Voltage Control in Power Systems: Preliminary Results T. Geyer, G. Ferrari-Trecate, T. Geyer, G. Ferrari-Trecate, M. Morari Automatic Control Laboratory.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Scheduled Model Predictive Control of Wind turbines in Above Rated Wind Avishek Kumar Dr Karl Stol Department of Mechanical Engineering.

Advertisements

TOWARDS a UNIFIED FRAMEWORK for NONLINEAR CONTROL with LIMITED INFORMATION Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer.

U D A Neural Network Approach for Diagnosis in a Continuous Pulp Digester Pascal Dufour, Sharad Bhartiya, Prasad S. Dhurjati, Francis J. Doyle III Department.

Javad Lavaei Department of Electrical Engineering Columbia University Various Techniques for Nonlinear Energy-Related Optimizations.

1 Finding good models for model-based control and optimization Paul Van den Hof Okko Bosgra Delft Center for Systems and Control 17 July 2007 Delft Center.

Lecture #1 Hybrid systems are everywhere: Examples João P. Hespanha University of California at Santa Barbara Hybrid Control and Switched Systems.

PROCESS INTEGRATED DESIGN WITHIN A MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL FRAMEWORK Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega, Omar Pérez University of Salamanca – Spain University.

Rudolf Wieser, Matthias Baechle, Valerijs Knazkins – ATPE

INTEGRATED DESIGN OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESSES USING MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL Mario Francisco, Pastora Vega University of Salamanca – Spain European.

NORM BASED APPROACHES FOR AUTOMATIC TUNING OF MODEL BASED PREDICTIVE CONTROL Pastora Vega, Mario Francisco, Eladio Sanz University of Salamanca – Spain.

Model Predictive Controller Emad Ali Chemical Engineering Department King Saud University.

Lecture outline Support vector machines. Support Vector Machines Find a linear hyperplane (decision boundary) that will separate the data.

1 Collision Avoidance Systems: Computing Controllers which Prevent Collisions By Adam Cataldo Advisor: Edward Lee Committee: Shankar Sastry, Pravin Varaiya,

Laplace Transform Applications of the Laplace transform

Per Unit Representation Load Flow Analysis Power System Stability Power Factor Improvement Ashfaq Hussain.

Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control

Low-Rank Solution of Convex Relaxation for Optimal Power Flow Problem

Thinking Mathematically Algebra: Graphs, Functions and Linear Systems 7.3 Systems of Linear Equations In Two Variables.

7.1 SOLVING SYSTEMS BY GRAPHING The students will be able to: Identify solutions of linear equations in two variables. Solve systems of linear equations.

Overview of Model Predictive Control in Buildings

Dynamic analysis of switching converters

MESB374 System Modeling and Analysis Introduction.

EM and expected complete log-likelihood Mixture of Experts

Integration of Design and Control : Robust approach using MPC and PI controllers N. Chawankul, H. M. Budman and P. L. Douglas Department of Chemical Engineering.

Introductory Control Theory CS 659 Kris Hauser.

Inverse Kinematics Find the required joint angles to place the robot at a given location Places the frame {T} at a point relative to the frame {S} Often.

TEMPLATE DESIGN © Coordinated Voltage Control in Electrical Power Systems Mohammad Moradzadeh, René Boel SYSTeMS Research.

ABB Summary: ABB Suite of Power Transmission Test Cases Mats Larsson Corporate Research ABB Switzerland Ltd. Jan 19, 2004.

What is a model Some notations –Independent variables: Time variable: t, n Space variable: x in one dimension (1D), (x,y) in 2D or (x,y,z) in 3D –State.

1.3 The Intersection Point of Lines System of Equation A system of two equations in two variables looks like: – Notice, these are both lines. Linear Systems.

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Pyeongik Hwang School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University Korea Hwang – Korea – RIF Session 4a – 0324.

ABB Corporate Research Mats Larsson / / 1  2002 ABB Corporate Research Ltd, Baden, Switzerland New Developments on ABB Test Case Mats Larsson.

Huixian Liu and Shihua Li, Senior Member, IEEE

Multiple Model approach to Multi-Parametric Model Predictive Control of a Nonlinear Process a simulation case study Boštjan Pregelj, Samo Gerkšič Jožef.

Modeling and Complexity Reduction for Interconnected Systems Carolyn Beck University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign August 2, 2001.

SOBIERAJSKI_PL_author_ALPHA4_BLOCK4.4_Question9 Barcelona May The probabilistic study of voltage problems in lightly loaded medium voltage.

István Selek, PhD Post. Doctoral Researcher Systems Engineering Research Group University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Advanced Control of Marine Power System

Nonlinear Predictive Control for Fast Constrained Systems By Ahmed Youssef.

Control Synthesis and Reconfiguration for Hybrid Systems October 2001 Sherif Abdelwahed ISIS Vanderbilt University.

Linear Models for Classification

Chapter 20 1 Overall Objectives of Model Predictive Control 1.Prevent violations of input and output constraints. 2.Drive some output variables to their.

SE201: Introduction to Systems Engineering Mathematical Modeling.

Lecture 25: Implementation Complicating factors Control design without a model Implementation of control algorithms ME 431, Lecture 25.

Energy Cost Minimization for Small Building with Renewable Energy Sources Based on Prediction Control Viktor Ten, Zhandos Yessenbayev, Akmaral Shamshimova,

Chapter 20 Model Predictive Control

Co-Simulation of Computer Networks and Power Grid Prof. Vincenzo Liberatore Research supported in part by NSF CCR , Department of Commerce TOP.

دانشگاه صنعتي اميركبير دانشكده مهندسي پزشكي استاد درس دكتر فرزاد توحيدخواه بهمن 1389 کنترل پيش بين-دکتر توحيدخواه MPC Stability-2.

September 28, 2000 Improved Simultaneous Data Reconciliation, Bias Detection and Identification Using Mixed Integer Optimization Methods Presented by:

Differential Equations Linear Equations with Variable Coefficients.

A new Nomogram Development POM- based tool - Application results in the Idaho Power System. Orlando Ciniglio, IPC Marianna Vaiman, V&R Energy WECC TSS.

Nonlinear balanced model residualization via neural networks Juergen Hahn.

Characteristic algebras and classification of discrete equations Ismagil Habibullin Ufa, Institute of Mathematics, Russian Academy of Science

| Vasilis Zois USC 1. |  Dynamic and sophisticated demand control – Direct control over household appliances  Curtailment Reasons – Reactive Curtailment.

Feedforward Control ( 前馈控制 ) Liankui DAI Institute of Industrial Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, P. R. China 2009/04/22.

School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology 1 Defuzzification Filters and Applications to Power System Stabilization.

Process Dynamics and Operations Group (DYN) TU-Dortmund

Xavier Bonnin and Davide Aguglia

Presentation at NI Day April 2010 Lillestrøm, Norway

MPC in Statoil Stig Strand, specialist MPC Statoil Research Center 93  SINTEF Automatic Control Dr. ing 1991: Dynamic Optimisation in State.

Optimal control T. F. Edgar Spring 2012.

Model-based Predictive Control (MPC)

Solve Systems of Linear Inequalities

Simultaneous Equations

Linear Algebra Lecture 3.

دانشگاه صنعتي اميركبير

ECE 576 POWER SYSTEM DYNAMICS AND STABILITY

Hafez Sarkawi (D1) Control System Theory Lab

LINEAR PROGRAMMING Example 1 Maximise I = x + 0.8y

Systems of three equations with three variables are often called 3-by-3 systems. In general, to find a single solution to any system of equations,

Presentation transcript:

Voltage Control in Power Systems: Preliminary Results T. Geyer, G. Ferrari-Trecate, T. Geyer, G. Ferrari-Trecate, M. Morari Automatic Control Laboratory Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in collaboration with Mats Larsson ABB

Power system: overview Generator 1:  infinite bus Generator 2:  generates limited power Capacitor bank:  stabilizes power system Transformer:  steps down voltage  controls load voltage Load:  consumes power Network:  connects components

Power system: overview (ctd.) hybrid system:  discrete manipulated variables  logic and finite state machine  nonlinearities  pwa functions 3 major submodels:  generator 2  transformer  load

Hybrid model dimensions:  2 ordinary diff. equations  1 finite state machine  29 algebraic equations:  11 linear, 18 nonlinear  6 states:  2 continuous, 4 discrete  4 manipulated variables:  1 continuous, 3 discrete model available:  in modelica  as pwa discrete-time approx. in MLD form  and ?

 control objectives:  stabilizeV 4m (cont.)  min. load shedding s L (disc.)  manipulated variables:  ultc voltage reference: V 4m,ref (cont.)  capacitor switching: s C (disc.)  load shedding: s L (disc.)  disturbance:  line outage (disc.) Control problem

Optimal Control Problem Subject to  Dynamics (in MLD form):  Soft constraints on bus voltages :

Receding Horizon Control  Optimize at time t (with new measurements)  Only apply the first optimal move u(t)  Repeat the whole optimization at time t +1  Advantage of on-line optimization: Feedback!

Tuning of Cost Function  Violation of soft constraints is penalized by:  Choose weight R on u such that: No constraint violation:nominal control: > ultc voltage reference > capacitor bank Constraint violation:emergency control: > all controls including load-shedding

Preliminary Results

Conclusions  Control problem:  MPC is able to stabilize the load voltage V 4m with N=2 and T s =15sec without using load-shedding  solution time 8sec..2min (PC with 1GHz)  but: there remains a control error  Outlook:  observer  model reduction  reachability analysis  large-scale problem