Getting It… Developing Interagency Core Trail Data Standards National Park Service - Bureau of Land Management - USDA Forest Service Together.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Travel Management Rule: Southwestern Region Implementation Travel Management: Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use ALL Trails Users Affected.
Advertisements

Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit One Why, What, How?
HOW TO ISSUE An Interagency Pass
USFS Trails Fundamentals Required Training Materials: (print before continuing training session)  Trail Fundamentals Reference Package  Posted at:
Overview of SMARA Responsibilities for Lead Agencies California Department of Conservation Office of Mine Reclamation Leah Gardner Senior Environmental.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Office of Valuation Services (OVS) IRWA Federal Agency Update March 26, 2014.
FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee NGAC Update - June 2011 Don Buhler, Bob Ader and Nancy von Meyer FGDC Subcommittee for Cadastral Data.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Environmental Impact Statement Process Development Services Department Carol Helland, Land Use Director/SEPA Official (DSD) David Pyle, Senior Land Use.
Interagency Trail Data Standards USDA Forest Service ▪ Bureau of Land Management National Park Service ▪ US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
EEM Established in 1989 Section of the Streets and Highways Code provides the Legislature with the authority to allocate $10 million annually. Fiscal.
ACCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS. OBJECTIVES After completing this lesson the participants will be able to: Understand the role of an Accident Review Board/Board.
Bureau of Land Management NAIP Information Meeting July 19 th, 2006.
Brent Frakes, Functional Analyst.  Need to discover, share, have access to large holdings of data and information to address rapid climate change  e.
Feasibility Studies National Heritage Areas. Initiating National Heritage Areas National Heritage Area designations have been initiated in four different.
PennDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program February 18, 2014.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
CUI Statistical: Collaborative Efforts of Federal Statistical Agencies Eve Powell-Griner National Center for Health Statistics.
1 Cooperating Agency and Coordination Training Washington State Association of Counties Friday, November 22, 2013 Victoria Barr, Oregon/Washington State.
Database Design - Lecture 1
Robert M. Worley II Director, Education Service VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Department of Veterans Affairs 2013 CCME Annual Symposium February 26,
1 Improving Federal Rights-of-Way Management to Spur Broadband Deployment Meredith Attwell Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary National Telecommunications.
PLANNING RSTWG Review of Planning Concept of Operations & Requirements Tasks.
U.S. Department of Transportation National Consumer Complaint Database (NCCDB) Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Commercial Enforcement and Investigations.
1.  Action Item 2.1a: “Improve coordination, effectiveness, and efficiency among federal agencies through establishment of a FICOR”  Key tasks to accomplish.
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Two Planning Processes.
Standardization of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail (CDNST) Data Management Kerry Shakarjian University of Denver Department of Geography Masters.
National Boundaries Group Update to Coordination Group Laura Waggoner, US Census Bureau and Robert Pierce, US Geological Survey, Co-Chairs March 18, 2014.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
Shelf Life Extension Program (SLEP)
Manual Direction Cave & Karst Resources Management James Goodbar Senior Cave /Karst Specialist Bureau of Land Management May 12-16, 2014 Cody, Wyoming.
Deemed Exports Overview and the Inspector General’s Report Presentation for : Alex Lopes Director, Deemed Exports and Electronics Division Office of National.
Board of Directors & Technical Committee Thursday, March 29, 2012 Data Management (Contract) Field Data Collection & Database Development Solution Presented.
12/04/07FGDC Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing Federal Geographic Data Committee Vegetation Subcommittee Briefing for the FGDC Coordination Group December.
Advancing Cooperative Conservation. 4C’s Team An interagency effort established in early 2003 by Department of the Interior Secretary Gale Norton Advance.
Handouts and forms available at: USFS Inventory and Budget.
American Community Survey ACS Content Review Webinar State Data Centers and Census Information Centers James Treat, ACSO Division Chief December 4, 2013.
Workshop 2 – Administrative Structure Recycled Water Feasibility Study Rancho Murieta Community Services District January 8, 2008.
GIS Consortium City of Kirksville, MO Adair County, MO Adair PWSD #1 Local Information Resources Through Local Partnerships Pam Kelrick GIS Coordinator.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Wildlife Agencies Government Organizations that Work for Wildlife.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
City Leadership & Bike Edina Task Force Annual Work Session February 16 th, 2010.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
SCORP Keys to Success Involvement-Steering Committee Public Input-Surveys and Focus Groups Comprehensive Evaluation of Statewide Recreational Needs and.
Florida Enterprise GIS Workgroup Collaborating and sharing to empower and enhance GIS services and resources statewide Sara Wander, GISP
Planning for Travel and Transportation Management National Training Center Course # Unit Three Land Use Planning Decisions.
Work(S) in Progress or Trails Theme  ITDS (Interagency Trail Data Standard)  NPS Data Transfer Standard and Implementation Plan  FGDC Trail Data Standard.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
1 Office of Travel & Tourism Industries, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Organization of American States XXI Inter-American.
Water Conservation and Recycling Roundtable Interim Federal Action Plan for the California Bay-Delta April 8, 2010.
Town Hall Meeting MLK Community Center July 21, pm.
INCORPORATING SAFETY IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Neil Pedersen Maryland DOT August 7, 2002.
Office of Greenways & Trails
Complete Streets: Making Connections
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
Department of Geography Geographic Information Science
USFS Inventory and Budget
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
COLLABORATIVE Alaska Federal Lands Collaborative Long Range Transportation Plan (CLRTP) FLMAs: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS)
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Getting It… Developing Interagency Core Trail Data Standards National Park Service - Bureau of Land Management - USDA Forest Service Together

Working Together As requested by the Interagency Trails Council A BLM, National Park Service, and Forest Service interagency effort To establish a common set of trail data standards To be applied to all agency-managed trails

Charter BLM, NPS and USFS representatives drafted interagency Charter for establishing core trail data standards For the collection, storage and retrieval of trails data For National Scenic Trails, National Historic Trails, and all other agency-managed trails February 2001:

How to Get It Done? Key Tasks Roles and Responsibilities Needed Resources Estimated Timeframes February 2001Interagency Action Plan Identified:

Data Dictionary or Database? Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary? Develop standardized database? Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task :

Data Dictionary or Database? Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary? Develop standardized database? Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task :

Data Dictionary or Database? Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary? Develop standardized database? Develop a core set of common data standards? Interagency Task :

Data Dictionary or Database? Develop standardized GPS Data Dictionary? Develop standardized database? Develop a core set of common data standards Interagency Task : ….that can be incorporated into data dictionaries or databases

Trail Interagency Trail Definition: A linear route managed for human-powered, stock, or OHV forms of transportation or for historic or heritage values. What’s a Trail?...

Factors to Consider Interagency core data set Data isn’t cheap! Standardized terminology Existing, standardized data attributes Implementation feasibility & timeframes

Review Criteria Selection Factors for Interagency Data Attributes Relate to a core interagency question? Of national, regional or statewide significance? Provide data needed to meet applicable laws, regulations, and/or policies? Address key congressional, OMB and department- wide reporting requirements? Currently available or obtainable? Does (or is) the Attribute…

Customers Interagency Counterparts Congress Partner Organizations General Public (media, trail users, educators, researchers, etc.) Travel & Recreation Industry (service providers) Advisory Boards Intra-Agency (GIS, Budget, Facilities, Resource Specialists, etc.) Who Benefits from Standardized Data?

What Do We Want to Know? Interagency Trail Questions Management Information (trail uses, accessibility status, condition, cost, etc.) Additional NST / NHT Questions (trail administrator, certified sites and segments, etc.) Basic Trail Information (trail name, length, location, etc.)

Answering the Questions Core Trail Data Standards Data Attribute Attribute Definition List of Values Metadata Crosswalk Translation (if needed)

Is the Trail Accessible? Data Standard Example Attribute Definition: Accessibility guideline compliance status for the trail or trail segment. Data Attribute: Accessibility Status List of Values: Accessible Not Accessible Not Evaluated

Defining the Attributes AttributeAttribute Definition Core Question Applies To Notes Tabular Display Spatial Display Overlap Allowed ? Reg Trail NSTNHT 1 NHT 2 NHT 3 Trail Management & Use MOTORIZED PROHIBITED Motorize use is prohibited yearlong along the trail. XXXNote: Do not record conflicting data between Managed Use & Motorized Prohibited XXNo Overlap Allowed PROHIBITED USE Mode of Travel prohibited by official legal order. Applicable CFR is cited and implemented through appropriate enforcement, restriction devices, and signing. XXXXXAllow Multiple Entries ACCESSIBILITY STATUS Accessibility guideline compliance status for trail segments that are actively managed for pedestrian use. XXXPer current agency Accessibility Guidelines XXNo Overlap Allowed

Defining the Attributes 36 Core Data Attributes Additional Attributes: 7 NST/NHT Attributes 13 NHT Attributes

Developing Codes Establishing Standardized Lists of Values Attribute Name Attribute DefinitionList of Values (LOV)LOV DefinitionOverlap Allowed? Crosswalk Translation ACCESSIBILITY STATUS Accessibility guideline compliance status for the trail ACCESSIBLE Trail meets current agency accessibility guidelines. No Overlap Allowed USFS = Accessibility Status (Infra Trails existing) NOT ACCESSIBILE Trail determined ineligible to meet agency accessibility guidelines. NOT EVALUATED Trail not evaluated for Accessibility AGENCYAgency or entity responsible for the land on which the trail resides. BIA – BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS No Overlap Allowed BLM – BUREAU OF LAND MGT BOR – BUREAU OF RECLAMATION C – COUNTY, PARISH, BUROUGH COE – CORPS OF ENGINEERS DOD – DEPT OF DEFENSE DOE – DEPT OF ENERGY FAA – FEDERAL AVIATION ADMIN

Interagency Benefits Additional Benefits of Working Together Trail Class Designed & Managed Use NHT Corridor Concept NHT Condition Categories Potential Management Tools for Interagency Adoption:

Current Status Internal & External Review Internal Review: BLM, NPS & USFS (2003) External Review (May 4 – June 30, 2004)

Where to Find It?

Online Comment Form

Expanded Comment Form

Frequently Asked Questions BLM: Adapting the standards into FAMS NPS: Adapting the standards into MAXIMO USFS: Majority of standards incorporated in Infra Trails. Remaining standards planned for Infra Trails or Infra Heritage (for specific NHT attributes) How will agencies incorporate the Interagency Trail Standards?

Frequently Asked Questions The Trail Data Standards Team is working with representatives of FGDC, RecOneStop, and agency GIS specialists on the detailed definition of identified spatial data attributes. Note: The majority of the interagency spatial attributes are included in current USFS Core GIS Data Standards. How will spatial data be handled?

Frequently Asked Questions “Trail segment” is used informally to identify the specific portion of trail to which a data attribute refers– or to answer the question being asked… What’s “trail segment” mean? County A County B

Frequently Asked Questions Trail Segment Examples: Trail Length: 24.3 miles (segment ) County: 5.6 miles County A; 18.7 mile County B (segments 0.0 – 5.6 and 5.6 – 24.3) Trail Class: 13.2 miles Trail Class 3; 11.1 miles Trail Class 2 (segment 0.0 – 13.2 and 13.2 – 24.3) County A County B

Frequently Asked Questions No Overlap Allowed: Only one attribute value can be recorded at any given location along the trail or trail segment. What’s “No Overlap Allowed” Mean? Example: County Mile 0.00 – 17.4: Mineral CountyMile 17.4 – 28.3: Shoshone County

Frequently Asked Questions No Overlap Allowed: Only one attribute value can be recorded at any given location along the trail or trail segment. What’s “No Overlap Allowed” Mean? Overlap Allowed: More than one attribute value can be recorded, if applicable, at any given location along the trail or trail segment. Example: County Mile : Mineral CountyMile 17.4 – 28.3: Shoshone County Example: Prohibited Use Mile 0.00 – 28.3: ATVs, Motorcycles, Bicycles

Frequently Asked Questions “Things along the trail” include trail structures, amenities, viewpoints, etc. While potentially valuable data at the trail or agency- specific level, this level of detail was determined to be beyond the scope of the interagency standards. What about “things along the trail”?

More Q&A’s…. Appendix G: Interagency Internal Review Appendix H: Frequently Asked Questions Posted at For additional questions, answers and clarification:

Bottom Line Benefits Improved communication and efficiency For our internal and external customers Through proactive interagency trails coordination and collaboration

National Park Service - Bureau of Land Management - USDA Forest Service