Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Leadership Team Fall Conference West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support Bridgeport Conference Center.
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Instructional Decision Making
Performance Appraisal Systems
Comparison of School and KSU Assessment of Teachers
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Welcome to CLASS Keys™ Study Session 1 February 22, 2010 Our session will begin at 4:00 p.m. While you are waiting, please do the following: Configure.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Honors Level Course Implementation Guide [English Language Arts]
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
CLASS Keys Process Studying the Standards Marlo Mong
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
The levels of performance considered at the element level are not intended to be used to label teachers as Not Evident, Emerging, Proficient, and Exemplary.
Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 9: Annual Evaluation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Observation Presentation Jared Jankord, Danny Janklow, Brad Jungwirth, Mike Good, Chris Soppe.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Formal Observation Administrator schedules and conducts one Formal Observation (50 Minutes). Administrator uses the Formative Classroom Analysis form to.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
Evelyn Wassel, Ed.D. Summer  Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning?  Using it effectively to promote further learning?
Georgia Performance Standards Curriculum Directors Conference September 20, 2006.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
Formative assessment and effective feedback at Manor Lakes College
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Creating a Standards-Based Classrooms An Overview of Adapting and Adopting Research Based Instruction to Enhance Student Learning.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
CLASS KeysTM Module 3: Self-Assessment and Reflection Spring 2010
State Board of Education Progress Update
Georgia Department of Education
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

Data Sources Artifacts: Lesson plans and/or curriculum units which evidence planned use of diagnostic tools, pre- assessment activities, activating strategies, and planning for developing differentiated instruction based on pre-assessment data. Conference Discussion Topics: The teacher can explain how diagnostic data are used to inform instruction. Discussion Prompts:  Discuss how you are using assessment data to inform your lesson or unit plans.  Describe how you are differentiating based on diagnostic data.  What is your process for analyzing and interpreting diagnostic data that you collect on students? 1 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

Continuum of Improvement A rubric with four levels of performance. Evidence Examples that develop the expectations for the rubric. Element Descriptors Words/phrases found in the element, rubric, or evidence. Data Sources Suggested artifacts and conference discussion topics. Research Rationale Current research justifying the element. Each Element in the CLASS Keys Contains 2 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

Research Rationale Teachers who received diagnostic information through student assessment, in comparison with control groups, were more specific in identifying skills that needed to be taught and made more adaptations to target those needs. Additionally, students in those classes had statistically greater achievement than those in comparison groups where diagnostic assessment was not fully implemented. [Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991)]. Diagnostic assessment has the potential to help teachers plan instruction that is more varied, is more responsive to individual needs, and promotes stronger outcomes [ibid]. How to effectively assess for diagnostic purposes. [Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998)]. 3 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys 12/4/2008

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Standards-Based Instruction What does it look like in action? What are teachers doing? What are students doing? 4 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Working in table groups, write down what you would expect to see in a S-B classroom. Then review the strand in the CLASS Keys Standards

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys Student Achievement How should teachers be held accountable for student achievement? 5 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

6 TeacherGradesSubjectMeasure(s) Richard WagnerK-5MusicRhythm Assessment, Instrument ID John Milton7Lang. ArtsXYZ Reading Assessment Brett Favre9-12Physical Ed.District Physical Fitness Test Isaac Newton4MathUnits 1-4 Common Assessments Wally Welder10-12WeldingSatisfactory Performance on 3 Welds CLASS Keys offers flexibility to districts regarding the impact on student achievement requirement. 12/4/2008

9/10/2008 CLASS Keys How Aerial View of Process for the Field Study 7 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

CLASS Keys Field Study Timeline Summer 2008Select Schools (+150) Fall 2008Training Sessions Field Study Early Spring 2009Data Collections Late Spring 2009 Revisions 8 CLASS Keys

Self-Assessment and Reflection Pre-Evaluation Conference 2-3 Informal Observations Pre-Observation Conference Formal Observation Post- Observation Conference 2-3 Informal Observations Annual Evaluation Conference TheProcessTheProcess 9

CLASS Keys 10 Standard Elements Self-Assessment CP 1.1 Content knowledge Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary CP 1.2 Vertical alignment Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary CP 1.3 Interdisciplinary Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary CP 2.1 Written curriculum Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary CP 2.2 Organizing Framework Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary CP 2.3 Planning assessment Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 1.1 Research-based Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 1.2 Higher-order thinking Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 1.3 Differentiation Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 1.4 Flexible grouping Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 1.5 Use of technology Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 2.1 High expectations Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 2.2 Communicate standards Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary SBI 2.3 Feedback/fair grading procedures Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary AL 1.1 Diagnostic Assessment Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary AL 1.2 Formative Assessment Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary AL 1.3 Summative Assessment Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary AL 2.1 Use data to identify needs and intervene Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 1.1 Classroom Management Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 1.2 Maximize Time Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 1.3 Acknowledge Diversity & Accomplishments Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 1.4 Students Taking Responsibility Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 2.1 Parent Involvement Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 3.1 Job-embedded Learning Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 3.2 Content and Pedagogy Professional. Learning Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary P 4.1 School Improvement Not EvidentEmergingProficientExemplary

CLASS Keys Professional Growth Plan An annual plan that includes Goal setting and action plan. Professional growth planning linked to the school/district improvement plan. A cycle of constant development. Purpose: To allow teachers to direct their own careers through goal setting and performance evaluation with strong ties to student learning. 11 9/10/2008 CLASS Keys

District Goals School Goals Team/Grade Level Goals Classroom Goals Student Goals Alignment of Goals from District to Classroom to Student 12 CLASS Keys

Informal Observations short, (5-15 minutes) unannounced observations. Only a few of the elements are assessed. The feedback can come in the form of an for informal observations more informals are conducted after the formal observation. These informals do impact the Annual Evaluation. 13

CLASS Keys 14 1.What do you want the students to know and be able to do by the end of the lesson? 2.What Georgia Performance Standard (GPS) or QCC or National Standard does the lesson address? 3.What assessment strategies will you use to monitor student understanding? 4.Describe the sequence of events in the lesson with amount of time expected for each event. 5.How have you integrated other subjects into the lesson to be observed? 6.If students will work in groups, what is the rationale for the make up of the groups? Pre-Observation Questions