RECIST Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Change in longest diameter = -19%. Change in sum of perpendicular diameters = -21%
Advertisements

Accenture Life Sciences Rethink Reshape Restructure… for better patient outcomes CDISC Journey in Lymphoma using Cheson 2007 Kevin Lee CDISC NJ meeting.
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
A Proposal for BMS (Dasatinib) in GIST Jon Trent, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Dept. of Sarcoma Medical Oncology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson.
Multi trial evaluation of longitudinal tumor measurement (TM)-based metrics for predicting overall survival (OS) using the RECIST 1.1 data warehouse Background:
Advanced NSCLC Objective response rate -Well defined & widely accepted -Does not correlate well with OS -May be more useful if SD included -Higher RR correlates.
The Need for Quantitative Imaging in Oncology Richard L. Schilsky, M.D. Professor of Medicine, Associate Dean for Clinical Research, University of Chicago.
Response Assessment Criteria for Clinical Trials Tumor Imaging Metrics Core January 29, 2008 Cheryl A. Sadow, MD Abdominal Imaging & Intervention Division.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
1 Telba Irony, Ph.D. Mathematical Statistician Division of Biostatistics Statistical Analysis of InFUSE  Bone Graft/LT-Cage Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device.
Update on 18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucose/Positron Emission Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography Imaging of Squamous Head and Neck.
Update on Lung Cancer Image Processing Rick Avila Karthik Krishnan Luis Ibanez Kitware, Inc. April 19, 2006.
 Determining the Nature of a Breast Abnormality  It is a procedure that may be used to determine whether a lump is a cyst (sac containing fluid) or a.
Attenuation of Treatment Effect Due to Measurement Variability in Assessment of Progression-Free Survival Pharmaceut. Statist. 2012, –402 Nicola.
01. 항암제 임상시험 승인 현황 02. General aspect of evaluation in cancer 03. Endpoint in Cancer Clinical Trial 04. Response Criteria 05. Conclusions  CONTENTS.
Cabozantinib (XL184) in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): Results from a Phase II Randomized Discontinuation Trial Hussain M et.
COMBI RECIST 1.1 February Target Lesions: Selection at Baseline Perform baseline evaluations as close to treatment start as possible (no more than.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Immune Related Response Criteria (irRC) Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors Training Presentation v3.0.
Phase I Study of PLX4032: Proof of Concept for V600E BRAF Mutation as a Therapeutic Target in Human Cancer Flaherty K et al. American Society of Clinical.
Anatomic and Functional Imaging Evaluation of a Clinical Trial of an IGFR Antibody in Patients (PTS) with Ewing Sarcoma (ES) Vadim Koshkin; Vanessa Bolejack;
Avoiding Protocol Violations
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
Investigator’s Meeting
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
These slides are intended to educate the scientific and medical community and keep them fully informed about continuing progress, as is their right, stipulated.
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Non small cell lung cancer
Implementation of Oncology specific SDTM domains
Cortés J et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster Discussion)
SDTM - Tips and Tricks Oncology Domains
EORTC Tumor response to pre-operative chemotherapy (CT) with FOLFOX-4 for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (LM) Interim results of the EORTC.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Ethical and practical challenges of organising clinical trials in small populations.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Selumetinib vs Chemotherapy on Progression-Free.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- Summarised
RECIST Training Workshop Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Brain imaging prior to lung cancer resection
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
CUP SSG May 2016 Dr Matt sephton
TREATMENT ARM B: Cycles 1–3: Cycles 4+: 5-FU continuous infusion
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
Audit Update LUNG-MAP Rose Ermete, Rn, bsn, ocn, ccrp
Figure 2 Response after initial increase in total tumour burden
Bergh J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 23.
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
The 12-month analysis from Basal Cell Carcinoma Outcomes with LDE225 Treatment (BOLT): A phase II, randomized, double-blind study of sonidegib in patients.
Fig. 5. Clinical data with BLU-285 confirm early evidence of activity in patients with diseases driven by KIT and PDGFRA activation loop mutations. Clinical.
Waterfall plot of the best per cent change from baseline in SLD of target lesions in 33 patients. Waterfall plot of the best per cent change from baseline.
Response to Carfilzomib Therapy
Waterfall plots of the best per cent change from baseline in sum of longest diameters (SLD) for target lesions. Waterfall plots of the best per cent change.
Clinical courses of patients.
(A) Survival time. (A) Survival time. All patients. (a) PFS since the start of EGFR-TKI (groups A, B and C). (b) OS since the start of EGFR-TKI (groups.
Computed Tomography RECIST Assessment of Histopathologic Response and Prediction of Survival in Patients with Resectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer after.
THE LANCET Oncology Volume 19, No. 1, p27–39, January 2018
Clinical response to anti-ERBB3 mAb therapy in a patient with an advanced NRG1-rearranged non–small cell lung cancer. Clinical response to anti-ERBB3 mAb.
RECIST 1.1 Paul O'Moore, M.D. Introduction to a Method of
General strategies of Cancer Treatment and evaluation of Response
Efficacy of nivolumab in Japanese patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (A) Kaplan-Meier curve for PFS, (B) Kaplan-Meier curve.
Antitumor activity. Antitumor activity. A, maximum change in target lesion size from baseline assessed according to RECIST 1.0 (n = 26). Six patients had.
Individual treatment outcomes of 20 patients treated with afatinib and 12 patients treated with afatinib and trastuzumab. Individual treatment outcomes.
(A) Survival curves according to clinical response.
Survival, subsequent therapies, and response.
Presentation transcript:

RECIST Overview

Introduction What is RECIST? RECIST Endpoints in Berenice Definitions Methods of Assessment Schedule of Assessments Evaluation of Tumour Response Minimum Source Data Requirements Summary

Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours What is RECIST? Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours A set of published rules that define when cancers improve (respond), stay the same (stable) or worsen (progress) during treatment Standardises solid tumor response evaluation => uniform reporting of clinical study outcomes Response Evaluation Criteria in SolidTumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (Eisenhauer et al. 2009).

Berenice RECIST Efficacy Outcome Measures Clinical response, defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) prior to surgery. The clinical response rate is defined as the proportion of patients in the ITT population who achieve a CR or PR prior to surgery. Tumor response will be assessed prior to each new cycle of therapy by clinical examination and/or, mammography, and/or other methods of evaluation as per local practice. Response will be assessed by the investigator as per local practice based on the principles of Response Evaluation Criteria in SolidTumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (Eisenhauer et al. 2009). The RECIST eCRF pages in Berenice are for collection of RECIST outcomes in the NEOADJUVANT period only

Definitions – Target Lesions Selected at baseline All measurable lesions Minimum of 1 maximum of 10 No more than 5 per organ Representative of all involved organs Selected based on size and suitability for accurate repeated measurements Unidimensional measurements (longest diameter) required for each target lesion at all assessed time points.

Definitions – Non Target Lesions Selected at baseline All other lesions that are not selected at baseline Excess measurable lesions ( e.g. when 10 have already been identified as target lesions) All non-measurable lesions Measurements are not required

Definitions – Non Measurable Lesions All other lesions including Small lesions < 20mm with conventional techniques of <10mmwith spiral CT Bone lesions Previously irradiated lesions Ascites, pleural effusions, cystic lesions etc.

Definitions – New Lesions Any lesion present on a follow up tumour assessment that was not present at baseline NTL = New Target Lesion

Methods of Assessment Target Lesions Non- Target Lesions and New Lesions Recommended CT (preferred) MRI Accepted Clinical Examination Chest X Ray Mammogram Ultrasound X Ray Endoscopy

Methods of Assessment Important to use the same imaging/examination methods to follow lesions Baseline method must be followed as much as is practical throughout the trial Bone scan, PET scan, angiography, tumor markers and cytology/histopathology are not acceptable methods as part of the RECIST framework

Schedule of Assessments Baseline Tumour Assessments Follow Up Assessments Unscheduled Tumor Assessments Clinical tumor assessment will be performed as per local medical practice based on the principles of RECIST version 1.1 criteria. During the adjuvant treatment period, patients should be assessed for recurrence at least every 3 months (Cycle 9, Cycle 13, Cycle 17, and Cycle 21), and at the study completion or early termination visit.

Evaluation of Response Complete Response (CR) All target lesions have disappeared completely (diameters =0) Partial Response (PR) Sum of the long diameters (LD) of the target lesions have shrunk by >/= 30% compared to the sum of long diameters at baseline Progressive Disease (PD) Sum of the LD for the target lesions have grown by >/= 20% compared to the smallest sum of the previously recorded LD Note: not necessarily baseline Stable Disease (SD) Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR or growth for PD i.e. conditions of PD, CR and PR are not satisfied Not Evaluable (NE) Any missing target lesion data As assessed by investigator

New Lesion Visit Response The presence or absence of new lesions must be recorded at each tumor assessment visit Detection of a new lesion = progressive disease (PD) If in doubt, confirm the presence before recording on eCRF

Overall Visit Response Combination of TL response, NTL response and presence, absence of new lesions RECIST overall response categories If patient has PD of TL, NTL or an appearance of a new lesion, the overall response will be a PD ( PD always overrides) If TL or NTL assesment is NE, then the overall assessment will also be NE unless there is clear evidence of progression e.g. a new lesion.

Confirmation of Response A responder is defined as a patient who has a confirmed CR or PR What do we mean by confirmed? Initial overall visit response of CR or PR Confirmation of response ( overall visit repsnise of CR or PR) at the next scheduled tumor assessment visit ( no less than 4 weeks later) Why do we confirm responses? to avoid overestimating the response rate observed.

Minimum Source Data Requirements Target Lesions and Non Target Lesions at baseline and follow up Site and location Date of assessment and method used Any lesion interventions (e.g. irradiation/surgery) Longest diameter measurements ( target lesions only) Reasons for any missing or non evlauable assessments Reasons for any inconsistencies between radiology report and patient notes Details of any new lesions ( site, location, date of assessment and method used) Overall assessment of non target lesion response (RECIST response as calculated by investigator) Investigator’s opinion of response

Summary RECIST is used to standardise tumour response evaluation Baseline documentation of tumour burden in terms of Target and Non – Target Lesions Target lesions are selected on the basis of their size and suitability for accurate repeated measurements Tumour assessments must be performed in accordance with visit schedule to avoid bias All patients must be followed for progression even if Discontinued randomised treatments Started another anticancer treatment

Doing now what patients need next