CESR Donna Kubik Spring, 2005. CESR With thanks to many at CESR for technical guidance (and friendship!): Dave Rice, Stu Peck, Jerry Codner, Gerry Dugan,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Advertisements

Transverse dynamics Selected topics, University of Oslo, Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2014,
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #8.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
Overview of ILC Plans D.Rubin April 17, D. Rubin2 ILC R&D Activities and Plans 1.Positron Source 2.Damping Ring 3.Low Emittance Transport - damping.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
January 15, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity December/January vs September/October -Machine studies and instrumentation -Simulation.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
The LHC: an Accelerated Overview Jonathan Walsh May 2, 2006.
Particle Accelerators
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
An Introduction To Particle Accelerators A-Level Physics.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
January 13, 2004D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c BESIII/CLEO-c Workshop, IHEP January 13, 2004 D.Rubin for the CESR operations group.
Fermilab Donna Kubik Spring, Fermilab Special thanks to many at Fermilab for technical guidance and friendship …among the many are Todd Johnson,
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, A Damping Ring Primer1 A Damping Ring Primer J. Rogers Cornell University Linear collider emittance requirements.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Adams Accelerator Institute 10 - E. Wilson - 1/24/ Slide 1 Lecture 14 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2004 E. J. N. Wilson.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Zeuten 2 - E. Wilson - 2/26/ Slide 1 Transverse Dynamics – E. Wilson – CERN – 16 th September 2003  The lattice calculated  Solution of Hill 
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Unit 2 Magnets for circular accelerators: the interaction regions Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
CESR as Light Source David Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Powering the LHC Magnets
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
ACCELERATORS AND DETECTORS
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
CfE Higher Unit 2 – Particles and Waves
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
Presentation transcript:

CESR Donna Kubik Spring, 2005

CESR With thanks to many at CESR for technical guidance (and friendship!): Dave Rice, Stu Peck, Jerry Codner, Gerry Dugan, and my mentor, Mario Giannella…

CESR

CESR Control Room

Names The names used to refer to the colliding beam facilities and the rings that comprise the facilities can be confusing “CESR” and “Tevatron” technically refer only to the storage ring But often “CESR” and “Tevatron” are used to refer to the entire accelerator complex

Names Wilson Lab accelerator Linac Synchrotron Storage ring (CESR) Fermilab accelerator Linac Booster Main injector Antiproton source Storage ring (Tevatron)

Linac 300MeV 160MeV 150keV

Converter “Converts” electrons to positrons Positrons are produced by accelerating electrons up to 150 MeV at an intermediate point of the linac where they strike a tungsten plate A spray of electrons, positrons, and X-rays emerges from the plate The positrons are selected, focused, accelerated in the remaining length of the Linac up to the 160 MeV final energy and injected into the synchrotron. 300MeV 160MeV 150keV

Synchrotron and storage ring 1.2GeV-5.2GeV

Synchrotron and storage ring SynchrotronStorage ring Synchrotron quadrupole sextupoledipoles Combined function magnets Combined-function magnets

Synchrotron and storage ring There are either e + or e - in the synchrotron Each species is accelerated and injected into the storage ring separately On the contrary, both e + and e - are in the storage ring. Storage ring Synchrotron quadrupole sextupoledipoles

Combined function magnets The synchrotron magnets (in contrast to those in the storage ring) are combined function magnets (aka gradient magnets). Each magnet bends the beam (a dipole function) and focuses the beam (a quadrupole function) SynchrotronStorage ring Combined function magnets Combined-function magnets

Combined function magnets

Rapid cycling The synchrotron magnets are part of a 60 Hz resonant circuit Energy is exchanged between the magnets and the capacitor banks with the power supply making up the losses Inductors (the magnet coils) Capacitor bank

Acceleration Acceleration cycles occur at 60 Hz As particles are accelerated and gain energy in the synchrotron, the magnetic field must also increase B increases while beam is accelerated injection extraction Note: The period shown is for a 15 Hz rep rate (which is the rep rate of FNAL’s rapid cycling synchrotron) 0 A Magnet current

Acceleration The magnet current waveform has a DC offset; the whole sinusoidal waveform is raised so the current is always positive. The electrons/positrons are injected just after the current reaches its lowest point. As particles are accelerated and gain energy in the synchrotron, the magnetic field also increases B increases while beam is accelerated injection extraction Note: The period shown is for a 15 Hz rep rate (which is the rep rate of FNAL’s rapid cycling synchrotron) 0 A Magnet current

Storage ring The storage ring has separated function magnets Dipoles, quadrupoles, sextupoles, octupoles Dipoles operate DC and are wired in series All higher order magnets are individually tunable Storage ringSynchrotron quadrupole sextupoledipoles

Storage ring Note, no acceleration occurs in the storage ring, so no magnet ramps are required (this is not true of Fermilab’s storage ring) But, as will be shown later, the storage ring requires lots of RF to restore energy lost to synchrotron radiation Storage ringSynchrotron quadrupole sextupoledipoles

Lorentz force law The e + and e - move in the opposite directions around the ring Therefore, depending on their function, some devices in the storage ring use E fields and some are based on B fields Use this to make the particles travel in a circular orbit Use this to separate the e+ and e- beams

Lorentz force law Magnetic fields –Used when you want both charges to be deflected in the same direction –They will follow the same orbit with opposite velocity Electric fields –Used when you want both charges to be deflected in the opposite direction –They will follow the different orbits q+q+ F q+ q-q- F q- E -+ Bird’s eye view of accelerator q-vq-v F q- q+vq+v F q+ xB -+ Bird’s eye view of dipole

Lorentz force law Magnetic fields –e+ and e- follow the same orbit q-vq-v F q- q+vq+v F q+ xB -+ Bird’s eye view of dipole Positron beam Dipole magnet B

Lorentz force law Magnetic fields –Allows the e+ and e- to be deflected by the same magnets and share the same vacuum chamber (beam tube) Positron beam Dipole magnet B q-vq-v F q- q+vq+v F q+ xB -+ Bird’s eye view of dipole

Parasitic crossings But, if the electrons and positrons follow exactly the same orbit, the bunches will collide at many places around the ring, not only at the detector. 45 bunches/beam (9 trains x 5 bunches) 89 parasitic crossings This will unduly disturb the beam Positron beam e- e+ Want this to happen only at the interaction point! Parasitic crossing point

Electrostatic separators Beams are separated at the parasitic crossing points by separating the closed orbits of the e+ and e- with electrostatic deflectors (separators)

Separators 4 horizontal (H) separators create a “pretzel” orbit The pretzel is only in H plane +-20 mm maximum separation 2 vertical (V) separators in north create semi-closed separation bump at north IP, where H pretzel has a node Mismatch of beta at e/w V separators is used to adjust V separation at south IP.

Separator design Must use electric field to cause opposite defection of e+ and e- q+q+ F q+ q-q- F q- E - + Viewed in beam direction q- q+ q- q+

Separator design Use of two electrodes per side with a gap in the middle avoids bombarding the electrodes with direct synchrotron radiation which would generate huge photo currents. Separator Viewed in beam direction

Separator design +V and -V are from two separate DC kV power supplies. q+q+ F q+ q-q- F q- E - + E -100 kV+100 kV Viewed in beam direction

Synchrotron radiation The acceleration due to the field within the bending magnet or a separator is perpendicular to the particle trajectory The resultant energy loss by synchrotron radiation is a significant fraction of the particle energy.

Synchrotron radiation Power of this synchrotron radiation is about half a megawatt 4 SRF cavities restore lost energy to the beam Sync radiation strikes the vacuum chamber in a narrow stripe, depositing energy on the vacuum chamber wall The heat generated must be carried away by water circulating through a channel in the vacuum chamber wall. One of the 4 CESR SRF cryostats

Synchrotron radiation But the synchrotron radiation is not all bad –It provides radiation-damping for the beams –CESR doubles as a light source CHESS is the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source

Radiation damping Synchrotron radiation reduces the momentum of the particle in the direction of its motion while the acceleration system restored momentum parallel to the central orbit y x Energy loss from synch radiation Energy restored from RF

CHESS

CHESS experimenter’s display

CLEO

Nine trains 5 bunches/train 14-ns bunch spacing

CLEO CLEO has a 1.5 Tesla superconducting solenoid All quads rotated 4.5 degrees (solenoid compensation) Old Normal-conducting quads New Superconducting low-beta quads

Beam energy For CESR-b the beam energy in the storage ring had to be maintained within 1 MeV of the  (4S) resonance peak (the peak width is 10 MeV) Note: CESR has changed from B physics to J/psi and Charm physics which require running CESR between 1.5 and 2.4 GeV The resonance peak is traditionally found by performing lengthy beam energy scans. Following such a scan, the beam energy is determined on a run-by- run basis by calculation based upon the machine parameters (rf frequency, measure dipole field, corrector strengths, electrostatic separator voltages, etc) while taking into account magnetic history.

Beam energy The traditional method of beam energy measurement at electron storage rings in resonant depolarization which is accurate with relative precision of This measurement takes a long time and cannot be part of routine or daily operations Another class of measurements has been investigated using synchrotron radiation

Beam energy CESR has investigated exploiting the very steep energy dependence of SR spectrum at xray energies. Able to measure energy changes consistent with expectations However, limited reproducibility and count rate –For example, may clip beam on apertures differently run to run, day to day

Beam energy CESR has changed from B physics to J/psi and Charm physics which require running CESR between 1.5 and 2.4 Gev There is less energy loss due to synchrotron radiation at these lower energies However, there is also less beneficial beam damping by the synchrotron radiation

Beam energy 12 superconducting wigglers have been installed in CESR to restore the beam damping lost by operating at lower energies