Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Overview
Advertisements

WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
BlackSea Region Meeting Varna Points raised by the EU Maritime Strategy of relevance for PlanCoast.
GREEN PAPER on Maritime Policy - PlanCoast Statement 2nd PlanCoast Meeting Constanta EU GREEN PAPER ON MARITIME POLICY.
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND Innovation and mainstreaming: Relevance To meet the Lisbon targets: Europe has to develop a knowledge based economy and to improve.
ESPON UK Network Workshop - ESPON and INTERREG IN THE UK Building spatial knowledge An ESPON Perspective Cliff Hague and Jenny Crawford.
Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
The Ecosystem Approach and Management of the Marine Environment Critique paper – a science perspective Dr Leonie Robinson School of Biological Sciences.
2. Fisheries management and the Ecosystem approach
International Natural Resource Management (INRM) Changxiao Li, Ph.D. SUMBER: /jpk/data/gjzrzygl/.../e-book/Chapter%2003.ppt‎
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Advancing the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Project (AEEA) Research Agenda Mark Eigenraam Senior.
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
Policy coordination process in AttractSEE project and Spatial Plan of Republic of Serbia Jelena Miljković, Siniša Trkulja Republic Agency for Spatial Planning,
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE AREAS OF LITHUANIA, POLAND AND RUSSIA, , PALANGA PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MARINE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ”GRIGORE ANTIPA” CONSTANTA, ROMANIA PROJECT TITLE Improvement of the scientific background for assuring.
Mangroves for the Future promoting investment in coastal ecosystem conservation.
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Palanga,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) PartiSEApate Multi-Level-Governance in Maritime Spatial Planning Background, Outputs,
Success stories and lessons learnt from participation in international programmes/projects in the thematic field “Climate actions, environment, resource.
A Strategic Analysis for identifying MPA’s : - Towards a Marine Spatial Planning Method for the French MPA Agency CAML Workshop Villefranche s/mer 18th.
Part-financed by the European Union Management of the Baltic Sea as a common resource Bo Löwendal, Sweden Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering Committee.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Pan-Baltic stakeholders’ dialogue on MSP: Synthesis report Anda Ruskule, BEF Berlin,
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
The European context: Ecosystem/Natural Capital Accounting Jock Martin Head of Programme European Environment Agency.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Sophie Sergent Ifremer European Affairs Department / MariFish WP7 ERANET MariFish COORDINATION OF EUROPEAN MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH Presentation of MariFish.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) “Maritime Spatial Planning - Shipping and Ports in the Baltic Sea” Pan-Baltic.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Offshore Energy / Grid Planning and MSP in the Baltic Sea Region Pan-Baltic stakeholder.
1 The IMAGE project I ndicators for fisheries MA naGement in E urope A specific targeted research project under the European Commission 6 th framework.
International Natural Resource Management (INRM) (III) Changxiao Li, Ph.D.
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regenerations Prof. Maros Finka, M.arch., Ph.D. „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Towards coherent maritime spatial planning in the Baltic Sea Region Talis Linkaits Head of VASAB Secretariat 2 December 2013 Palanga PartiSEApate Partners.
Biocomplexity Teacher Workshop May 31 – June 2, 2008 University of Puerto Rico.
The South Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative’s Third Thursday Web Forum The SALCC Strategic Plan and What It Means Thursday, April 19, 2012.
Kiel University, Germany Institute for Natural Resource Conservation Department of Ecosystem Management Benjamin Burkhard (Project coordinator) Enhancing.
Agenda 1.Review and confirm areas of convergence & divergence 2.Review draft 1-page workshop summary 3.Review and prioritize next steps 1.
HELCOM HOLAS II ESA WS, Helsinki EU Horizon 2020 Coordination and support action Ville Karvinen / SYKE Enhancing ecosystem services mapping for.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Theme 2 Developing MPA networks Particular thanks to: Theme 2 Concurrent Session Rapporteurs, Dan Laffoley, Gilly Llewellyn G E E L O N G A U S T R A L.
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Extension of General Plan of Republic of Lithuania with marine solutions N.Blаžauskas,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP implementation: consultations Project Partner Meeting December,
ESPON Workshop at the Open Days 2012 “Creating Results informed by Territorial Evidence” Brussels, 10 October 2012 Introduction to ESPON Piera Petruzzi,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) LT – MSP Model Case, “state of the game“ 2 nd PartiSEApate Project Partner Meeting.
North American Marine Protected Areas Network Commission for environmental cooperation Biodiversity Conservation Working Group CEC Council Session - 24.
WP4: Transnational MSP Governance – dialogue and institutional building Overall aim: to engage national bodies, sectors and researchers in dialogue.
Add your Logo in the slide master menu GLOBAQUA Meeting, January 13th-14th, Freising IMPLICATIONS Module Reporting back Implications Module: WP8, WP9,
Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Maritime Spatial Planning as Tool for Underwater Cultural Heritage management.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan Northern Dimension and the oceans and the seas Mieczysław Ostojski, Prof. WSS Chairman Helsinki Commission 15th Baltic Sea.
An introduction to the ecosystem approach and ecosystem services.
WP6: Coastal Transects Ratana Chuenpagdee, Coastal Development Centre, Thailand Kungwan Juntarashote, Coastal Development Centre, Thailand Robert Kay,
Skills list for MSP, SoME and EBSAs Lucy Scott Mami Wata Inception meeting 27 April 2016.
Assessment of the state of coasts in Europe – EEA activities and needs Andrus Meiner, European Environment Agency European Conference on Coastal Zone Research:
Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development 3 rd Task Force meeting Paris December 2007 Marrakech Task Force on Sustainable Tourism Development.
Part-financed by the European Union European Regional Development Fund and European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Baltic Sea Region Programme.
The Project Outputs and Activities.
Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity
Introduction to the EEA and the EIONET
Cumulative Effects Assessment and Marine Spatial Planning
3. The what and why of EAFM? Version 1.
Overview of global initiatives and their relevance for the EU context
Our work on Cumulative Impact Assessment
Coastal Research and Planning Institute,
3. The why and what of EAFM? Essential EAFM Date • Place 1.
Cape Town, South Africa, November 2017
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
Different purposes where information on BES can be helpful/is needed
© Fresh Thoughts Consulting
Presentation transcript:

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic SEA” Pan-Baltic stakeholder workshop on Research Workshop “Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic SEA” Klaipeda, May N. Blažauskas, CORPI Palanga, 2 December, 2013

Participants at the workshop - 30: Partners: 6 Other institutions: 9 Workshop on Underwater Cultural Heritage

Goals of the workshop: To establish dialog between research and Maritime Spatial Planning Identification of applicability of research on marine ecosystems and socio – economic valuation of ecosystem services to support Marine Spatial Planning To reflect on current and future research topics in order to cover knowledge gaps and therefore facilitate the Marine Spatial Planning To Elaborate potential research priorities to be addressed for the BONUS Call 2013 themes related to the MSP

The main topics at the workshop Enhancing Research for Marine Spatial Planning in the Baltic Sea - introduction to MSP principles and Lithuanian Model case Session 1: Ecosystem based approach in MSP Identification of current research efforts that can support the understanding of the ecosystem based approach Applicability of predictive biological mapping for MSP (PreHab and MARMONI project) Small scale detection of marine assets, their temporal variability and the complex interactions in marine fauna and reflection in delineation of protected areas (DENOFLIT Project). Session 2: Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services (ES) to support MSP Concept of ecosystem services assessment, applicable socio - economic valuation methods for the evaluation of marine areas. Case studies on socio – economic valuation of marine biodiversity in the Gulf of Gdansk and MSP in Norway Session 3: Interdisciplinary session Three thematic blocks focused on ecosystem based approach ; integration of socio – economic indicators of ecosystem services into MSP ; Land – Sea integration Workshop on Underwater Cultural Heritage

Key findings:  Interest in the development of joined databases for MSP purposes including biological and socio – economic data, biological mapping techniques are fundamental aspect for the implementation of the ecosystem based approach in MSP.  Research should investigate the role of networks of MPA and possibly assess the ES provision derived from the ecological networks  Researchers’ face problems in sharing knowledge on the management of marine areas on Pan-Baltic level (conservation regimes, uses, restrictions) and in particular of MPA in order to have a better understanding of different planning and management approaches – “What works and what doesn`t?”.  Ecosystem Services can be applied as performance indicator on how different ecosystem – based management measures or planning scenarios can affect human wellbeing  There is the need to develop and apply tradeoff analysis tools based on ES provided by a specific sea use. Tradeoff analysis system should enable to assess tradeoffs not only between two conflicting uses (2 dimensional perspective) but be capable to address multiple uses conflicts/benefits Workshop on Underwater Cultural Heritage

Some lessons learned:  “Research” in MSP is a broad concept and requires a careful selection of research topics to be addressed in a single workshop  Experience from attendance in other sectorial workshops shows that research in MSP is constant a component in of the workshops, in terms research activities within the sector, identification of research gaps and research priorities within the same sectors. Workshop on Underwater Cultural Heritage