only perhaps prudent and imprudent acts. (Nietzsche)  Ethical Skepticism: There may be right or wrong acts, but there is no way to know which are which. (Pyrrho)  Emotivism/Logical Positivism: The question is meaningless; it merely expresses one's emotions, or disapproval or approval, but has not substance in reality. (A. J. Ayer)

© 2002, Karey Perkins Bibliography Almeder, Robert. Human Happiness and Morality: A Brief Introduction to Ethics. New York: Prometheus, Held, Virginia. “The Ethics of Care,” pp In the The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, Ed. David Copp. Oxford: Oxford UP, Hursthouse, Rosalind. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford UP, Thiroux, Jacques P. Ethics: Theory and Practice. 7 th Ed. New York: Prentice-Hall, 2001.