QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
Advertisements

First results from QUIET Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration 1.
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
The Ability of Planck to Measure Unresolved Sources Bruce Partridge Haverford College For the Planck Consortium.
7. Radar Meteorology References Battan (1973) Atlas (1989)
FDWAVE : USING THE FD TELESCOPES TO DETECT THE MICRO WAVE RADIATION PRODUCED BY ATMOSPHERIC SHOWERS Simulation C. Di Giulio, for FDWAVE Chicago, October.
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
Calibration for LHAASO_WFCTA Yong Zhang, LL Ma on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration 32 nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, Beijing 2011.
Calibration System with Cryogenically-Cooled Loads for QUIET-II Detector M. Hasegawa, O. Tajima, Y. Chinone, M. Hazumi, K. Ishidoshiro, M. Nagai High Energy.
Cleaned Three-Year WMAP CMB Map: Magnitude of the Quadrupole and Alignment of Large Scale Modes Chan-Gyung Park, Changbom Park (KIAS), J. Richard Gott.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Photo: Keith Vanderlinde Detection of tensor B-mode polarization : Why would we need any more data?
SIW 2003 The antenna element Ravi ATNF, Narrabri 1.The role of the antenna in a Fourier synthesis radio telescope 2.The Compact array antenna.
QUaD: A CMB Polarization Experiment … First Year Results, arXiv: v1 Robert B. Friedman The University of Chicago GLCW
K. Ganga – CMB Science and Observations 1 Rencontres du Vietnam /08 The QuaD CMB Polarization Experiment K. Ganga APC.
Distinguishing Primordial B Modes from Lensing Section 5: F. Finelli, A. Lewis, M. Bucher, A. Balbi, V. Aquaviva, J. Diego, F. Stivoli Abstract:” If the.
Oxford Astrophysics C-BASS – The C-Band All Sky Survey Oxford University – Oliver King, Christian Holler, Mike Jones, Angela Taylor, Matthew Brock, Jaya.
N. Ponthieu Polarization workshop, IAS, Orsay, 09/15/ N. Ponthieu (IAS) The conquest of sky polarization The upper limits era First detections Prospects.
CMB polarisation results from QUIET
CMB Polariztion B. Winstein Chicago, CfCP General Introduction to the Problem The CAPMAP Solution.
Einstein Polarization Interferometer for Cosmology (EPIC) Peter Timbie University of Wisconsin - Madison Beyond Einstein SLAC May
1 CMB Polarimetry with BICEP: Probing Inflationary Gravitational Waves IAS - Polarization 2005 Denis Barkats.
Thoughts on Ground-based lensing measurements Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford/SLAC KIPAC.
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
Simulating the Interferometer In order to simulate the performance of an interferometer, 20 by 20 degree sections were extracted from the simulated CMB.
The Atacama B-mode Search: A TES-Based CMB Polarization Instrument CMBpol Workshop, Chicago July 2, 2009 Joe Fowler Princeton University.
The CMB and Neutrinos. We can all measure the CMB T CMB = \ K CMB approx 1% of TV noise! 400 photons/cc at 0.28 eV/cc.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
Antennas The primary elements of a synthesis array M. Kesteven ATNF 25/September/2001.
STATUS REPORT OF FPC SPICA Task Force Meeting March 29, 2010 MATSUMOTO, Toshio (SNU)
Phased Array Feeds John O’Sullivan SKANZ 2012 CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science,
Polarization Surveys with the DRAO 26-m Telescope at 1.4 GHz Maik Wolleben, T. Landecker, O. Davison Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory W. Reich,
ASIAA NTU PHYS J.H.P.Wu & AMiBA Team To remove the ground pickup and electronic DC component in the data, we tracked the source- (P1) and tail- (P2) patches.
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope New Views of the Universe December 11, 2005 Joe Fowler Princeton University.
Search for B-modes in CMB Polarization  QUIET and other experiments Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration Ultimate High Energy Physics QUIET collaboration.
Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee (AAAC) May 11, 2006 Vladimir Papitashvili Antarctic Sciences Section Office of Polar Programs National Science.
Update on QUaD Sarah Church QUaD Collaboration Funded: National Science Foundation Astronomy Program and Office of Polar Programs.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
MATRIX RADIOMETRIC SYSTEM FOR RATAN-600 «МАRS-3» Conclusion of installation A.B.Bеrlin, N.A.Nizhelsky, М.G. Mingaliev, P.G.Tsiboulev, D.V.Kratov, V.V.Smirnov,
The W ILKINSON M ICROWAVE A NISOTROPY P ROBE Mission.
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
K band History Science workshop determined efficiency improvements necessary for K Band: weather, observing requests, mapping programs. Only enough funds.
Academia Sinica National Taiwan University AMiBA System Performance Kai-yang Lin 1,2 and AMiBA Team 1,2,3 1 Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
The Millimeter-wave Bolometric Interferometer (MBI) Peter Hyland University of Wisconsin – Madison For the MBI Collaboration New Views Symposium December.
B Polarization Measurement of the CMB
1 QUIET The Search for B-Mode Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background Using Coherent HEMT Detectors A Proposed New Initiative for Fermilab April.
QUIET Experiment Rencontres de Moriond 2010 March 14 th, 2010 Akito KUSAKA (for QUIET collaboration) University of Chicago, EFI and KICP.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Physics/SLAC
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
EBEx foregrounds and band optimization Carlo Baccigalupi, Radek Stompor.
Experimental Cosmology Group Oxford Astrophysics Overview CLOVER is a UK-led experiment to detect the B-mode polarisation of the Cosmic Microwave Background.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
Centimeter Receiver Design Considerations with a look to the future Steven White National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
1wnb Synthesis Imaging Workshop ALMA The Atacama Large Millimeter Array.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
1 Injecting W-band power (from Gunn oscillator) into QUIET receiver module KEK and Fermilab Collaborating at Lab 3 Status of QUIET-II at Fermilab Fritz.
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Investigating dark energy with CMB lensing Viviana Acquaviva, SISSA, Trieste Lensing collaborators in SISSA: C. Baccigalupi, S. Leach, F. Perrotta, F.
PLANCK TEAM of the DISCOVERY Center. The most mysterious problems.
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
Observational Cosmology Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Presentation transcript:

QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT

QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami

What is QUIET ? Radiotelescope that measures intensity and polarization of the CMB Located in Chile Main science objective is to improve characterization of E- mode polarization and detect the difficult B-mode polarization Two phases are planned. Phase-I is ongoing, started in August Phase II is planned to start in 2012, in a larger scale, improving the techniques learned during phase-I

CALTECH STANFORD FERMILAB U. CHICAGO COLUMBIA U. MIAMI JPL SITE MANCHESTER OSLO MPI-BONN KEK PRINCETON OXFORD QUIET Collaboration

Science Goals We can measure the polarisation of the CMB the same way as for light The Stokes parameters quantify the polarization properties of a light ray ▫ I = no filter at all ▫ Q = linear polarizer at 0 and 90° ▫ U = linear polarizer at -45 and 45 ° ▫ V = circular polarizer I is just the temperature Q and U combine to form E- and B-modes No known physical process can generate V- polarized CMB radiation

Status and Forecast on the EE and BB characterization Science Goals

Site and Instrumentation

Site Chajnantor Scientific Reserve in Chile at 5080 m above sea level Among the best places for mm and submm astronomy Access to CBI infrastructure Accessible at all times 1 hour drive from San Pedro de Atacama Good sky coverage For outside work bottled oxygen systems are used Oxygen concentration in control room is increased ~27%

Q BandW Band Frequency40 GHz90 GHz N° of HEMT Detectors17/284/6 Resolution28 arcmin (FWHM)12 arcmin (FWHM) Telescope TypeCrossed Dragone Module Sensitivity300 μK s½550 μK s½ Array Sensitivity70 μK s½60 μK s½ Observation PeriodOct 2008 – June 2009June 2009 – Mid 2010 ? Phase-I Summary

Mount Inherited from CBI Alt-Az axes Rotation about optical axis (boresight axis) Elevation range limited to 43 deg < el < 87 deg

Optics Crossed Dragone design 1.4 m primary and secondary mirrors FWHM: 28 (Q) and 12 (W) arcmin

Horn Arrays Conical corrugated feed horn arrays Excellent beam symmetry Low sidelobe response Low cross-polarization Broad frequency band Typical FWHM of ~7 deg Built by UM

OMTs Splits incoming radiation into L and R 20% bandwidth Low loss High isolation on the output ports to avoid temperature-to-polarization leakage

Detector Modules Heart of the receiver Polarimeter on a chip Automated assembly and operation Measuring of Q and U simultaneously in each pixel Operate at ~20K

Module/OMTs Seven element demonstration array

Receiver

Calibration and Preliminary Data

Polarization MOON Once/7 days, Relative Gains, Angles NOISE SOURCE Once/1.5 hours, Relative Gains, Angles TAU A Once/2 days, Absolute Gains, Angles, Beams SKY-DIP Once/1.5 hours, Relative Gains, Stability JUPITER Once/7 days, ∆T Gains, Beam Gain Stability Temperature Calibration Strategy + supplemental measurements

Beam Shape using Jupiter Calibration

Tau A Gains Moon Polarization Fits Calibration

CMB Analysis

Observation Regions 4x(15x15)=900 [deg²] Patch Centers Low foreground regions in coordination with ABS, Polarbear (Multifrequency measurements for galactic foreground removal) Distribution to allow continuous scanning

Average 68.1% Downtime mainly due to: -Mechanical Problems -Generator problems -Bad weather Telescope Operation during Q-Band Season

Phase-I, EE Power-spectra Forecasts Q W

Patch 2a Results (PRELIMINARY)

Other Interesting Observations Galactic Center Polarization Maps with Q-Band Data (PRELIMINARY)

Other Interesting Observations Galactic Center Temperature Map with Q-Band Data (PRELIMINARY) QUIET WMAP

Phase-II

Phase-II Summary Ka BandQ BandW Band Frequency32 GHz40 GHz90 GHz N° of modules (P/T)16/255/61389/108 Beamsize (FWHM)28 arcmin20 arcmin8.5 arcmin Module Sensitivity165 μK s½178 μK s½364 μK s½ Beginning operations2013 ? N° of telescopes3 Telescope typeCrossed Dragone

Phase-II Power-spectra Forecasts Current Performance Likely Improvement (noise, duty cycle, 1/f)

Appendix Alternate technique to identify gravitational lensing effects (Zaldarriaga(1999), Hu(2002)) Lens reconstruction: Lensing Deflection Field calculation from cross-correlation of E- and B-modes Stronger constraints on cosmological parameters than using B-mode power spectrum By measuring shape and amplitude of the Deflection power spectrum QUIET Phase-II can place constraints on parameters such as: Neutrino mass (Maltoni, 2004) Dark energy density (Stompor, 1999) Spatial curvature (Stompor, 1999)

Summary QUIET Science: Experiment addressing fundamental questions in physics Taking the CMB polarization knowledge to new levels QUIET Status: Largest HEMT-based focal plane array ever deployed, using state of the art MMIC packaging techniques Phase-I observing and proposing Phase-II to start in 2012/2013

Systematic Errors o Overall signal size o Overall gain calibration o Beamsize calibration o Pointing error o Fake signal source o Instrumental I->Q/U : caused by OMT, 1% for Q-band. Negligible. o Gain fluctuations : up to 20% negligible for phase I. o E->B mixing source o Polarization angle : calibration better than 5% for phase I. o Optics cross polarization : only affects by order of ∆ө² o Q/U gain mismatch : relative gain between Q and U stable. o Patch geometry : finite patch, patch irregularity, pixelization

Systematic Errors E->B, Patch geometry