Low Latency Data Visualisation Solar Orbiter SOC SOWG #5, ESAC, 8-10 July 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networked Digital Whiteboard with Handwritten-Symbol Interpreter and Dynamic-Display-Object Creator Atsuhide Kobashi Henry M. Gunn High School Palo Alto,
Advertisements

Toward operational use of radiation belt models D. Heynderickx BIRA, Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel, Belgium.
ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 SOC-Instrument Team interfaces CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
SpaceWire EGSE: Real-Time Simulation of SpaceWire Instruments in a Day 1 Stephen Mudie, Steve Parkes, Martin Dunstan.
Shows the data from one orbit This is the page to go to to look at the GUVI data in the form of images.
ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 Mosaics Operational aspects CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
Dale E. Gary Professor, Physics, Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 3/16/2012OVSA Preliminary Design Review.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Phase E Kickoff Meeting February 23, 2007.
GENEVAC: An Application for Calculating, Viewing and Storing Gamma-ray Burst Data Sam Stafford The Ohio State University Department of Physics GRB Temporal.
FASR-A 6 Gb/s x 2 x GB/s 400 GB/day 50 GB/day ~1 GB/day X xxx FASR Data Analysis Plan 22-May-2005 Simplified Data Pipeline.
HAWCPol / SuperHAWC Software & Operations J. Dotson July 28, 2007.
Online Analysis for STEREO's IMPACT Investigation: Lessons Learned P. Schroeder, J.G. Luhmann, W. Marchant and V. Toy (University of California – Berkeley),
Advanced Technology Center 1 HMI Rasmus Larsen / Processing Modules Stanford University HMI Team Meeting – May 2003 Processing Module Development Rasmus.
Solar Orbiter SOWG 5| Richard Carr| Low Latency Pipeline Hosting and Delivery Architecture | Slide 1 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Solar Orbiter.
EMC Quiet Planning During Science Operations Andrew Walsh & Chris Watson Solar Orbiter SOC, ESAC, Madrid EMC Working Group #12, Imperial College,
Data Processing and User Software Ken Ebisawa (Astro-E2 GOF) presentation and demonstration.
Dynamic Web Pages (Flash, JavaScript)
Detecting EUV waves Detecting Dimmings www. SolarDemon.oma.be near real-time, Flare, Dimming, and EUV wave Monitoring E. Kraaikamp 1, C. Verbeeck 1, and.
Time Table exchange QSAS / CL / CAA / AMDA CESR, 25/26 feb
Solar Orbiter. Contents The mission The mission The orbit The orbit The instruments The instruments VIM: Visible-light Imager and Magnetograph VIM: Visible-light.
Ircon ® ScanIR ® 3 Linescanner How to work with Snapshots? Confidential Rev. A 07/2013.
Data Management Subsystem: Data Processing, Calibration and Archive Systems for JWST with implications for HST Gretchen Greene & Perry Greenfield.
User Interface Elements of User Interface Group View.
“Joint planning” session Preliminary instrument operation & science plans of SOT/XRT/EIS for several months after the launch. Instrument checkout and Performance.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
NEPTUNE Canada Workshop Oceans 2.0 Project Environment NEPTUNE Canada DMAS Team Victoria, BC February 16, 2009.
Global Land Cover Facility The Global Land Cover Facility (GLCF) is a member of the Earth Science Information Partnership (ESIP) Federation providing data,
SSDS: Data for Science A Walkthrough of Proposed SSDS Capabilities 4 April 2002 John Graybeal.
EUS - Science, JCV,RAL, March Solar Orbiter EUI/SOLAR ORBITER Report of the Science WG T. Appourchaux, F. Auchère, L. Harra, E. Marsch, L. Teriaca,
Astronomical Spectroscopy and the Virtual Observatory ESAC, March 2007 VO tools and cross-calibration Pedro García-Lario European Space Astronomy.
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Sexy Science User Interfaces June 17, 2011 GRITS III, Pasadena, CA John Good.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
Microsoft Dynamics NAV 2009 and Architecture Overview Name Title Microsoft Corporation.
SOWG # 6, 20/01/2015 ESAC Agenda  Finalization of the service 20 specifications  Test plans for the service20 at spacecraft level  Instruments.
NASA Earth Observing System Visualization Tools ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences Introduction.
EOVSA Data and Database System J. McTiernan EOVSA CoDR 25-April-2011.
IMPACT SWG Status Report – December 11, Early IMPACT Timeline Status Day 3,410-28, 10-29IDPU/MAG/SWEA and STE turned on Day 711-1Booms deployed.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
STEREO Science Center Status Report William Thompson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center STEREO SWG March 27-28, 2007.
SolarFlows Dr. Gabriele Pierantoni (TCD). Contents What is Heliophysics ? How could workflows help ? Some examples What we are doing...
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
EOVSA Pipeline Processing System J. McTiernan EOVSA Prototype Review 24-Sep-2012.
ADNET Systems, Inc. Jack Ireland & Helioviewer Team ADNET Systems, Inc. Helioviewer Discovery for Everyone Everywhere.
Page 1 PACS GRITS 17 June 2011 Herschel Data Analysis Guerilla Style: Keeping flexibility in a system with long development cycles Bernhard Schulz NASA.
1/106 December 2001Rosetta SOWG Status of the Rosetta Project TestBed (PTB) P. van der Plas Modelling and Simulation Section ESA/ESTEC ESA/Estec 6 December.
1 Getting Involved with GLAST Workshop, CFA, 06/21/ C. Shrader, NASA/GSFC GLAST Data & Software Release plans + Science Support Center Services C.
SPDF Science Advisory Group - September 29-30, 2005 Page 12/24/2016 9:09:48 PM Services of the Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF) / Sun-Earth Connection.
7. LTP PLANNING EXERCISE: RESULTS Planning outcome Lessons learned from Planning Exercise.
ISWG 25 Jan 2016 Report to SOWG 26 Jan 2016 Burst mode planning ESAC analysis of EPD close/far data taking strategy; probably ok Implies we can be a bit.
STEREO and the Virtual Heliospheric Observatory Tom Narock 1,2 Adam Szabo 1 Jan Merka 2 (1) NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center (2) L3 Communications, GSI.
EOVSA Data and Database System J. McTiernan EOVSA Technical DesignMeeting 7-Nov-2011.
ESOC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESOC | Page 1 SOC-Instrument Team interfaces CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
+ UVIS Data Visualization UVIS Team Meeting Braunschweig, Deutschland June 18, 2012.
ESAC | Chris Watson | ESA/ESAC | Page 1 “Day in the life” testing of LL VMs CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
New HR-DDS User Services David J. S. Poulter, National Oceanography Centre, UK
The road to the first E2E tests
SOC-Provided Ancillary Data: Update
SOC-Produced Auxiliary data
Instrument Teams to SOC Test Specifications
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Richard Carr, ESAC, January 2015
SOC-Instrument Team interfaces
Overview of the LHD Central Control Room Data Monitoring Environment
LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION WITH THE IMPACT TOOL
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
IOR and E_FECS ICDs CHRIS WATSON ESAC.
Observing CMEs with Solar Orbiter
esa. int/solar-orbiter/51168-summary/;
Presentation transcript:

Low Latency Data Visualisation Solar Orbiter SOC SOWG #5, ESAC, 8-10 July 2014

Reminder: Uses of LL Data Low Latency Data are low volume science data, downlinked with the highest science priority. They have the following functions: To allow assessment of instrument health and performance. A means of choosing selective data for downlink. Support S/C pointing planning when tracking solar features (VSTP only): compensating feature’s proper motion and/or re-targeting. We aim to provide a browsing and visualisation tool that will be needed to fulfil the first two functions. Pointing at VSTP will be handled by a dedicated tool within SOC. We do not aim to provide a full (or half!) featured data analysis tool.

Current Concept 1.LL Data are generated at the SOC with instrument team provided pipelines. 2.Pipelines take the form of virtual machines that take science TM packets as input and output data products that allow visual representation. 3.Pipelines are simple and static. Static calibrations only Only run on near real-time data (no reprocessing) 4.Output from each pipeline is combined as needed and sent to: LL Data Display Tool PTR Generation Tool Science (& planning) archive

Proposed Tool Our proposal is to provide a simple web-based tool that: 1.Is fast. 2.Has no requirements on the client side apart from a browser. 3.Will allow side-by-side visualisation of multiple in situ and remote sensing data, and provide a (very) rudimentary assessment of linkage between the two. This implies: 1.A minimum of on-the-fly calculations. 2.Serving pre-generated plots. 3.LL Pipelines produce digital data.

Proposed Tool Imagery: FITS Format; only containing instrument headers (i.e. aligned to instrument boresights). Time Series (including SPICE & STIX spectra / light curves?): CDF or ASCII format; vector quantities in spacecraft coordinates. SOC will augment instrument-provided FITS headers with static misalignment information & WCS. SOC will transform time series data into a more scientifically useful coordinate system (probably spacecraft-centric RTN). SOC will pre-render images from FITS files and pre-draw time series plots for various combinations of parameters.

Proposed Tool 10 x Instrument LL Pipelines Time Series Data CDF or ASCII (TBD) Spacecraft Coordinates Time Series Data CDF or ASCII (TBD) Spacecraft Coordinates Image Data FITS Instrument-Internal Header Image Data FITS Instrument-Internal Header Coordinate Transformation to RTN (TBC) Apply Alignment FITS Headers Plot Time Series Render Images LL Data Display Tool Instrument Team Provided SOC Provided

Example Layout Image Time Controls Image layer 1 Image layer 2 Image layer 3 Image layer 4 Transparency selectorsPrimary image selector Image Zoom Level (3 choices) IMAGE TIME SERIES Plot (e.g. 5 panels) Context Display 1 (e.g. orbit) Context Display 1 (e.g. orbit) Context Display 2 (e.g. Attitude) Time Series Time Controls Time Series Parameters GO button Overlay selectors (for FoVs, footpoint etc.)

Example: Time Series Plot Choice of several (~6) predefined combinations of parameters e.g. Overview Linkage Waves Particles Choice of several predefined durations e.g. 6hrs, 1day, 3days STIX Lightcurves and SPICE spectral intensities could be plotted as time series here. Simple way of showing in situ science plan: Thick line = burst mode, each colour represents a different instrument ETA of (fastest?) energetic particles from current image time ETA of Solar Wind from current image time

Example: Small FoV Images Legend with image times Title is Carrington Lat/Lon of image centre e.g. EUI, PHI, SPICE Raster Possible subfield of Full Disk image in background Centred on Spacecraft boresight we use for pointing. FoV Large enough to cover all small FoV instruments. Based on static coalignment numbers, not dynamic. In a rolled state, keep overall FoV the same, move images.

Example: Small FoV Images Centred on Spacecraft boresight we use for pointing. FoV large enough to cover all small FoV instruments. Based on static coalignment numbers, not dynamic. In a rolled state, keep overall FoV the same, move images. Legend with times Title is Carrington Lat/Lon of image centre

Example: Full Disk Images Solar North always ‘up’ Spacecraft boresight always in the centre North/South solar pole and equator marked on high inclination images. Magnetic footpoints calculated with modal slow and fast SW velocities, not directly from SWA data. Legend with times High Res Telescope FoV / Data Two Full Disk Images Stacked (One with 50% transparency) Xs: e.g. Sub spacecraft point, Magnetic footpoint for slow and fast SW

Example: ‘Coronal’ Field of View 1.Full Disk+METIS+SOLO-HI 2.Also version with just Full Disk+ METIS? 3.Note: SOLO-HI has multiple possible FoV sizes, so less obvious what to do here.

Example: Simple Ephemeris 1.Simple 2D orbit projection 2.Position of spacecraft on orbit. 3.RSWs highlighted. 4.Model Parker Spiral field line. 5.Earth and other assets (SPP)

Limited HK & Planning Display Static display of top level planning information. Planned instrument modes. 1 chart per day – simple display of an image outside main window. Limited HK and events information. Actual Instrument modes Times of trigger issuing / receipt Subset of platform activities that have a science impact (Rolls, HGA pointings, wheel offloadings). We don’t intend this to be an HK Browser.

Time Handling Choose a time, it plots the closest images to that time. If the image time is TBD minutes away from requested time, tool warns user. ‘Study’ based instruments should have a validity time for each study and a valid study would be plotted rather than the closest image. Since different instruments have different cadences the forward and back buttons cycle through at the cadence of the layer selected as the time basis (primary layer). Time series side is easy given plots will have fixed durations. Possibility to set one side as primary or have a simple, static propagation system – the in situ side automatically displays the energetic particle ETA period for the current image for example?

Access (Details TBD) Because Low Latency Data Display Tool will be needed operationally, we envisage two instances: 1.An operational instance with access limited to Instrument Team Institutions and ESA establishments. 2.An open instance accessible by the wider scientific community and general public. Technical details TBD.

Summary & Questions for Working Groups: We aim to provide a web-based tool, serving pre- generated plots in various combinations. Speed and simplicity are key. Separate tool will handle PTR generation. We believe this will address the 3 defined uses of LL data. Bearing in mind we’re not providing a science analysis tool and we will also make available all LL Data files to Instrument teams: Have we missed anything? Which combinations of Time Series Parameters would be the most useful?