Fermilab Donna Kubik Spring, 2005. Fermilab Special thanks to many at Fermilab for technical guidance and friendship …among the many are Todd Johnson,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Re-commissioning the Recycler Storage Ring at Fermilab Martin Murphy, Fermilab Presented August 10, 2012 at SLAC National Laboratory for the Workshop on.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
F UEC - 6 Oct 06 Recent FNAL Collider Operations Ron Moore Fermilab – Tevatron Dept.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
ILC RTML Lattice Design A.Vivoli, N. Solyak, V. Kapin Fermilab.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Particle Accelerators
An Introduction To Particle Accelerators A-Level Physics.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
Antiproton Source Capabilities and Issues Keith Gollwitzer & Valeri Lebedev Accelerator Division Fermilab 1.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
CESR Donna Kubik Spring, CESR With thanks to many at CESR for technical guidance (and friendship!): Dave Rice, Stu Peck, Jerry Codner, Gerry Dugan,
Eric Prebys, FNAL. USPAS, Knoxville, TN, January 20-31, 2014 Lecture 20 - Cooling 2 Anti-protons are created by hitting a target with an energetic proton.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Recent RF Development at Fermilab Weiren Chou and Akira Takagi Fermilab, U.S.A. July 7, 2003 Presentation to the FFAG03 Workshop July 7-12, 2003, KEK.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Accelerator Issues Fermilab Antiproton Experiment Keith Gollwitzer Antiproton Source Department Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Particle physics experiments l Particle physics experiments: collide particles to  produce new particles  reveal their internal structure and laws of.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Fermilab Proton Driver and Muons David Johnson Fermilab Neutrino Factory Muon Collider Collaboration Meeting March 14, 2006.
Fermilab Run 2 Accelerator Status and Upgrades
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Anatomy of Accelerators Marty Peters Summer 2006.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Proton Driver Design Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab February 19, 2014.
F Possible Proton Capabilities at Fermilab Dave McGinnis April 16, 2007.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
F HCP 2007 Performance and Future of the Tevatron Ron Moore Fermilab - Tevatron Dept. Tevatron overview and performance Antiproton source + Recycler overview.
Bob Lambiase May 21, The purpose of eRHIC is to have the capability to collide heavy ions with leptons, such as electrons and polarized electrons.
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Beam based measurements
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev AAC Workshop 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Presentation transcript:

Fermilab Donna Kubik Spring, 2005

Fermilab Special thanks to many at Fermilab for technical guidance and friendship …among the many are Todd Johnson, Jim Morgan, Dave Capista, Linda Spentzouris, Jean Slaughter

Main Control Room

Preaccelerator

The Cockcroft-Walton is a classic multistage diode/capacitor voltage multiplier

Production of H - ions Place H atom in an electric field and strip away its electron Protons will congregate on the Cs metal surface The metal has free electrons. Cs, with a very low work function, makes it easy to attract electrons from the metal

Production of H - ions Every once in awhile, an incoming proton will knock a proton with two electrons off the surface of the Cs The negative H - will move away from the negative surface and get accelerated down the column to 750 keV

Preaccelerator Accelerates H - ions to 750 keV for injection into the Linac Like the Van de Graaff, the accelerator starts out with negative ions, but for a different reason H - facilitates multi-turn injection into the Booster This will be described below in the section on the Booster

Linac

The Linac takes the 750 keV H - ions from the Preacc, accelerates them to 400 MeV, and then sends them on to the Booster. There are five drift tube cavities and seven side coupled cavities The drift tube Linac makes up the first stage of the Linac and the side-coupled Linac is the second stage

Drift tube Linac Vacuum vessel for drift tube Linac Inside the vessels are drift tubes of increasing length to accommodate increasing velocity of the H - There are quadrupoles inside the drift tubes to focus the beam

Side-coupled Linac With side-coupled cavities, each individual cell is a separate accelerating cavity coupled to other cells in the module The module is not one cavity with drift-tubes but rather several separate cavities powered by the same RF source by coupling.

Neutron Therapy Uses 66 MeV H- ions from the Linac to produce neutrons for cancer therapy at the Neutron Therapy facility (NTF) First operational in 1975 Similar to the Clinical Neutron Therapy System (CNTS) at the University of Washington

Booster

Booster injection The revolution period in Booster at injection is 2.22 µsec, while the pulse length in Linac is approximately 40 µs long The 400 MeV chopper selects only a portion of the Linac beam; the remainder of the beam is sent to one of the Linac dumps Extending the chop width generates multiple Booster turns The Linac beam pulse is long enough to run about 18 turns (18 turns would be a µs chop length selected from the 40 µsec Linac pulse) Operationally, the practical limit for maximum intensity is 5 or 6 turns

The need to inject negative ions But how is more than 1 turn added to the Booster without knocking out the protons that are already circulating inside the Booster? This is facilitated by injecting negative ions, as described on the next slide.

Orbmp

Booster The booster is a rapid-cycling (15 Hz) synchrotron Shown are the combined function magnets and RF cavities Total of 17 RF cavities sprinkled around the Booster Combined function magnets RF cavitites

FNAL’s Booster is very similar to CESR’s synchrotron Both synchrotrons use combined function magnets and resonant circuits CESR’s synchrotron Built under the direction of Robert Wilson First beam in late 1960’s? Fermilab’s Booster synchrotron Built under the direction of Robert Wilson First beam 1970?

Booster The Booster magnets are part of a 15 Hz resonant circuit Energy is exchanged between the magnets and the capacitor banks with the power supply making up the losses Combined function Magnets - inductors Capacitor bank for magnet power- resonant circuit

Booster A resonant power supply system uses a sinusoidal current waveform to excite the magnets Combined function Magnets - inductors Capacitor bank for magnet power- resonant circuit

Acceleration RF energy, delivered by the 17 RF cavities, accelerates the proton beam over the rising portion of the sinusoidal magnet current waveform. Acceleration cycles occur at 15 Hz B increases while beam is accelerated injection extraction 0 A Magnet current

Acceleration There is a DC offset to the AC magnet current, so that the curcent is always positive. It would be difficult to do multi-turn injection right at the point where the energy is changing the fastest. With the offset, injection occurs on the "flatter" part of the sinewave. B increases while beam is accelerated injection extraction 0 A Magnet current

Main Injector

Main Injector/Recycler The main injector was built to replace the Main Ring in the Tevatron tunnel The Main Ring is seen above the Tevatron in the photo. The MR was not actually removed, it was abandoned in place. The main ring quads (red magnets), however, were removed and reused An old view of the Tevatron tunnel with Main Ring magnets still present

Main Injector/Recycler Main Injector –Accelerates protons –Delivers protons for antiproton production –Accelerates antiprotons from the Antiproton Source Antiproton Recycler (green ring) –The Recycler doesn't actually recycle; that plan was given up. –Now it stores antiprotons from the Accumulator to limit the peak stack size, which keeps the production rate up. –

Antiproton Source

Three main components –Target –Debuncher –Accumulator

Target A single batch of protons with an intensity of up to 5 X is accelerated to 120 GeV in the Main Injector The beams strikes the nickel production target in the target vault and produces a shower of secondary particles

Target The resulting cone of secondary particles is focused and made parallel by means of a Lithium lens A pulsed dipole magnet bends all negatively-charged particles of approximately 8 GeV into the AP2 line while most of the other particles are absorbed within a beam dump From the AP2 line, the anitprotons travel to the debuncher and then to the accumulator

Two types of cooling Betatron (or transverse cooling) is applied to a beam to reduce its transverse size, i.e. to reduce its horizontal or vertical emittance Momentum cooling systems reduce the longitudinal energy spread of a beam by accelerating or decelerating particles in the beam distribution towards a central momentum

Debuncher The momentum spread of the 8 GeV beam of secondaries is reduced through bunch rotation and adiabatic debunching. Both betatron (transverse) stochastic cooling and momentum (longitudinal) cooling is applied to reduce the beam size and momentum spread Debuncher (outer,light blue ring)

D to A Just before the next pulse arrives from the target, the antiprotons are extracted from the Debuncher and injected into the Accumulator via the D to A line D to A line

Accumulator Successive pulses of antiprotons are stacked into the Accumulator 'core' by means of RF deceleration and momentum stochastic cooling The antiprotons in the core are maintained there by momentum and betatron cooling systems Accumulator (inner, dark blue ring)

Accumulator After several hours, enough antiprotons have been accumulated to initiate a transfer to the Main Injector and Tevatron for a store (or to the Recycler via the Main Injector). Accumulator (inner, dark blue ring)

Tevatron

Receives 150 GeV protons and antiprotons Cryogenic magnets Normal-conducting (warm) RF cavities, all located at FO (do not need to be evenly spaced around the ring) Accelerates to 980 GeV Stores beam providing p + p - collisions for CDF and DO

Tevatron map

Tevatron magnets All Tevatron magnets are superconducting 4.2 Tesla bend field (red magnets) Quadrupoles (yellow) Tevatron correction elements are superconducting coils located within the main Tevatron quadrupole cryostats

Tevatron FODO lattice FODO lattice

Parasitic crossings The Tevatron operates with 3 trains, 12 bunches/train of each species This would result in 70 parasitic crossings: –(36x2)-2=70 –Note: the (-2) is because we want the beam to cross at CDF and DO So, like CESR, the Tevatron uses separators to minimize the effect of the parasitic crossings Tevatron separator

Parasitic crossings But unlike CESR, synchrotron radiation is minimal in the Tevatron, so the electrode design did not need to take that into consideration The Tevatron separators consist of two “parallel plates”, separated by 5 cm, with a potential difference of 200kV DC between them They can be constructed in either “horizontal” and “vertical” configurations. The parts for each type are identical Tevatron separator

Helix In CESR, the electrons and positrons were separated with a pretzel orbit in just one plane (horizontal) In the Tevatron, the protons and antiprotons are separated via helical orbits Horizontal and Vertical separators spaced roughly 90 degrees apart in phase generate the helix (compare circular polarization) Tevatron separator functions

Helix But there is no desire to separate protons and antiprotons at CDF and DO! Tevatron separator functions

Tevatron energy The energy is calculated from the magnetic field in the dipoles and the revolution frequency. The RF frequency is known with great precision, probably better than anything else about the machine. The cross section predictions have bigger sources of uncertainty than the energy

Operator’s job At first glance, it looks like a Day in the Life of an operator is identical at each accelerator…………

Operator’s job Fermilab –Maintain luminosity –Make sure machine is ready to refill CESR –Maintain luminosity –Make sure machine is ready to refill

Operator’s job But the properties of electrons vs. hadrons make a Day in the Life of an operator very different at each machine The duration of a “store” (the time before the storage ring must be refilled) differs

Store duration Fermilab –Store duration ~ 24 hours –Luminosity lifetime hours –Filling time The Tevatron fill time is ~30 minutes, but the total turnaround time is ~2 hrs with the tune- ups, etc. CESR –Store duration ~ 1 hour –Luminosity lifetime 2-3 hours –Filling time 5 minutes

Store duration FermilabCESR 1 day

CESR

Tevatron

Proton intensity Antiproton intensity (different scale!) Luminosity

Why length of stores differ Fermilab –Lower luminosity 50x10 30 cm -2 s -1 –Higher energy 980 GeV CESR –Higher luminosity 1280x10 30 cm -2 s -1 –Lower energy 5 GeV

Why length of stores differ The combination of lower energy and higher luminosity at CESR results in beams that are more “disrupted” in the collisions, leading to a much shorter lifetime In addition, even without any collisions, the lower-energy beams in CESR are more susceptible than the Tevatron beams to other influences, such as beam-gas scattering, which cause beam loss and reduced lifetime Even though the electron beams in CESR are radiation-damped, the net effect is a poorer lifetime for the CESR beams

Radiation damping Synchrotron radiation reduces the momentum of the particle in the direction of its motion while the acceleration system restored momentum parallel to the central orbit y x Energy loss from synch radiation Energy restored from RF

What happens between stores Fermilab –Maintain luminosity –Attend to any tuning requests from the many experiments (DO, CDF, MiniBooNE, MINOS, Meson Test Beam Facility, etc. –Make sure the Preacc, Linac, Booster, and Main Injector, Tevatron are ready for the next fill –Accumulate the antiprotons for the next fill –Monitor cryogenics CESR –Maintain luminosity –Attend to any tuning requests from CLEO and CHESS –Make sure the Linac is ready for the next fill

Operators Fermilab –Need a crew of 4-5 operators CESR –One operator